I am sorry. Jamie Andrews has some interesting research about viruses. Not in this specific substack. However his research is interesting. I am sorry again for being so superficial.
It’s a very good point you make, and I’m in agreement to the extent that if we demand scientific evidence to prove viruses, then by the same logic, scientific evidence should be demanded to make an assertion about bio resonance. That said, viruses have not been scientifically validated. If “bio resonance” has not been scientifically validated, then I’m ok with saying it’s not a proven hypothesis. Viruses are not proven. Don’t lose site of the important point.
"Energetic and bioresonant triggers"...Sorry she didn't explain it well enough but it's a real energy that might have been too long to go into. I was already educated on it so I took it as very valid.
I'm not saying energy fields and other things don't exist. I'm open to things that aren't easily measured.
But for someone to say something (viruses) don't exist because it can't be isolated, to then turn around with that and call one pseudoscience and believers fools.....
Search results said " Weakened virus vaccines, also known as live attenuated vaccines, are made by reducing the virulence of a virus so it can still trigger an immune response without causing the full-blown disease. Here’s a concise overview of the process:Virus Selection: Scientists start with a disease-causing (pathogenic) virus strain, from an infected person or animal.
Attenuation Process:Passaging: The virus is grown in non-human cells (e.g., animal cells or tissue cultures) over multiple generations. Each passage forces the virus to adapt to the new host environment, often losing traits that make it harmful to humans.
Environmental Stress: The virus may be exposed to conditions like high or low temperatures, chemicals, or UV radiation to induce mutations that weaken its ability to cause disease.
Genetic Modification: In some cases, modern techniques like genetic engineering are used to precisely delete or alter genes responsible for virulence, ensuring the virus remains safe but immunogenic.
Testing for Safety and Efficacy:The weakened virus is tested in cell cultures and animal models to confirm it replicates enough to stimulate immunity but doesn’t cause significant illness.
Extensive lab and clinical trials ensure the attenuated strain is safe for humans, particularly for vulnerable groups like children or immunocompromised individuals.
Vaccine Production:The attenuated virus is grown in large quantities in controlled lab conditions, often using cell lines like Vero cells.
It’s purified, stabilized with additives (e.g., sugars or proteins to maintain potency), and formulated into a vaccine dose.
Quality Control: Rigorous testing ensures the vaccine is free of contaminants, maintains its weakened state, and meets regulatory standards."
From my understanding, the detailed process above is based on isolating the virus which is never done. Symptoms produce material which they might call a virus but really when experiments were done that were purposely hidden, those materials were inserted directly into different tissues of other animals and humans and did not make the others ill. So it's not proven the symptom material is a virus. So see how that makes the detailed process based on something never found. A contagion.
The point is that whatever goo they manage to create (whether from viruses or whatever someone want to call it) stimulates an antibody response to the particular antigen. The antibody response can be measured.
Again, that said, vaccination has costs not worth the benefit. But the antibody response is measurable.
Here in the States, this is why I support some of RFK's work. His statement on Measles was a slow glimpse into how viruses and vaccines are not deadly and not needed. Will check this out and add this article to my repetition of information against modern healthcare!
I also am encouraged by some of Rfkjr’s efforts, but he fails entirely to confront the most important issue…so I’m mostly disappointed in him after being a supporter for the last 20 years.
I got chickenpox at 33. Thirty years ago. Never had it as a child. In a few days my 3ry old got it. In a few more days my 6mo old got it. We were all fine and it was no big deal. The only one who DIDN’T get it was my husband who had had CP as a child. So sorry, my real world experience does not agree with you. And no my children never had the vaccine. It wasn’t quite out yet.
Maybe you and the kids spent more time in a toxic environment than did your husband, who might have been out of the house while toxins dissipated from perhaps a recent furniture acquisition, or paint job, or whatever poisoned you and the kids? Or perhaps your husband was the only one who didn’t react to an exposure? His vaccinated status is a noteworthy observation, but I think just coincidence. My guess is his body mass is greater than yours, and much greater than the kids, so a toxic dose of anything would be greater for him than for you.
Epidemiological observation is not the same as scientific experimentation & confirmation of hypothesis. If we don’t respect the scientific method, we are likely to attribute incorrect cause of things we observe.
Here we go again. Another light bulb just switched on. Back in the 70"s when shag rugs were perfected, way better than the shags of the 60"s that I hated, so sloppy looking, I bought a giant one for my L/R. A long black shag 1 1/2" high, razor cut to a perfect crew cut that never left foot prints upon it. A gorgeous, sumptuous wave of excellence and comfort. Black & White is how I decorated as Coco Chanel was my ideal designer
My L/R and D/R were done but waited almost 9 months for that rug to arrive from California. Every single day upon entering my apartment, I smelled what can only be described as chemicals, like that new car smell. But unlike a new car, the smell never dissipated. Not ever.
That was 1974. That was the beginning of my epic colds that consumed me and relegated me to sickness during the year with the only exception being summertime.
Amandha Vollmer's videos were like a wet rag slapping me violently in the face as I watcher her. She was so direct, so unrelenting, so dismissive, giving no quarter to other hypotheses, that I ever so temporarily dismissed her. Always went back. I admire her immensely and I believe her.
