This makes perfect sense. But, "blamed it on the Jews"?? Show me the divide between England and the Jews because there is none that I can see. The monarchy under Henry 8th broke with the Vatican when Pope Clement denied the king a divorce. Mary Queen of Scots was beheaded as she was a Catholic. Jews capture England after Waterloo to forever control finance. There is nothing Jews hate more than Catholics. If England pulled off the Bolsheviks, who financed the Revolution? I rest my case.
I can see clearly that England has been pulling the strings for centuries. But, like you, I also see clearly the practices of the Jews that have been unrelenting since murdering Christ. IMO, there is absolutely no separation between the Brits and the Jews. To say England orchestrated the Bolshevik Revolution (90% Jew actors) and then blamed it on the Jews is no different than saying the white man created slavery using Jewish ships, but the Jews had nothing to do with it. They are both sides of the same coin.
A good case could be made that various Jewish and possibly crypto-Jewish secretive banking dynasties effectively control the Anglosphere from the shadows.
A nice introduction to re-discovering our roots. Or: why we cannot have the essentials of living conditions which we should have been provided and free of charge. Like housing, basic food, hygiene and health care. Without these, we are useless for the rulers - so granting these is in the best interest of the ruling groups.
Once you see through the games illustrated in this article (and book), you can find similar battles fought in your backyard, against you. Paradoxically, this is true even if you are part of the ruling groups. See through this “against our own” layer is priceless. It will explain all battles fought within, waged by our own against our own, from a company structure to residential settlement issues and to the fake education cycle.
These “fake insurrections” form a governing tactic that is at least one level higher (or deeper, depending on your vantage point) than “divide and rule”. Prepared well enough, translated into the personal life realm, executed with splendid timing and supported by cute marketing, it can produce lifelong unaware drones who will fight their own no matter what. On a personal / family level, it is always a battle lost. And we all know it from experience.
Self-sabotage (or the destruction of self-worth) is a variant of this tactic, taught to us since early childhood. The resulting mass personal destruction turned out to be so devastating that the ruling groups had to allow countermeasures and to prevent the collapse of established social structures. This is where the governed public learned about assertiveness, motivation, personal goals, empowerment, rags to riches (or billionaire who started it all in a garage), multi-level marketing (or wealth building for anyone who is not wired to achieve it), Cinderella scenarios and similar concepts. That’s another fascinating story.
You judge a Government on how they treat their citizens. The British have a terrible reputation on how they treated their poor. Just think of those who for mostly minor demeanor were condemned for 14 years, transported in chains to Australia, and punished with flogging, the most favorite British punishment. Read "The Fatal Shore" by Robert Hughes.
By the way, this organization of social structures we now have is the best one possible. However much you like it or not, nothing better has ever been designed and practically implemented.
Any country is a huge organism of complexity beyond our comprehension. Plus, dozens of countries are in constant mutual and multi-party relations. And it all works pretty efficient. Are there any drawbacks? Sure, there must be, like with any organization. Is it possible to hijack the system for wrong purposes? Sure, you can do it with any system. Due to wrong intentions (hostility) or insufficient knowledge (arrogance or greed). Are there areas to improve? Obviously, like with any living system.
Which is why we have elections in which we give up our private ambitions and delegate them to a handful of people who are ready to take this responsibility for us. And this is all as it should be.
It’s all wrong because we don’t understand the basics. Here they are:
The country is not the nation and is not the state. These are three different entities. You and I, as part of the nation, do not belong to the state. There is no place for us in the state. The state is the exclusive organisational structure with the purpose of running the country and managing the nation. Officials who perform “public” functions (ministers, presidents, post office or bank employees, etc.) are part of the state. You are not. This is defined by law.
Consequently, we (the nation) do not have and can not have any say in matters related to the structure or functioning of the state. Zero. The state is separate from the nation and law does not regulate any hierarchy there. For this reason, the state officials have legal immunity and members of the nation (citizens) have zero protection from any actions (legal name: transactions) effected by the state and its representatives (e.g. tax office employees, police officers, enforcement officers, etc.).
