The Engineered Scorn in the Blind, Targeted at Those With Eyes to See:
Many people I encounter are so brainwashed by media that they can't see two inches in front of their noses, and if you ever challenge them on the propaganda they find there, like Pavlov's dog they will call you a conspiracy theorist. They will then turn up their nose and walk away with a heightened sense of superiority.
The term "conspiracy theory" is remarkably adept at turning off all critical thinking like a light switch in a large portion of the people I have personally met.
Conditioning the public to react this way has to have been one of the most effective PSYOPs ever pushed onto the general population.
It is equal parts diabolic and brilliant, and it means that the elites can get away with just about anything with little to no scrutiny because everyone is too afraid to point out that the emperor has no clothes lest they be labeled a "conspiracy theorist".
The term"conspiracy theorist" is a comfort blanket that the indoctrinated have been trained to parrot, once uttered it allows the un-inquiring mind to slip back into uninformed ignorance.
You are one of the few who get how a single word or 2 can completely hijack human perception…it’s literally hypnotic induction and post hypnotic suggestion in 2 seconds and the mindless masses reinforce this trance every single second of every single day…
It’s unbelievable… we need to start believing it’s real.
Agreed. This is why they took control of most MSM and the entertainment industry. When you have (almost) total control over the message, the brainwashing comes easily.
JP Morgan, Steel, Shipbuilding, and “powder” interests hired 12 high-ranking newspaper execs to determine how to “control generally the policy of the daily press” throughout the entire country.
Answer: They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. …the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly SUPERVISE AND EDIT INFORMATION…. This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the WISHES of the interests served.
What a great tribute to this remarkable man who more than any other of his era spoke truth to power. We have missed his voice this last decade or so and now he is gone. Thank you for posting this excellent essay which helps us to understand the demise of the left as providing any challenge to the power structure which has only intensified its control since the false pandemic.
9/11 Was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event, that had people outsource their thinking to the US Government's propaganda arm, the mainstream media. (COVID anyone?)
The tagline, "never forget" was a further deployment of perception management and the NIST Report was a cover-up of what actually happened.
Then que your COINTELPRO outfit to keep the cover-up going, affectionately called the 9/11 "truth" movement...
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Dr. Wood is/was a CIA plant to "redirect" attention away from the FACT that the *entire exercise* was carried out by governmental agency in concert with international finance agenda. Aside from the *intentional* destruction of nearly all record of Trade manipulation dating back to the late 1980's, the former World Trade center complex was riddled with asbestos. The cost of remedy exceeded actual property valuation in 1994, the date of initial examinations of structures 1 through 7.
“It's amusing to witness the spectacle of people hotly debating whether the moon is made of cottage cheese or Gouda...” - Paul Vonharnish - (1/6/2023)
Interesting how Dr Morgan Reynolds AND Dr Wood went after the governmental agencies, that were covering up what happened on 9/11. It seems you did not fully comprehend what I wrote. I suggest you read it again...
Are you even aware of the fraudulent 9/11 evidence presented by Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage and AE911?
Or what about when Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, was discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defense Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
We're still discussing whether the moon exists. Thermite(s) and thermate have been in use for decades and decades. Mr. Duff is bullshitting. Christopher Bollyn provides copious pages of insight into the 9/11 fiasco.
The FACT that nearly all record of illicit financial trades and international stock market scams were turned to dust on 9/11/2001, should be considered as "rather compelling".
O, you want to go to Christopher Bollyn, now do you?
Ok - School is in session - Don't start crying after reading this...
NO ONE believing Christopher Bollyn’s presentations about ‘Solving 9/11” notices that nowhere does he point a serious finger at SAIC and ARA and the 21 other NIST subcontractors, but you cannot disregard that A LOT of people knew that something was going to happen that day, as a lot of researchers have gone into depth on the insider trading, people not going to work the day, the war games and so much more bluff around WHAT happened to the Towers.
I would argue that Bollyn takes the attention away from the NIST subcontractors and the technology used on 9/11, that can free us from this false scarcity world we live in.
After all, Bollyn was the first first person to actually connect 9/11 to DEW in February 14, 2002.