Question. I have an immune deficiency including low antibodies among other things. Throughout my life, especially when I am toxic from mold, I get "viral" symptoms similar to the flu. At those times I test positive for either EBV or CMV (or both), but not other things that are tested.. At other times I don't test positive for these viruses. If I never really had these viruses, and it's purely toxicity, then what is being measured that causes them to show up as positive on a test? Thanks
I will try to explain. I agree with the above that there is no such thing as viruses, but what each "viral" symptom complex represents is an intoxication with a new toxin....one that you've never been exposed to before. In brief, because of damage that has occurred in our immune systems it allows most toxins to enter tissues. We make antibodies to toxins not to viruses. Once you make antibodies to these toxins, it protects you from further damage into the tissues. But during that first intoxication you do not have antibodies and what happens is that the body tries to get rid of it through normal means (kidneys, liver, bowels) but when the load of toxin in the blood becomes too large to handle the body experiences a Herxheimer reaction (spewing) runny nose, coughing/sputum, rashes, vomiting or diarrhea. They are all attempts to get rid of the toxin as fast as the body can and get it out of our circulation. See https://nikkilangmd.substack.com/p/our-immune-systems-are-failing-us for a more complete explanation. New toxins that enter the body without antibodies present are allowed to reside in those cells causing all kinds of chronic diseases down the pike. Even though you might have a particular toxin residing in your tissues if you are not re-exposed to it, your antibodies will slowly dissipate and may become low enough to not be detected. Getting back to chicken pox, yes arsenic can cause a vesicular rash during detoxification, but there is actually a more modern day toxin that you are much more likely to be exposed to today that causes the same vesicular rash and that toxin is: Polyethylene Glycol-75 (PEG-75). It also causes the herpes zoster rash, but an intoxication principle I like to call pairing is in play(which I explain in more detail in the above mentioned article), which determines. whether or not it will end up residing in the nerve fibers. I hope that explains it, but if you have further questions don't hesitate to ask.
I like your response, but let’s be honest, beyond a toxic threshold anyone will exhibit symptoms of poisoning regardless of prior exposure and antibody response.
Hi Nikki, Your comment on Polyethylene Glycol-75 (PEG-75) is interesting as my partner is currently dealing with a shingles episode. Several months ago he had a heart ablation procedure and we wondered if this is a reaction to that or heart meds he is on.
"... partner is currently dealing with a shingles episode ..."
I personally treated myself early for "shingles" with the generic version of the brand name drug Zovirax (generic name is acyclovir) 16 years ago. I was showing the symptoms of what we call "shingles" ... I admit I was a little scared of course ... but I didn't panic and run off to my doctor (although i did speak to a close friend of mine who is an M.D.) ... Before the way more expensive, patented newer version of acyclovir --a very similar drug called Valtrex (generic name: valacyclovir) came to the market, there was the closely-related off-patent generic drug called acyclovir (brand name Zovirax). ***Notice the similarity of the generic names "valacyclovir" and "acyclovir"*** ...
Well, i happen to have on hand a supply of acyclovir pills past its expiry date ... but i rarely throw old drugs in the trash ... so i started taking a very heavy dose of acyclovir .. IIRC the dosage was something like 800mg of acyclovir 2 or 3 times per day ... I EXPERIENCED AN IMMEDIATE IMPROVEMENT ... the affected band of my chest stopped spreading to new areas ... the little water-filled, itchy, blister-like sores on my chest began to dry up on the 1st day of the drug, healed IIRC in approx 4 days, and were COMPLETELY GONE in about a week.
I was never keen on the shingles jabs even 16 years ago. Now I am an anti-vaxxer, and not afraid to say so anymore. Also, now i rest easy knowing that i probably have natural immunity against what we call "shingles" hopefully for some number of years into my future. So i am firmly in favor of early treatment of "shingles" with acyclovir.
MOTIVE: Also, one of the main motives for Big Pharma's introduction of Valtrex (valacyclovir) was the fact that the patent on the older pill Zovirax (acyclovir) had expired in the U.S. So while they had been able to charge very high prices for Zovirax for 7 years (or is it 14 years, i can't remember if it's 7 or 14 years), once the patent on Zovirax expired, pharma could no longer charge exorbitant prices for the acyclovir pills. So they just tweaked the chemical formulations just a wee bit to become "Valtrex" (valacyclovir) so it became eligible for a NEW PATENT for more years, so then Pharma could again charge HUGE prices for the very similar drug Valtrex (generic valacyclovir). Then pharma encourages the doctors to write prescriptions for the newer patent-protected (expensive) drug, and the cheap though effective drug acyclovir is intentionally de-emphasized and even denigrated. That is their business model!
DISCLAIMER: This is NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. Not saying this would work for everyone. I'm only saying that acyclovir this worked very well for me. Nipped my early shingles in the bud. And I treated it EARLY. I'll avoid shingles, flu, RSV, and pneumococcal shots, and of course I never took the Covid-19 experimental genetic therapy shots as well.
Shingles doesn’t continue to spread (it’s a contained rash), so I don’t think the drug you took can be the reason for the discontinuation of the spread. Perhaps you were misdiagnosed. I bet you also drank some water on the day the blisters began to dry, but it would be unscientific to attribute water consumption to the healing process. Perhaps the rash was going to heal without the drug. Or maybe that drug has properties that inhibit cellular detoxification. Look into that drug more before putting your faith into it.
