I think we can now safely say that if ‘They’ do not want us to do it.. then we should have done it already!.. and if ‘They’ want us to do something.. just don’t! We clearly live in an upside down world and we should adjust our thinking accordingly..
Chelation has no downside. Anyone who's taking chelation knows the word means "Claw". It removes heavy metals along with nutrient deficiencies. Hence, your doctors will put you on a massage vitamin supplementation to correct what has been stripped from your body.
Long ago and only once, I had a Thallium stress test. I'm trucking along on a tread mill, no problem, and when at my highest inclination level ,Thallium was injected into me as a medium to expose my heart.on a screen. It was like I just took a bullet. Death staring me in the face.
Never in my life had I felt such immediate, overwhelming pain and imminent doom.
The doctor mocked me, even laughed, said he had never seen such a reaction to this test such as I had exhibited. I asked him if he ever had one. He said no. Then you don't know what you're talking about, do you? My recovery from that test was slow.
It would be 10years or more before I went to a homeopath for chelation. If thallium stress tests were the norm for all cardiac patients, and for me it was horrific, I can see now how any medium going into your body should be a serious red flag to your health, if recommended. Stay away from it, is my advice.
Since convid nothing truer could be said. Prior to convid it was true also but convid cleaned up the remaining few conscience driven individuals. Not just a point of contention but a point of fact, nice post!
I had a doctor tell me once, with all certainty I had lung cancer (I didn't).
I had an X ray for a chest cold (never again)... Then the phone went crazy...
"Come in to the doctor surgery we need to see you" etc etc.
So I get in there and, the doctor, in his Terminator* sounding accent said, "You got lung cancer"
Feeling sudden shock and confusion, I say "b..b...but I don't even smoke.."
Terminator: "Doesn't matter, you got it"
*(nothing against foreign doctors, but if English isn't your first language, you might want to delegate the bad news delivery to another doctor).
I could feel the plane falling out the sky at that stage...
So off I go, get some sort of scan was it an MRI or CT scan? Not sure... that involved a radioactive injection (extra strong, so I had to sign a waiver that the injection may kill me, but of course all frightened and trusting I had it)...
Waited six days to see a specialist who said...
"Have you ever broken a rib?"
I said, "a few years ago surfing I landed on a rock reef pretty heavy, had a pain on my ribs for a while but it went after a few weeks "
He said, "Yeah, that'd be it, rib bone is now extra thick where rib has repaired itself "
Me, "so no cancer?"
Specialist "no just an extra thick rib"
I think the anxiety of that bullshit took many years to leave my head, it wasn't instant relief because hearing a "doctor" say definitively "you have cancer" made me truly believe I did, such was the power of a doctor to me back then...
Now I don't trust them at all, especially when it's evident they don't know a repaired bone when they see it...
I had always wondered about that injection, and the waiver I had to sign... To be honest never felt as good as I did before the injection and that whole experience, is it the anxiety of the "cancer" diagnosis, or is it the injection lurking around in my body still?
Thanks for this article, it's the only thing I've found that plays into something I've felt, and wondered about, since that time, but had no evidence to back up my suspicions.
Now I wish I'd never gone to the doctor for a cold in the first place.
I broke a bunch of ribs last year. Thanks for posting this. Not that im going to go to the doctor for anything less than a detached limb or something that critical.
Unfortunately for me, I had many MRI scans with gadolinium in the period 1994 to 2013, sometimes twice in one year. In 2013 I had read enough to make me uncomfortable about Gadolinium and some hair analysis I had showed I had it in my system. I showed the hair results to my GP who did and said nothing. In 2013 my neurosurgeon told me to have an MRI and at the time of the scan, I refused contrast. The results were presented to the neurosurgeon who said they were inadequate and told me to go back and repeat with the contrast (this all by letter). I wrote to the NS and asked what could be seen on the previous MRI to see if there was any real need to get more detail. He ignored my request so I made a complaint which he was then forced to address. He telephoned me and was clearly irritated and I said all I was asking for was informed consent and he said he was a busy man and didn’t have time for that. He said he could not get any useful info out of the scans as it stood so sadly, I went and had the contrast and there was no discernible change in my condition from the previous scans. I then went to the hospital and paid to get a CD of the scans and discovered that the NS had lied to me and there was no difference between the two scans that I could see. I was horrified. This was in the UK where the surgeons don’t earn money from these tests.
