I appreciate you for sharing a wide range of books/opinions and adding yours (and others) commentary, it all helps fill in either pieces of the truth or indeed shining light on the limited hangouts/narratives being propagated.
Ahh, come on, hell no. The Introduction is all I could get through. If anyone knew HIV was a lie it was Kary Mullis. Not even close to the imminent death sentence given to all those poor men who were on the receiving end of that diagnosis. These bastards knew the real disease was in the cure. AZT, courtesy of fraud Fauci.
He did the exact same thing, killing innocent people, with Remdesivir that caused organ failure, oops, I mean covid. Cha-ching. May that lying P of S burn in hell for all eternity. Trust me, I'm having a serious talk with Jesus when I see him if He let that slime off the hook.
This is how it works. You make a cocktail. Give it a chemical name. OK, now, what can it do? No matter, we'll make up some syndrome or disease. Folks will fall for it hook line and sinker.
Here comes the next fake virus, disease, epidemic , no, we don't have them anymore, now they're pandemics,( gotta share the wealth ) with the drug sitting silently in the wings waiting to make it's debut. Make a drug, Create a disease, Offer a cure= death and profit.
"It's not personal Sonny, it's just business". As usual.
"La Ciencia del Pánico is perhaps the first major film rethinking the HIV=AIDS dogma to emerge from the Spanish-speaking world although, for the benefit of us anglophones, it can be watched with English subtitles. Due to the large number of languages that interviews were conducted in (French, German and Italian apart from English and Spanish), both languages sometimes need subtitles.
Further increasing its accessibility the entire video is available online, for free, at http://www.lacienciadelpanico.tk. Obviously this film was a passion of its makers, not a money-making venture (note to all dissenting film-makers -- go to Hollywood if you want to make money). The video has its own story as it was made by film maker Patrizia Monzani as well as the HIV-positive victim of AIDS drugs, Isabel Otaduy. Like so many who took antiretrovirals for years, Isabel died young, in 2009, never able to see the final product of her passion to tell the world the truth and to try to stop others from walking the same path as her.
AIDS in Europe is more a disease of intravenous drug users and people outside of the standard "risk groups" who get scooped up by the randomness of the ELISA test, than of gay men as in the United States, or the malnourished as in Africa, and this is reflected in the film.
Apart from the seropositive people the film blends in the opinions of doctors, scientists and researchers on both sides of the argument. Refreshingly, many of the interviews are of less well-known experts as English films tend to focus on interviewing only English-speaking people.
The stories of the people wearing the scarlet letters HIV sometimes describe a history of drug use or the party lifestyle and sometimes not. In both cases, each nugget of a personal story quickly segues into a discussion of HIV testing, the toxicity of AIDS drugs or the very existence of the boogeyman HIV.
The stories of loss, of their own health or of friends, are sad and moving and contrast in a chilling way with the casualness with which a mainstream doctor admits to the side effects or inaccuracies of the tests, as if this information was insignificant.
It is hard to understand how such a well-educated person can be so wedded to medicine-by-numbers that the fact that a protease inhibitor user with serious lipodystrophy no longer recognizes themself in the mirror does not cause him to pause and think about his current course, despite the obvious icebergs ahead.
But then, they are not actually sailing the boat, they are just giving directions by remote control -- Take this drug, stop that drug, ignore the side effects, think of how we are saving your life.
The establishment side was mainly represented by one doctor but having a hundred would not have changed the film as they all would have said the same thing, like robots. The technique of moving from personal anecdote to the mainstream explanation to a more convincing explanation from an AIDS critic will help the people who are new to this subject understand both the personal and scientific impact of the dogma.
The most important message is how much damage an out of control medical theory imposed on the world can wreak sadly without the majority of its inhabitants having the slightest clue anything is, the propaganda is that good.
But, like other excellent dissident films such as House of Numbers or The Other Side of AIDS, the propaganda will not survive this film.
It is interesting to compare La Ciencia with another film that I recently reviewed, This Child of Mine. Both are similar in that they address the personal side of AIDS, how the theory turns the lives of people upside down, both physically and emotionally. While This Child of Mine focuses only on families dealing with the children of an HIV-positive mother, La Ciencia interviews a much broader spectrum of people caught by the HIV lie.