The tests are measuring proteins, nothing more than that. And the presence of proteins don’t mean you have any “virus” …they are just proteins. Mike stone has written a lot about antibodies:
I don't believe in the terrain theory as the total explanation for all symptoms. Viruses do exist; giant viruses can in fact be easily viewed under a microscope. Most viruses do not cause symptoms and play a role in ecological balance. I think blaming toxicity for the symptoms experienced by the thousands of women who test positive for HIV is dangerous. The drugs do control viral damage to T cells and extend lives by decades; they also have side effects. Simply telling these poor people they simply have symptoms of toxicity, and they don't need the medications will result in a great increase in mortality. Regarding chickenpox, children had chickenpox in rural areas in Europe for decades with no exposure to environmental toxins. Measles? Kids who had measles after physical contact from playing with other infected children, despite exposure later to toxins, were immune and never again experienced the measles constellation of symptoms, that is no coincidence. The author is entitled to his opinion based on Cowan, Kauffman, the Bailey's, Brogan etc...Jeremy Hammond wrote a good article debunking their claims.
His theory is the cause of symptoms are not contagion but the 'soul.' Who has ever isolated the 'soul.' He has interesting theories, but they don't land for me.
Good, you understand that isolation is a scientific imperative for establishing an independent variable to determine if it cause disease. Remember, we are not attempting to prove causation but rather scrutinizing “virus” as the causative agent. If it’s not isolated, it’s difficult to say it exists at all. We’re talking about physical particles called “viruses.” Thats the issue at hand my friend.
It’s not about “belief” but about understanding what the virologists are calling “isolation.” No virus has been physically isolated and characterized. If you believe that isolation has been achieved, that’s just a thought. If you know that virus has been isolated, just share the experiment with us. It’s not faith we’re discussing here.
I’m certainly willing to read Hammond’s article (please share it), but it’s not just an opinion held by Cowan Kaufman, Bailey, etc. if you look into the issue for yourself, you’ll see that “viruses” have not been isolated and therefore cannot be characterized. Virology is total pseudoscience that fails to adhere to valid and logical scientific methods. Without isolation, it’s impossible to say what the genome is, what “it” looks like, and/or whether “it” is the cause of disease.
With regard to “giant viruses”, Stefan Lanka was credited for making a “giant virus” discovery. Then he realized his discovery was nothing resembling the mythical “virus” he thought he had discovered. Lanka abandoned virology after he realized the methods are unscientific.
We will have to disagree; there are many ways to determine the existence of viruses. La Scola was the first to determine they were working with giant viruses, not Lanka, they can be seen under a regular scope.
I’m ok with disagreement, but let’s search for some truth in science together. Those “structures” known as giant viruses…do they fit the definition of “virus.” Lanka discovered one such structure and he believed it to be “giant virus”. Layer, as you’ll hear him tsar in that video, he concluded they were something like spores. Lanka does not believe in viruses these days. I don’t either after looking into the methods. Why do you believe in viruses?
I have had measles, chicken pox, from contagion and family members died from T cell destruction due to infection with HIV. ART saves thousands of women's lives in Africa who are infected with HIV. Without these drugs, they would die. I know people in the U.S. who are alive because of the drugs, which of course have side effects. There is a responsibility that goes with the subject, convincing someone they do not have HIV, because there is no such thing, resulting in no treatment, and later death is a big deal.
Indeed the topic is a big deal especially when it comes to choices that have life & death consequences, and I don’t disregard the serious implications. Let me respectfully ask, if something like “contagion” cannot be proven in a scientific process, shouldn’t we question whether “contagion” is the correct theory? Shouldn’t we consider whether viruses are real when they’ve never been truly isolated (and demonstrated to do anything)? If you say yes, then you’re with me on thinking scientifically. If you say no, then I’ll have no problem telling you you aren’t thinking scientifically. I mean no disrespect.
What test do they use to determine these (fake) “viral infections?”
If it’s an antibody test, then they are detecting proteins that indicate to them that you have a “virus” they were taught is associated with elevated antibody levels. If it’s PCR (which I doubt they would be using for your case, but maybe they did) then they are detecting specific sequences that they have been told are sequences from (fake) “viruses.”
My guess is when you are feeling unwell and they test you, they are picking up higher than “normal” levels of proteins or sequences that are in your body.
Have you ever tried submitting a sample when you’re feeling well to see what they detect? All the testing is meaningless vis-a-vis “viral” detection.
Another brilliant analysis as usual as you did with Antoine Bechamp! The false paradigm of allopathic medicine was built on the lies and deception of fake science such as germ theory and vaccine development, not to mention the destruction of the scientific method which was necessary to maintain the universal fraud; genuine medical science has failed to progress in 150 years because genuine discoveries and real geniuses were suppressed and continue to be suppressed; today's mantra is follow the money and retain power and control through fear and lies that feeds the same fraudulent-based system of the past; Pasteur was Fauci and Gates rolled into one and the role model for the countless number of charlatans who followed...
