22 Comments
User's avatar
CHUCK's avatar

The sad part is they've made tobacco the bad guy by placing cancer warnings on the packs. Tobacco is smoked in many countries that have little to zero lung cancer, it's the addictive chemicals they lace the cigarettes with that are the carcinogens! In Europe you can buy Turkish cigarettes and they're not required to have any warning label, because it's just tobacco!

CM Maccioli's avatar

I can't remember where the heck I was, I saw Russian cigarettes that my husband bought and liked. Then In China, non-smoking signs EVERYWHERE, while 50 million Chinese ignored and smoked like chimneys right in front of the signs. My son said, "Dad, can't you read the signs", reply being, "I don't read Chinese". "But Dad, they're in English also".

"I can't read English today". I laughed my butt off.

So much for a totalitarian repressive government, huh?.

xkry's avatar

Not only that but tobacco greedily laps up arsenic from the soil and absorbs it. For the longest time, arsenic-based pesticides were the most popular pesticides used by the tobacco industry (in fairness, so too agriculture as a whole). If I was a betting man, it wasn't really the tobacco smoke causing cancer it was inhaling arsenic-tainted smoke from tobacco treated with pesticides.

People know better now, but they didn't ban arsenical pesticides until the late 80s / early 90s!

Aim for organic pure tobacco products if you are going to enjoy them!

John Davison's avatar

Exactly.

20% of populations mmRNA covid "vaccine" unjabbed. We're the slow thinkers.

We bring Empires down - eventually.

pnelson947@gmail.com's avatar

DARPA Intercept Program: DNA-Altering Self-Spreading Vaccines for Humans. First distributed to Merck's veterinarian division, then Mars veterinarian franchises for "Shedding" the DARPA covid bioweapon vaccines and other mRNA onto the unvaccinated "slow thinkers" so they will become DARPA covid bioweapon GMO humans too!

The Rockefeller/Globalist billionaire/Big Pharma cartel Empire is very powerful.

CM Maccioli's avatar

Most edifying and very interesting. I can attest to all being true based on witness and experience. Only one point confounds me and that is smoking. I can rattle off 50 family members who smoked their entire lives, some starting at 12 years old. Only one, my sister, died of non-Hodge lymphoma. 10% were beer drinkers, almost no hard liquor, died of cirrhosis.

Since we've been lied to for 150 years to push diseases that do not exist, since smoking is the 1st question a doctor will ask a patient, my feeling is that they now have the excise they need to diagnose anything their heart desires, because you smoke or have ever smoked in your lifetime.

My experience has been that everything hinges on that. A stigma that stays with you for life even though we were told that quitting smoking for x amount of time would render you clean like you had never smoked. I guess they forgot about that guideline because now they ask, have you ever smoked. It's just too obvious to me that an affirmation to smoking is a good ruse.

Annemarie's avatar

I can't believe I never spotted 'framing ham'. They love to jest with us.

Robert Townshend's avatar

Spot on again.

I noticed that stunt mentality during the boom of the climate panic. A new field called "climate science" was running concurrent with an actual science of climate. The one had little or nothing to do with the other. Beyond odd when you think about it...but so are never-seen hopping meanies called viruses.

"Climate science" was trumpeted while the actual science of climate, with its piles of hard info and uncertainties, was never contradicted, just completely ignored. Go figure.

To make things tougher, I realised after a while that "climate skepticism", in which I was a participant, was based more in right-wing politics than actual skepticism, just as "climate science" - or Thunbergian science? - was based in left-wing or progressive right politics.

Anyway, I had a go at unravelling some of that here:

https://mosomoso.substack.com/p/essay-that-long-sleepy-heavy-science?r=4oa54b

https://mosomoso.substack.com/p/essay-that-long-sleepy-heavy-science-5f2?r=4oa54b

Thalie_1326's avatar

What gives us cancer is the multitude of chemicals they lace our cigarettes / tobacco with. Tobacco itself is protecting people from what they are trying to poison us with...

It noticeably started with 3G. 4G, then 5G during the scamdemic, and they are planning to install 6G sooner than expected.

