Trial by Jury – The Case of the Missing Corona ‘Virus’
[The camera zooms in on the courtroom packed with reporters, their pens poised. The aspiring viroLIEgist sits nervously at the witness stand, fidgeting with a stack of lab notes. Across from him stands the sharp-dressed attorney, Mr. Rigorous, known for his devastating cross-examinations. Behind him, the jury watches intently]
Judge: [Hammering the gavel] Order in the court! Mr. Rigorous, you may proceed with your cross-examination.
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] Thank you, Your Honor. [He approaches the viroLIEgist.] Dr.
Specimen, you claim to have isolated a novel corona virus, is that correct?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Uh, yes, yes. We have a robust methodology –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Robust, you say? [He winks at the jury.] Let’s start at the
beginning. Did you, at any point, isolate and purify this so-called “virus” directly from the fluids of a sick patient?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, not exactly. You see, direct purification from fluids is unnecessary because –
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in, eyebrows raised] Unnecessary? I see. What you’re telling us is that you skipped the part where you would actually prove there’s a virus in the patient’s mucus?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] We used a well-established protocol. Instead, we combined the
patient’s mucus with a monkey kidney cell culture, starved it, and –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting with mock concern] Oh, so you took a patient’s mucus, mixed it with cells from an entirely different species, starved those cells, poisoned them with toxic chemicals, antibiotics, and, what was it again, fetal bovine serum?
Dr. Specimen: Well, yes, that’s standard –
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] “Standard.” So, after this biological disaster, when the cells inevitably
broke down and died, you claimed that was evidence of a virus?
Dr. Specimen: [Getting defensive] Yes! The cytopathic effect is what –
Mr. Rigorous: [Smirking] Cytopathic effect! Ah, the mysterious code for “we poisoned cells and
watched them die.” Tell me, Dr. Specimen, what proof do you have that the breakdown of these poisoned, malnourished cells was caused by a virus rather than, say… the toxic soup you created?
Dr. Specimen: [Stammering] Well, it’s what the literature says and, um… everyone knows –
Mr. Rigorous: [Cutting in] “Everyone knows?” [He gestures dramatically to the jury.] I believe
this court would prefer evidence over gossip, Doctor. Now, let’s talk about the genome you supposedly ‘discovered.’ You took this toxic brew, fed it into a machine, and then used some software to assemble genetic pieces, correct?
Dr. Specimen: Yes, yes, we sequenced the genome –
Mr. Rigorous: [Raising his voice] Ah, sequenced! You mean the software took fragments and tried to fit them together, like a biological jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces?
Dr. Specimen: [Defensively] It’s highly sophisticated software!
Mr. Rigorous: [Sarcastically] Sophisticated? Doctor, if I fed a pile of shredded newspaper into that machine, would it also “reconstruct” War and Peace?
[The jury chuckles. Dr. Specimen looks increasingly uncomfortable]
Dr. Specimen: [Panicking] No, no! It’s different. This is how we create the viral genome.
Mr. Rigorous: [Slyly] Create, you say? So, we’re not finding a virus – we’re creating one?
Interesting choice of words, Doctor. Now, did you ever attempt to prove that this Frankenstein creation could naturally infect a healthy host?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, no. We injected lab animals with the toxic cell culture, and when they got sick –
Mr. Rigorous: [Mocking] Sick from your toxic brew? And that, Doctor, is what you call “evidence” of transmission? You didn’t try something simple, like, I don’t know, letting the sick patient sneeze on a healthy person?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] Natural transmission doesn’t work well in the lab! It’s much cleaner to inject -
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Cleaner? Cleaner to torture animals with direct injections of this toxic sludge you call a “virus”? [He lets the words hang in the air.] Doctor, do you have any explanation for why you skipped natural transmission altogether, or is it because – oh, I don’t know – it never works?
[The courtroom erupts with murmurs. Dr. Specimen is visibly sweating]
Mr. Rigorous: [Turning to the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, this man would have you believe that by starving cells, poisoning them, and injecting that toxic concoction into helpless animals, he’s “proving” a virus exists. All without ever isolating or purifying anything! Is this science… or sleight of hand?
