92 Comments
User's avatar
Mark Brody's avatar

Well the nuclear explosion was successful insofar as this article has literally "blown my mind".

The tell is the secrecy. If nuclear explosions were real, the science explaining it would have been made public somewhere by someone in 80 years. Moon landing hoax, no viruses, infectious disease not due to transmission but to terrain factors, sun exposure prevents melanoma, not causes it, COVID-19 disease never existed -- the demolition of one myth after the next makes this column likely the most explosive substack there is. Great work, and well done! You are the modern Socrates, proving to us that everything we thought was true was a fabrication created from our mental distortions. If there is one surviving truth, it may be this: everything we once believed is false.

Debi Lutman's avatar

Pretty much listed them all. And they’re just the categories, so many under each one. Talk about hoodwinked!!

Kaylene Emery's avatar

Much of this work is above my pay grade . However over the past five years after much study I notice I have been promoted ….mentally.

CK_'s avatar

Modern Physics appears to be a PSYOP. Relativity was supposed to explain the failure to detect the aether (which every textbook tells us was NOT detected) but it turns out the aether was repeatedly found but suppressed because aether physics leads to free energy.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341219567_The_Aether

Quantum Field theory also appears to be a hoax:

https://www.oliverconsa.com/2022/12/quantum-electrodynamics-is-rotten-at.html

The Powers That Be likely do have super advanced technology (and possibly weapons of mass destruction) but we don't know the physical basis.

Crixcyon's avatar

Well, it makes sense as the government has lied about everything at least since the Civil War. Starting with the takeover of the West. Name one Indian tribe or civilization that the government did not lie to. Generation after generation have been hoaxed to death. Is mRNA a hoax? Maybe people are dying because they are sick of government and all its endless lies.

Carole's avatar

Crikey! Having doubts about the spikey!

Igz Navi's avatar

Civil War? That's the US government. Small potato. There are governments lying since Jesus Christ,

JLo2112's avatar

The physics justification is absolute hog-wash. Fission bombs use fast neutron fission where as nuclear reactors function on thermal neutron fission. U238 is especially useful for fast fission due to its fast fission cross section where as U235 has a higher thermal fission cross section and is desirable for nuclear reactors.

FISSION: Fast vs Thermal and critical/super-critical operations

Thermal fission is more efficient and controllable for two reasons, thermalization time and the use of delayed neutron precursors. All neutrons are born fast and promptly. Nuclear reactors and not bombs are designed to incorporate delayed neutrons into the population to achieve criticality. The fission neutron lifecycle for fast fission is 10^-7 sec and about 10^-4 sec for thermal fission, meaning the time it takes for a neutron released from fission to cause another fission - this is incredibly fast, but as you can see the fast fission lifecycle is 3 orders of magnitude faster than thermal fission. Additionally, you need both critical mass and a critical shape to have sustained fission - nuclear bombs optimize that shape for fast fission. Fission lifecycle time is based on various design parameters, particularly shape, volume, and material content. Nuclear reactors are designed to only reach critical operation using delayed neutron population bobs are not. A nuclear reactor that achieves critical operations using only prompt neutrons is uncontrollable - this is what happened at Chernobyl, the control rods had carbon tips that when passed through the peak neutron flux during the scram enabled prompt criticality. Nuclear bombs on the other hand have no need for delayed neutrons and hence change prompt super critical extremely fast.

BOMBS: Energy release vs volume expansion.

The destructive force produced by a bomb is through causing a pressure wave. In a traditional bomb, this is done using a chemical reaction to create gas at a high rate. A nuclear bomb does this by instantaneously releasing a large amount of energy that heats the surrounding environment which causes the forceful pressure wave. The amount of energy released is captured by Einstein's equation E=MC^2. You don't have to convert much Mass (M) to get an incredible amount of Energy (E) release. The energy release is mostly electro-magnetic, so the EMP can also have a large destructive effect. If you detonate a nuclear bomb in outer space then all get is a flash of light (primarily electromagnetic radiation consisting of visible and invisible high energy frequencies - micro, X, and gamma rays) and no destructive wave other than the mass of the fission products release which dissipates cubically and quickly with distance. The EMP will still reap havoc though.