The styles of the films are also completely different, This Child of Mine is like acoustic folk music, the film maker sitting back quietly and observing, leaving the viewer feeling as if they are on the couch as the events unfold. La Ciencia is much more electronic and edgy, weaving a story from the fragments of recollections and opinions of the people the filmmakers interviewed.
Both express the pain of people who lost friends and loved ones to AZT or other AIDS drugs, not always understanding until later what was happening. While This Child of Mine was restricted to the United States, the makers of La Ciencia made or obtained interviews from all over the world. Both films are different, but both work, one is a folk club, the other a night club. Watch them both. Expand your horizons."
Whoa!! you are the man. Thanks so much for the links. I read Spanish very well so no problem there. Have you heard of "La Quinta Columna", a site by Ricardo Delgado, from Spain. He was one of the best that got zero coverage during covid. That man brought the truth out almost immediately. I learned more from him than the very good American doctors who also spoke truth to power during that deadly time of the vaccines. I have sent all of Delgado's videos to my Dominican neighbors, sadly too late, as they took the vax, but yours I'll send as well. Thanks again
If you have any pertinent links to information re: Spanish nursing homes and hospitals and how elders were being abandoned and killed via protocols from 2020-2023 I would be interested.
Thanks. This book has been on my shelf - but I have never read it. I imagine a lot of vaccine research took place in Africa, that we are unaware of. It is interesting that those who seek to "save humanity" from "dreaded diseases" have no problem testing their products on "undeveloped" populations. Vaccinology is either a religion in its own right or part of an existing religion that Koprowski, Sabin, Salk, Gallo, Plotkin and others have in common. They apparently believe their test subjects are equivalent to lab rats, only tools in their search for fame and fortune.
Of all medical interventions, I believe vaccines have caused the greatest morbidity and mortality - and I refuse to believe it was accidental. As for the origin of "HIV" or its role in AIDs - there are so many theories. The timing was perfect, it saved the CDC after the 1976 Fort Dix "swine flu" threat that never was and the preventive vaccine - which failed. The explosion of "AIDS" in Africa (more likely the renaming of endemic diseases as AIDS) was instrumental in not only increasing funding for "science" but also providing a justification for use of the continent as a laboratory to test all sorts of potentially valuable medical inventions/interventions - a boom for the scientist involved and the pharmaceutical industry. It also was crucial in propagating fear, enforcing medical dogma, and increasing charitable donations for the funding of "The Science"- much like the March of Dimes. The fundraising involve many celebrities that are/were idolized by the masses.
The 2000 year old Hippocratic Oath: "With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man's entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so." - is very interesting, and makes one wonder if some physicians did administer poisons to their patients for various reasons, like compensation. If so, the practice is ancient.
I think the main takeaway is vaccine contamination, and the way vaccine are prepared, it’s impossible to guarantee safety and purity at that level. Even today mRNA vaccines have high amounts of SV40 promoter, by using plasmids, which can recombine once injected, and is a real danger to ovaries that only have limited eggs in a lifetime. So we a creating yet another rise in soft tissues cancers just like the baby boomers generation got after Polio SR40 contamination in the 1950’s
I remember reading an article years ago about a journalist who tried to uncover the practice of growing vaccines in monkey kidneys. The kidneys were cut out of live chimpanzees and the bodies thrown in a pile behind the building to die. The practice was stopped when obtaining new chimps became too difficult. The journalist ended up dead and the Internet link disappeared.
The whole process of drug development is horrendous and should be the number one consideration for anyone to think twice about accepting one. We no longer test cosmetics on animals but EVERY drug has caused harm to animals and many humans during its development.
After reading your thorough introduction and opinion of the book, I decided not to read the whole review. However I still learned something just from your intro. So thank you and well done!
I appreciate you for sharing a wide range of books/opinions and adding yours (and others) commentary, it all helps fill in either pieces of the truth or indeed shining light on the limited hangouts/narratives being propagated.