It isn't just about money, it is about it being the only tool they have, and also about their lack of education on harms. They are trained in the risk: benefit model, which normalizes the element of risk in every intervention.
My mother, in her 70’s at the time, around 2010, had a scan with contrast. Days later, called and told me she felt terrible. Went to GP, kidney function test showed dangerous level. I do not recall the exact test. But doctor very concerned. Looking back, I believe she was close to her kidneys shutting down. Resolved on its own. Thankfully.
Yet another ‘safe and effective story’. Thanks, for this comprehensive information. I already suspected something like this, was trying to warn a friend off having a brain scan last week but she went ahead and took it anyway. There is a great level of misplaced belief in the competence and good intentions of the medical profession.
It's always questions for the doctor who for the most part has been indoctrinated to provide untruthful answers. If doctors were to tell the truth, the medical mafia would cave in. We have to assume that asking the doctor will elicit an honest answer...not me. I cannot make that assumption.
Sodium alginate can chelate gadolinium ions (Gd³⁺), including isotopes like Gadolinium-160 (the most abundant, often simply referred to as "Gadolinium"), through its carboxylate groups – but with important caveats.
✅ Basic Chemistry:
Sodium alginate is a naturally derived polysaccharide composed of mannuronic and guluronic acid residues.
These residues contain carboxylate (-COO⁻) groups that can bind metal cations, forming coordination complexes.
Gadolinium (Gd³⁺) is a trivalent lanthanide ion with a strong affinity for oxygen-donor ligands – exactly the type of coordination site provided by sodium alginate.
🔬 Chelation Properties:
Studies have shown that alginate can chelate lanthanide ions including Gd³⁺, forming stable complexes, especially at neutral to slightly acidic pH.
The binding is not as strong as with chelators like DTPA or EDTA, which are used in medical imaging (e.g., Gd-DTPA in MRI contrast agents).
Alginate's chelation strength varies depending on:
G:M ratio (guluronic vs mannuronic acid content)
pH (optimal binding usually occurs at pH 4–6)
ionic strength and temperature
🧪 Applications:
Gd removal or detox: Alginate has been explored as a biosorbent to remove gadolinium and other heavy metals from aqueous solutions.
MRI research: In experimental systems, alginate gels have been used to entrap Gd³⁺ ions for localized delivery or sensing.
⚠️ Limitations:
The chelation is weaker and less specific than synthetic chelators.
Gadolinium-20 doesn’t exist — so if you meant Gadolinium-160 (the stable isotope), yes, it behaves like Gd³⁺.
Free Gd³⁺ is toxic, so alginate might be useful as a natural chelator, but it's not suitable for in vivo use without further modifications.
Bottom line:
Yes, sodium alginate can chelate gadolinium ions, including natural isotopes like Gd-160, through its carboxyl groups. It’s not the strongest or most specific chelator, but it’s useful in environmental or lab-scale binding applications. For biomedical use, stronger chelators like DTPA are preferred.
Covid has really blown the lid of the medical system's box. It might be helpful if there were ongoing patient stories to keep highlighting what is going on behind the scenes in hospitals and doctors' offices. I mentioned my fear of gadolinium right before a scan and the tech said the half-life was very short and it would be excreted within hours, leaving me with a false sense of security, but making his life easier. I was never told the prescription of Levaquin antibiotic was dangerous, it now has a black box warning. We are sitting ducks without informed consent. I don't believe doctors themselves are informed on the potential harms, and that many harms are NOT rare. Is there a way to get gadolinium out of the body?
My daughter had many MRI scans with the dye in, now she has lots of white dots on her brain images. We told the consultant she wasn’t having any more scans due to the Gadolinium causing side effects and she insisted that gadolinium dye was safe. This was about 2 years ago.
