Earth’s “core” is another scam, laying ground for unlimited extortion of public funds for “research”, just like “space”, “Moon”, “Sun”, “Solar system”, etc.
So far, there is zero evidence for the existence of the “core”. Even its concept is still a fantasy. A theory, at best, if you will. It’s just another mental pulp trying to “explain” basic physical phenomena.
For comparison:
The alleged radius of the alleged “globe” Earth is about 6,378 km (3,963 mi).
The deepest borehole - an actual drilling from the surface into the depth of the ground - completed so far is Kola Superdeep Borehole SG-3. It reached 12,262 metres (7.619 mi) in 1989.
In other words, we have drilled 12.3 km / 6,378 km = 0.00193 of the alleged radius - 0.19%. About 1/500 of the alleged radius of the Earth.
The drilling of these 12.3 km took 19 years - can you imagine?
Why has the drilling stopped? Officially, due to lack of funding. Really? Exactly the same reason why we will not go to the Moon “again” - no money. Looks repetitive. Where major scientific ventures are under way, they reach a certain stage and stop for good. Is it because after some years of scamming the public won’t fall for it any more? The internet changed everything, and detecting and disclosing deceit is now extremely easy, especially in the natural sciences, where facts are based on facts.
Back to the drilling. We have reached 0.19% of the Earth’s alleged radius - in a single spot, with extremely low-quality samples, completely unverifiable. Coming up with a theory of a “core” somewhere deep there, 500 times deeper, is a great courage (or a quest for more funding).
Consequently, all theories related to the “core” are of the same value as global warming, dwindling of oil reserves, extreme effectiveness of solar or wind energy, and so on.
But... you can take it seriously. We have always needed myths to escape our daily reality. The so called scientists are all too happy to provide us with such myths. As someone once said about a huge 4-letter agency: “60 years of space research: taking us on a journey to nowhere”. All paid from your taxes. We could be billionaires (if not for these wasted taxes), but apparently we prefer to be poor and believe in myths.
That was an immortal mosquito, it lived up to 19 years.
My guess is that we, the great science, all-knowing about stars, prehistory, geology, invisible viruses and invisible PCR puzzles, the aerodynamics of space flight, etc, we do not have any viable technology to drill down farther on. Aligning a 12-km 9-inch diameter pipe system must be a challenge. One move wrong and all the structure becomes unrecoverable useless scrap.
Theory: any science that goes beyond the career of people in charge of money must be wrong. When the funders found out that a bunch of “scientists” drilled their pockets for 19 years and provided non-gold non-oil rocks in return, they must have gone crazy. That about funding.
Officially they said that temperature was too high (212F / 100C expected, 356F / 180C reported), which made the rock too “plastic” to continue drilling.
My working theory is that they cut through the crust layer and reached the Earth’s core. But the core was a huge empty space, filled with atmospheric air. The dimensions were too large to measure. They couldn’t take any photos (too dark). And the temperature of this huge chamber was equal to that at the surface of the Earth. This finding made them scare like hell, but breathable and liveable hell this time. They knew that no-one would believe them, so they continued the hot core fairy tale and closed the door.
My second theory is that this space was perfectly lit and measurable. They quickly found that it was an upside-down dome-like space. They obviously concluded that it reflected the flat Earth concept and that made them even more scared - they would be expelled from all their scientific communities, journals, and cash desks. So they closed the door.
Are my theories crazy? We don’t know, there is no way to prove or disprove them. But they are equally possible to those melted-core fantasies.
Follow Einstein. He said once that science is BS because it is limited - but imagination is the king because it has no limits. He got a Nobel for this, so he must be right. Is our modern science modelled after Einstein’s concept?
We don’t know it. We have never been close to anything space. All our information comes from secondary and tertiary sources, and news people who blindly quote whatever they want. Accusing anyone about lying is wrong.
But you can cross-check their official data, reports, images and find discrepancies. You can also cross-check official “space” information against established physics. It will take some time. And you will need to do a lot of calculations (plain math, nothing of rocket science).
The whole process will be very eye-opening and very instructive. Once you learn how to do it in one field, you can do it anywhere, from food labels to TV messages to verifying compatibility of people in relationships. Life becomes easier then.
There are two types of global warming...man made which is fake and natural which is real. Humanity is much better off with a little warming than a little cooling. We have had warmer periods quite survivable, but I wouldn't want to live during an ice age.
