I'm not down with the promotion of statins for anything.
It's a toxic drug that messes with the liver. That's how it reduces cholesterol by blocking the atp to cholesterol pathway.
Metformin is another iffy subject. Take enough of that and you'll screw up your body's insulin response.
Ask yourself why people use it to lose weight... It causes diarrhea which means the body isn't able to digest the food.
I don't understand why would someone use these medicines when there's much safer and more effective things like fenbenzadole and ivermectin.
Funny that she promotes terrain doctors but has a non terrain view of cancer as the thing to be attacked. This war like view of cancer is total bullshit and not terrain theory.
TERRAIN WOULD SAY FIX THE BODY SO THE CONDITIONS ARE NOT RIPE FOR THE NEED OF CANCER.
When metabolism is slow, debris and toxins build up in the body because elimination pathways are slow. Cancer is the way the body holds onto these things without harming the body.
Again, I think she's half assed in her ideas and approaches but then most MDs are.
I would be very careful with fenbenzodale and ivermectin, or any “alternative” to Pharma. It’s reeks of a false binary. Best to do occasional keto, regular fasting, ensure good nutrition through clean food, avoid toxins as best as possible, exercise wisely, and sleep deeply and consistently. Then and only then, concentrated chemical interventions.
Brilliant.. so glad to see this information being exposed more and more. As someone who used the alternative approach, including the repurposed drug (Fenbendazole) in my husbands’s stage 4 melanoma with Mets, I can vouch for the success of this protocol. I just wish loved ones, already needlessly lost to cancer had known. Cancer is a metabolic dis-ease and is curable!
Hello Unbekoming, and thank you again for your remarkable and tireless work.
What are your thoughts on Dr. Xuewu Liu's work on intratumoral injections of 20,000 ppm ClO₂ and the clinical trial he has just launched with a 95% target for complete remission? Thank you.
THANK YOU-This book review is extremely useful as an addition ( or alternative if the patient has already had conventional treatment or chooses not to )
> King acknowledges barriers, financial, institutional, cultural..
Quoting the obvious from a recent other substack I'm currently following with a view forward:
"... turning them into centralized systems of control. A private corporation, the Federation of State Medical Boards, quietly influenced licensing and discipline, pressuring regulators to punish doctors who questioned official narratives. We trace this back to the early 1900s when powerful foundations reshaped medicine through the Flexner Report, eliminating natural healing schools and replacing them with a pharmaceutical model tied to financial and political power. Today, regulators and governments serve global agendas rather than the public, rewarding obedience and punishing integrity. The path forward is decentralization: rebuilding medicine, governance, and community structures on truth, accountability, and the direct relationship between individuals and those who serve them .."
"Corruption has overwhelmed medicine and government, and only decentralization will restore our sovereignty"
Thank you very much drawing attention to this excellent publication.
In the FAQs # 12 is an extremely important one. "Cancer" is not a death sentence. It may seem like one and is made one due to the helplessness of the traditional oncological approaches with few exceptions. It certainly is a wakeup call that something serious has gone wrong with your health. Dr. Geerd Ryke Hamer of "New German Medicine" fame in the 1980ies went so far as to state that metastases are actually a result of the diagnosis shock rather than anything spreading from a primary tumor for which there is 0 evidence.
We are really living in an age of enlightenment. So many things getting revealed, century old beliefs questioned and reversed. Just as examples the "vaccines safe and effective" lie and the germ theory and virus narratives more and more don't believe in. Same goes for the oncology dogmas, great for big pharma and Rockefeller medicine turnover, but not so great for those subjecting themselves to the often barbaric treatment with a 2% survival rate.
Cancer as a metabolic disease is gaining a lot of traction, and much is written on this, as a simple Perplexity prompt will reveal:
Peer-Reviewed and Academic Articles
------------------------------------------
"Beyond genetics: integrative oncology and the metabolic perspective on cancer treatment" (Frontiers in Oncology, 2024) discusses how cancer may arise from mitochondrial dysfunction and describes integrative metabolic approaches.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics" (Academia.edu, 2013) reports that cancer is fundamentally a metabolic disorder and outlines therapeutic implications based on mitochondrial metabolism.
"Is Cancer a Metabolic Disease?" (PMC, 2013) presents evidence for tumors reprogramming metabolic pathways and describes oncogenes' role in driving these changes.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease" (PMC, 2010) links impaired energy metabolism to cancer hallmarks and supports metabolic-based management strategies.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel ..." (PMC, 2013) by Seyfried elaborates on respiration and fermentation disruptions as primary causes and reviews metabolic-based therapies.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics" (Carcinogenesis, 2014) theorizes that mitochondrial dysfunction is central and discusses metabolic management strategies.