[He paces dramatically, letting the tension build]
Mr. Rigorous: One last thing, Doctor. After injecting animals with this ‘viral’ brew, did you ever attempt to purify the “virus” again from those animals to confirm it was there?
Dr. Specimen: [Almost whispering] No…
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in] No? You never bothered to re-isolate the virus, because that would expose the fact it wasn’t there in the first place, wouldn’t it?
[Dr. Specimen is completely defeated, sinking lower in his seat]
Mr. Rigorous: [Addressing the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case. We are dealing with
scientific fraud on a monumental scale, a fraud that never once demonstrated the existence of a virus through proper isolation or purification. It’s smoke and mirrors! I leave it in your capable hands to deliver justice.
[The jury nods thoughtfully as they leave the room to deliberate. After a brief pause, they return, their verdict ready]
Judge: Members of the jury, have you reached a verdict?
Jury Foreperson: [Standing] We have, Your Honor. We find the defendant… guilty of scientific fraud!
Judge: [Solemnly] Very well. [He turns to Dr. Specimen] For crimes against logic and reason, and for misleading the public in the name of science, I hereby sentence you to… [He smirks] a life term as the head of the National Institute of Infectious Arse-covering and Deception -NIIAD.
[The courtroom erupts in gasps and laughter as the viroLIEgist is dragged out, wailing in ‘protest’]
Cowan’s view is of immense value because he walks the listener/watcher step by step along the lines of scientific and rational reasoning. If you watch several Cowan’s clips, you will learn how the modern mind should be used, especially in the healthcare environment.
His emphasis on defining terminology and analysing data in the context of the defined terms is of paramount importance. His in-depth (and extremely simple and obvious) questions about the wording in the published studies are eye-opening. These questions are based only on this particular publication - no debates, no opposition, no debunking, no fight whatsoever. In other words, the authors of the publications self-disclose what they really do, and if you know where to look for and what questions to ask (which you may learn from Cowan), you will quickly understand the essence of any medical / scientific publication.
I can testify to that very well. The doctors no matter the speciality, or age, refuse to believe women, more than men. The only thing they can be sure of is if you are pregnant or not. Even that gets the propaganda scare crap. I've known that since my first, who is nearly 56.
You have this, or that disease. All get ruled out, later if you are presitent. The Idio Pathic Colitis turned out to be Gastropresis. Neuropathy of legs, Spinal Stenosis. Tuesday's ER Visit, which I'm sure was expensive as they did blood work and a CT. That doc, failed to tell me my bowel was Impacted, my Primary had to. Reaction to a new med. And I don't want more chems in my 'cleaner new skinner body'. They can keep the Linzess. Already tried it, found it to strong.
The Covid crisis was manufactured because the people behind it wanted to manufacture a worldwide pandemic. I and a few others may know it was a planned operation deliberately carried out, but 99% of the public is clueless and want to remain clueless. So nothing at all will change.
So, given the conclusion that it was all built on a house of cards, wouldn't one move on to ask the questions: how were the death numbers generated in 2020? how was the PCR fraud conducted? how is it that so much time is spent still arguing about the existence of viruses and the methodology of virology? The crime detectives seem to be obsessing about how to test whether the blood on the rug is type A or B while the murderer is still at large and claiming new victims.
Also please send this diatribe. Health officials recommend standard precautions to reduce infection risk, including staying current with COVID-19 vaccinations, practicing good hygiene, and ensuring proper ventilation indoors.
Trial by Jury – The Case of the Missing Corona ‘Virus’
[The camera zooms in on the courtroom packed with reporters, their pens poised. The aspiring viroLIEgist sits nervously at the witness stand, fidgeting with a stack of lab notes. Across from him stands the sharp-dressed attorney, Mr. Rigorous, known for his devastating cross-examinations. Behind him, the jury watches intently]
Judge: [Hammering the gavel] Order in the court! Mr. Rigorous, you may proceed with your cross-examination.
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] Thank you, Your Honor. [He approaches the viroLIEgist.] Dr.