AFTER CATARACT AND LASER SURGERIES. I HOPE YOU LIKE BUYING EYEDROPS FOR DRY EYES FOREVER. SIDE EFFECTS: However, if the cornea has an irregular curve, it results in conditions such as nearsightedness (myopia) and farsightedness (hyperopia).
Eldest son, says his Ophthalmologist wants to inject some crap in his right eye, NO anesthesia.
The State insurance guy lied to him, put him on the MOST EXPENSIVE OBUMERCARE. $1600 a month income, no savings left.
HOPE YOU LIKE BUYING EYEDROPS.
Laser-free vision correction uses electrical current to reshape the eye.
Imagine correcting your vision in under a minute – no lasers, blades, or pain. Scientists have developed a novel, non-invasive technique that reshapes the cornea using only a mild electric current and a temporary pH shift. In early trials, it reversed myopia without the need for traditional surgery. However, if the cornea has an irregular curve, it results in conditions such as nearsightedness (myopia) and farsightedness (hyperopia).
Laser-free vision correction uses electrical current to reshape the eye.
Imagine correcting your vision in under a minute – no lasers, blades, or pain. Scientists have developed a novel, non-invasive technique that reshapes the cornea using only a mild electric current and a temporary pH shift. In early trials, it reversed myopia without the need for traditional surgery.
Thank you for this. My eyes are in a serious way right now due to failed eye surgeries 2 years ago. Three doctors so far just want to stab my eyes with a needle. I refused .outright. Am hoping this new doctor will help.
I know, I know. I checked the fluid they inject. Blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, 6th nerve palsy etc etc and that's from the "trusted" CDC & Medicare websites. Plus I read the abstracts.
Buy my vision is betting worse by the month. Can't read a book. I know I need intervention, not those shots in the eye that offer virtually no vision improvement whatsoever, not an option.
This is a great article I will be including on an article talking about the AGE OF DETOX. Supplements, tinctures, detox, the real cure is DETOX. Humanity has been decades long poisoned....
"Little ones who are around the same developmental or purge stage often experience similar internal shifts. Their bioresonance with each other can create a harmonic field, especially if there is already familiarity via experience (kids who are friends, go to school together, otherwise considered family or tribe). This field resonance can act as a catalyst. A child who was already preparing for a healing expression may be nudged into it by simply being near others undergoing the same thing. The frequency of cleansing becomes a shared experience." Very interesting
--I once saw a video of kids running to and fro on a playground--there was a passing along of motion, a very clear rhythm and pattern!
No virus has ever passed the Koch's Postulates test. Viruses don't exist. With so many chemicals in the Chicken Pox shot it's impossible to declare a consensus on exactly WHAT helps or doesn't help.
Thank you for this outstanding summary of truth. I hope this breaks through to those who still hold on to the lies. I’m your next article, please outline methods for detoxing.
Great article. Based on what was written in this article, it seems we can argue that much of the information and data can apply to the lies about shingles. I am curious if the data is similar to support the shingles viral lie. I wonder, too, if the cleansing protocols are similar.
James Dobson, the influential evangelical radio host and founder of Focus on the Family, has died at 89, leaving behind a legacy of shaping politics and culture for generations.
Calling the virus theory.a cult, but at the same time calling chickenpox parties as due to "Energetic and bioresonant triggers". Yeah, ok....
I love the rest of your work but this is beyond confirmation bias.
How about the pox party that:
Got all the kids pox. One brought it home to the father who never had it.
The jabbed kid at the party didnt get it.
Now, I think all vaccines aren't worth the cost. but.... "Energetic and bioresonant triggers"
Germ denial discredits the rest of your good work.
Jamie Andrews is more explicit..
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/a-whoopping-lie?publication_id=2692591&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=18h3vn&utm_medium=email
Sorry. What do you think this link shows?
I am sorry. Jamie Andrews has some interesting research about viruses. Not in this specific substack. However his research is interesting. I am sorry again for being so superficial.
It’s a very good point you make, and I’m in agreement to the extent that if we demand scientific evidence to prove viruses, then by the same logic, scientific evidence should be demanded to make an assertion about bio resonance. That said, viruses have not been scientifically validated. If “bio resonance” has not been scientifically validated, then I’m ok with saying it’s not a proven hypothesis. Viruses are not proven. Don’t lose site of the important point.
"Energetic and bioresonant triggers"...Sorry she didn't explain it well enough but it's a real energy that might have been too long to go into. I was already educated on it so I took it as very valid.
I'm not saying energy fields and other things don't exist. I'm open to things that aren't easily measured.
But for someone to say something (viruses) don't exist because it can't be isolated, to then turn around with that and call one pseudoscience and believers fools.....
If a virus can’t be isolated, then how can they develop j a bs for the so-called virus?
There need not be a “virus” (and there isn’t) in order for an injectible toxic potion to be made, sold, and mandated.
Search results said " Weakened virus vaccines, also known as live attenuated vaccines, are made by reducing the virulence of a virus so it can still trigger an immune response without causing the full-blown disease. Here’s a concise overview of the process:Virus Selection: Scientists start with a disease-causing (pathogenic) virus strain, from an infected person or animal.
