Discrimination

"Is this discrimination based on science?"

What I would like to know now is what are you going to do, so that my otherwise healthy children can continue receiving full medical treatment, instead of being discriminated against? – West Australian mother’s email to her physiotherapist

One of the best parts of this Substack journey is the emails I get.

This recently from a fellow NSW traveller.

Life sure has gottn very crazy over the last few years, and there seems no end in sight. rather it feels like this is just the beginning of a very dark and stupid period that most people are unaware of. Scarey stuff.

I am living on my parents farm, in regional NSW nsw, about 5-6 hours NW of sydney. It sounds like you may be near where i grew up, at newport...

I am trying to start a organic farm. Im too small to make a living from it, but too big to treat it as a hobby. Ive planted about 1000 fruit and nut trees (many grown from seed by me and my daughter), and i have medicinal/ culinary herbs, and veges in the ground. Being unjabbed meant i couldnt get to work (gardening, handyman etc). then the floods hit, and that has screwed things up a bit more financially for me. It’s all good, but means I’m living week to week with not a lot of extra $ to spend. Especially with the cost of living these days!!

But i just wanted to say- if you ever make it out west- you are very welcome at my place/ farm. There is great camping by our creek. And i have lots of good nutrient dense foods to eat. You are welcome anytime. I feel like i know you quite well, even though we’ve never met.

I know it may sound crazy, but if the shit ever really hits the fan, and you need to get out of sydney and go somewhere- you are welcome out here. XXX is the property name. locals know how to find me if u ever need to....

we have just formed a local group. There are about 100 people registered so far. all like minded. trying to be proactive to the strange future that seems just around the corner... so we aim to have our food system in place, alternative medical system, alternative exchange system etc so we can function, and even thrive independently of the imposed maddness.

So if u ever need to, or even feel like a holiday- you are so welcome.

I love how likeminded people are coming together and starting to plan for a future that many of us think is possible, maybe probable.

Well, I know where we are going if the shit every truly hits the fan.

I also received this email recently from a West Australian mother.

Subject: How the label Mass Psychosis/ Hypnosis stops us getting to the middle

Hi

Labels are great for psychologists and psychiatrists who are trying to make sense of what they see in terms of patterns of human behaviour, but who wants to accept a label applies to them. It's like a call to rebel, it doesn't open our mind. We all like to feel unique and be treated as individuals. I feel a great mistake has been made in labelling. Like it was a retaliation for the label "anti vaxxer". 

Just like we might feel the anti vaxxer label is an insult to our intelligence, and it's easy to think someone using it is a waste of our breathe, even a waste of space, so too can the situation be reversed. Imagine being told you are so stupid and weak you were hypnotized without even needing a hypnotist to be in the same room. It's going to make you very angry and ready to retaliate, even physically. To show you are strong! Labels stoke the fire. 

Skip to reality, away from the drama created by labels, and this whole situation is about trust. A common ground topic anyone can talk about. Start with the "I" and keep away from the "You" as for any conflict resolution. For example -

I didn't trust the TGA recommendations because I have known for over a decade that we use food additives that are banned in the UK and US. I know roundup has been banned in the UK for a couple of decades, but we still use it as the TGA has still presumed it to be "safe". When the vaccines came into the country I visited their website and found they were taking their safety data directly from the pharma companies and that they are funded by the pharma companies. I thought they were funded by govt, by the taxpayer. When I discovered they weren't I saw the conflict of interest and felt anything they said could not be trusted.

Why do you trust an organisation like the TGA who is funded by the pharmaceutical industry? Especially given we now know it doesn't stop transmission, and you will still catch it. That's not what they said would happen. You took it for good reasons, but do you still think you can trust them?

The last sentence especially is important. It is telling them they were thinking logically when they took it, their motivation was good, you are not judging them. And the but invites them to think, to recognise they can change direction. If they start to think, you could add that it seems like an illness now that most people get over regardless of their vaccine status, and we still don't know the medium and long term effects but we do have SADS. Then leave them to quietly think. 