CONCLUSION:

Nuclear bombs are and were absolutely possible, especially for Fat-Man and Little-Boy. This is especially true because the physics of the day support it - fast fission mode of action, U238 fissile material, fast acting - 10^-7 neutron lifecycle, and large energy release.

Caleb Finley Bronson's avatar

Thank you! I was reading this thinking “but, the heat and energy make a plasma cloud, the “fire” of the nuclear explosion, right?” I had to do some digging to verify. Your comment highlights exactly what should be the case; unbelievably high energy release in a fraction of a second creates so much heat that the atmosphere around the bomb instantly turns into plasma, expanding outward in an explosive shockwave.

Simonde's avatar

So you believe nukes are real and that since 1945 no nukes have ever been used in angry conflicts because the people that control them wish, above all, to preserve peace and prosperity for all? If they really had them, they would really use them, all the time, and they would be top secret.

Caleb Finley Bronson's avatar

Well, yes, I do. I don’t necessarily think it’s that those who control them wish for peace. I’m referring to Mutually Assured Destruction. It’s like male individuals of a given species will sometimes duke it out, but often hold back in some formalistic or ritualistic manner, because the mutual cost of both males fighting to the death is to no one’s advantage. Russia doesn’t win if everyone dies, nor does the US. Isn’t that a plausible explanation?

NY Nanny's avatar

Thanks for a brilliant explanation.

Andrew Stratelates's avatar

U238 is the abundant form of Uranium, so if it is bomb material, why the heck does anyone have to do all the “enrichment” to get U235 in high concentration (0.72% of Uranium is 235, that’s why it has to be enriched to work as fissile material). It is clearly stated that U235 is needed for controlled fission, either for nuclear power or for a controlled chain reaction, aka a fission bomb.

JLo2112's avatar

U235 more easily undergoes fission, it has a high neutron capture cross-section. U238 is also used in power plants, especially breeder reactors that produce PU239 which can be used for weapon or nuclear fuel. commercial reactors are boiling water reactors and operate with lower enrichment than what would be used in a pressurized water reactor where there is NO boiling. There is no reason to highly enrich uranium if you’re building a a boiling water reactor. I think all of the hoopla about enrichment in IR is probably propaganda - they’ve been 2 weeks away from a bomb for 10yrs, IDK.

maria b's avatar

I put this question to rest years ago from the opposite direction: no way could anyone have gone back to live in those places for hundreds of years due to the ‘half life’ of radioactive elements. To me, that doesn’t even require logic to figure out. There’s a man in Norway who has extensively documented this entire narrative.

Well done for bringing this out into the light here!! The happiness in my heart to find someone else knowing this too!

Martin Bassani's avatar

And so the other nuclear powers only had to figure out the deception and just claim to have a nuclear weapon?! I do believe that much of what we are told are lies; the danger is to assume that everything we are told is a lie. The problem is in our inability to discern what is a lie and what is not. This weakness is exploited in all large engineered events (psy-ops). They are all hybrids of real and synthetic; we are unable to know with any certainty where one ends and the other begins. This uncertainty is being deftly exploited and it has given a rise to psy-ops like flat earth theories, no virus, no Moon landing, etc. I have no way of knowing what is true and what is not in any of these “theories”. I know one thing for sure - we are ruled by demonic criminals, bent on enslaving or killing us. That is all I need to know. The rest is information noise keeping us from discerning undeniable truths about our current reality.

Paula Wertheim's avatar

FINALLY- I've been waiting for someone to address this psy-op! Thank you🫡

Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

I've been debunking nukes for over a decade. Nuclear Weapons Don't Exist Parts 1-7 by Chief Justice https://teslaleaks.com/f/robotaxi-reveal-nuke-hoaxers-circle-jerk-no-kings-protests Vladimir Zelenskyy Explains Impending Nuke Hoax Part 6 - English Translation https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/vladimir-zelenskyy-explains-impending

Nuke Hoax Emergency: - There Are No Nuke Shelters & No Nuclear Button Either ft Emergencies are "Urgent" by Foreigner https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuke-hoax-emergency--no-nuke-shelters-no-nuclear-button-ft-urgent

Russia, Israel & Vatican Nuclear Bomb & Nuclear Power Danger Hoax https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/russia-israel-alex-jones-nuke-bomb-nuclear-power-danger-hoax

Nuclear Power Danger Hoax + Manhattan "Project Tesla" for Fusion 1988 https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/tesla-westinghouse-nuclear-power-danger-hoaxproject-independence

Debunking Einstein + Nuke Hoax Part 3 by Chief Justice https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/teslaleakscom-debunking-einstein-nuke-hoax-3-by-chief-justice

Grandi Gilmore's avatar

Yes another Money Grubbing Elaborate Scam/ Con .just like the Moon landing and Plandemics .

