The intro has enough 🔥 already. We read: “In the 1970s, women in the United States reported higher happiness than men. By the mid-2000s, that gap had reversed. By 2024, across every available metric — happiness, life satisfaction, anxiety, depression, sadness, loneliness, anger, restless sleep — women scored worse than men in country after country, dataset after dataset, decade after decade.
During those same fifty years, women’s educational attainment surpassed men’s. The wage gap narrowed. Female workforce participation hit record levels. Legal rights expanded. Reproductive control became widely accessible.
By every indicator that policymakers use to certify progress, women’s lives improved enormously.” — until they didn’t!
Feminism is probably the biggest of the cultic psy ops to date. False prophetess, and CIA asset, and girlfriend of de pop king Kissinger, Gloria Steinem led the pack. All the real conspiracy theories virus, germ, gene, Freudianism, Darwinism, feminism have two purposes in mind: remove the Truth that man is created in the image of God and therefore convince that man that he is only a thing the same as king Louis he of Jungle Book fame and things have no right to human rights ( but corporations do because they are considered as a human ) and nihilism. This is what makes these psy ops easy to discern. And we must discern them because, as we see, many have been greatly deceived by this great wickedness. And the fall out is anguish beyond description.
The streetlight effect is so profound in the macro to micro spectrum of this research. Many men tend to look at the externals they can provide, leading to ‘I gave her everything (material), how could she leave me?’ While many women would trade more ‘stuff’ for intimacy and closeness with their mate in a heartbeat. So the research initially followed the material aspects instead of the emotional. Good to see they’re going back to correct that oversight.
However, since the ‘culprit,’ as sooo often, is Big Pharma, will anything be done about it?
Anything contrary to nature is unsustainable. As with all other animals, Homo sapiens females role is to be MOTHERS AND HAVE CHILDREN. The attempt to substitute a "career" in place of children is unnatural, and is bound to lead to unhappiness. The role of the mother in the natural world is to transmit life from one generation to the next, and ensure survival of the species.
I have been dealing with HPA dysfunction, not in myself, but in a neutered male dog. While he has very few physical problems, as measured by standard tests, he doesn't seem as energetic as most dogs, even those fed on kibble, that I encounter. Flattened affect does affect happiness. And it appears from this article that the Pill does the same thing.
I have followed feminism since the bra burning marches on the Capitol Hill in the late sixties to now. I believe that the Pill, like third wave feminism led to the destruction of the mental well being of educated females. Questions to ponder:
1. Who are the loudest advocates for the illegal immigrants from third world countries: educated liberal women even though the culture from which these migrants come are anti-women, some like those from militant Islamic countries regard women as property and treat women like they do dogs in some Islamic countries.
2. Who are the ones most in favor of child mutilation called gender transition: educated liberal women. Despite their education, these women's brains not only defy logic but also defy the very science they claim backs them, when no credible scientific study ever validated that you can change your plumbing just by willing it so. Worse, it is coming out that many of Victoria's Secret models are actually men.
How many women in influential positions are actually men? Like former Oregon governor Kate Brown, who openly admitted to being transgender. We are being run by a group of men who want to displace women and render them obsolete and liberal white women are their foot soldiers along with 3rd world migrants.
I have nothing against a man who wants to be a woman, but think about this: what if feminism was really a way to destroy women, to make them obsolete? Think artificial wombs which really do enable men to have babies: nobody ever said they had to gestate a baby only to have them. So the whole thing about women in high positions of power or authority normalized women in these positions.
Once it was normalized, pull out the rug from women who really believed that there is no physiological difference between men and women with this whole transgender nonsense, thus after flattening their affect, getting them to refuse to reproduce, then let them destroy themselves, a process we see in front of our eyes: believing that radical Islamic men will somehow change their treatment of women if we bribe them with free stuff. It is pretty obvious to me that these women's brains no longer function in a rational, physiologically normal way. I'm willing to bet that they are on the Pill since many of them went in a 'sex strike'.
