Being alive now is like finding out there is a serial killer, really a few of them, locked into all our lives via 'scientism'; vaccines, (all pharma drugs remove bodily function, that's how they 'work'), petrochemicals/glyphosate in farming, chemtrails blot out the sun to stop 'global warming'.....I can come to no other conclusion, the gov'ts of the world are seeking to kill and debilitate as many humans as possible. It's such an ugly thing to face each day, but I would rather face it than live in la la land.
Attorney Aaron Siri dragged the vaccine system into federal court and forced the CDC to produce the studies it relied on for one of its most repeated claims — that the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.
What showed up in court was revealing.
The CDC listed twenty studies.
Nineteen had nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life. Most were about the MMR shot, which isn’t even given until around twelve months. The twentieth review acknowledged there was essentially no conclusive evidence either way.
That stipulation was signed by the Department of Justice and entered by a federal judge.
Then there’s the structural issue few people talk about.
Since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, vaccine manufacturers have had liability protection that no other product category enjoys. If a pharmaceutical drug harms you, you can sue the manufacturer. If a vaccine harms you, the case goes to a special federal program with capped damages and limited discovery.
Remove liability and you remove the incentive to generate long-term safety data.
At the same time, the schedule expanded dramatically — from a handful of shots in the 1980s to dozens across childhood today.
The system that emerged is unusual by any standard:
no liability, a guaranteed market, mandated uptake, and government promotion.
Whether one agrees with Siri’s conclusions or not, the legal record he forced into the open raises questions that deserve serious discussion.
And now foreign (China, Germany) pesticide manufacturers are being shielded from liability lawsuits in the USA. From The Children’s Health Defense Team today:
The Farm Bill as written won’t actually help farmers or improve the health of Americans. The bill would:
• Create a liability shield for pesticide manufacturers: Section 10205 preempts state "failure-to-warn" lawsuits if companies follow EPA labels. This protects domestic and foreign producers from accountability in U.S. courts, reducing incentives for safer products.
• Prevent local governments from protecting drinking water and protecting drinking water and schools from pesticide exposure
• Block states from enforcing animal welfare and food safety standards within their own markets.
• Take away states' rights to regulate dangerous toxins: Sections 10205 & 10206 impose national uniformity on labeling and bar local governments from any pesticide rules. This strips states and communities of their right to add stricter warnings or restrictions based on local health risks (e.g., cancer links to glyphosate).
• Delay overdue toxicity reviews: While Section 10211 improves data collection, the package overall reduces pressure on EPA to speed up backlogged safety reviews. Section 10207 overrides other laws, potentially weakening environmental oversight.
• Promotes the use of wireless technology over fiber optic for precision agriculture: Sec. 608 could be read to disallow funding for fiber networks if there is an existing qualifying and funded wireless network. Sec. 6302 promotes precision agriculture. Precision Ag is useful to Big Ag, but relatively hard for small farmers because of complexity and expense. Further, it will lead to more EMR exposure to humans, livestock and other species. Finally, it will require more infrastructure – towers – in rural areas.
Well... It's too late to point out the Autism/vaccine link. The majority of administrative classes are already displaying on the Autism spectrum. They live in an isolated world of their own, and display the empathy of a fence post. I rest my case...
Despite the evidence that vaccines cause harm and having measles actually provides cardiac and cancer protections, parents like them as they allow them both not to have to take time off from work to stay with a child that has measles, chicken pox or mumps(if the shots work, that is). I guess it's easier to deal with a kid with chronic sinus problems than take time off from work to nurse them through the measles.
Yes, I read lots as a child, and in several kids books hete in GB like The Famous Five and various pony books I was into, a measles episode was something featured more than once, same theme, " Hurrah! Two weeks off school! We can have some fun" and pet dog thinking they said eeasles and hunting round the room for them. Interestingly, I recently said I had measles as a child, ss did every other kid I knew, cos I am of that age, it was no big deal, and nobody believed me 😆 as I'm not dead or seriously maimed, total strangers assert they know my medical history better than I do and it was chicken pox, despite me saying no, I remember it was confirmed and anyway I had chicken pox at 36, much to the amusement of the other parents at my kids school.
the accountability gap in vaccine approval is real and underdiscussed. not an anti-vax take — just an observation that incentives shape what gets studied
"A disease that killed roughly 1 in 450,000 people, that typically struck children"
The data does not mean that children were killed by "measles". It means there was an association between those deaths and a measles diagnosis i.e the deaths could have been caused by poisoning with 'aspiirin' or other substances. Not only does such data not represent a cause of death but it also is meaningless since measles might have been called smallpox or the flu or chilckenpox or varous other things to varying degrees in different time periods.
"that increase likely exceed the life-years saved by preventing four hundred measles deaths per year."
Changing the definiton of "measles" to "vaccine preventable" does not mean "life-years saved " or preventing any deaths. It simply means shifting the association from one category to other ones.
Being alive now is like finding out there is a serial killer, really a few of them, locked into all our lives via 'scientism'; vaccines, (all pharma drugs remove bodily function, that's how they 'work'), petrochemicals/glyphosate in farming, chemtrails blot out the sun to stop 'global warming'.....I can come to no other conclusion, the gov'ts of the world are seeking to kill and debilitate as many humans as possible. It's such an ugly thing to face each day, but I would rather face it than live in la la land.
