“I don’t believe you can have an honest discussion of British Empire without discussing and understanding The Rothschilds.”
This quote captures everything! You can’t understand the world unless you understand the British Empire and you can’t understand the British Empire unless you understand the Rothschilds
Along with the British Empire, we should know who actually came up with that term and that’s the man known as John Dee.
"Under the guise of conservation, the GEF has been instrumental in establishing "protected areas" that often result in displacing indigenous populations, particularly African pastoralists, from their traditional lands."
This is happening with the Maasai people in Tanzania today.
What ever happened to the US debt free silver dollar? In 1963 the US treasury was responsible for issuing the silver dollar and also Secretary Service ID credentials. After 1963 there was no more silver dollar, but plenty of Secret Service ID’s. Go figure!
Great article. I wonder what piqued my interest in the Rothschilds? The History of Money?
Eustace Mullins, most definitely. Later Dean Henderson's Big Oil. But one summer day, I was about 10, I laid under a low hanging limb of a lilac tree in my back yard. There was a massive spider web between the low limb and a much higher one. I took a closer look and found numerous fruit flies, mosquitos and one large fly. I wanted to rescue the fly. I stayed there for some time.
The spider moved painfully slow to a bug, laid atop it and bug-be-gone. Had a siesta and moved onto the next. I waited. Then I went inside to bring some lemonade outside with me and again, took up my viewing position. After quite a long time, only the fly remained on the web and the spider was back to it's original position before it began it's repast.
Was the spider waiting till it knew no resistance would be encountered not knowing if the fly was dead? Was the spider just full and saved the fly for his last tasty meal? I left and came back. I saw the spider quickly race to the fly and squirt some nasty fluid onto the fly, that it had awakened and tried to free itself, to no avail. I turned away. This play was not so entertaining after all. It had distressed me greatly. Sixty years later I remember it clearly. No better analogy of power than the fly in the spider web.
There are many elements here that could be considered antisemitic, particularly due to its use of classic tropes often associated with conspiracy theories surrounding the Rothschild family. Here’s a breakdown of elements that are especially concerning and can signal antisemitic undertones:
1. Overemphasis on “Hidden” or “Invisible” Power
Referring to the Rothschild family as a “force” with secretive and “invisible” influence over global affairs resembles the antisemitic trope of a Jewish family or group covertly manipulating world events. This narrative implies that the Rothschilds operate in shadows, hidden from the public eye, and exert near-total control over global systems, which mirrors themes in traditional antisemitic propaganda.
2. Comparison to Supervillains
The line likening the Rothschilds to Voldemort, or a “he who must not be named” figure, demonizes the family as an omnipotent, malevolent presence, a narrative often used in antisemitic rhetoric to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as threats to society.
3. References to Political Manipulation and Financial Control
Claims about grooming political leaders, controlling global institutions, and orchestrating financial crises for their gain align closely with antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish people exerting undue influence over politics and finance. These claims often echo older tropes about Jewish bankers or financiers, fostering harmful stereotypes.
4. Comparisons to Spiders in a Web
The analogy describing the Rothschilds as spiders controlling webs in a garden recalls language historically used to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as schemers who entrap others. Associating Jewish people with spiders or webs has a long history in antisemitic propaganda, and the image of webs extending covertly through society furthers this harmful stereotype.
5. Depiction as Controllers of Global Crises
The idea that the Rothschilds thrive off wars and crises, orchestrating destruction to rebuild “stronger networks,” implies that they intentionally exploit or create human suffering for profit. This paints the family as not only opportunistic but fundamentally evil, which reinforces antisemitic notions of Jewish people as puppeteers of global conflict.
6. Generalization of Influence Across History and Industry
The article implies that the Rothschilds alone have maintained control over international finance, politics, and technology for centuries, which exaggerates their real influence and reduces complex historical developments to the actions of a single family. This simplification is often a hallmark of conspiracy theories, which unjustly attribute significant societal changes or conflicts to Jewish individuals or families.
7. Implication of Dual Loyalties and Collusion with Elite Groups
Phrases like “invisible empire” and the “Club of the Isles” evoke an image of secretive Jewish networks working within and across elite circles, an antisemitic trope suggesting that Jewish people have hidden loyalties or engage in exclusive alliances with powerful entities to control societies.
In Summary
While some valid historical criticisms could be made about wealth accumulation and influence, the article employs rhetoric and imagery commonly associated with antisemitic conspiracy theories. These elements combine to paint a picture of the Rothschilds that aligns more with long-standing prejudices and stereotypes than with objective critique. Such language risks reinforcing harmful narratives rather than offering a balanced or factual account of the Rothschilds’ historical role in finance and industry.