Attenuation Process:Passaging: The virus is grown in non-human cells (e.g., animal cells or tissue cultures) over multiple generations. Each passage forces the virus to adapt to the new host environment, often losing traits that make it harmful to humans.
Environmental Stress: The virus may be exposed to conditions like high or low temperatures, chemicals, or UV radiation to induce mutations that weaken its ability to cause disease.
Genetic Modification: In some cases, modern techniques like genetic engineering are used to precisely delete or alter genes responsible for virulence, ensuring the virus remains safe but immunogenic.
Testing for Safety and Efficacy:The weakened virus is tested in cell cultures and animal models to confirm it replicates enough to stimulate immunity but doesn’t cause significant illness.
Extensive lab and clinical trials ensure the attenuated strain is safe for humans, particularly for vulnerable groups like children or immunocompromised individuals.
Vaccine Production:The attenuated virus is grown in large quantities in controlled lab conditions, often using cell lines like Vero cells.
It’s purified, stabilized with additives (e.g., sugars or proteins to maintain potency), and formulated into a vaccine dose.
Quality Control: Rigorous testing ensures the vaccine is free of contaminants, maintains its weakened state, and meets regulatory standards."
From my understanding, the detailed process above is based on isolating the virus which is never done. Symptoms produce material which they might call a virus but really when experiments were done that were purposely hidden, those materials were inserted directly into different tissues of other animals and humans and did not make the others ill. So it's not proven the symptom material is a virus. So see how that makes the detailed process based on something never found. A contagion.
Focusing on isolation is a red herring.
The point is that whatever goo they manage to create (whether from viruses or whatever someone want to call it) stimulates an antibody response to the particular antigen. The antibody response can be measured.
Again, that said, vaccination has costs not worth the benefit. But the antibody response is measurable.
Here in the States, this is why I support some of RFK's work. His statement on Measles was a slow glimpse into how viruses and vaccines are not deadly and not needed. Will check this out and add this article to my repetition of information against modern healthcare!
I also am encouraged by some of Rfkjr’s efforts, but he fails entirely to confront the most important issue…so I’m mostly disappointed in him after being a supporter for the last 20 years.
https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/why-is-robert-f-kennedy-jr-running?utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true
I got chickenpox at 33. Thirty years ago. Never had it as a child. In a few days my 3ry old got it. In a few more days my 6mo old got it. We were all fine and it was no big deal. The only one who DIDN’T get it was my husband who had had CP as a child. So sorry, my real world experience does not agree with you. And no my children never had the vaccine. It wasn’t quite out yet.
Maybe you and the kids spent more time in a toxic environment than did your husband, who might have been out of the house while toxins dissipated from perhaps a recent furniture acquisition, or paint job, or whatever poisoned you and the kids? Or perhaps your husband was the only one who didn’t react to an exposure? His vaccinated status is a noteworthy observation, but I think just coincidence. My guess is his body mass is greater than yours, and much greater than the kids, so a toxic dose of anything would be greater for him than for you.
Epidemiological observation is not the same as scientific experimentation & confirmation of hypothesis. If we don’t respect the scientific method, we are likely to attribute incorrect cause of things we observe.
Nope he drank like a fish back then and golfed on golf courses with lots of chemicals.
Here we go again. Another light bulb just switched on. Back in the 70"s when shag rugs were perfected, way better than the shags of the 60"s that I hated, so sloppy looking, I bought a giant one for my L/R. A long black shag 1 1/2" high, razor cut to a perfect crew cut that never left foot prints upon it. A gorgeous, sumptuous wave of excellence and comfort. Black & White is how I decorated as Coco Chanel was my ideal designer
My L/R and D/R were done but waited almost 9 months for that rug to arrive from California. Every single day upon entering my apartment, I smelled what can only be described as chemicals, like that new car smell. But unlike a new car, the smell never dissipated. Not ever.
That was 1974. That was the beginning of my epic colds that consumed me and relegated me to sickness during the year with the only exception being summertime.
Amandha Vollmer's videos were like a wet rag slapping me violently in the face as I watcher her. She was so direct, so unrelenting, so dismissive, giving no quarter to other hypotheses, that I ever so temporarily dismissed her. Always went back. I admire her immensely and I believe her.
Question. I have an immune deficiency including low antibodies among other things. Throughout my life, especially when I am toxic from mold, I get "viral" symptoms similar to the flu. At those times I test positive for either EBV or CMV (or both), but not other things that are tested.. At other times I don't test positive for these viruses. If I never really had these viruses, and it's purely toxicity, then what is being measured that causes them to show up as positive on a test? Thanks
I will try to explain. I agree with the above that there is no such thing as viruses, but what each "viral" symptom complex represents is an intoxication with a new toxin....one that you've never been exposed to before. In brief, because of damage that has occurred in our immune systems it allows most toxins to enter tissues. We make antibodies to toxins not to viruses. Once you make antibodies to these toxins, it protects you from further damage into the tissues. But during that first intoxication you do not have antibodies and what happens is that the body tries to get rid of it through normal means (kidneys, liver, bowels) but when the load of toxin in the blood becomes too large to handle the body experiences a Herxheimer reaction (spewing) runny nose, coughing/sputum, rashes, vomiting or diarrhea. They are all attempts to get rid of the toxin as fast as the body can and get it out of our circulation. See https://nikkilangmd.substack.com/p/our-immune-systems-are-failing-us for a more complete explanation. New toxins that enter the body without antibodies present are allowed to reside in those cells causing all kinds of chronic diseases down the pike. Even though you might have a particular toxin residing in your tissues if you are not re-exposed to it, your antibodies will slowly dissipate and may become low enough to not be detected. Getting back to chicken pox, yes arsenic can cause a vesicular rash during detoxification, but there is actually a more modern day toxin that you are much more likely to be exposed to today that causes the same vesicular rash and that toxin is: Polyethylene Glycol-75 (PEG-75). It also causes the herpes zoster rash, but an intoxication principle I like to call pairing is in play(which I explain in more detail in the above mentioned article), which determines. whether or not it will end up residing in the nerve fibers. I hope that explains it, but if you have further questions don't hesitate to ask.