Having been a former Pill user myself, I know that much of what is published in this article is true: the spiritual aspect of a dysfunctional HPA axis is what I spent the better part of 30 years fighting. You do lose connection with your higher self, your spiritual self, God, or Source or whatever you wish to name this higher consciousness. I never realized that normal cortisol functioning helps maintain the integrity of your Spirit until a few years ago, decades after I stopped the Pill. It is different from neutering (or spaying) because in the former you have your gonads. You are just suppressing their function. In the sercond, the body knows it is missing parts and tries to adapt as best it can and cortisol function may very well be normal. Not sure why it isn't for my dog, but that is for another time.
Neutering and spaying cats seems to damage their personality. We recently spayed a female cat and there was a noticeable drop in her affection afterwards. It made me sad.
We didn't neuter our tom cat and he was so much more vital and generally delightful compared to other male cats that we neutered. Sadly, he sprayed to mark his territory in the house.
I've also known two men who were castrated by doctors in hopes it would slow down their prostate cancer. It really bothered both of them, one to the point of suicide.
I think disrupting these processes, even chemically, does deep damage to the psyche of biological creatures.
I would have been willing to pay a little more to women (women use more of our taxes ten men and of course men pay excess in taxes on average) to stay the f- home or wherever just as long as I didn't have to deal with them at work. 2 of the 3 jobs I worked at was women toxic hell-hole.
Here is part of the answer:
It answers a question most people that are not sleeping or not an NPC have wondered. And yes, it is clown world and a lot of people around us are no longer Homo Sapiens, they are “Homo Umbrans” — the Shadow Human. listen to may audio overview to wet-your-whistle.
And when your done - and you have the answer to that question that has haunted you for the last 3 years.
Now you can help Fix it all. Pray, and by the will of God we can turn this around. It's time ..
.. It's long Past time all God-Fearing men worldwide join - We need an Abrahamic World-Wide Justice System, to start .. then a Traditional pre-1958 Pope-King-Man (of course!)
The Abrahamic System, 9 Orthodox Justices; 3 Christians, 3 Jews, 3 Muslims. A Top world Court, And One in every world region. Shared Commandments, Natural Law, Freedom of Hearing, Conversion, Worship, ...
And those of us older women who did all the things we were supposed to like a career etc, and didn't find men when the time came, find ourselves old and alone, having to do everything in our lives as well as pay the bills, no one to lean on, no one to help, no one who cares. And so the pattern intensifies as we get older. There is a whole generation of us who are broken, and there is no repair.
I was never a feminist. Married right out of college had two children and was/am a stay at home mom. I have many a girlfriends who were hard core feminists never married or had children, but all have “big” careers. They woke up at 40 saying to me they feel alone on an island. I loved every minute of being home and wouldn’t change it for anything, but I have always longed to have that “big” career I was taught to think I missed out on. Logically, I know that is a ridiculous thought, but that’s what a public school education from the 80’s-90’s brainwashed you to think.
I agree mostly. My biggest regret is not having children. The rest is life.
Always expected to, just never got around to it. There is a light for women like us. We just have to accept our choices. I now follow no one's life advice, which to me is the most liberating.
Good article- good comments. All at least 99% secular.
The fact remains that especially since the 60’s, we’ve got further and further from His will. It’s all in His book. Day by day we drift further away. It shall be the demise of this secular world.
Happiness is not a one-size-fits-all equation. It lies strictly in the realm of the individual. And there are NO drugs that can add to happiness or even create it. Unless you are on the receiving end making all those billions in profits and incomes peddling them to the brain dead public which refuses to look at their own lives, minds, hearts and souls.
A brilliant analysis - that I have never seen elsewhere. A testament in one sense to the madness of our modern model of "progress" - "if we 'technically' can do it - we must do it" - "negative consequences be damned/and/or simply ignored." We altered the physiology AND thus the psychology of the majority of women while pretending this was all somehow just some - "new normal" - with only benefits and no possible downsides we might want to explore/acknowledge.