As per usual, note the emphasis on the disinfo ‘high heat”, ‘lasers”, ‘vaporization”, ‘dust is only from concrete”, and of course ‘Jewish space laser” etc.
This was before David Icke’s book, which was published on October 11, 2002 and there is important background info you need to know about David Icke’s 9/11 disinformation.
Dr. James R. Millette, a forensic scientist and president of MVA Scientific Consultants, conducted an independent analysis of World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples in late 2011 and early 2012.
This work was commissioned by skeptic Chris Mohr to investigate claims from the 2009 paper by Niels Harrit et al., which suggested red/gray chips in the dust were "active thermitic material" (nano-thermite).
Millette's study examined chips from four dust samples collected near Ground Zero and concluded they were consistent with primer paint used on steel structures, not thermite.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
You call yourself a "truth seeker", when in actual fact, you're a conspiracytainment consumer. You have not done one iota of your own independent research, aka READING...
I never claimed to be a "truth seeker". I chased the 9/11 rabbit into many 9/11 rabbit holes for over 5 years. I did this knowing full well that the majority of the investigations were futile. The majority of the protagonists are already quite dead, neutralized, or out of reach.
NONE of the evidence will ever be heard in courts of law, because our alleged 'courts' play on the same teams as those who control world trade and finance, political theater, professional indoctrination (such as Rand Corporation), and nearly all public and social media.
The elephant in the elevator is false attributions of human value and the economic systems that support and finance those values. Have a nice eternity.
And you seemed to have failed abysmally with your going down the 9/11 rabbit hole.
I'll re-iterate this for you again...
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a pattern recogniser. For instance, I noticed that the JFK assassination involved not one, but two 'lone gunmen' (one of whom shot the other); I noticed this pattern as an amazing coincidence.
We mustn't forget, as Detrick Bonhoeffer reminded us that the "collective stupidity' of the masses plays a large role in whether lies and deception take root in the first place; Bonhoeffer called it a "human defect" which prevented openness to reason or facts, even in the face of overwhelming and convincing evidence; at this point it's not just about conspiracy theorists which is a symptom of the larger problem, which is not knowing where truths of any kind are to be found anymore; and that is because we now live in a pseudo reality, a false matrix of "truths" we blindly accept out of personal cowardice and fear; the psychopaths and those who live for power and control have taken full advantage and have been largely unstoppable because they are not only anti-human but anti-life in every way imaginable. P.S. This is NOT a conspiracy theory!
Both of you mention that council, which is mentioned at large in No One dare call it a conspiracy. A booklet I read a few years ago, and that shows how the world works (for these so-called 'elites')
For someone who does not believe in coincidence, this can only be serendipity. Or a conspiracy theory, whatever one wants to call it.
It is rather unfortunate that that Substack only works with apps, which I won't load, otherwise I could refer them to your article as well. This is just too much of a 'coincidence'. I must be classified as a conspiracy believer!
The most pervasive conspiracy of all time: "Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work for the benefit of all." - John Maynard Keynes - (June 5, 1883 – April 12, 1946) [End quote] This coming from a person who championed Keynesian economics, and was an avowed eugenicist. That said:
The balance of the Wikipedia definition points out various charades which painted lip-sick on the adopted fallacy of trade *associations* and their intent...
Deliciously deceptive trickery being utilised by our lords and masters. The supreme beings who call the shots. Reminds me somewhat of: Clash of the Titans (1981, Harry Hamlin as Perseus; Ursula Andress as Aphrodite; and that old darling of the British stage and screen, Larry Olivier as our man/god, Zeus)
Maggie Smith and Burgess Meredith, positively hamming it up, in the motion picture (as above), constantly thwarting and blighting the lives of the poor mortals; the everyday Joe’s going about their business, trying to get from A to B, and get their daily tasks knocked out, boy. Was it ever difficult…
..What with Medusas’ to deal with; the odd Cyclops thrown in your path, as you toil away on your weary way. And just when you thought it was safe to eat your lunch: Sea serpents and flying dragons to contend with. All courtesy of the Powers that Be. Phew.!!