"Cancer as a Metabolic Disorder" (PMC, 2022) reviews metabolic alterations, highlighting the role of glucose, glutamine, and fatty acid metabolism in cancers.
Substack and Independent Posts
------------------------------------
"Cancer as Metabolic Disease" (The Tom Renz Newsletter on Substack, 2024) offers a lay summary of the metabolic disease model and implications for public understanding.
"Tripping over the Truth: How the Metabolic Theory of Cancer Is Overturning One of Medicine's Most Entrenched Paradigms" (Substack, 2025) discusses the paradigm shift toward metabolic approaches to cancer.
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA - Nov 04, 2024
The Evolution And Validation Of The Metabolic Theory Of Cancer
For the past 70 years the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT) guided all research and treatment in cancer. Why are so few aware that it was overturned 15 years ago by the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC)?
THIS ONE NOT IN THE AI LISTING - IE CENSORED - AND PROBABLY THE BEST...
Last but not least the great FLCCC (free) "Cancer Care" PDF by veteran Oncologist Dr. Paul Marik is a must read, though it covers many more repurposed drugs and therefore cannot go into the same detail as Dr. Kings publication
“Viruses” to the point they exist are endogenous only, do not spread, and are likely part of “taking out the garbage.” Block that, cancers will thrive.
I'm not down with the promotion of statins for anything.
It's a toxic drug that messes with the liver. That's how it reduces cholesterol by blocking the atp to cholesterol pathway.
Metformin is another iffy subject. Take enough of that and you'll screw up your body's insulin response.
Ask yourself why people use it to lose weight... It causes diarrhea which means the body isn't able to digest the food.
I don't understand why would someone use these medicines when there's much safer and more effective things like fenbenzadole and ivermectin.
Funny that she promotes terrain doctors but has a non terrain view of cancer as the thing to be attacked. This war like view of cancer is total bullshit and not terrain theory.
TERRAIN WOULD SAY FIX THE BODY SO THE CONDITIONS ARE NOT RIPE FOR THE NEED OF CANCER.
When metabolism is slow, debris and toxins build up in the body because elimination pathways are slow. Cancer is the way the body holds onto these things without harming the body.
Again, I think she's half assed in her ideas and approaches but then most MDs are.
Statins rot the brain with this cholesterol myth.
Statins greatly lessen or even prevent any benefits from exercise, the latter which is the most powerful “drug” on the planet. I will never take them.
I would be very careful with fenbenzodale and ivermectin, or any “alternative” to Pharma. It’s reeks of a false binary. Best to do occasional keto, regular fasting, ensure good nutrition through clean food, avoid toxins as best as possible, exercise wisely, and sleep deeply and consistently. Then and only then, concentrated chemical interventions.
A very insightful comment!
Before you listen to your doctor, just remember; we are the sickest nation on earth
🎯
Brilliant.. so glad to see this information being exposed more and more. As someone who used the alternative approach, including the repurposed drug (Fenbendazole) in my husbands’s stage 4 melanoma with Mets, I can vouch for the success of this protocol. I just wish loved ones, already needlessly lost to cancer had known. Cancer is a metabolic dis-ease and is curable!
No mention of sodium bicarbonate and a balanced ph? and that D3 is just rat poison offers more
Promotion of questionable commercial products. Paging more Statins, my brain is still functioning.
Hello Unbekoming, and thank you again for your remarkable and tireless work.
What are your thoughts on Dr. Xuewu Liu's work on intratumoral injections of 20,000 ppm ClO₂ and the clinical trial he has just launched with a 95% target for complete remission? Thank you.
THANK YOU-This book review is extremely useful as an addition ( or alternative if the patient has already had conventional treatment or chooses not to )
What most people think is science is actually SCIENTISM, it is an obedience cult, let me explain..
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/the-ai-science-fraud-deception-why
This book humanises medicine by refusing to reduce patients to protocols, instead offering them agency.
It reframes oncology as more than “slash‑burn‑poison,” showing that care can be creative and metabolic.
Each drug profile is not a miracle claim but a careful map of risks, cautions, and possibilities.
Supplements are treated with dignity, not as fads, but as precise interventions grounded in lived biochemistry.
The ketogenic diet is presented not as fashion but as discipline, a way of starving cancer’s fuel.
Stories of patients extend the science into tenderness, reminding us that numbers are always human lives.
King acknowledges barriers, financial, institutional, cultural, yet insists that knowledge must be shared, not hoarded.
The book humanises oncology by bridging research with compassion, offering clarity where fear often reigns.
It insists that healing is not only about survival but about dignity in the choices we make.