I like your response, but let’s be honest, beyond a toxic threshold anyone will exhibit symptoms of poisoning regardless of prior exposure and antibody response.
Hi Nikki, Your comment on Polyethylene Glycol-75 (PEG-75) is interesting as my partner is currently dealing with a shingles episode. Several months ago he had a heart ablation procedure and we wondered if this is a reaction to that or heart meds he is on.
"... partner is currently dealing with a shingles episode ..."
I personally treated myself early for "shingles" with the generic version of the brand name drug Zovirax (generic name is acyclovir) 16 years ago. I was showing the symptoms of what we call "shingles" ... I admit I was a little scared of course ... but I didn't panic and run off to my doctor (although i did speak to a close friend of mine who is an M.D.) ... Before the way more expensive, patented newer version of acyclovir --a very similar drug called Valtrex (generic name: valacyclovir) came to the market, there was the closely-related off-patent generic drug called acyclovir (brand name Zovirax). ***Notice the similarity of the generic names "valacyclovir" and "acyclovir"*** ...
Well, i happen to have on hand a supply of acyclovir pills past its expiry date ... but i rarely throw old drugs in the trash ... so i started taking a very heavy dose of acyclovir .. IIRC the dosage was something like 800mg of acyclovir 2 or 3 times per day ... I EXPERIENCED AN IMMEDIATE IMPROVEMENT ... the affected band of my chest stopped spreading to new areas ... the little water-filled, itchy, blister-like sores on my chest began to dry up on the 1st day of the drug, healed IIRC in approx 4 days, and were COMPLETELY GONE in about a week.
I was never keen on the shingles jabs even 16 years ago. Now I am an anti-vaxxer, and not afraid to say so anymore. Also, now i rest easy knowing that i probably have natural immunity against what we call "shingles" hopefully for some number of years into my future. So i am firmly in favor of early treatment of "shingles" with acyclovir.
MOTIVE: Also, one of the main motives for Big Pharma's introduction of Valtrex (valacyclovir) was the fact that the patent on the older pill Zovirax (acyclovir) had expired in the U.S. So while they had been able to charge very high prices for Zovirax for 7 years (or is it 14 years, i can't remember if it's 7 or 14 years), once the patent on Zovirax expired, pharma could no longer charge exorbitant prices for the acyclovir pills. So they just tweaked the chemical formulations just a wee bit to become "Valtrex" (valacyclovir) so it became eligible for a NEW PATENT for more years, so then Pharma could again charge HUGE prices for the very similar drug Valtrex (generic valacyclovir). Then pharma encourages the doctors to write prescriptions for the newer patent-protected (expensive) drug, and the cheap though effective drug acyclovir is intentionally de-emphasized and even denigrated. That is their business model!
DISCLAIMER: This is NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. Not saying this would work for everyone. I'm only saying that acyclovir this worked very well for me. Nipped my early shingles in the bud. And I treated it EARLY. I'll avoid shingles, flu, RSV, and pneumococcal shots, and of course I never took the Covid-19 experimental genetic therapy shots as well.
Shingles doesn’t continue to spread (it’s a contained rash), so I don’t think the drug you took can be the reason for the discontinuation of the spread. Perhaps you were misdiagnosed. I bet you also drank some water on the day the blisters began to dry, but it would be unscientific to attribute water consumption to the healing process. Perhaps the rash was going to heal without the drug. Or maybe that drug has properties that inhibit cellular detoxification. Look into that drug more before putting your faith into it.
Thnx for nuthin. Troll.
Shingles can be effectively treated with something called Strontium (30C) 2 pellets into the mouth twice a day for two weeks. Here is a link I have found on Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Stramonium-30C-Homeopathic-Remedy-Gram/dp/B0785G3V9M/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?crid=3BDTFI57WAKLU&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.P02Xe_pPqNnW-smDYEo5M699hw30nvFe5sElV9Bb2zOS1DJVhcOHSDmXsmlZ8n57Q5agMiNUjpf6xV_HhmQMx1c3exiCN8eEk_-9quR03lE7xS2dtCbfbvWkZvfynQOAD4zXlo_JhXg2Vv6IfMk3lshDZdJHbfq6rx8IGX508woEYeamhtcCnVg-cUO3F2lrj0uz2rsXMABOPWD9XL2oiQ2AesNKeDUVDJyKuvzP50Z8LtJHAya8NiGibKerxpQgySLn5E8zNp_RzC4Fk6_HHfHKX3B-_ErwXaYlm9QD5OY.DEqh1DQ59tRdOUipcW0w29b1FTl41zqTa604mSvER1s&dib_tag=se&keywords=stramonium+30c&qid=1755738376&sprefix=stramonium%2Caps%2C122&sr=8-1-spons&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9hdGY&psc=1 I do not believe that his heart medication is playing a role in his break out. It would be something else that he has been exposed to much more recently that has triggered the PEG-75 to be triggered, and express itself. The strontium should act as an antitoxin and bind and remove the PEG-75 so that further break outs will not occure.