A co-production between United Kingdom and The Good Ol’ U S of A. Brilliant. Nothing ever changes, really. They’re both still making our lives miserable. And desperately trying to throw us off the scent, at every opportunity.
It was the Kennedy Killing, where the term was coined. The Intelligence services got so irked by people (white and blue collar) talking about the Presidents death, that they had to come up with a term to dissuade the unwashed from discussing the ‘viable’ alternatives to the ‘state sponsored’ death. Hence: this is all conspiratorial bullshit.!! By Conspiracy Theorists.
Now, let’s head these nutcases off at the pass…
Extending the theories/stories even further: making it utterly illogical and idiotic, so far fetched; in order to blow it all out the window. A farce. A terrible joke. An absurd piece of none sense. Over produced, by half wits with tin foil hats. Who also happen to be Racist, right wing, fascist- possibly-Nazi sympathisers .(??).
And let’s not forget: the capitalist/free market/billionaire mouthpiece- versus - communist/anarchist/socialist/leftist/chomsky-esque, paradigm; is a conspiracy, too. A false dichotomy.
very nice essay, thank you once again. it is only logical for groups to forward their goals.
It is in our nature to avoid internal conflict. I often ask the person with whom i have a dialogue to attemt to challenge themselves out of their comfort zone.
on a positive note, a small group cannot amass the consciousness load needed to overtake good, when confronted with a vast population of awakened people.
in other words, by carrying out a personal transformation (Daisaku Ikeda called it Human Revolution), and also helping others around us do the same, we can actually turn history into a positive direction and be truly happy.
it is not a dream, it is reality, which we ourselves create through our collective consciousness.
Jacques Attali was counsellor to French-President François Mitterrand and the first head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Between 1969-2023 he managed to pump out 86 books in 54 years with no lack it seems of eerily-predictive subject matter.
From his glowing Wikipedia entry:
“Since his earliest books, Attali foresaw and announced signals of the future, albeit weak at the time, that later came true:
1. In La parole et l'outil (1976) - he announced and described the shift from an energy-based society to an information-based society.
2. In Bruits, in 1977 - he announced what would later be the internet and YouTube.
3. In La nouvelle économie française, in 1978 - he discussed the coming emergence of the personal computer, hyper-surveillance and self-surveillance.
4. In L'ordre Cannibale, in 1980 - he announced the advent of a prosthetic society, now known as transhumanism.
5. In Histoires du temps - he announced the rapid pace of history and the growing immediacy of relationships.
6. In Amours - he announced the emergence of poly-romantic relationships.
7. In Lignes d'horizons, in 1990 - he predicted the relative decline of US power.
8. In Brève histoire de l'avenir - he announced a corporate power grab by health data and insurance companies.
9. In Au propre et au figuré - he announced the break-up of property and subsequently invented the concept of the "nomadic object."
10. In L'homme nomade - he described the great movement of populations saying their sedentary life was only temporary.”
Outside of conspiracy, how else does one explain his prolific output of suspiciously-prescient writings.
The Engineered Scorn in the Blind, Targeted at Those With Eyes to See:
Many people I encounter are so brainwashed by media that they can't see two inches in front of their noses, and if you ever challenge them on the propaganda they find there, like Pavlov's dog they will call you a conspiracy theorist. They will then turn up their nose and walk away with a heightened sense of superiority.
The term "conspiracy theory" is remarkably adept at turning off all critical thinking like a light switch in a large portion of the people I have personally met.
Conditioning the public to react this way has to have been one of the most effective PSYOPs ever pushed onto the general population.
It is equal parts diabolic and brilliant, and it means that the elites can get away with just about anything with little to no scrutiny because everyone is too afraid to point out that the emperor has no clothes lest they be labeled a "conspiracy theorist".
The term"conspiracy theorist" is a comfort blanket that the indoctrinated have been trained to parrot, once uttered it allows the un-inquiring mind to slip back into uninformed ignorance.
Very well said.
You are one of the few who get how a single word or 2 can completely hijack human perception…it’s literally hypnotic induction and post hypnotic suggestion in 2 seconds and the mindless masses reinforce this trance every single second of every single day…
It’s unbelievable… we need to start believing it’s real.