If you like I will send you a copy of the email I sent at the beginning of the year to the physiotherapists who would not see my daughter and I, due to our vaccine status. Despite the previous two years of treatment and a diagnosis that had not improved and the need to check for deterioration. It has the screen shot of the TGA webpage showing they took their safety data from the companies, and another showing they are funded by them. Amongst some other things. Didn't get us anywhere because the physiotherapists were located out of a hospital building also, but a friend said it was a bloody well written letter and used it herself.

To which I replied that I definitely wanted to see the letter. Among other reasons, I want to capture what I can of these citizen battles and communications for the public record.

She replied.

I have attached the word document with the letter, which I sent in email form to the physios in February 2022. I also copied in our family doctor, and the other treating physicians for my girls. As well I sent a similar version to those who treat a brother of mine, who struggles with mental health issues. He is well read, with no intention of getting the jab. While fully awake at the time I figured I could at least make these "professionals" feel a little uncomfortable with the info by writing in this non aggressive style.

I share this sentiment. It’s one of the reasons I wrote my letter to the head of a martial arts franchise that was about to start discriminating against me, my son and the other unvaccinated.

At the very least, I want these letters and emails to tax the otherwise oblivious and unthinking mind of the reader. They might not change what they do, but I want them sleeping a bit less comfortably at night in the knowledge that they might be part of an injurious and fascist enterprise.

Now we have a document proving it's gene therapy, as you probably already know  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36054264/ (You'll see how this is relevant when you read the letter)

My husband swallowed the narrative whole though he must have some idea by now as when he got COVID none of us did. And I have told him about the study linked above. I put the two girls and myself in the Control Group back in Sept 2021 as an added safeguard, to give my stance some more legitimacy. I was so scared for a time he might act rashly and take them off to get jabbed. A girlfriend in the group has told me that vaccinated people hearing that she was in the control group treated her with respect, rather than as a selfish anti vaxxer. They thought she was being courageous and self sacrificing.

Re trust, everyone understands that some people are less trusting and more cynical. They often then feel that the fact that they are more trusting is a positive trait. We need to allow them to have that view, to say it's okay they were trusting. Agree that they "should" have been able to trust unlike us cynical bastards, lol, and lead them to recognize they were betrayed. Then they can direct their anger appropriately at the fraudsters at the TGA (or perhaps the pharma companies), instead of at us. Better to point them predominantly in one direction at the beginning, rather than make it overly complex. 

When I got this, I honestly thought that they had made up the control group idea, and I thought it was genius...I replied.

I love the “They thought she was being courageous and self sacrificing” 🤣

When you told people you were in the control group (which is genius) how did you frame it…did you say that you had formally signed up with the health department…I’m curious on exactly what you told people…I love the chutzpah of it and annoyed I didn’t think of it myself!

Well, it turns out it was for real! She replied.

Are you aware there is a control group? We enter medical data once a month.

https://www.vaxcontrolgroup.com/

A medical study has been put out already on the groups health outcomes and you get an ID with a bar code etc you can have on your phone. That's what my girlfriend showed instead of a Vax pass out whatever the hell they used. I haven't needed to use it as we didn't go anywhere that required it when the lock outs occurred. We tend to be nature bunnies which is free and usually unrestricted 🤨.  Though independently set up, it's affiliated with groups such as the World Council for Health. And AMN I think among others. 

I figured my girls and I being in the control group would help me "persuade" my husband to leave the children alone. At least yesterday he said that he agreed the girls didn't need the vaccine. Then he proceeded to call me an anti-vaxxer. 😆 The only one vaccinated and the only one of us to get COVID so far is him. I calmly informed him about previous vaccinations, and told him I don't make judgements on him because I don't believe in the mass psychosis and he has no right to make judgements on me. It's taken a long time to get it all sorted in my head to be able to deal completely calmly with him. That recent study showing its gene therapy is the clincher for feeling secure in discussing the topic so close to home. He didn't want to see the study though, and without looking at it was declaring it's probably pre print and not on a reputable site. But it is Pubmed NIH. It's "official". MSM have so much to answer for. 😡 Have not talked about the topic lately til yesterday as it's a hot button issue, obviously, but that study meant I could clearly say it was the right thing to do to leave the girls alone.

What a nightmare. 

It would have been a good strategy! Lol. A fake ID and who would have known except the jab Nazi's who would doubt no matter what.