For the same reason, the so called elections, of any level, are completely irrelevant to how the state organises itself and what is does. This is why you are led to believe for a very long time that you support a certain “candidate”, and when the time is ripe, the state removes the candidate and replaces him/her with another candidate of their choice. And nobody is objecting to this - which by legal standards is “misleading” the public. It also means changing the terms and conditions of the election process while it is running - a phenomenon which is illegal in any business in any place of the world. You don’t change the rules of the game while players are out there in the field. Unless... you are the state - then, you decide what is ok and what is not, and the participants in the game have no means of objection or complaint.
In short, the nation is always subordinate to the state - which used to be called slavery. You, as a member of the nation, can not decide about your own fate, lifestyle, financial decisions or freedom of travel. The state make these decisions for you, they can grant you some “privileges” (like a permit to travel abroad, aka pass-port), and they can allow you to perform some activities (like driving a vehicle - by means of issuing a driving “licence”). These decisions cover all aspects of your life, from birth to death. Nothing is left for you to decide.
Even when we finally come to understanding this, we refuse to accept it. Strange, because this is how this life is organised and structured. There is no other way, and there will never be any alternative - because the state governs literally everything. We have zero choice. We can only accept what is and learn to live within this framework.
This makes perfect sense. But, "blamed it on the Jews"?? Show me the divide between England and the Jews because there is none that I can see. The monarchy under Henry 8th broke with the Vatican when Pope Clement denied the king a divorce. Mary Queen of Scots was beheaded as she was a Catholic. Jews capture England after Waterloo to forever control finance. There is nothing Jews hate more than Catholics. If England pulled off the Bolsheviks, who financed the Revolution? I rest my case.
There doesn't seem to be an end to this rabbi hole. Oops, rabbit hole!
Lol.
Maybe there is another story that makes far more sense than this coverup?
https://open.substack.com/pub/craignelsen/p/improving-genocide
I can see clearly that England has been pulling the strings for centuries. But, like you, I also see clearly the practices of the Jews that have been unrelenting since murdering Christ. IMO, there is absolutely no separation between the Brits and the Jews. To say England orchestrated the Bolshevik Revolution (90% Jew actors) and then blamed it on the Jews is no different than saying the white man created slavery using Jewish ships, but the Jews had nothing to do with it. They are both sides of the same coin.
White man did not create slavery.
There is no difference between the Crown Corporation and predecessor entities like the British East India Co. and the Jews.
Yes, thank you, I know. Dean Henderson's book on Big Oil, goes into some detail on BRI Co.
Interesting. Thanks!
Interesting...but the ridiculous title of the book is revealing as to it's lack of true substance, or it's undisclosed motivation.
Richard Poe has a website (richardpoe.com)
Here's a quote from it...'My ancestors were Russian Jews, Mexican conversos, indigenous Mexicans, and Koreans. I am them, and they are me.'
What a surprise!
lol. Utter nonsense. Next catalog the statements of Jews saying Communism is Jewish.
Kibbutzes are communitarian:).
a lot of rubbish. rewriting history is unbecoming.
"We know they are lying. They know they are lying. But they are still lying"
Quite:).
https://www.nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1143117.noor-bin-ladin-hartes-los.html
Bin Ladin thinks Trump will save us. Nice try.
thx 🌹🌻🌸💐💚💛💜❤️🌼😍🥰
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=king+richard+grave+found+in+england&atb=v223-1&ia=web the last real english/ british king , after him all were 4by 2s... withought linage according to some sources... good God save us from evil
A good case could be made that various Jewish and possibly crypto-Jewish secretive banking dynasties effectively control the Anglosphere from the shadows.
Call me a conspiracy realist:).
Karl Marx was a better expert on beards than economics:).
Whew!
A nice introduction to re-discovering our roots. Or: why we cannot have the essentials of living conditions which we should have been provided and free of charge. Like housing, basic food, hygiene and health care. Without these, we are useless for the rulers - so granting these is in the best interest of the ruling groups.
Once you see through the games illustrated in this article (and book), you can find similar battles fought in your backyard, against you. Paradoxically, this is true even if you are part of the ruling groups. See through this “against our own” layer is priceless. It will explain all battles fought within, waged by our own against our own, from a company structure to residential settlement issues and to the fake education cycle.