Thank you Damien, excellent 100 mile high view of what thet are doing.
This may interest you: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/everything-you-watch-or-read-is-owned
I think you may find that worth every second of your time.
Agreed. This is why they took control of most MSM and the entertainment industry. When you have (almost) total control over the message, the brainwashing comes easily.
Very
From the Congressional Record, January 27, 1917:
JP Morgan, Steel, Shipbuilding, and “powder” interests hired 12 high-ranking newspaper execs to determine how to “control generally the policy of the daily press” throughout the entire country.
Answer: They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. …the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly SUPERVISE AND EDIT INFORMATION…. This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the WISHES of the interests served.
Much more on the CIA’s stranglehold of the media and how they use it to control us here: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/counterfeit-continuity-in-our-fourth
What a great tribute to this remarkable man who more than any other of his era spoke truth to power. We have missed his voice this last decade or so and now he is gone. Thank you for posting this excellent essay which helps us to understand the demise of the left as providing any challenge to the power structure which has only intensified its control since the false pandemic.
Amen.
The "cock up not conspiracy" crowd do my head in. It sounds reasonable, but it's essentially running cover for criminals.
9/11 Was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event, that had people outsource their thinking to the US Government's propaganda arm, the mainstream media. (COVID anyone?)
The tagline, "never forget" was a further deployment of perception management and the NIST Report was a cover-up of what actually happened.
Then que your COINTELPRO outfit to keep the cover-up going, affectionately called the 9/11 "truth" movement...
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr. Wood is/was a CIA plant to "redirect" attention away from the FACT that the *entire exercise* was carried out by governmental agency in concert with international finance agenda. Aside from the *intentional* destruction of nearly all record of Trade manipulation dating back to the late 1980's, the former World Trade center complex was riddled with asbestos. The cost of remedy exceeded actual property valuation in 1994, the date of initial examinations of structures 1 through 7.
“It's amusing to witness the spectacle of people hotly debating whether the moon is made of cottage cheese or Gouda...” - Paul Vonharnish - (1/6/2023)
Interesting how Dr Morgan Reynolds AND Dr Wood went after the governmental agencies, that were covering up what happened on 9/11. It seems you did not fully comprehend what I wrote. I suggest you read it again...
Are you even aware of the fraudulent 9/11 evidence presented by Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage and AE911?
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v6u8uar-fraudulent-911-evidence-presented-by-steven-e.-jones-richard-gage-and-ae911.html
Or what about when Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, was discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11.
Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defense Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v6rm9n1-nano-thermite-does-not-exist.html
Are you going to dismiss the open letter of 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza?
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
We're still discussing whether the moon exists. Thermite(s) and thermate have been in use for decades and decades. Mr. Duff is bullshitting. Christopher Bollyn provides copious pages of insight into the 9/11 fiasco.
Christopher Bollyn - Tracking the 9-11 Insiders to their Rothschild Roots >>> January 3, 2013 >>> https://www.bollyn.com/tracking-the-9-11-insiders-to-their-rothschild-roots-2/
The FACT that nearly all record of illicit financial trades and international stock market scams were turned to dust on 9/11/2001, should be considered as "rather compelling".
O, you want to go to Christopher Bollyn, now do you?
Ok - School is in session - Don't start crying after reading this...
NO ONE believing Christopher Bollyn’s presentations about ‘Solving 9/11” notices that nowhere does he point a serious finger at SAIC and ARA and the 21 other NIST subcontractors, but you cannot disregard that A LOT of people knew that something was going to happen that day, as a lot of researchers have gone into depth on the insider trading, people not going to work the day, the war games and so much more bluff around WHAT happened to the Towers.
I would argue that Bollyn takes the attention away from the NIST subcontractors and the technology used on 9/11, that can free us from this false scarcity world we live in.
After all, Bollyn was the first first person to actually connect 9/11 to DEW in February 14, 2002.
Link: https://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn1.html
As per usual, note the emphasis on the disinfo ‘high heat”, ‘lasers”, ‘vaporization”, ‘dust is only from concrete”, and of course ‘Jewish space laser” etc.