Specimen, you claim to have isolated a novel corona virus, is that correct?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Uh, yes, yes. We have a robust methodology –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Robust, you say? [He winks at the jury.] Let’s start at the
beginning. Did you, at any point, isolate and purify this so-called “virus” directly from the fluids of a sick patient?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, not exactly. You see, direct purification from fluids is unnecessary because –
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in, eyebrows raised] Unnecessary? I see. What you’re telling us is that you skipped the part where you would actually prove there’s a virus in the patient’s mucus?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] We used a well-established protocol. Instead, we combined the
patient’s mucus with a monkey kidney cell culture, starved it, and –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting with mock concern] Oh, so you took a patient’s mucus, mixed it with cells from an entirely different species, starved those cells, poisoned them with toxic chemicals, antibiotics, and, what was it again, fetal bovine serum?
Dr. Specimen: Well, yes, that’s standard –
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] “Standard.” So, after this biological disaster, when the cells inevitably
broke down and died, you claimed that was evidence of a virus?
Dr. Specimen: [Getting defensive] Yes! The cytopathic effect is what –
Mr. Rigorous: [Smirking] Cytopathic effect! Ah, the mysterious code for “we poisoned cells and
watched them die.” Tell me, Dr. Specimen, what proof do you have that the breakdown of these poisoned, malnourished cells was caused by a virus rather than, say… the toxic soup you created?
Dr. Specimen: [Stammering] Well, it’s what the literature says and, um… everyone knows –
Mr. Rigorous: [Cutting in] “Everyone knows?” [He gestures dramatically to the jury.] I believe
this court would prefer evidence over gossip, Doctor. Now, let’s talk about the genome you supposedly ‘discovered.’ You took this toxic brew, fed it into a machine, and then used some software to assemble genetic pieces, correct?
Dr. Specimen: Yes, yes, we sequenced the genome –
Mr. Rigorous: [Raising his voice] Ah, sequenced! You mean the software took fragments and tried to fit them together, like a biological jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces?
Dr. Specimen: [Defensively] It’s highly sophisticated software!
Mr. Rigorous: [Sarcastically] Sophisticated? Doctor, if I fed a pile of shredded newspaper into that machine, would it also “reconstruct” War and Peace?
[The jury chuckles. Dr. Specimen looks increasingly uncomfortable]
Dr. Specimen: [Panicking] No, no! It’s different. This is how we create the viral genome.
Mr. Rigorous: [Slyly] Create, you say? So, we’re not finding a virus – we’re creating one?
Interesting choice of words, Doctor. Now, did you ever attempt to prove that this Frankenstein creation could naturally infect a healthy host?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, no. We injected lab animals with the toxic cell culture, and when they got sick –
Mr. Rigorous: [Mocking] Sick from your toxic brew? And that, Doctor, is what you call “evidence” of transmission? You didn’t try something simple, like, I don’t know, letting the sick patient sneeze on a healthy person?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] Natural transmission doesn’t work well in the lab! It’s much cleaner to inject -
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Cleaner? Cleaner to torture animals with direct injections of this toxic sludge you call a “virus”? [He lets the words hang in the air.] Doctor, do you have any explanation for why you skipped natural transmission altogether, or is it because – oh, I don’t know – it never works?
[The courtroom erupts with murmurs. Dr. Specimen is visibly sweating]
Mr. Rigorous: [Turning to the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, this man would have you believe that by starving cells, poisoning them, and injecting that toxic concoction into helpless animals, he’s “proving” a virus exists. All without ever isolating or purifying anything! Is this science… or sleight of hand?
[He paces dramatically, letting the tension build]
Mr. Rigorous: One last thing, Doctor. After injecting animals with this ‘viral’ brew, did you ever attempt to purify the “virus” again from those animals to confirm it was there?
Dr. Specimen: [Almost whispering] No…
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in] No? You never bothered to re-isolate the virus, because that would expose the fact it wasn’t there in the first place, wouldn’t it?
[Dr. Specimen is completely defeated, sinking lower in his seat]
Mr. Rigorous: [Addressing the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case. We are dealing with
scientific fraud on a monumental scale, a fraud that never once demonstrated the existence of a virus through proper isolation or purification. It’s smoke and mirrors! I leave it in your capable hands to deliver justice.