These “fake insurrections” form a governing tactic that is at least one level higher (or deeper, depending on your vantage point) than “divide and rule”. Prepared well enough, translated into the personal life realm, executed with splendid timing and supported by cute marketing, it can produce lifelong unaware drones who will fight their own no matter what. On a personal / family level, it is always a battle lost. And we all know it from experience.
Self-sabotage (or the destruction of self-worth) is a variant of this tactic, taught to us since early childhood. The resulting mass personal destruction turned out to be so devastating that the ruling groups had to allow countermeasures and to prevent the collapse of established social structures. This is where the governed public learned about assertiveness, motivation, personal goals, empowerment, rags to riches (or billionaire who started it all in a garage), multi-level marketing (or wealth building for anyone who is not wired to achieve it), Cinderella scenarios and similar concepts. That’s another fascinating story.
You judge a Government on how they treat their citizens. The British have a terrible reputation on how they treated their poor. Just think of those who for mostly minor demeanor were condemned for 14 years, transported in chains to Australia, and punished with flogging, the most favorite British punishment. Read "The Fatal Shore" by Robert Hughes.
By the way, this organization of social structures we now have is the best one possible. However much you like it or not, nothing better has ever been designed and practically implemented.
Any country is a huge organism of complexity beyond our comprehension. Plus, dozens of countries are in constant mutual and multi-party relations. And it all works pretty efficient. Are there any drawbacks? Sure, there must be, like with any organization. Is it possible to hijack the system for wrong purposes? Sure, you can do it with any system. Due to wrong intentions (hostility) or insufficient knowledge (arrogance or greed). Are there areas to improve? Obviously, like with any living system.
Which is why we have elections in which we give up our private ambitions and delegate them to a handful of people who are ready to take this responsibility for us. And this is all as it should be.
It’s all wrong because we don’t understand the basics. Here they are:
The country is not the nation and is not the state. These are three different entities. You and I, as part of the nation, do not belong to the state. There is no place for us in the state. The state is the exclusive organisational structure with the purpose of running the country and managing the nation. Officials who perform “public” functions (ministers, presidents, post office or bank employees, etc.) are part of the state. You are not. This is defined by law.
Consequently, we (the nation) do not have and can not have any say in matters related to the structure or functioning of the state. Zero. The state is separate from the nation and law does not regulate any hierarchy there. For this reason, the state officials have legal immunity and members of the nation (citizens) have zero protection from any actions (legal name: transactions) effected by the state and its representatives (e.g. tax office employees, police officers, enforcement officers, etc.).
For the same reason, the so called elections, of any level, are completely irrelevant to how the state organises itself and what is does. This is why you are led to believe for a very long time that you support a certain “candidate”, and when the time is ripe, the state removes the candidate and replaces him/her with another candidate of their choice. And nobody is objecting to this - which by legal standards is “misleading” the public. It also means changing the terms and conditions of the election process while it is running - a phenomenon which is illegal in any business in any place of the world. You don’t change the rules of the game while players are out there in the field. Unless... you are the state - then, you decide what is ok and what is not, and the participants in the game have no means of objection or complaint.
In short, the nation is always subordinate to the state - which used to be called slavery. You, as a member of the nation, can not decide about your own fate, lifestyle, financial decisions or freedom of travel. The state make these decisions for you, they can grant you some “privileges” (like a permit to travel abroad, aka pass-port), and they can allow you to perform some activities (like driving a vehicle - by means of issuing a driving “licence”). These decisions cover all aspects of your life, from birth to death. Nothing is left for you to decide.
Even when we finally come to understanding this, we refuse to accept it. Strange, because this is how this life is organised and structured. There is no other way, and there will never be any alternative - because the state governs literally everything. We have zero choice. We can only accept what is and learn to live within this framework.
Have to tell you, the Byzantine arm of the Roman empire centred in Constantinople also used colour revolutions for internal machinations. There were two colour factions and I do recall they were blue and green. https://mikedashhistory.com/2012/03/02/blues-versus-greens-how-circus-factions-nearly-brought-down-the-byzantine-empire/