This was before David Icke’s book, which was published on October 11, 2002 and there is important background info you need to know about David Icke’s 9/11 disinformation.
David Icke's disinformation on 9/11
Why did David backtrack on his 2002 book?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911
Then on your thermite bullshit....
Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis
The 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis and over 15 years of lies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/denis-rancourt-2010-death-blows-to
Dr. James Millette's 2012 WTC Dust Analysis
Dr. James R. Millette, a forensic scientist and president of MVA Scientific Consultants, conducted an independent analysis of World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples in late 2011 and early 2012.
This work was commissioned by skeptic Chris Mohr to investigate claims from the 2009 paper by Niels Harrit et al., which suggested red/gray chips in the dust were "active thermitic material" (nano-thermite).
Millette's study examined chips from four dust samples collected near Ground Zero and concluded they were consistent with primer paint used on steel structures, not thermite.
Find it here: https://internationalskeptics.com/forums/index.php?threads/wtc-dust-study-feb-29-2012-by-dr-james-millette.231314/
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe (2025)
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
You call yourself a "truth seeker", when in actual fact, you're a conspiracytainment consumer. You have not done one iota of your own independent research, aka READING...
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
I never claimed to be a "truth seeker". I chased the 9/11 rabbit into many 9/11 rabbit holes for over 5 years. I did this knowing full well that the majority of the investigations were futile. The majority of the protagonists are already quite dead, neutralized, or out of reach.
NONE of the evidence will ever be heard in courts of law, because our alleged 'courts' play on the same teams as those who control world trade and finance, political theater, professional indoctrination (such as Rand Corporation), and nearly all public and social media.
The elephant in the elevator is false attributions of human value and the economic systems that support and finance those values. Have a nice eternity.
And you seemed to have failed abysmally with your going down the 9/11 rabbit hole.
I'll re-iterate this for you again...
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
My 5 hour interview with Patricia Casazza: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-jersey-girl-patricia-casazza
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
eugyppius needs to read this. Great read. Thanks.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a pattern recogniser. For instance, I noticed that the JFK assassination involved not one, but two 'lone gunmen' (one of whom shot the other); I noticed this pattern as an amazing coincidence.
Be a pattern recogniser.
🤣😂 sign me up.
The JFK "assassination" was a hoax.
Thank you for your detailed analysis! Sometimes I get overwhelmed by all the lies that we have to live with.
Because I spoke to him of Agenda 2030, vaccine passports, digital currency and digital ID, my doctor diagnosed me as having paranoid delusions.
We mustn't forget, as Detrick Bonhoeffer reminded us that the "collective stupidity' of the masses plays a large role in whether lies and deception take root in the first place; Bonhoeffer called it a "human defect" which prevented openness to reason or facts, even in the face of overwhelming and convincing evidence; at this point it's not just about conspiracy theorists which is a symptom of the larger problem, which is not knowing where truths of any kind are to be found anymore; and that is because we now live in a pseudo reality, a false matrix of "truths" we blindly accept out of personal cowardice and fear; the psychopaths and those who live for power and control have taken full advantage and have been largely unstoppable because they are not only anti-human but anti-life in every way imaginable. P.S. This is NOT a conspiracy theory!
I just filed this article when I saw yours
https://newspaste.substack.com/p/harvards-young-nuclear-proliferators?
Both of you mention that council, which is mentioned at large in No One dare call it a conspiracy. A booklet I read a few years ago, and that shows how the world works (for these so-called 'elites')
For someone who does not believe in coincidence, this can only be serendipity. Or a conspiracy theory, whatever one wants to call it.
It is rather unfortunate that that Substack only works with apps, which I won't load, otherwise I could refer them to your article as well. This is just too much of a 'coincidence'. I must be classified as a conspiracy believer!
The most pervasive conspiracy of all time: "Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work for the benefit of all." - John Maynard Keynes - (June 5, 1883 – April 12, 1946) [End quote] This coming from a person who championed Keynesian economics, and was an avowed eugenicist. That said:
One can pin the tail on the economic donkey/pig right here: Views on trade imbalance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics#:~:text=Views%20on%20trade%20imbalance
The balance of the Wikipedia definition points out various charades which painted lip-sick on the adopted fallacy of trade *associations* and their intent...