At a societal level we took our sexually dimorphic species - massively altered the very biology/psychology of reproduction (and thus also mating strategies) in almost the entire female half of the species - and then suggested/implied to any who might question whether there might be any "negative" impacts to all this - that we were bigots, or misogynists, "anti-feminist," or somehow "regressive" - for daring to simply notice in our female partners, and questioning, the clear negative impacts on the lives of our partners of them being on hormonal birth control.
This article takes me back to being a 22 year old in 1974 and remembering how absolutely miserable - both physically and emotionally - several women I dated in that period of my life reported that they felt while being on the pill. Several women I knew started and stopped on the pill multiple times - hoping for improvement. Perhaps hoping for some "reset" that might happen - and I think sometimes feeling that there was perhaps - "something wrong with them" - that they couldn't be on the pill without feeling so miserable.
It was as if the Zeitgeist of that period simply didn't allow for any questioning of the universally accepted - "emancipatory/revolutionary impact" - of oral contraception. I don't think it an overstatement to say that at least some women of that era - who didn't find their own experiences neatly lining up as "positive" with this new "technological fix" - somehow almost felt like traitors to their sex for daring to question and to trust the response of their own bodies and their own minds. Thank you for bringing this topic into the conversation and into the light - where it has always belonged.
You also have the use and abuse of SSRI's to add to the mix along with the birth control which, by the way,was developed at the Worcester Foundation of Experimental Biology by Gregory Pincus in 1960.
And none of these measures looks at interpersonal dynamics. Counting things, categorising things is a very logical/typically male strength. Women excel in verbal and emotional skills. The thing that's changed most since the 1970's is that people will experience more female bosses and management. And, as any schoolgirl can tell you, if you're in the wrong clique, have natural skills/good looks the chances are, you're going to suffer....and it's the kind of suffering that never gets seen, counted, quantified. If both males and females exhibit degrees of psychopathy of about 15% (population) that means very few women escape the playground bullying/harassment/secret back stabbing/reputation ruining gossip (lies). Etc. In male organisations a toxic male manager can be sweet-talked by the wise female, reducing the noxious impact of the male. In female dominated organisations there is no counterforce.
Reading through the comment stream, I find that most don't address the meat of the article, that women are likely unhappy not because of sociological factors but pharmaceutical ones. We all seem to be fixated on the sociological. As much as were the researchers.
I do wonder how much of the research cited was performed in the Muslim world. I have a feeling it wasn't much, maybe none. I would think there's a perfectly adequate control sample there, in terms of access to hormonal contraception. But of course it would be hard to see past our sociological biases against the "status" of women in those societies to access it.
It would be interesting whether this lowness was orientated about covid vac status…women are finally realizing that their blinded obedience to the liberal dogmatic mentality and booster after booster massive negative effect on both breast cancers, GI cancers and fertility/still borns has now been recognized. How else to express this realizing as “unhappiness”…so ifvac status is not commented upon thennthis studymissed the biat.
The intro has enough 🔥 already. We read: “In the 1970s, women in the United States reported higher happiness than men. By the mid-2000s, that gap had reversed. By 2024, across every available metric — happiness, life satisfaction, anxiety, depression, sadness, loneliness, anger, restless sleep — women scored worse than men in country after country, dataset after dataset, decade after decade.
During those same fifty years, women’s educational attainment surpassed men’s. The wage gap narrowed. Female workforce participation hit record levels. Legal rights expanded. Reproductive control became widely accessible.
By every indicator that policymakers use to certify progress, women’s lives improved enormously.” — until they didn’t!