To which I replied:

No, I had no idea someone had done that, I thought you were making it up 😊 as a strategy.

It’s still genius! And if it helped in any way to shut people up at vax pass places, then all the better. Thanks for letting me know.

Obviously, it has no official standing, but if you flash that ID card, nobody would know there wasn’t a control group, and I can see it working in most situations. Genius!

Here is the email to the physiotherapist. If a non-doctor mother can put all of this together, why can’t our doctors? I think most of us know the answer by now…

---

Owing to the experimental nature of the mRNA vaccines and the lack of long term safety data, I was one of those who decided they would prefer not to engage in the “clinical trial” the Health Minister Greg Hunt embarked Australia upon in good faith at the beginning of 2021. “We’re engaged in the world's largest ever vaccination rollout and, at the same time, effectively, clinical trial. We will learn more”.[i] Unfortunately it appears the government is not “learning more” despite new information from the publicly available and highly reputable sources detailed below. That I am now to be discriminated against for taking a more cautious approach in protecting my health is upsetting.

Effectiveness

Sadly the Federal and McGowan governments do not appear to have seen the following information published by Public Health Scotland on the 19th January 2022 which clearly shows the vaccine is not effective. The table on Page 38 of the report, reproduced below, is available at the following location https://publichealthscotland.scot/MEDIA/11223/22-01-19-COVID19-WINTER_PUBLICATION_REPORT.PDF

As you can easily see the case rates are Age-standardised per 100,000 with a 95% confidence interval. Figures show that the unvaccinated are at less risk of catching COVID, and therefore cannot pose a greater risk to the community. However this is the premise upon which discrimination is occurring as required by the State Government. Given this data and the fact that dozens of cruise ships with fully vaccinated passengers and crew have had outbreaks of COVID, medical discrimination based on supposed reduced transmission rates would also appear to be completely unjustified.

Safety

On the 19th of January this year the British Medical Journal published the editorial Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now.[ii] Within the document they provided a link to the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency website https://phmpt.org/

This non-profit organisation “submitted a Freedom of Information Act Request to the FDA for all of the data within Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine biological product file.”[iii] They had to sue the FDA for not releasing the data and a court upheld their request. Information released to date is available via selection of the button titled PFIZER’S DOCUMENTS on their website. The pdf document 5.3.6 postmarketing experience, available from November 17, 2021 at this website is downloadable. A copy of Table 1 shown below, illustrates that from the receipt of the emergency use authorisation on 1st December 2020, cumulatively through to just the 28th February 2021, a report detailing 1223 deaths due to vaccination was compiled.

I have attached a copy of the document highlighting the information I personally felt was most pertinent. That being the tables detailing the differing severe adverse reaction types with fatalities, and the oft repeated conclusion “This cumulative case review does not raise new safety issues. Surveillance will continue”. I also highlighted the entire 9 page APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST, because which adverse events are more serious, such as “Death neonatal” and “Stillbirth”, will depend on an individual’s current life choices.

The government ought to be aware of this information given their proclaimed “learning” mindset. However as the public knows, government departments have traditionally been slow to build momentum and then may find it difficult to pivot direction once they are on a course. This is a known weakness of governing bodies. This weakness should not mean my children and I have to relinquish our freedoms, or forego our bodily integrity and risk serious harm and or death, or be prevented from receiving our usual medical care. I believe it would be an understatement based on this post marketing report alone, to say that the choice to vaccinate must be a personal one between doctors and their patients, as tradition dictates, based on individual risk factors. Especially given what we put into our bodies cannot be taken out.

IS THIS DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SCIENCE?

I understand receipt of this information is as likely to be as distressing for you, as it was for me to find it. It fills me with great sadness which makes writing this letter to share the information very difficult. But I believe that as an adult I must not let my actions be dictated by my emotions. By sadness and especially not by fear, when I have parental responsibilities to meet. I have provided the links for the above information, so you can seek and view the data for yourselves, as I would want to in your position.