By and large I understood nothing in this article. Does being on the oceans floor mean core earth? I think not. If we are truly a flat earth, and I can't deny the strong evidence, then rotation means nothing. But I did pick up on water temperatures.
I used to scuba dive in the West Indies quite a bit. Naturally the water was warm as I jumped in. At a depth of 100' below the surface the water got cold. I never wore a full wet suit. Traversing off the coast of N.A. where WW11 relics lied beneath sinking to the floor, I did notice a dramatic change of water temperature at a depth that I thought could not be attributed to a sunny day, as I was too deep.
Nonetheless, being on the floor, legs exposed, I swam thru very cold water and suddenly got hit by very warm pockets that came out of nowhere. I remember memorizing some of those pocket locations to warm up as I explored the German war ship sunk off the coast of Aruba.
Since I could hold my breath for quite a while, I experienced that same cold/warm phenomenon hitting the ocean floor while snorkeling as well. Don't know if that correlates to this authors take on the ocean temp but that is what I experienced while swimming.
That said, dissecting, explaining and exploring all possible scientific facts and figures, by and large, is above my pay grade and a dizzying prospect to my lack of knowledge. What does strike a chord with me is the solution to a created scenario that is so counter productive, so expensive, so down right ridiculous, that people actually fall for it. That is scary.
Would you take your chances escaping from a catastrophe in an electric car, not fully charged, in bad weather, finding the fastest and safest way out? Or rely on a gas driven car that most people maintain a good level of fuel to get you 100 miles away from home? The greatest invention of the US and world, driven by a limitless supply of fuel, delivering freedom of navigation, are now replaced by kill switch electric vehicles that spontaneously explode, is the solution to climate change? Please, someone, explain that to me like I'm a 4 year old.
The deepest humans have been active is close to three miles down at the Mponeng gold mine outside of Johannesburg. The rock temperature down there is 140F and the mining company uses 6000 tons of ice a day to make it livable for the workers.
Deepest gold mine I've seen in Australia is the open pit operation at Kalgoorlie. Don't need ice; the drivers sit in air conditioned huge dump trucks bringing the ore up:).
Ice isn't especially expensive to make. I've walked past backalley ice factories in Bangkok enough times. And they use plenty of ice daily in Thailand, that's for sure.
We are polluting our bodies, our bloodstream,every cell in our body. We are polluting the environment, the soil, the air, the waterways. So, perhaps we should reframe the discussion about global warming and call it global deforming because we are trashing our home?
Human consumption of the planets resources @ 70 billionths of its mass per annum currently. All of which never leaves the system. How much effect will this teeny consumption have? How will we run out of stuff?
The converse is then true. When iron transforms from face-centered cubic (FCC/BCC) to hexagonal closepack (HCP) structure, this is endothermic … absorbing massive amounts of energy … resulting in core cooling.
Is there a theory on this cycle? Is it a matter of tens of years or thousands?
500 years of Copernican Jesuit freemasonic indoctrination aka propaganda about the world being a "planet" which is rotating and orbiting the sun is difficult to shake off:).
One of the questions is why they came up with the heliocentric model. A search for scientific truth? Or was the Vatican so mad about the Reformation and its subsequent loss of control and power and wealth that it tried to derail the scriptures with a revenge psyop?
Climate change is just one aspect of a much bigger story of infinite supply. Most previous civilizations lived on subsistence farming, but technology and energy dense fossil fuels has allowed us to turn the planet into consumers paradise. But infinite growth on a finite planet is coming to an end.
2003 was the 1st year in history a small sailboat was able to travel by water from the Pacific to the Atlantic oceans. I believe it was done in September or October. THAT's NOT FROM GLOBALLY WARMING???????
Earth’s “core” is another scam, laying ground for unlimited extortion of public funds for “research”, just like “space”, “Moon”, “Sun”, “Solar system”, etc.
So far, there is zero evidence for the existence of the “core”. Even its concept is still a fantasy. A theory, at best, if you will. It’s just another mental pulp trying to “explain” basic physical phenomena.
For comparison:
The alleged radius of the alleged “globe” Earth is about 6,378 km (3,963 mi).
The deepest borehole - an actual drilling from the surface into the depth of the ground - completed so far is Kola Superdeep Borehole SG-3. It reached 12,262 metres (7.619 mi) in 1989.
In other words, we have drilled 12.3 km / 6,378 km = 0.00193 of the alleged radius - 0.19%. About 1/500 of the alleged radius of the Earth.