Ahh, come on, hell no. The Introduction is all I could get through. If anyone knew HIV was a lie it was Kary Mullis. Not even close to the imminent death sentence given to all those poor men who were on the receiving end of that diagnosis. These bastards knew the real disease was in the cure. AZT, courtesy of fraud Fauci.
He did the exact same thing, killing innocent people, with Remdesivir that caused organ failure, oops, I mean covid. Cha-ching. May that lying P of S burn in hell for all eternity. Trust me, I'm having a serious talk with Jesus when I see him if He let that slime off the hook.
This is how it works. You make a cocktail. Give it a chemical name. OK, now, what can it do? No matter, we'll make up some syndrome or disease. Folks will fall for it hook line and sinker.
Here comes the next fake virus, disease, epidemic , no, we don't have them anymore, now they're pandemics,( gotta share the wealth ) with the drug sitting silently in the wings waiting to make it's debut. Make a drug, Create a disease, Offer a cure= death and profit.
"It's not personal Sonny, it's just business". As usual.
Yep.
Hooper gets just about everything wrong.
You might like this.
"La Ciencia del Pánico is perhaps the first major film rethinking the HIV=AIDS dogma to emerge from the Spanish-speaking world although, for the benefit of us anglophones, it can be watched with English subtitles. Due to the large number of languages that interviews were conducted in (French, German and Italian apart from English and Spanish), both languages sometimes need subtitles.
Further increasing its accessibility the entire video is available online, for free, at http://www.lacienciadelpanico.tk. Obviously this film was a passion of its makers, not a money-making venture (note to all dissenting film-makers -- go to Hollywood if you want to make money). The video has its own story as it was made by film maker Patrizia Monzani as well as the HIV-positive victim of AIDS drugs, Isabel Otaduy. Like so many who took antiretrovirals for years, Isabel died young, in 2009, never able to see the final product of her passion to tell the world the truth and to try to stop others from walking the same path as her.
AIDS in Europe is more a disease of intravenous drug users and people outside of the standard "risk groups" who get scooped up by the randomness of the ELISA test, than of gay men as in the United States, or the malnourished as in Africa, and this is reflected in the film.
Apart from the seropositive people the film blends in the opinions of doctors, scientists and researchers on both sides of the argument. Refreshingly, many of the interviews are of less well-known experts as English films tend to focus on interviewing only English-speaking people.
The stories of the people wearing the scarlet letters HIV sometimes describe a history of drug use or the party lifestyle and sometimes not. In both cases, each nugget of a personal story quickly segues into a discussion of HIV testing, the toxicity of AIDS drugs or the very existence of the boogeyman HIV.
The stories of loss, of their own health or of friends, are sad and moving and contrast in a chilling way with the casualness with which a mainstream doctor admits to the side effects or inaccuracies of the tests, as if this information was insignificant.
It is hard to understand how such a well-educated person can be so wedded to medicine-by-numbers that the fact that a protease inhibitor user with serious lipodystrophy no longer recognizes themself in the mirror does not cause him to pause and think about his current course, despite the obvious icebergs ahead.
But then, they are not actually sailing the boat, they are just giving directions by remote control -- Take this drug, stop that drug, ignore the side effects, think of how we are saving your life.
The establishment side was mainly represented by one doctor but having a hundred would not have changed the film as they all would have said the same thing, like robots. The technique of moving from personal anecdote to the mainstream explanation to a more convincing explanation from an AIDS critic will help the people who are new to this subject understand both the personal and scientific impact of the dogma.
The most important message is how much damage an out of control medical theory imposed on the world can wreak sadly without the majority of its inhabitants having the slightest clue anything is, the propaganda is that good.
But, like other excellent dissident films such as House of Numbers or The Other Side of AIDS, the propaganda will not survive this film.
It is interesting to compare La Ciencia with another film that I recently reviewed, This Child of Mine. Both are similar in that they address the personal side of AIDS, how the theory turns the lives of people upside down, both physically and emotionally. While This Child of Mine focuses only on families dealing with the children of an HIV-positive mother, La Ciencia interviews a much broader spectrum of people caught by the HIV lie.