This is a prime example of statistical deception: the numbers tell one story; women’s empowerment, freedom, etc — but then with all this; what’s not told is that women are sadder: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/statistical-deception-the-great-travesty
This is the great gaslight that impacts women: told one thing, but led astray. We all know feminism is the reason why and as we know, feminism is a spiritual attack to disrupt humanity: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-feminism-and-dei-destroy-humanitys
As always, thanks for this work man!
Feminism is probably the biggest of the cultic psy ops to date. False prophetess, and CIA asset, and girlfriend of de pop king Kissinger, Gloria Steinem led the pack. All the real conspiracy theories virus, germ, gene, Freudianism, Darwinism, feminism have two purposes in mind: remove the Truth that man is created in the image of God and therefore convince that man that he is only a thing the same as king Louis he of Jungle Book fame and things have no right to human rights ( but corporations do because they are considered as a human ) and nihilism. This is what makes these psy ops easy to discern. And we must discern them because, as we see, many have been greatly deceived by this great wickedness. And the fall out is anguish beyond description.
The streetlight effect is so profound in the macro to micro spectrum of this research. Many men tend to look at the externals they can provide, leading to ‘I gave her everything (material), how could she leave me?’ While many women would trade more ‘stuff’ for intimacy and closeness with their mate in a heartbeat. So the research initially followed the material aspects instead of the emotional. Good to see they’re going back to correct that oversight.
However, since the ‘culprit,’ as sooo often, is Big Pharma, will anything be done about it?
Anything contrary to nature is unsustainable. As with all other animals, Homo sapiens females role is to be MOTHERS AND HAVE CHILDREN. The attempt to substitute a "career" in place of children is unnatural, and is bound to lead to unhappiness. The role of the mother in the natural world is to transmit life from one generation to the next, and ensure survival of the species.
I have been dealing with HPA dysfunction, not in myself, but in a neutered male dog. While he has very few physical problems, as measured by standard tests, he doesn't seem as energetic as most dogs, even those fed on kibble, that I encounter. Flattened affect does affect happiness. And it appears from this article that the Pill does the same thing.
I have followed feminism since the bra burning marches on the Capitol Hill in the late sixties to now. I believe that the Pill, like third wave feminism led to the destruction of the mental well being of educated females. Questions to ponder:
1. Who are the loudest advocates for the illegal immigrants from third world countries: educated liberal women even though the culture from which these migrants come are anti-women, some like those from militant Islamic countries regard women as property and treat women like they do dogs in some Islamic countries.
2. Who are the ones most in favor of child mutilation called gender transition: educated liberal women. Despite their education, these women's brains not only defy logic but also defy the very science they claim backs them, when no credible scientific study ever validated that you can change your plumbing just by willing it so. Worse, it is coming out that many of Victoria's Secret models are actually men.
How many women in influential positions are actually men? Like former Oregon governor Kate Brown, who openly admitted to being transgender. We are being run by a group of men who want to displace women and render them obsolete and liberal white women are their foot soldiers along with 3rd world migrants.
I have nothing against a man who wants to be a woman, but think about this: what if feminism was really a way to destroy women, to make them obsolete? Think artificial wombs which really do enable men to have babies: nobody ever said they had to gestate a baby only to have them. So the whole thing about women in high positions of power or authority normalized women in these positions.
Once it was normalized, pull out the rug from women who really believed that there is no physiological difference between men and women with this whole transgender nonsense, thus after flattening their affect, getting them to refuse to reproduce, then let them destroy themselves, a process we see in front of our eyes: believing that radical Islamic men will somehow change their treatment of women if we bribe them with free stuff. It is pretty obvious to me that these women's brains no longer function in a rational, physiologically normal way. I'm willing to bet that they are on the Pill since many of them went in a 'sex strike'.
Having been a former Pill user myself, I know that much of what is published in this article is true: the spiritual aspect of a dysfunctional HPA axis is what I spent the better part of 30 years fighting. You do lose connection with your higher self, your spiritual self, God, or Source or whatever you wish to name this higher consciousness. I never realized that normal cortisol functioning helps maintain the integrity of your Spirit until a few years ago, decades after I stopped the Pill. It is different from neutering (or spaying) because in the former you have your gonads. You are just suppressing their function. In the sercond, the body knows it is missing parts and tries to adapt as best it can and cortisol function may very well be normal. Not sure why it isn't for my dog, but that is for another time.