Ultimately, it is less about miracle cures than about restoring humanity to the fight against cancer.
> King acknowledges barriers, financial, institutional, cultural..
Quoting the obvious from a recent other substack I'm currently following with a view forward:
"... turning them into centralized systems of control. A private corporation, the Federation of State Medical Boards, quietly influenced licensing and discipline, pressuring regulators to punish doctors who questioned official narratives. We trace this back to the early 1900s when powerful foundations reshaped medicine through the Flexner Report, eliminating natural healing schools and replacing them with a pharmaceutical model tied to financial and political power. Today, regulators and governments serve global agendas rather than the public, rewarding obedience and punishing integrity. The path forward is decentralization: rebuilding medicine, governance, and community structures on truth, accountability, and the direct relationship between individuals and those who serve them .."
"Corruption has overwhelmed medicine and government, and only decentralization will restore our sovereignty"
https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/the-need-for-decentralization-in
Thank you very much drawing attention to this excellent publication.
In the FAQs # 12 is an extremely important one. "Cancer" is not a death sentence. It may seem like one and is made one due to the helplessness of the traditional oncological approaches with few exceptions. It certainly is a wakeup call that something serious has gone wrong with your health. Dr. Geerd Ryke Hamer of "New German Medicine" fame in the 1980ies went so far as to state that metastases are actually a result of the diagnosis shock rather than anything spreading from a primary tumor for which there is 0 evidence.
We are really living in an age of enlightenment. So many things getting revealed, century old beliefs questioned and reversed. Just as examples the "vaccines safe and effective" lie and the germ theory and virus narratives more and more don't believe in. Same goes for the oncology dogmas, great for big pharma and Rockefeller medicine turnover, but not so great for those subjecting themselves to the often barbaric treatment with a 2% survival rate.
Cancer as a metabolic disease is gaining a lot of traction, and much is written on this, as a simple Perplexity prompt will reveal:
Peer-Reviewed and Academic Articles
------------------------------------------
"Beyond genetics: integrative oncology and the metabolic perspective on cancer treatment" (Frontiers in Oncology, 2024) discusses how cancer may arise from mitochondrial dysfunction and describes integrative metabolic approaches.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics" (Academia.edu, 2013) reports that cancer is fundamentally a metabolic disorder and outlines therapeutic implications based on mitochondrial metabolism.
"Is Cancer a Metabolic Disease?" (PMC, 2013) presents evidence for tumors reprogramming metabolic pathways and describes oncogenes' role in driving these changes.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease" (PMC, 2010) links impaired energy metabolism to cancer hallmarks and supports metabolic-based management strategies.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel ..." (PMC, 2013) by Seyfried elaborates on respiration and fermentation disruptions as primary causes and reviews metabolic-based therapies.
"Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics" (Carcinogenesis, 2014) theorizes that mitochondrial dysfunction is central and discusses metabolic management strategies.
"Cancer as a Metabolic Disorder" (PMC, 2022) reviews metabolic alterations, highlighting the role of glucose, glutamine, and fatty acid metabolism in cancers.
Substack and Independent Posts
------------------------------------
"Cancer as Metabolic Disease" (The Tom Renz Newsletter on Substack, 2024) offers a lay summary of the metabolic disease model and implications for public understanding.
"Tripping over the Truth: How the Metabolic Theory of Cancer Is Overturning One of Medicine's Most Entrenched Paradigms" (Substack, 2025) discusses the paradigm shift toward metabolic approaches to cancer.
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA - Nov 04, 2024
The Evolution And Validation Of The Metabolic Theory Of Cancer
For the past 70 years the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT) guided all research and treatment in cancer. Why are so few aware that it was overturned 15 years ago by the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC)?
https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/the-evolution-and-validation-of-the
THIS ONE NOT IN THE AI LISTING - IE CENSORED - AND PROBABLY THE BEST...
Last but not least the great FLCCC (free) "Cancer Care" PDF by veteran Oncologist Dr. Paul Marik is a must read, though it covers many more repurposed drugs and therefore cannot go into the same detail as Dr. Kings publication
https://imahealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-FLCCC-Dr-Paul-Marik-v2.pdf
Excellent news.
Glucose does not feed cancer, you need glucose for the brain. Virus plus toxins equal Cancer. (Information from the Medical Medium).
“Viruses” to the point they exist are endogenous only, do not spread, and are likely part of “taking out the garbage.” Block that, cancers will thrive.
What's a virus?
Manmade in a lab. Who knows, a concoction of poison?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aokD2rcs74dRtkWglSaUtuMaI9dKtucK
Xylitol and Anti-Cancer Benefits
I still can't form a sub, it won't turn into Bold Black.
Profits keep flowing.