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
thank you
Deliciously deceptive trickery being utilised by our lords and masters. The supreme beings who call the shots. Reminds me somewhat of: Clash of the Titans (1981, Harry Hamlin as Perseus; Ursula Andress as Aphrodite; and that old darling of the British stage and screen, Larry Olivier as our man/god, Zeus)
Maggie Smith and Burgess Meredith, positively hamming it up, in the motion picture (as above), constantly thwarting and blighting the lives of the poor mortals; the everyday Joe’s going about their business, trying to get from A to B, and get their daily tasks knocked out, boy. Was it ever difficult…
..What with Medusas’ to deal with; the odd Cyclops thrown in your path, as you toil away on your weary way. And just when you thought it was safe to eat your lunch: Sea serpents and flying dragons to contend with. All courtesy of the Powers that Be. Phew.!!
A co-production between United Kingdom and The Good Ol’ U S of A. Brilliant. Nothing ever changes, really. They’re both still making our lives miserable. And desperately trying to throw us off the scent, at every opportunity.
It was the Kennedy Killing, where the term was coined. The Intelligence services got so irked by people (white and blue collar) talking about the Presidents death, that they had to come up with a term to dissuade the unwashed from discussing the ‘viable’ alternatives to the ‘state sponsored’ death. Hence: this is all conspiratorial bullshit.!! By Conspiracy Theorists.
Now, let’s head these nutcases off at the pass…
Extending the theories/stories even further: making it utterly illogical and idiotic, so far fetched; in order to blow it all out the window. A farce. A terrible joke. An absurd piece of none sense. Over produced, by half wits with tin foil hats. Who also happen to be Racist, right wing, fascist- possibly-Nazi sympathisers .(??).
And let’s not forget: the capitalist/free market/billionaire mouthpiece- versus - communist/anarchist/socialist/leftist/chomsky-esque, paradigm; is a conspiracy, too. A false dichotomy.
Two cheeks of the same Ass.
Great piece. All the best.
very nice essay, thank you once again. it is only logical for groups to forward their goals.
It is in our nature to avoid internal conflict. I often ask the person with whom i have a dialogue to attemt to challenge themselves out of their comfort zone.
on a positive note, a small group cannot amass the consciousness load needed to overtake good, when confronted with a vast population of awakened people.
in other words, by carrying out a personal transformation (Daisaku Ikeda called it Human Revolution), and also helping others around us do the same, we can actually turn history into a positive direction and be truly happy.
it is not a dream, it is reality, which we ourselves create through our collective consciousness.
this is our "conspiracy".
So true
Jacques Attali was counsellor to French-President François Mitterrand and the first head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Between 1969-2023 he managed to pump out 86 books in 54 years with no lack it seems of eerily-predictive subject matter.
From his glowing Wikipedia entry:
“Since his earliest books, Attali foresaw and announced signals of the future, albeit weak at the time, that later came true:
1. In La parole et l'outil (1976) - he announced and described the shift from an energy-based society to an information-based society.
2. In Bruits, in 1977 - he announced what would later be the internet and YouTube.
3. In La nouvelle économie française, in 1978 - he discussed the coming emergence of the personal computer, hyper-surveillance and self-surveillance.
4. In L'ordre Cannibale, in 1980 - he announced the advent of a prosthetic society, now known as transhumanism.
5. In Histoires du temps - he announced the rapid pace of history and the growing immediacy of relationships.
6. In Amours - he announced the emergence of poly-romantic relationships.
7. In Lignes d'horizons, in 1990 - he predicted the relative decline of US power.
8. In Brève histoire de l'avenir - he announced a corporate power grab by health data and insurance companies.
9. In Au propre et au figuré - he announced the break-up of property and subsequently invented the concept of the "nomadic object."
10. In L'homme nomade - he described the great movement of populations saying their sedentary life was only temporary.”
Outside of conspiracy, how else does one explain his prolific output of suspiciously-prescient writings.