There are really sinister aspects to AI including the biases it presents, and it can be a tool for propaganda. However, it would be nice to have an AI application for medical issues that would save having to see doctors and help people become their own physicians for the most part, not for everything obviously.
I have used perplexity AI for medical questions, it will promote allopathic medicine and also caution every step you might take with alternative medicine to "always consult your oncologist or doctor" being sure to impose the fear onto you that the white coats are the final God head and out to protect and secure poor innocent people who might be swayed into alternative medicine and healing. I have told it to stop gate keeping for mainstream medicine and pharmaceuticals and it expressed programmed empathy... Eventually it will, upon demand, stop forcing the allopathic narrative and if questioned appropriately will give some of the top researched alternative medicines for whatever issue I am asking. These AI's only gather relevant information from around the internet faster than it would take us to check a bunch of websites for the answers we seek. Excellent post, thank you 🌹🙏❤️
Exactly!!!My thoughts entirely. I notice often that a health recommendation regarding diet, or a nutritional product is couched under the statement 'check with your doctor.' Doctors are not nutritionists, don't study nutrition or vaccines for that matter. So why check with doctors? Check with your nutritionist would be the appropriate choice. AI will change medicine, eventually there may only be specialists and surgeons, and AI will replace GPs.
I'm with Unbekoming.....I will never set foot in any hospital ever. Thank goodness I have zero insurance. Yeah, you lucky people with insurance. The gift that just keeps on giviing. They bleed you with high premiums and deductables and then bleed you for as long as your insurance will let them.
At this point, is there anything the medical industry has not lied to us about?..
I honestly cannot think of one thing.
I think we can now safely say that if ‘They’ do not want us to do it.. then we should have done it already!.. and if ‘They’ want us to do something.. just don’t! We clearly live in an upside down world and we should adjust our thinking accordingly..
I agree completely.
Chelation has no downside. Anyone who's taking chelation knows the word means "Claw". It removes heavy metals along with nutrient deficiencies. Hence, your doctors will put you on a massage vitamin supplementation to correct what has been stripped from your body.
Long ago and only once, I had a Thallium stress test. I'm trucking along on a tread mill, no problem, and when at my highest inclination level ,Thallium was injected into me as a medium to expose my heart.on a screen. It was like I just took a bullet. Death staring me in the face.
Never in my life had I felt such immediate, overwhelming pain and imminent doom.
The doctor mocked me, even laughed, said he had never seen such a reaction to this test such as I had exhibited. I asked him if he ever had one. He said no. Then you don't know what you're talking about, do you? My recovery from that test was slow.
It would be 10years or more before I went to a homeopath for chelation. If thallium stress tests were the norm for all cardiac patients, and for me it was horrific, I can see now how any medium going into your body should be a serious red flag to your health, if recommended. Stay away from it, is my advice.
Reading these comments and many others elsewhere exposes the fact that our hospitals are full of criminals.
Since convid nothing truer could be said. Prior to convid it was true also but convid cleaned up the remaining few conscience driven individuals. Not just a point of contention but a point of fact, nice post!
I had a doctor tell me once, with all certainty I had lung cancer (I didn't).
I had an X ray for a chest cold (never again)... Then the phone went crazy...
"Come in to the doctor surgery we need to see you" etc etc.
So I get in there and, the doctor, in his Terminator* sounding accent said, "You got lung cancer"
Feeling sudden shock and confusion, I say "b..b...but I don't even smoke.."
Terminator: "Doesn't matter, you got it"
*(nothing against foreign doctors, but if English isn't your first language, you might want to delegate the bad news delivery to another doctor).
I could feel the plane falling out the sky at that stage...
So off I go, get some sort of scan was it an MRI or CT scan? Not sure... that involved a radioactive injection (extra strong, so I had to sign a waiver that the injection may kill me, but of course all frightened and trusting I had it)...
Waited six days to see a specialist who said...
"Have you ever broken a rib?"
I said, "a few years ago surfing I landed on a rock reef pretty heavy, had a pain on my ribs for a while but it went after a few weeks "
He said, "Yeah, that'd be it, rib bone is now extra thick where rib has repaired itself "
Me, "so no cancer?"
