I hope people begin to think about our own beahviour against the rest of the biosphere as a possible reason for why there exists a serious conflict between the needs of humans and the consequences for the rest of the biosphere. The oligarchy is obviously evil in its interaction with the majority of the humans.
.
But why is it so difficult for us to do something about it?
.
I suggest it is because the oligarchy is a useful tool for nature to strike back on the humans.
.
And I like to raise your expectation about there being possible ways for us to deal with that constructively. So nature no longer needs to strike back on us.
.
What will happen if we seriously do something about our abusive action on the rest of nature?
It could be worth following that path.
.
Cleansing the seas from plastic and preventing more pollution to slip into the biosphere. Creating a biosphere closer to its normal condition. As things are today profits for the oligarchy increases and nature deteriorates and our fellow creatures are suffering. When the cleansing and reform of our reality comes about I assume the said profits would decrease. But our own health will increase. How do we approach the expected oligarchic resistance? Is there a way to modify the way the oligarchy operates? Such matters ough to be part of the debate in connection with the topics often mentioned on unbecoming.
"When Ethel Douglas Hume’s Béchamp or Pasteur? appeared in 1923, it seemed to be just the thing that would fill this gap and end the use of serums and other biologicals forever. BUT IT IS NOW 19 YEARS SINCE THAT BOOK, which should have marked an epoch in the healing arts, was published. It did not receive the attention it deserved in medical circles and, though it IS NOW IN ITS SECOND EDITION the medical profession are pushing biologicals harder than ever."
I hope people begin to think about our own beahviour against the rest of the biosphere as a possible reason for why there exists a serious conflict between the needs of humans and the consequences for the rest of the biosphere. The oligarchy is obviously evil in its interaction with the majority of the humans.
.
But why is it so difficult for us to do something about it?
.
I suggest it is because the oligarchy is a useful tool for nature to strike back on the humans.
.
And I like to raise your expectation about there being possible ways for us to deal with that constructively. So nature no longer needs to strike back on us.
.
What will happen if we seriously do something about our abusive action on the rest of nature?
It could be worth following that path.
.
Cleansing the seas from plastic and preventing more pollution to slip into the biosphere. Creating a biosphere closer to its normal condition. As things are today profits for the oligarchy increases and nature deteriorates and our fellow creatures are suffering. When the cleansing and reform of our reality comes about I assume the said profits would decrease. But our own health will increase. How do we approach the expected oligarchic resistance? Is there a way to modify the way the oligarchy operates? Such matters ough to be part of the debate in connection with the topics often mentioned on unbecoming.
Cutting animal protein from your diet and replacing it with sugar seems unwise.
"When Ethel Douglas Hume’s Béchamp or Pasteur? appeared in 1923, it seemed to be just the thing that would fill this gap and end the use of serums and other biologicals forever. BUT IT IS NOW 19 YEARS SINCE THAT BOOK, which should have marked an epoch in the healing arts, was published. It did not receive the attention it deserved in medical circles and, though it IS NOW IN ITS SECOND EDITION the medical profession are pushing biologicals harder than ever."
Strange.