The styles of the films are also completely different, This Child of Mine is like acoustic folk music, the film maker sitting back quietly and observing, leaving the viewer feeling as if they are on the couch as the events unfold. La Ciencia is much more electronic and edgy, weaving a story from the fragments of recollections and opinions of the people the filmmakers interviewed.
Both express the pain of people who lost friends and loved ones to AZT or other AIDS drugs, not always understanding until later what was happening. While This Child of Mine was restricted to the United States, the makers of La Ciencia made or obtained interviews from all over the world. Both films are different, but both work, one is a folk club, the other a night club. Watch them both. Expand your horizons."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UshKLBE6V30&t=3s&ab_channel=ricci1003
http://aras.ab.ca/articles/video/lacienciadelpanico.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UshKLBE6V30&t=3s&ab_channel=ricci1003
Whoa!! you are the man. Thanks so much for the links. I read Spanish very well so no problem there. Have you heard of "La Quinta Columna", a site by Ricardo Delgado, from Spain. He was one of the best that got zero coverage during covid. That man brought the truth out almost immediately. I learned more from him than the very good American doctors who also spoke truth to power during that deadly time of the vaccines. I have sent all of Delgado's videos to my Dominican neighbors, sadly too late, as they took the vax, but yours I'll send as well. Thanks again
I have.
If you have any pertinent links to information re: Spanish nursing homes and hospitals and how elders were being abandoned and killed via protocols from 2020-2023 I would be interested.
Desafortunadamente, no. Hago las cosas en la manera antigua. Leo y tomo notas. Verificare mis notas para ud.
Thanks. This book has been on my shelf - but I have never read it. I imagine a lot of vaccine research took place in Africa, that we are unaware of. It is interesting that those who seek to "save humanity" from "dreaded diseases" have no problem testing their products on "undeveloped" populations. Vaccinology is either a religion in its own right or part of an existing religion that Koprowski, Sabin, Salk, Gallo, Plotkin and others have in common. They apparently believe their test subjects are equivalent to lab rats, only tools in their search for fame and fortune.
Of all medical interventions, I believe vaccines have caused the greatest morbidity and mortality - and I refuse to believe it was accidental. As for the origin of "HIV" or its role in AIDs - there are so many theories. The timing was perfect, it saved the CDC after the 1976 Fort Dix "swine flu" threat that never was and the preventive vaccine - which failed. The explosion of "AIDS" in Africa (more likely the renaming of endemic diseases as AIDS) was instrumental in not only increasing funding for "science" but also providing a justification for use of the continent as a laboratory to test all sorts of potentially valuable medical inventions/interventions - a boom for the scientist involved and the pharmaceutical industry. It also was crucial in propagating fear, enforcing medical dogma, and increasing charitable donations for the funding of "The Science"- much like the March of Dimes. The fundraising involve many celebrities that are/were idolized by the masses.
The 2000 year old Hippocratic Oath: "With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man's entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so." - is very interesting, and makes one wonder if some physicians did administer poisons to their patients for various reasons, like compensation. If so, the practice is ancient.
Thank you for posting this. I always learn in unexpected ways from your work.
Really appreciate the recent “Electric Universe” post also.
I think the main takeaway is vaccine contamination, and the way vaccine are prepared, it’s impossible to guarantee safety and purity at that level. Even today mRNA vaccines have high amounts of SV40 promoter, by using plasmids, which can recombine once injected, and is a real danger to ovaries that only have limited eggs in a lifetime. So we a creating yet another rise in soft tissues cancers just like the baby boomers generation got after Polio SR40 contamination in the 1950’s
I remember reading an article years ago about a journalist who tried to uncover the practice of growing vaccines in monkey kidneys. The kidneys were cut out of live chimpanzees and the bodies thrown in a pile behind the building to die. The practice was stopped when obtaining new chimps became too difficult. The journalist ended up dead and the Internet link disappeared.
The whole process of drug development is horrendous and should be the number one consideration for anyone to think twice about accepting one. We no longer test cosmetics on animals but EVERY drug has caused harm to animals and many humans during its development.
A very long detailed read, but it was well worth the path to the truth.
AIDS, another great medical hoax.
After reading your thorough introduction and opinion of the book, I decided not to read the whole review. However I still learned something just from your intro. So thank you and well done!