Neutering and spaying cats seems to damage their personality. We recently spayed a female cat and there was a noticeable drop in her affection afterwards. It made me sad.
We didn't neuter our tom cat and he was so much more vital and generally delightful compared to other male cats that we neutered. Sadly, he sprayed to mark his territory in the house.
I've also known two men who were castrated by doctors in hopes it would slow down their prostate cancer. It really bothered both of them, one to the point of suicide.
I think disrupting these processes, even chemically, does deep damage to the psyche of biological creatures.
I would have been willing to pay a little more to women (women use more of our taxes ten men and of course men pay excess in taxes on average) to stay the f- home or wherever just as long as I didn't have to deal with them at work. 2 of the 3 jobs I worked at was women toxic hell-hole.
Here is part of the answer:
It answers a question most people that are not sleeping or not an NPC have wondered. And yes, it is clown world and a lot of people around us are no longer Homo Sapiens, they are “Homo Umbrans” — the Shadow Human. listen to may audio overview to wet-your-whistle.
Here is the audio overview of this article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88f3y09DowI
".. the Wounding of Human Faculties", https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2238, https://archive.is/35vHJ
---
And when your done - and you have the answer to that question that has haunted you for the last 3 years.
Now you can help Fix it all. Pray, and by the will of God we can turn this around. It's time ..
.. It's long Past time all God-Fearing men worldwide join - We need an Abrahamic World-Wide Justice System, to start .. then a Traditional pre-1958 Pope-King-Man (of course!)
The Abrahamic System, 9 Orthodox Justices; 3 Christians, 3 Jews, 3 Muslims. A Top world Court, And One in every world region. Shared Commandments, Natural Law, Freedom of Hearing, Conversion, Worship, ...
More Here in Apologetic article, this YT mirror of audio overview of article; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NkpLdRpzrQ
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2228:, 8th October 2025, By the Will of God, Our First possible 'Treatise Concerning ..' From Offices of Papal-King" https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2228
https://archive.is/aEcrq
And those of us older women who did all the things we were supposed to like a career etc, and didn't find men when the time came, find ourselves old and alone, having to do everything in our lives as well as pay the bills, no one to lean on, no one to help, no one who cares. And so the pattern intensifies as we get older. There is a whole generation of us who are broken, and there is no repair.
I was never a feminist. Married right out of college had two children and was/am a stay at home mom. I have many a girlfriends who were hard core feminists never married or had children, but all have “big” careers. They woke up at 40 saying to me they feel alone on an island. I loved every minute of being home and wouldn’t change it for anything, but I have always longed to have that “big” career I was taught to think I missed out on. Logically, I know that is a ridiculous thought, but that’s what a public school education from the 80’s-90’s brainwashed you to think.
What stands out is how no matter which path you choose, there’s a narrative telling you it wasn’t enough. That conditioning runs deeper than we think.
Isnt it all crazy? The manipulations of everything. Every single thing.
I agree mostly. My biggest regret is not having children. The rest is life.
Always expected to, just never got around to it. There is a light for women like us. We just have to accept our choices. I now follow no one's life advice, which to me is the most liberating.
Good article- good comments. All at least 99% secular.
The fact remains that especially since the 60’s, we’ve got further and further from His will. It’s all in His book. Day by day we drift further away. It shall be the demise of this secular world.
Happiness is not a one-size-fits-all equation. It lies strictly in the realm of the individual. And there are NO drugs that can add to happiness or even create it. Unless you are on the receiving end making all those billions in profits and incomes peddling them to the brain dead public which refuses to look at their own lives, minds, hearts and souls.