The drilling of these 12.3 km took 19 years - can you imagine?
Why has the drilling stopped? Officially, due to lack of funding. Really? Exactly the same reason why we will not go to the Moon “again” - no money. Looks repetitive. Where major scientific ventures are under way, they reach a certain stage and stop for good. Is it because after some years of scamming the public won’t fall for it any more? The internet changed everything, and detecting and disclosing deceit is now extremely easy, especially in the natural sciences, where facts are based on facts.
Back to the drilling. We have reached 0.19% of the Earth’s alleged radius - in a single spot, with extremely low-quality samples, completely unverifiable. Coming up with a theory of a “core” somewhere deep there, 500 times deeper, is a great courage (or a quest for more funding).
Consequently, all theories related to the “core” are of the same value as global warming, dwindling of oil reserves, extreme effectiveness of solar or wind energy, and so on.
But... you can take it seriously. We have always needed myths to escape our daily reality. The so called scientists are all too happy to provide us with such myths. As someone once said about a huge 4-letter agency: “60 years of space research: taking us on a journey to nowhere”. All paid from your taxes. We could be billionaires (if not for these wasted taxes), but apparently we prefer to be poor and believe in myths.
You missed a decimal place. 0.19%. Just a mosquito bite.
Thank you for correcting me. Updated.
That was an immortal mosquito, it lived up to 19 years.
My guess is that we, the great science, all-knowing about stars, prehistory, geology, invisible viruses and invisible PCR puzzles, the aerodynamics of space flight, etc, we do not have any viable technology to drill down farther on. Aligning a 12-km 9-inch diameter pipe system must be a challenge. One move wrong and all the structure becomes unrecoverable useless scrap.
Theory: any science that goes beyond the career of people in charge of money must be wrong. When the funders found out that a bunch of “scientists” drilled their pockets for 19 years and provided non-gold non-oil rocks in return, they must have gone crazy. That about funding.
Officially they said that temperature was too high (212F / 100C expected, 356F / 180C reported), which made the rock too “plastic” to continue drilling.
My working theory is that they cut through the crust layer and reached the Earth’s core. But the core was a huge empty space, filled with atmospheric air. The dimensions were too large to measure. They couldn’t take any photos (too dark). And the temperature of this huge chamber was equal to that at the surface of the Earth. This finding made them scare like hell, but breathable and liveable hell this time. They knew that no-one would believe them, so they continued the hot core fairy tale and closed the door.
My second theory is that this space was perfectly lit and measurable. They quickly found that it was an upside-down dome-like space. They obviously concluded that it reflected the flat Earth concept and that made them even more scared - they would be expelled from all their scientific communities, journals, and cash desks. So they closed the door.
Are my theories crazy? We don’t know, there is no way to prove or disprove them. But they are equally possible to those melted-core fantasies.
Follow Einstein. He said once that science is BS because it is limited - but imagination is the king because it has no limits. He got a Nobel for this, so he must be right. Is our modern science modelled after Einstein’s concept?
One thing is certain: NASA is lying its head off about all things space.
We don’t know it. We have never been close to anything space. All our information comes from secondary and tertiary sources, and news people who blindly quote whatever they want. Accusing anyone about lying is wrong.
But you can cross-check their official data, reports, images and find discrepancies. You can also cross-check official “space” information against established physics. It will take some time. And you will need to do a lot of calculations (plain math, nothing of rocket science).
The whole process will be very eye-opening and very instructive. Once you learn how to do it in one field, you can do it anywhere, from food labels to TV messages to verifying compatibility of people in relationships. Life becomes easier then.
They are masters of illusion. That much is clear:).
There are two types of global warming...man made which is fake and natural which is real. Humanity is much better off with a little warming than a little cooling. We have had warmer periods quite survivable, but I wouldn't want to live during an ice age.
By and large I understood nothing in this article. Does being on the oceans floor mean core earth? I think not. If we are truly a flat earth, and I can't deny the strong evidence, then rotation means nothing. But I did pick up on water temperatures.
I used to scuba dive in the West Indies quite a bit. Naturally the water was warm as I jumped in. At a depth of 100' below the surface the water got cold. I never wore a full wet suit. Traversing off the coast of N.A. where WW11 relics lied beneath sinking to the floor, I did notice a dramatic change of water temperature at a depth that I thought could not be attributed to a sunny day, as I was too deep.
