12 Comments
User's avatar
Jill Long's avatar

I found this article fascinating, informative and interesting! Back in the 70’s and 80’s when I was having my children, the doctor was a bit surprised when I told him that I was going to breastfeed my baby. Seemed it was the beginning of a new phase where other women decided the same thing! I found it very satisfying and continued to breastfeed all of my babies, of which I had 5 sons who grew up to be healthy robust young men! Nary a drop of commercially produced unhealthy infant formula made its way into my boys! And I say that with pride!

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Midwest doc did it again. All mothers to be should read this article as well as the medical professionals that are supposed to be guiding them to deliver healthy babies . It is not happening and now we have the complication of the MRNA injections, which are not safe . My wife could not breast-feed because the milk gene could not be turned on! I did not know the cause until all my children were adults. If the mother to be does not have sufficient vitamin D in vivo the milk gene cannot be activated. To this day, our medical professionals do not demand that every mother to be should be tested for vitamin D deficiency. The goal should be a blood value over 50 ng’s. NIH to this day believes and states that 20 NG’s is sufficient. Totally erroneous based on manipulated and false assumptions. Vitamin D is not a vitamin but a hormone that regulates about 3000 gene expressions I hope Robert F Kennedy Junior will make the effort to fix this very basic problem which drives the autism problem and all the other infant problems that we have.

Jill Long's avatar

Absolutely! Vitamin D is extremely important for so many functions in our bodies. I like to take a good Cod Liver oil, besides being a great natural way to get that hormone, aka vitamin D, we are also getting Vitamin A, and the Omega 3’s fatty acids EPA and DHA, which are also extremely important! Good stuff!!!

Jill Long's avatar

I nursed each of my boys well beyond a year!

mani malagón's avatar

What ails us? —Lack of attachment.

● ⅓ of us are cut out of our mother's womb

● ⅔ of us are abruptly disconnected from our mother's placenta

● only ⅓ of us are suckled a full year

● our immune systems are almost immediately insulted with injections

● we're sat in front of a hypnotizing baby-sitting machine to chew on kibble

● ad nauseum, — until every natural tendency is disrupted or suppressed

https://substack.com/profile/28883515-mani-malagon/note/c-108960733

Robert Townshend's avatar

Then there's movies and the sophistication message, becoming a saturation from the 1930s on. A tit with a slurping infant was indecent while a woman without a cigarette was a prude or hick.

Nothing must get in the way of Philip Morris or progress generally. Especially tits, clearly one of God's errors, like foreskins and tonsils.

Dogpoo101's avatar

I agree with you 💯 breast is most definitely best for baby. I breast fed both mine till just after 1 y/o until their teeth and a painful bite took me out of it!🤣 I remember when doing my nurse training accompanying the health visitor and she told me she was not supporting nestle as they gave out free baby milk tins to the poor African mothers and then it made their breast milk dry up so making them dependent on having to buy their baby milk …not a good ethical way to do business eh.

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

EXCELLENT. As you point out there are reasons a woman can't Breast Feed, they have issues producing, gave baby up for adoption, any number of reasons. New organic formulas are coming on the market thankfully. But doctors don't recommend them, they are tied into the 'standard formula industry'. BEST ORGANICS. https://www.google.com/search?sa=X&sca_esv=d833d18f7e9af2bc&rlz=1C1GCEA_enUS1123US1123&udm=2&sxsrf=AHTn8zpvg6rfLHPI_y_J5b6beAQrCwK_aw:1744724167614&q=best+organic+baby+formula&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAFvEKpmUWlyikF-UnpiXmayQlJhUqZCWX5RbmpMIAA-lSp8cAAAA&source=univ&ved=2ahUKEwiSn_eBlNqMAxXdIUQIHbfbALoQrNwCegUIiAEQAA&biw=1396&bih=632&dpr=1.38

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

POLICE STATE: Loudoun County Child Protective Services Took a 1-Month-Old Breastfeeding Baby from Her Mother and Navy Veteran Father at Gunpoint

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/police-state-loudoun-county-child-protective-services-took/

They’re not protecting anyone. They’re destroying a peaceful family. They’re endangering children. They’ve removed a fragile newborn from the safest place she could be—her mother’s arms—and handed her over to a system where children do die in state care.

This isn’t justice. This is government-sponsored child abuse. This is psychological warfare. This is terror.

QR https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/488912622_10163044465788383_5860042682816380790_n.jpg

Dogpoo101's avatar

I agree with you 💯 breast is most definitely best for baby. I breast fed both mine till just after 1 y/o until their teeth and a painful bite took me out of it!🤣 I remember when doing my nurse training accompanying the health visitor and she told me she was not supporting nestle as they gave out free baby milk tins to the poor African mothers and then it made their breast milk dry up so making them dependent on having to buy their baby milk …not a good ethical way to do business eh.

guest1.6's avatar

Granted, the government-medical-corporate birthing complex is guilty as charged, but shouldn't the mothers also bear some responsibility? Propaganda by itself cannot destroy a mothering instinct--there must be a longstanding cultural and familial push in negating breastfeeding and ultimately its nefarious identification by the mother.

How can a woman who just birthed--after 9 months of unity in the womb--not have the instinct to breastfeed her child? It is inconceivable to abandon the pleasurable and life-sustaining contact "outside" the body, it is still her child! There is an unrelenting drive to give herself fully and fuse again via the breast and mouth. This sounds sexual because ultimately it is if we accept Freud's wide ranging definition of "pleasure" which occurs in the erogenous zones; both require surrender and love for their complete fulfillment.

If prohibited from nursing, a female mammal would feel distraught with a sense of danger and furiously fight to reach her offspring again. Can we imagine what the infant feels under these circumstances--think of a loss of a love object but enormously more painful. We know the newborn has a "suckling reflex" and searches for the breast immediately. When it is not found it wails inconsolably until--as usual--a pacifier is pushed into his mouth.

Healthy, natural nutrition is very significant, but there is a lot more than the "milk" itself, the infant needs the bonding to literally continue in life. While bottle-fed infants (or for that matter, any type of parenting that voids necessary bodily touch) might survive and "grow up", they will forever lack the sense of security from being loved and intimately nourished. Any woman who is aware of her deeper feelings will automatically understand this.

Brenda Mitchell's avatar

What about women who have had the Covid Vaccine? I've read there are reports of babies dying or becoming very ill due to the toxic ingredients from the vaccine coming through into the mother's milk. My daughter had two of these vaccines about three/four years ago and is breastfeeding my 5 month old grandson and he seems fine. What is the doctor's recommendation regarding this issue?