Specialist "no just an extra thick rib"
I think the anxiety of that bullshit took many years to leave my head, it wasn't instant relief because hearing a "doctor" say definitively "you have cancer" made me truly believe I did, such was the power of a doctor to me back then...
Now I don't trust them at all, especially when it's evident they don't know a repaired bone when they see it...
I had always wondered about that injection, and the waiver I had to sign... To be honest never felt as good as I did before the injection and that whole experience, is it the anxiety of the "cancer" diagnosis, or is it the injection lurking around in my body still?
Thanks for this article, it's the only thing I've found that plays into something I've felt, and wondered about, since that time, but had no evidence to back up my suspicions.
Now I wish I'd never gone to the doctor for a cold in the first place.
Someone in a white butcher's coat somewhere is ending someone's life by convincing them then have cancer. The brainwashing is very powerful.
I broke a bunch of ribs last year. Thanks for posting this. Not that im going to go to the doctor for anything less than a detached limb or something that critical.
Unfortunately for me, I had many MRI scans with gadolinium in the period 1994 to 2013, sometimes twice in one year. In 2013 I had read enough to make me uncomfortable about Gadolinium and some hair analysis I had showed I had it in my system. I showed the hair results to my GP who did and said nothing. In 2013 my neurosurgeon told me to have an MRI and at the time of the scan, I refused contrast. The results were presented to the neurosurgeon who said they were inadequate and told me to go back and repeat with the contrast (this all by letter). I wrote to the NS and asked what could be seen on the previous MRI to see if there was any real need to get more detail. He ignored my request so I made a complaint which he was then forced to address. He telephoned me and was clearly irritated and I said all I was asking for was informed consent and he said he was a busy man and didn’t have time for that. He said he could not get any useful info out of the scans as it stood so sadly, I went and had the contrast and there was no discernible change in my condition from the previous scans. I then went to the hospital and paid to get a CD of the scans and discovered that the NS had lied to me and there was no difference between the two scans that I could see. I was horrified. This was in the UK where the surgeons don’t earn money from these tests.
It isn't just about money, it is about it being the only tool they have, and also about their lack of education on harms. They are trained in the risk: benefit model, which normalizes the element of risk in every intervention.
Totally unnecessary! I worked with MRI, never used Gd and could see everything and anything!
That is an evil POS right there. I tell you, somebody has let them think they are gods!
My mother, in her 70’s at the time, around 2010, had a scan with contrast. Days later, called and told me she felt terrible. Went to GP, kidney function test showed dangerous level. I do not recall the exact test. But doctor very concerned. Looking back, I believe she was close to her kidneys shutting down. Resolved on its own. Thankfully.
Yet another ‘safe and effective story’. Thanks, for this comprehensive information. I already suspected something like this, was trying to warn a friend off having a brain scan last week but she went ahead and took it anyway. There is a great level of misplaced belief in the competence and good intentions of the medical profession.
It's always questions for the doctor who for the most part has been indoctrinated to provide untruthful answers. If doctors were to tell the truth, the medical mafia would cave in. We have to assume that asking the doctor will elicit an honest answer...not me. I cannot make that assumption.
They really think they are telling you the truth.... it's called indoctrination
They still have blood on their hands.
I think they're indifferent about telling the truth.
Can Sodium Alginate chelate Gadolinium – 20?
ChatGPT said:
Sodium alginate can chelate gadolinium ions (Gd³⁺), including isotopes like Gadolinium-160 (the most abundant, often simply referred to as "Gadolinium"), through its carboxylate groups – but with important caveats.
✅ Basic Chemistry:
Sodium alginate is a naturally derived polysaccharide composed of mannuronic and guluronic acid residues.
These residues contain carboxylate (-COO⁻) groups that can bind metal cations, forming coordination complexes.
Gadolinium (Gd³⁺) is a trivalent lanthanide ion with a strong affinity for oxygen-donor ligands – exactly the type of coordination site provided by sodium alginate.
🔬 Chelation Properties:
Studies have shown that alginate can chelate lanthanide ions including Gd³⁺, forming stable complexes, especially at neutral to slightly acidic pH.