Pure evil never sleeps. Wake up, people, before they murder us all.
This one is worth your time.
Attorney Aaron Siri dragged the vaccine system into federal court and forced the CDC to produce the studies it relied on for one of its most repeated claims — that the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.
What showed up in court was revealing.
The CDC listed twenty studies.
Nineteen had nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life. Most were about the MMR shot, which isn’t even given until around twelve months. The twentieth review acknowledged there was essentially no conclusive evidence either way.
That stipulation was signed by the Department of Justice and entered by a federal judge.
Then there’s the structural issue few people talk about.
Since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, vaccine manufacturers have had liability protection that no other product category enjoys. If a pharmaceutical drug harms you, you can sue the manufacturer. If a vaccine harms you, the case goes to a special federal program with capped damages and limited discovery.
Remove liability and you remove the incentive to generate long-term safety data.
At the same time, the schedule expanded dramatically — from a handful of shots in the 1980s to dozens across childhood today.
The system that emerged is unusual by any standard:
no liability, a guaranteed market, mandated uptake, and government promotion.
Whether one agrees with Siri’s conclusions or not, the legal record he forced into the open raises questions that deserve serious discussion.
The documents exist.
The signatures are on them.
And the court record says exactly what it says.
Worth a read.
— Lone Wolf 🐺
Didn't I just read this in the story?
And now foreign (China, Germany) pesticide manufacturers are being shielded from liability lawsuits in the USA. From The Children’s Health Defense Team today:
The Farm Bill as written won’t actually help farmers or improve the health of Americans. The bill would:
• Create a liability shield for pesticide manufacturers: Section 10205 preempts state "failure-to-warn" lawsuits if companies follow EPA labels. This protects domestic and foreign producers from accountability in U.S. courts, reducing incentives for safer products.
• Prevent local governments from protecting drinking water and protecting drinking water and schools from pesticide exposure
• Block states from enforcing animal welfare and food safety standards within their own markets.
• Take away states' rights to regulate dangerous toxins: Sections 10205 & 10206 impose national uniformity on labeling and bar local governments from any pesticide rules. This strips states and communities of their right to add stricter warnings or restrictions based on local health risks (e.g., cancer links to glyphosate).
• Delay overdue toxicity reviews: While Section 10211 improves data collection, the package overall reduces pressure on EPA to speed up backlogged safety reviews. Section 10207 overrides other laws, potentially weakening environmental oversight.
• Promotes the use of wireless technology over fiber optic for precision agriculture: Sec. 608 could be read to disallow funding for fiber networks if there is an existing qualifying and funded wireless network. Sec. 6302 promotes precision agriculture. Precision Ag is useful to Big Ag, but relatively hard for small farmers because of complexity and expense. Further, it will lead to more EMR exposure to humans, livestock and other species. Finally, it will require more infrastructure – towers – in rural areas.
Please email your U.S. Senators and Representatives today and urge them to remove these sections to preserve state protections, corporate accountability, and timely health safeguards: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/take-action-urge-your-senators-and-congressional-representatives-to-amend-the-farm-bill/#form
It is very welcome news, for which some of us have waited over five years...
https://timothywiney.substack.com/p/definitive-proof-that-america-is
Well... It's too late to point out the Autism/vaccine link. The majority of administrative classes are already displaying on the Autism spectrum. They live in an isolated world of their own, and display the empathy of a fence post. I rest my case...
Despite the evidence that vaccines cause harm and having measles actually provides cardiac and cancer protections, parents like them as they allow them both not to have to take time off from work to stay with a child that has measles, chicken pox or mumps(if the shots work, that is). I guess it's easier to deal with a kid with chronic sinus problems than take time off from work to nurse them through the measles.
Yes, I read lots as a child, and in several kids books hete in GB like The Famous Five and various pony books I was into, a measles episode was something featured more than once, same theme, " Hurrah! Two weeks off school! We can have some fun" and pet dog thinking they said eeasles and hunting round the room for them. Interestingly, I recently said I had measles as a child, ss did every other kid I knew, cos I am of that age, it was no big deal, and nobody believed me 😆 as I'm not dead or seriously maimed, total strangers assert they know my medical history better than I do and it was chicken pox, despite me saying no, I remember it was confirmed and anyway I had chicken pox at 36, much to the amusement of the other parents at my kids school.
the accountability gap in vaccine approval is real and underdiscussed. not an anti-vax take — just an observation that incentives shape what gets studied
Absolutely scandalous.
"A disease that killed roughly 1 in 450,000 people, that typically struck children"
The data does not mean that children were killed by "measles". It means there was an association between those deaths and a measles diagnosis i.e the deaths could have been caused by poisoning with 'aspiirin' or other substances. Not only does such data not represent a cause of death but it also is meaningless since measles might have been called smallpox or the flu or chilckenpox or varous other things to varying degrees in different time periods.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/6088-reyes-syndrome
"that increase likely exceed the life-years saved by preventing four hundred measles deaths per year."
Changing the definiton of "measles" to "vaccine preventable" does not mean "life-years saved " or preventing any deaths. It simply means shifting the association from one category to other ones.
https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/measles-magic