Thank you, much appreciated!
I don't see the answer to what is being measured in the viral tests. Are you saying EBV antibodies and CMV antibodies are really antibodies to toxins?
Yes, that is exactly what I am saying.
The tests are measuring proteins, nothing more than that. And the presence of proteins don’t mean you have any “virus” …they are just proteins. Mike stone has written a lot about antibodies:
https://viroliegy.com/2024/10/03/the-antibody/
I don't believe in the terrain theory as the total explanation for all symptoms. Viruses do exist; giant viruses can in fact be easily viewed under a microscope. Most viruses do not cause symptoms and play a role in ecological balance. I think blaming toxicity for the symptoms experienced by the thousands of women who test positive for HIV is dangerous. The drugs do control viral damage to T cells and extend lives by decades; they also have side effects. Simply telling these poor people they simply have symptoms of toxicity, and they don't need the medications will result in a great increase in mortality. Regarding chickenpox, children had chickenpox in rural areas in Europe for decades with no exposure to environmental toxins. Measles? Kids who had measles after physical contact from playing with other infected children, despite exposure later to toxins, were immune and never again experienced the measles constellation of symptoms, that is no coincidence. The author is entitled to his opinion based on Cowan, Kauffman, the Bailey's, Brogan etc...Jeremy Hammond wrote a good article debunking their claims.
Here is Stefan sharing his discovery of “giant virus” and his further thoughts on the pseudoscience known as “virology”
https://odysee.com/@Truth_Comes_to_Light:6/Dr-Tom-Cowan-and-Stefan-Lanka:e
His theory is the cause of symptoms are not contagion but the 'soul.' Who has ever isolated the 'soul.' He has interesting theories, but they don't land for me.
Good, you understand that isolation is a scientific imperative for establishing an independent variable to determine if it cause disease. Remember, we are not attempting to prove causation but rather scrutinizing “virus” as the causative agent. If it’s not isolated, it’s difficult to say it exists at all. We’re talking about physical particles called “viruses.” Thats the issue at hand my friend.
You believe viruses have not been isolated and I believe they have.
It’s not about “belief” but about understanding what the virologists are calling “isolation.” No virus has been physically isolated and characterized. If you believe that isolation has been achieved, that’s just a thought. If you know that virus has been isolated, just share the experiment with us. It’s not faith we’re discussing here.
I’m certainly willing to read Hammond’s article (please share it), but it’s not just an opinion held by Cowan Kaufman, Bailey, etc. if you look into the issue for yourself, you’ll see that “viruses” have not been isolated and therefore cannot be characterized. Virology is total pseudoscience that fails to adhere to valid and logical scientific methods. Without isolation, it’s impossible to say what the genome is, what “it” looks like, and/or whether “it” is the cause of disease.
With regard to “giant viruses”, Stefan Lanka was credited for making a “giant virus” discovery. Then he realized his discovery was nothing resembling the mythical “virus” he thought he had discovered. Lanka abandoned virology after he realized the methods are unscientific.
We will have to disagree; there are many ways to determine the existence of viruses. La Scola was the first to determine they were working with giant viruses, not Lanka, they can be seen under a regular scope.
I’m ok with disagreement, but let’s search for some truth in science together. Those “structures” known as giant viruses…do they fit the definition of “virus.” Lanka discovered one such structure and he believed it to be “giant virus”. Layer, as you’ll hear him tsar in that video, he concluded they were something like spores. Lanka does not believe in viruses these days. I don’t either after looking into the methods. Why do you believe in viruses?
I have had measles, chicken pox, from contagion and family members died from T cell destruction due to infection with HIV. ART saves thousands of women's lives in Africa who are infected with HIV. Without these drugs, they would die. I know people in the U.S. who are alive because of the drugs, which of course have side effects. There is a responsibility that goes with the subject, convincing someone they do not have HIV, because there is no such thing, resulting in no treatment, and later death is a big deal.
Indeed the topic is a big deal especially when it comes to choices that have life & death consequences, and I don’t disregard the serious implications. Let me respectfully ask, if something like “contagion” cannot be proven in a scientific process, shouldn’t we question whether “contagion” is the correct theory? Shouldn’t we consider whether viruses are real when they’ve never been truly isolated (and demonstrated to do anything)? If you say yes, then you’re with me on thinking scientifically. If you say no, then I’ll have no problem telling you you aren’t thinking scientifically. I mean no disrespect.
What test do they use to determine these (fake) “viral infections?”