Excellent observations! Thought provoking! Thank you!!!!🙏🏻
A brilliant analysis - that I have never seen elsewhere. A testament in one sense to the madness of our modern model of "progress" - "if we 'technically' can do it - we must do it" - "negative consequences be damned/and/or simply ignored." We altered the physiology AND thus the psychology of the majority of women while pretending this was all somehow just some - "new normal" - with only benefits and no possible downsides we might want to explore/acknowledge.
At a societal level we took our sexually dimorphic species - massively altered the very biology/psychology of reproduction (and thus also mating strategies) in almost the entire female half of the species - and then suggested/implied to any who might question whether there might be any "negative" impacts to all this - that we were bigots, or misogynists, "anti-feminist," or somehow "regressive" - for daring to simply notice in our female partners, and questioning, the clear negative impacts on the lives of our partners of them being on hormonal birth control.
This article takes me back to being a 22 year old in 1974 and remembering how absolutely miserable - both physically and emotionally - several women I dated in that period of my life reported that they felt while being on the pill. Several women I knew started and stopped on the pill multiple times - hoping for improvement. Perhaps hoping for some "reset" that might happen - and I think sometimes feeling that there was perhaps - "something wrong with them" - that they couldn't be on the pill without feeling so miserable.
It was as if the Zeitgeist of that period simply didn't allow for any questioning of the universally accepted - "emancipatory/revolutionary impact" - of oral contraception. I don't think it an overstatement to say that at least some women of that era - who didn't find their own experiences neatly lining up as "positive" with this new "technological fix" - somehow almost felt like traitors to their sex for daring to question and to trust the response of their own bodies and their own minds. Thank you for bringing this topic into the conversation and into the light - where it has always belonged.
WOW!!!! GREAT WORK!
You also have the use and abuse of SSRI's to add to the mix along with the birth control which, by the way,was developed at the Worcester Foundation of Experimental Biology by Gregory Pincus in 1960.
The SSRI abuse is real, just mentioned the 2:1 female to male ratio (in a response to different comment) which I think is conservative estimate.
And none of these measures looks at interpersonal dynamics. Counting things, categorising things is a very logical/typically male strength. Women excel in verbal and emotional skills. The thing that's changed most since the 1970's is that people will experience more female bosses and management. And, as any schoolgirl can tell you, if you're in the wrong clique, have natural skills/good looks the chances are, you're going to suffer....and it's the kind of suffering that never gets seen, counted, quantified. If both males and females exhibit degrees of psychopathy of about 15% (population) that means very few women escape the playground bullying/harassment/secret back stabbing/reputation ruining gossip (lies). Etc. In male organisations a toxic male manager can be sweet-talked by the wise female, reducing the noxious impact of the male. In female dominated organisations there is no counterforce.
Recently, I read about depression, emphasizing the crucial role of women-- mothers and wives--to prevent anarchy.
My mother was quite disagreeable, but SHE WAS SMART.
It has NEVER OCCURRED to me that women were not similarly gifted
ThecGreatvDepress of the 1930s
Reading through the comment stream, I find that most don't address the meat of the article, that women are likely unhappy not because of sociological factors but pharmaceutical ones. We all seem to be fixated on the sociological. As much as were the researchers.
I do wonder how much of the research cited was performed in the Muslim world. I have a feeling it wasn't much, maybe none. I would think there's a perfectly adequate control sample there, in terms of access to hormonal contraception. But of course it would be hard to see past our sociological biases against the "status" of women in those societies to access it.
More women are experiencing psychologic breakdowns. It will be off the charts when the jabs are at full effect. This is intentional.
It would be interesting whether this lowness was orientated about covid vac status…women are finally realizing that their blinded obedience to the liberal dogmatic mentality and booster after booster massive negative effect on both breast cancers, GI cancers and fertility/still borns has now been recognized. How else to express this realizing as “unhappiness”…so ifvac status is not commented upon thennthis studymissed the biat.