[The jury nods thoughtfully as they leave the room to deliberate. After a brief pause, they return, their verdict ready]
Judge: Members of the jury, have you reached a verdict?
Jury Foreperson: [Standing] We have, Your Honor. We find the defendant… guilty of scientific fraud!
Judge: [Solemnly] Very well. [He turns to Dr. Specimen] For crimes against logic and reason, and for misleading the public in the name of science, I hereby sentence you to… [He smirks] a life term as the head of the National Institute of Infectious Arse-covering and Deception -NIIAD.
[The courtroom erupts in gasps and laughter as the viroLIEgist is dragged out, wailing in ‘protest’]
You pegged it, and made it funny.
Massive thanks for the positive comment! Greatly appreciated!!
A great and detailed summary of the interesting subject. Before this one, the most attractive and appealing presentation of this angle came from Dr. Tom Cowan in “Discussing the actual origin of the lab leak theory- Webinar from 10/18/23” (https://rumble.com/v3q956g-discussing-the-actual-origin-of-the-lab-leak-theory-webinar-from-101823.html).
Cowan’s view is of immense value because he walks the listener/watcher step by step along the lines of scientific and rational reasoning. If you watch several Cowan’s clips, you will learn how the modern mind should be used, especially in the healthcare environment.
His emphasis on defining terminology and analysing data in the context of the defined terms is of paramount importance. His in-depth (and extremely simple and obvious) questions about the wording in the published studies are eye-opening. These questions are based only on this particular publication - no debates, no opposition, no debunking, no fight whatsoever. In other words, the authors of the publications self-disclose what they really do, and if you know where to look for and what questions to ask (which you may learn from Cowan), you will quickly understand the essence of any medical / scientific publication.
Dr Cowan is rock solid man!
The business of sickness and disease is total hogwash. Fakery and fear worth $4.5 trillion in the US alone every year.
I can testify to that very well. The doctors no matter the speciality, or age, refuse to believe women, more than men. The only thing they can be sure of is if you are pregnant or not. Even that gets the propaganda scare crap. I've known that since my first, who is nearly 56.
You have this, or that disease. All get ruled out, later if you are presitent. The Idio Pathic Colitis turned out to be Gastropresis. Neuropathy of legs, Spinal Stenosis. Tuesday's ER Visit, which I'm sure was expensive as they did blood work and a CT. That doc, failed to tell me my bowel was Impacted, my Primary had to. Reaction to a new med. And I don't want more chems in my 'cleaner new skinner body'. They can keep the Linzess. Already tried it, found it to strong.
They are all mad scientists. That's all....no glory there, huh.
The Covid crisis was manufactured because the people behind it wanted to manufacture a worldwide pandemic. I and a few others may know it was a planned operation deliberately carried out, but 99% of the public is clueless and want to remain clueless. So nothing at all will change.
Dr Tom Cowan wrote extensively about this subject.
Young People Are Getting Hit With Strokes Like Never Before
https://www.randpaulreview.com/p/young-people-are-getting-hit-with
Very well done. Needs more coverage. Like my Catherine Fitts articles, you can't get even Gateway, Townhall, or Epoch, to cover either story.
Please send this wonderful article to Dr R Malone and RFK Jnr.
If the above critique of the Fan Wu discovery of SARS-CoV-2 is correct - all scientists on the planet need to turn in their badges immediately.
So, given the conclusion that it was all built on a house of cards, wouldn't one move on to ask the questions: how were the death numbers generated in 2020? how was the PCR fraud conducted? how is it that so much time is spent still arguing about the existence of viruses and the methodology of virology? The crime detectives seem to be obsessing about how to test whether the blood on the rug is type A or B while the murderer is still at large and claiming new victims.
May I suggest a look at this video for a bigger picture? https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/dXyHYqfvXgioFWNTXaWbhi
Also please send this diatribe. Health officials recommend standard precautions to reduce infection risk, including staying current with COVID-19 vaccinations, practicing good hygiene, and ensuring proper ventilation indoors.
The people behind the Covid psyop put the "E" into evil, capital letter intended.