12 Comments
User's avatar
John Orban's avatar

I have to admit, as much as I hate reading these articles, they are extremely well written and referenced.

Neil Pryke's avatar

I was going to comment on the arrogance and lack of responsibility displayed by some medical and pharmaceutical entrepreneurs...but as no-one takes a blind bit of notice, I'll leave it at that...

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Neil it is like preaching to the choir. Even if we forward the article all those that are worshipers of white coats and needles won't even read the title. But may be we reach one- so I do keep forwarding and restacking!

I did not even read the whole article, as this no longer involves me - I am too old.

And also, when I read Johns Hopkins I know more or less what is coming. I do not trust anything with that name attached.

John Orban's avatar

Amen, sister. The only thing Hopkins is good at is fleecing its patients.

Neil Pryke's avatar

Thank you ! It's the same every time...like some conjuring trick performed for profit, with minimal outlay for correct materials, and hype to cover up the deceptions..!

Russell Schierling's avatar

Hello Unbekoming. You interviewed me about censorship a couple years ago. Your following has exploded in that time - congrats on your success. I left you a comment on your post about that sad POS, Stanley Plotkin. I'm writing to let you know that I did to Gemini, what Siri did to Plotkin. Essentially Gemini admits that Google is guilty of (insert crime-of-choice here_____________). Gemini admitted, during the course of a 40,0000 word six-plus hour interrogation that Google is not only guilty of RICO / Racketeering / Money-laundering, and more, but thanks to mass censorship, has "blood on its hands". Keep up the excellent work! https://doctorschierling.com/blog/google-censorship

Unbekoming's avatar

Thanks Russell, off course I remember you, and hope you have been well. I will check out your post.

Angelena's avatar

I appreciate all the comments made . They are valid and well said. What I do not appreciate is the total lack of any compassion, concern or outrage for the millions of women whose lives have been forever altered by this criminality. To expect that consideration from the perps is naive but , from the people who read this author I would expect something more caring. If we don't stand in support of wounded humanity even in a small two word sentence "I'm sorry ", we are really no better than the perps. You might say that would be trite.

What it says is I hear you and I send you love.

Pelican72's avatar

This is so painful to read! I cannot finish it. What is wrong with society, with medicine, with people that this goes on!!! Is an individual life so valueless?

STH's avatar

I don’t think the newer ones are much safer? I have a 35yo friend just two years ago, whose IUD got “lost”. The doctor couldn’t find it. Ultrasound couldn’t find it. She had to have surgery to find the darn thing! She now will likely never be able to have children.

yantra's avatar

i don't think so either - altho that dalkon shield was bizarrely bad. unavoidable unsafe, the whole lot of them. just like the senate admitted re childhood vaccines back in 1986.

hope she is okay.

yantra's avatar

well, finally. the dalkon shield is revealed - predatory medicine at it's finest. i wonder if there is any data on the damage that spikey little device (take a look at a picture of it - yikes) has done to embryos or fetuses growing in the womb who survive. i would wager that all IUDs are inherently dangerous ("unavoidably unsafe") to both women and their babies. not to mention their partners, whose penises get poked by the barb-like tails. oh, and getting IUDs implanted is no picnic - extremely painful in my experience.

i had a dalkon shield inserted in ~1971, but was saved by a guardian angel in the form of a country doctor. while visiting elsewhere for a cousin's wedding, i was overcome by intense abdominal pain which drove me to seek medical attention. the doc who examined me did a pelvic and pulled out the IUD. he didn't know for sure it was the culprit, but figured it boded no good. luckily for me he was ahead of his time by being behind the times. i recovered quickly with no other treatment and no obvious complications, and though slightly resentful at the time for his unilateral intervention, i later was grateful, especially when i started hearing in the 1980s and later about lawsuits for cancer caused by dalkon shields. thanks to that insightful doctor, mine was only in for 2 or 3 months or so.