If it’s an antibody test, then they are detecting proteins that indicate to them that you have a “virus” they were taught is associated with elevated antibody levels. If it’s PCR (which I doubt they would be using for your case, but maybe they did) then they are detecting specific sequences that they have been told are sequences from (fake) “viruses.”
My guess is when you are feeling unwell and they test you, they are picking up higher than “normal” levels of proteins or sequences that are in your body.
Have you ever tried submitting a sample when you’re feeling well to see what they detect? All the testing is meaningless vis-a-vis “viral” detection.
Another brilliant analysis as usual as you did with Antoine Bechamp! The false paradigm of allopathic medicine was built on the lies and deception of fake science such as germ theory and vaccine development, not to mention the destruction of the scientific method which was necessary to maintain the universal fraud; genuine medical science has failed to progress in 150 years because genuine discoveries and real geniuses were suppressed and continue to be suppressed; today's mantra is follow the money and retain power and control through fear and lies that feeds the same fraudulent-based system of the past; Pasteur was Fauci and Gates rolled into one and the role model for the countless number of charlatans who followed...
Excellent.
AFTER CATARACT AND LASER SURGERIES. I HOPE YOU LIKE BUYING EYEDROPS FOR DRY EYES FOREVER. SIDE EFFECTS: However, if the cornea has an irregular curve, it results in conditions such as nearsightedness (myopia) and farsightedness (hyperopia).
Eldest son, says his Ophthalmologist wants to inject some crap in his right eye, NO anesthesia.
The State insurance guy lied to him, put him on the MOST EXPENSIVE OBUMERCARE. $1600 a month income, no savings left.
HOPE YOU LIKE BUYING EYEDROPS.
Laser-free vision correction uses electrical current to reshape the eye.
https://newatlas.com/medical-devices/emr-vision-cornea-lasik/
Imagine correcting your vision in under a minute – no lasers, blades, or pain. Scientists have developed a novel, non-invasive technique that reshapes the cornea using only a mild electric current and a temporary pH shift. In early trials, it reversed myopia without the need for traditional surgery. However, if the cornea has an irregular curve, it results in conditions such as nearsightedness (myopia) and farsightedness (hyperopia).
Laser-free vision correction uses electrical current to reshape the eye.
https://newatlas.com/medical-devices/emr-vision-cornea-lasik/
Imagine correcting your vision in under a minute – no lasers, blades, or pain. Scientists have developed a novel, non-invasive technique that reshapes the cornea using only a mild electric current and a temporary pH shift. In early trials, it reversed myopia without the need for traditional surgery.
Thank you for this. My eyes are in a serious way right now due to failed eye surgeries 2 years ago. Three doctors so far just want to stab my eyes with a needle. I refused .outright. Am hoping this new doctor will help.
Do more checking first. These surgeries always come with hidden side effects.
I know, I know. I checked the fluid they inject. Blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, 6th nerve palsy etc etc and that's from the "trusted" CDC & Medicare websites. Plus I read the abstracts.
Buy my vision is betting worse by the month. Can't read a book. I know I need intervention, not those shots in the eye that offer virtually no vision improvement whatsoever, not an option.
Outstanding stuff you are putting out, keep it up.
My recent experience: elderly relative in hospital with oxygen and IV to “maintain blood pressure”
Tried to get “home oxygen” but everyone in hospital resisted. Seems “home” oxygen is behind a medical barrier, “requires” a Prescription!!
Seems like part of the democide agenda.
I’m looking into a portable oxygen generator to have on hand for an emergency.
This is a great article I will be including on an article talking about the AGE OF DETOX. Supplements, tinctures, detox, the real cure is DETOX. Humanity has been decades long poisoned....
Yet another wonderful article! The unraveling of the Great Lie is gaining momentum, so grateful to be present for the shift. Thank you.
"Little ones who are around the same developmental or purge stage often experience similar internal shifts. Their bioresonance with each other can create a harmonic field, especially if there is already familiarity via experience (kids who are friends, go to school together, otherwise considered family or tribe). This field resonance can act as a catalyst. A child who was already preparing for a healing expression may be nudged into it by simply being near others undergoing the same thing. The frequency of cleansing becomes a shared experience." Very interesting
--I once saw a video of kids running to and fro on a playground--there was a passing along of motion, a very clear rhythm and pattern!
No virus has ever passed the Koch's Postulates test. Viruses don't exist. With so many chemicals in the Chicken Pox shot it's impossible to declare a consensus on exactly WHAT helps or doesn't help.
Viruses mean TOXINS in Latin!
Very thorough post! Great job!
Thank you for this outstanding summary of truth. I hope this breaks through to those who still hold on to the lies. I’m your next article, please outline methods for detoxing.
“measles survivors have lower cardiovascular disease and cancer”
I’m wondering if this is simply because they didn’t get toxic injections that cause cancer & heart problems.
Great article. Based on what was written in this article, it seems we can argue that much of the information and data can apply to the lies about shingles. I am curious if the data is similar to support the shingles viral lie. I wonder, too, if the cleansing protocols are similar.
Evangelical leader James Dobson dies at age 89.
https://thehill.com/homenews/5463237-james-dobson-evangelical-leader/
James Dobson, the influential evangelical radio host and founder of Focus on the Family, has died at 89, leaving behind a legacy of shaping politics and culture for generations.