Nonetheless, being on the floor, legs exposed, I swam thru very cold water and suddenly got hit by very warm pockets that came out of nowhere. I remember memorizing some of those pocket locations to warm up as I explored the German war ship sunk off the coast of Aruba.
Since I could hold my breath for quite a while, I experienced that same cold/warm phenomenon hitting the ocean floor while snorkeling as well. Don't know if that correlates to this authors take on the ocean temp but that is what I experienced while swimming.
That said, dissecting, explaining and exploring all possible scientific facts and figures, by and large, is above my pay grade and a dizzying prospect to my lack of knowledge. What does strike a chord with me is the solution to a created scenario that is so counter productive, so expensive, so down right ridiculous, that people actually fall for it. That is scary.
Would you take your chances escaping from a catastrophe in an electric car, not fully charged, in bad weather, finding the fastest and safest way out? Or rely on a gas driven car that most people maintain a good level of fuel to get you 100 miles away from home? The greatest invention of the US and world, driven by a limitless supply of fuel, delivering freedom of navigation, are now replaced by kill switch electric vehicles that spontaneously explode, is the solution to climate change? Please, someone, explain that to me like I'm a 4 year old.
Absolutely correct. People are brainwashed sheep. Shalom
The deepest humans have been active is close to three miles down at the Mponeng gold mine outside of Johannesburg. The rock temperature down there is 140F and the mining company uses 6000 tons of ice a day to make it livable for the workers.
-how do you get to make and locate 6000 tonnes per day?
astronomical cost and effort?
curious D
They have an ice factory on the surface.
My source for this factoid is Matthew Hart's 2013 book " Gold ". All about the yellow metal. Chapter 1 where he visits this amazing deep mine.
-to cover the cost of ice, most likely indicates that they have low cost of wages..
zero chance of making that ice and low wages in australia (the lowercase nation now)
Deepest gold mine I've seen in Australia is the open pit operation at Kalgoorlie. Don't need ice; the drivers sit in air conditioned huge dump trucks bringing the ore up:).
Ice isn't especially expensive to make. I've walked past backalley ice factories in Bangkok enough times. And they use plenty of ice daily in Thailand, that's for sure.
We are polluting our bodies, our bloodstream,every cell in our body. We are polluting the environment, the soil, the air, the waterways. So, perhaps we should reframe the discussion about global warming and call it global deforming because we are trashing our home?
Human consumption of the planets resources @ 70 billionths of its mass per annum currently. All of which never leaves the system. How much effect will this teeny consumption have? How will we run out of stuff?
The converse is then true. When iron transforms from face-centered cubic (FCC/BCC) to hexagonal closepack (HCP) structure, this is endothermic … absorbing massive amounts of energy … resulting in core cooling.
Is there a theory on this cycle? Is it a matter of tens of years or thousands?
500 years of Copernican Jesuit freemasonic indoctrination aka propaganda about the world being a "planet" which is rotating and orbiting the sun is difficult to shake off:).
One of the questions is why they came up with the heliocentric model. A search for scientific truth? Or was the Vatican so mad about the Reformation and its subsequent loss of control and power and wealth that it tried to derail the scriptures with a revenge psyop?
Climate change is just one aspect of a much bigger story of infinite supply. Most previous civilizations lived on subsistence farming, but technology and energy dense fossil fuels has allowed us to turn the planet into consumers paradise. But infinite growth on a finite planet is coming to an end.
Climate has changed before?
“ . . . it is these ocean state changes that are
1:02:28 correlated with the great disasters of the past impact can cause extinction but
1:02:35 it did so in our past only wants[once] that we can tell whereas this has happened over
1:02:40 and over and over again we have fifteen evidences times of mass extinction in the past 500 million years
1:02:48 so the implications for the implications the implications of the carbon dioxide is really dangerous if you heat your
1:02:55 planet sufficiently to cause your Arctic to melt if you cause the temperature
1:03:01 gradient between your tropics and your Arctic to be reduced you risk going back
1:03:07 to a state that produces these hydrogen sulfide pulses . . . “?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ako03Bjxv70
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2017/03/04/global-warming-in-a-climate-of-ignorance-space-news/
2003 was the 1st year in history a small sailboat was able to travel by water from the Pacific to the Atlantic oceans. I believe it was done in September or October. THAT's NOT FROM GLOBALLY WARMING???????
What if the world isn't a globe? 😀
And the cow jumped over the moon.
A cow named Apollo? 😀