Real tobacco protects us from radiations. That is the big secret the tobacco inversion is hiding.

https://open.substack.com/pub/francesleader/p/smokers-are-the-winners?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

openyourmind's avatar

It's is part of the problem with cancer. But the bigger and main problem with cancer's is that they are caused by parasite worm infestation throughout the body and most of our ailments are because of this. It's an accumulation of heavy metals and sugars bad cooking oils over processed foods that are the main contributors of it.

They have even lied about the chemotherapy which nitrogen mustard gas and people wonder why they never get cured of it. I think it's about a 90% of people die from it.

The full 20 minutes interview of it is on the Stu Peters show with Dr Lee Merritt.

It is also on my Substack.

Robin Eubanks's avatar

Great essay. I would credit Nobel Prize economist Dahiel Kahneman for the Thinking Fast and Slow distinction. That analysis that you used so successfully here is crucial to the Competency Frameworks mandated now for not Just K-12 and college, but also professional degrees such as law and medicine. The conceptual tools and heuristics to be mandated for all students get specified so that eventually you get 'shared meaning making' with very few in a position to recognize the fundamental errors at the core.

That factual knowledge that allows an individual to recognize the Inapt Metaphor. The fluent, voracious reading that allows an individual to create their own examples to Think Slow and examine the reality around them. K-12 legislation in the US calls the use of the desired assigned Concepts and Heuristics as Higher Order Thinking Skills and mandates that at least 95% of American students in every type of school be examined to ensure wide spread use.

Are the students becoming part of the Herd in their perception and their interpretation of experiences? It's the exact mechanism you describe here and it trains students to be the precise type of citizen pawns that was so useful and lucrative to insiders in the latter half of the 20th century as laid out using your medical and tobacco examples. The Rockefeller Foundation also laid out its involvement in the shift to conceptual frameworks as the new definition of Knowledge back around 1980.

Think of the possibilities for those who are familiar with the assigned concepts, Understandings, and heuristics now instilled in the masses for Fast Thinking at an unconscious level.

Rob (c137)'s avatar

Lead didn't just lower IQ.

It also increased violence.

Notice how many riots there were until the 90s...

https://robc137.substack.com/p/violence-down-since-they-banned-lead

This is a great sign and it goes against the crap the predator class has always said: humans are violent and stupid.

https://robc137.substack.com/p/the-milgram-experiment-and-how-we

Carl Nelson's avatar

This is excellent.

Bard Joseph's avatar

In 1940 11 of 100,000 had lung cancer

One book indicates that radioactive materials were added to crop with a Eugenics agenda in 1950.

Also heart disease was unheard of in 1940.

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

Many died because they and doctors lied

Arlequín's avatar

Wonderful writing, I love that part we are only human's that's true hahaha, sorry I want to laugh, it's really a great investigative work, wanna check my narrative?

veggie warrior's avatar

Great essay. Tobacco playbook was a perfect prelude to Covid playbook.

skipper's avatar

I disagree with the founding assumption here that the public can only think in short phrases or conclusions rather than that they do not want to think, assess. or weigh anything. They could provide the effort if they wanted to. It is the parents responsibility for their child. The value or possibilities of a human child have been so degraded that life is just a bunch of molecules bouncing around. Abortion is just a reworking of these lifeless elements. Evolution of something from nothing is just luck. Most conclusions are excuses.

DANIEL SANTIAGO RPh, PharmD's avatar

This substack is excellent.

Tommy Jensen's avatar

They say tobacco smoke particles with hooks hang on to the calcium or fat on the walls in the veins. I buy that explanation, why?

Because I understand the lungs can take a certain amount of smoke without problems. They are build to sustain a variation of burdens.

But the smoke particles goes from the lungs to the blood veins, and are being circulated around through the body into the most vulnerable parts.

So yes, the body should be able to withstand smoke from a wood fire, forest fire, a stove, from time to time, no problem.

But if we smoke each day, and the product further is laced with artificial chemicals of various substance, I see a problem on the long run, 5-10-15-20 years, where doctors good advise could very well be justified.

Yes, I too have felt tobacco to have some nice side effects, it leaves your weight where it should.

I felt it protects too something in the body, just a feeling.

But the conclusion on the long run is to say, that tobacco smoke simply do not belong daily in your blood veins, nor lungs, nor your heart, liver, m.m.

What belongs there is clean oxygen who clean your blood and related organs, yes? Case resolved