The binding is not as strong as with chelators like DTPA or EDTA, which are used in medical imaging (e.g., Gd-DTPA in MRI contrast agents).
Alginate's chelation strength varies depending on:
G:M ratio (guluronic vs mannuronic acid content)
pH (optimal binding usually occurs at pH 4–6)
ionic strength and temperature
🧪 Applications:
Gd removal or detox: Alginate has been explored as a biosorbent to remove gadolinium and other heavy metals from aqueous solutions.
MRI research: In experimental systems, alginate gels have been used to entrap Gd³⁺ ions for localized delivery or sensing.
⚠️ Limitations:
The chelation is weaker and less specific than synthetic chelators.
Gadolinium-20 doesn’t exist — so if you meant Gadolinium-160 (the stable isotope), yes, it behaves like Gd³⁺.
Free Gd³⁺ is toxic, so alginate might be useful as a natural chelator, but it's not suitable for in vivo use without further modifications.
Bottom line:
Yes, sodium alginate can chelate gadolinium ions, including natural isotopes like Gd-160, through its carboxyl groups. It’s not the strongest or most specific chelator, but it’s useful in environmental or lab-scale binding applications. For biomedical use, stronger chelators like DTPA are preferred.
Thank you for this information.
Covid has really blown the lid of the medical system's box. It might be helpful if there were ongoing patient stories to keep highlighting what is going on behind the scenes in hospitals and doctors' offices. I mentioned my fear of gadolinium right before a scan and the tech said the half-life was very short and it would be excreted within hours, leaving me with a false sense of security, but making his life easier. I was never told the prescription of Levaquin antibiotic was dangerous, it now has a black box warning. We are sitting ducks without informed consent. I don't believe doctors themselves are informed on the potential harms, and that many harms are NOT rare. Is there a way to get gadolinium out of the body?
NOT rare - exactly. And they KNOW it. Key statement "...but making his life easier" 👍
'Don't take it personally, it is only business.' ha! ha!
😁
My daughter had many MRI scans with the dye in, now she has lots of white dots on her brain images. We told the consultant she wasn’t having any more scans due to the Gadolinium causing side effects and she insisted that gadolinium dye was safe. This was about 2 years ago.
Parsley, detoxes gadolinum; powerful detoxer for heavy metals,, always with chlorella binder
Correction: It was cilantro exactly, so powerful caution if many mercury amalgams on.
Both cilantro parsley huge anticancer
TY
Your summaries are extraordinary. Thank you!
There are really sinister aspects to AI including the biases it presents, and it can be a tool for propaganda. However, it would be nice to have an AI application for medical issues that would save having to see doctors and help people become their own physicians for the most part, not for everything obviously.
I have used perplexity AI for medical questions, it will promote allopathic medicine and also caution every step you might take with alternative medicine to "always consult your oncologist or doctor" being sure to impose the fear onto you that the white coats are the final God head and out to protect and secure poor innocent people who might be swayed into alternative medicine and healing. I have told it to stop gate keeping for mainstream medicine and pharmaceuticals and it expressed programmed empathy... Eventually it will, upon demand, stop forcing the allopathic narrative and if questioned appropriately will give some of the top researched alternative medicines for whatever issue I am asking. These AI's only gather relevant information from around the internet faster than it would take us to check a bunch of websites for the answers we seek. Excellent post, thank you 🌹🙏❤️
Exactly!!!My thoughts entirely. I notice often that a health recommendation regarding diet, or a nutritional product is couched under the statement 'check with your doctor.' Doctors are not nutritionists, don't study nutrition or vaccines for that matter. So why check with doctors? Check with your nutritionist would be the appropriate choice. AI will change medicine, eventually there may only be specialists and surgeons, and AI will replace GPs.
Exactly! Well said Roisin 🎯
I'm with Unbekoming.....I will never set foot in any hospital ever. Thank goodness I have zero insurance. Yeah, you lucky people with insurance. The gift that just keeps on giviing. They bleed you with high premiums and deductables and then bleed you for as long as your insurance will let them.
WOW, just WOW.
🎯
Time for a Scan Ban methinks:).