I personally surmise that misplaced trust by the public in government health authorities and regulators as well as the TGA has led to this situation. I confess my initial scepticism about taking COVID vaccinations without knowledge of long term effects, arose when I discovered on August 31st 2021 (screenshot below), that the TGA issued provisional approval and then declared “Further data on safety, quality and effectiveness will continue to be provided to the TGA by Pfizer (Comirnaty).” This seemed to me to create a possible bias in the safety advice the TGA might give to government. But at the time I was in the fortunate position of not being impacted by any mandates so I looked no further. However recently I pondered how the TGA was funded, believing previously it was government funded and therefore had the public’s interest at heart. As per the second screenshot I discovered it does in fact receive funding from pharmaceutical manufacturers, creating an untenable conflict of interest in my mind. Further there was a submission to The Senate Select Committee on Health in 2014, attached, which detailed safety concerns on the quality of information the TGA provides. “When licensing drugs for marketing the TGA relies on research funded and controlled by pharmaceutical companies. Too often pharmaceutical companies ‘cherry pick’ favourable evidence, and hide or ‘spin’ unfavourable evidence to support their commercial interests. Sometimes, as was the case for Vioxx and Pradaxa, patients pay with their lives.”[iv] The BMJ published an article to this effect on 2 November 2021 titled Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial.[v]

More chillingly at least for me, was my discovery just prior to Christmas that what I thought was “anti-vax” propaganda was in reality fact. At the Opening Ceremony of the World Health Summit 2021[vi] Stefan Oelrich, a member of the Board of Management of Bayer AG and head of the Pharmaceuticals Division, stated in his speech that the mRNA vaccines are indeed cell and gene therapy. He goes on to say that if they had called the mRNA vaccines cell or gene therapies the majority of the public would have refused them. You can view this for yourself using the you tube link in footnote 6 at approx. 1hr 37 min 40 sec. Fact checkers have comprehensively disputed this fact as false and to this day articles are still appearing saying “anti-vax” people are incorrect in that assertion. And further again to my dismay, Facebook asserted on the 29/11/2021 in its defence against a claim of defamation by John Stossel, in a legal filing to a court of law,  that fact check “labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”[vii] Opinion.

With this information to hand it would be irresponsible for me to have an injection as it could impact my ability to parent or end it permanently. The data shows that this “cell and gene therapy” is neither safe nor effective, so it would in fact be immoral for me to take it and risk leaving my children without a mother or with a severely disabled parent. I cannot take a “vaccine” that is purported to protect against severe disease, hospitalisation and death, but that has and may directly cause severe disease, hospitalisation and death. Especially given the WA government has successfully led us to the point where the risk from infection now is from the Omicron variant, an infection so mild for the vast majority that countries such as the UK, Denmark and Sweden are ending restrictions and saying the coronavirus is now endemic. Yet that is the policy you are saying I must concede to in order to enter a building so my children can receive treatment for their medical condition. Discrimination based on flawed or out of date information is still discrimination.

Finally, I do not believe I or anyone else has suffered from Mass Formation Psychosis. I believe it is an unhelpful label that incidentally carries judgement of others within it. Labels create distance between people where they should simply be respectful and openly share the latest medical information without censorship by anybody with conflicting interests. The emotion of fear, ignorance of how institutions such as the TGA are funded and operate, along with misplaced trust in government officials, would be my rationale for how it came to be that I am having to write this letter. What I would like to know now is what are you going to do, so that my otherwise healthy children can continue receiving full medical treatment, instead of being discriminated against? Please call me to discuss how we will proceed once you have done your own due diligence in confirming the information I have supplied is genuine. Thank you.

---

---

Thank you for reading this Substack.

Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to a good cause.

I am always looking for good, personal GMC (pandemic and jab) or childhood vaccination stories. Shared stories are remembered and help others.

In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.

You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com

If you are Covid-jab injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment

Here are three eBooks I have produced so far:

FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein

FREE eBook: The Climate™

FREE eBook: What is a woman? - “We don’t know yet.”

---

[i] https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/doorstop-interview-about-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout-on-22-february-2021

[ii] https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o102

[iii]

https://phmpt.org/

[iv] https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?hearingid=2531&submissions=true

[v] https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

[vi]

[vii] https://climaterealism.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Facebook-admits-its-fact-check-is-opinion-page-2.pdf