Igz Navi's avatar

And space-monkeys are coming and F.. us.

Scaler Wave's avatar

Wheels on the fraud go round and round.

Igz Navi's avatar

Yeah! Let the good times roll!

Elise Guidoux's avatar

My brain hurts, I have never taken a physics course! 🤣

Full Name's avatar

You avoided a substantial amount of brain damage by not taking one-

Igz Navi's avatar

Now you can take a psychic course.

Gecko1's avatar

At the risk of repeating myself...

Trinity Test - world's first claimed "nuclear" weapon detonation - 16 July 1945

1+6+7+1+9+4+5 = 33

(say the word "trinity" very fast and it sounds like "TNT" or "TriNiTy")

Hiroshima claimed "atomic" bombing - 6 August 1945

6+8+1+9+4+5 = 33

The freemasonic master number strikes again:)

😄

JacqNSW's avatar

Mustard gas was also dropped with the Hiroshima hydrogen bomb, causing horrific inhalation tract and skin burns. Total bastidios that planned and instigated this action.

Donna Furnival's avatar

Once again, I thank you for your efforts to release humanity from the cages put around us from birth.

In grade 3 (1957), we did drills where when the siren went off we got under our desks.

Everytime I heard that sound, I responded in the same way. Duck and cover. I was trained up on a lie, like a Pavlovian dog.

Thank you!

Igz Navi's avatar

Desks are great protection against nukes but not efficient for lies.

Joel W. Hay, PhD's avatar

“No footage exists of the actual atomic explosions, only aftermath photos identical to other firebombed cities. The famous mushroom clouds? Those images come from 1952 hydrogen bomb tests, not 1945.”

What do you think hydrogen bombs are made out of? Mushroom soup? In order to trigger a fusion reaction. Edward Teller demonstrated that you need to start with a fission reaction. So you’ve got a logic problem. If you can’t get a picture of a fission bomb exploding without a fusion bomb, and you can’t get a fusion bomb without a fission bomb. Then you’ve got mushroom soup all over your silly story.

Joel W. Hay, PhD's avatar

Oh, and by the way, a hydrogen bomb is 1000 times more powerful than an atomic bomb. So I wouldn’t be as worried about fission not working as I would about fusion Not working. Fusion is what we can destroy the world with several times over.

Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

By the way, the proof of the "Hydrogen Bomb" was a video taken 200 miles away from a Russian airplane, video taping a cloud. Sure, it needs to be. The latest movie, where you get your "science" on nuclear bombs admitted that Little Boy and Fat Man (the gayest thing you've ever heard), could only destroy 200-500 meters; barely the size of a Walmart parking lot.

Jeffrey Pitts's avatar

Beat me to it. Can’t have one without the other…so the story goes.

follow the silenced's avatar

"This glaring procedural violation suggests the weapons were always intended as psychological warfare rather than functional devices."

This and as justification for billions upon billions of taxpayer's money, literally disappearing into...hot air.

Another money laundry and plundering machine.

Steve Axtell's avatar

Hmmm. I live near Rocky Flats in Colorado. Rocky Flats was a major producer of plutonium triggers for nuclear weapons. I know a scientist who worked at Rocky Flats. I know an engineer who worked on the machinery that milled the triggers. I don’t think they were showing up for work and playing “pong” on their computers.

Jaya Jeff Sims's avatar

Humans are easily fooled, especially when salaried.

Farhad's avatar

Why can't rapid expansion of air be just as dangerously explosives as rapid expansion of combustion products. In both cases you need an enormous source of heat. Both fission and fusion generate heat, where in conventional bombs, combustion provides the heat.

Gecko1's avatar

Where has nuclear "fusion" occurred? In reality?