If you do a real serious deep dive into the rothchild linage, going back further than even the name Rothchild you will come across things that will change the way you think. There is a lot of documentation that suggests they are not Jewish but of Turkish descent. They have been implicated in horrible things, and if you follow the money, it becomes undeniable that that they have been in some very dark and dishonest situations. It also becomes very apparent that that would stand to gain from a lot of traffic events. Calling a duck a duck and not a cow isn’t very antisemitic.
I don't dismiss the possibility that powerful families, banking interests, religious institutions, and political elites have exercised enormous influence throughout history. That's hardly controversial. Where I become skeptical is when that history is reduced to a single, continuous 6,000-year conspiracy carried out by one bloodline or network. That requires a level of evidence far beyond recurring names, similar institutions, or shared genetic markers.
My criticism of the Rothschild article wasn't that elites never exist or never coordinate. It was that it relied on tropes portraying one family as an almost supernatural, hidden force directing world events. Extending the timeline back to Sumer doesn't, by itself, resolve those evidentiary concerns. The question isn't whether powerful elites have existed—they clearly have. The question is whether the evidence supports one continuous organization controlling civilization across six millennia. Those are two very different claims.
Its a 2 hour of video of evidence, watch it 1st, then lets pick apart the facts.
Where I definitely see a continuous theme
1. Temple banking
2. Slave / Tax farming
3. Religious motifs
Exposed Infant" or "The Floating Chest" (The Origin: Sumer (c. 2300 BCE)The Figure: Sargon of Akkad, the first empire-builder of history.The earliest known version of this story belongs to Sargon. According to the Sargon Birth Legend (a Neo-Assyrian text likely based on older oral traditions), Sargon was born illegitimately to a high priestess who could not keep him.
Next Moses. The Figure: Moses, the lawgiver of Israel.The biblical account in Exodus 2 parallels the Sargon legend closely, likely adapting the well-known Mesopotamian trope to tell a subversive story of liberation
The Variation: India & Greece (Ancient Antiquity)The motif was not limited to the Near East; it appeared across Indo-European cultures to mark heroes of divine parentage.India (Mahabharata): Karna, son of the sun god Surya and Princess Kunti, is born illegitimately. To hide her shame, Kunti places him in a basket and floats him down the Ganga (or Ashva) river
The Imperial Legend: Rome (c. 750 BCE / 3rd Century BCE text)The Figures: Romulus and Remus, founders of Rome.The Romans utilized this trope to claim divine favor from Mars.The Vessel: A basket or trough.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone to watch a two-hour documentary before they can question its conclusions. If there's a specific piece of evidence you think is compelling, I'd be happy to discuss that.
As for the examples you cite, recurring themes like temple banking, taxation, slavery, or flood/exposed-child myths don't, by themselves, establish a continuous 6,000-year conspiracy. Historians have long recognized that cultures borrow stories, institutions, and religious motifs from one another. The Moses and Sargon parallels, for example, are well known and debated, but they don't demonstrate an unbroken elite bloodline directing civilization.
I'm open to evidence. What I'm skeptical of is the leap from "these patterns recur throughout history" to "therefore the same bloodline has secretly controlled history for six millennia." That's an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence.
Predictable comment, it had to come from someone. Nothing to do with antisemitism, all to do with what the Rothschilds have done are doing. Except that there are examples of their own antisemitism, unless it's good old-fashioned class and money snobbery.
Where I do agree with you is aome lazy scholarship where people will say its ALL the Rothschilds and ALL Jewish
House of Aldobrandini (Black Nobility)The Marriage: Baron David de Rothschild (head of the French branch) married Princess Olimpia Aldobrandini in 1974.
House of Habsburg (Imperial Austria)The Marriage: Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild married Countess Hildegard von Auersperg in 1946.
House of Ligne (Belgian Royalty)The Marriage: Philippe de Nicolay (a Rothschild descendant via the French branch) married Princess Sophie de Ligne.
House of Borghese (Black Nobility)The Connection: Through the marriage to Princess Olimpia Aldobrandini, the Rothschilds are linked to the Borghese family (Olimpia's mother was a Borghese).
House of Thurn und Taxis (German Princely House)The Marriage: Baroness Minka von Rothschild (of the Austrian branch) married Prince Alexander von Thurn und Taxis.
House of Gramont (French Ducal House)The Marriage: Baroness Marguerite de Rothschild married the Duc de Gramont in 1878.
House of Wagram (Napoleonic Nobility)The Marriage: Bertha Clara von Rothschild married the Prince de Wagram in 1882.
House of Brandolini d'Adda (Venetian Nobility)The Marriage: Marie Angliviel de la Beaumelle (daughter of Baroness Béatrice de Rothschild) married Count Brandino Brandolini d'Adda.
House of Bismarck (Prussian Iron Chancellor)The Marriage: Hannah Mathilde von Rothschild married Maximilian von Goldschmidt-Rothschild
House of FitzGerald (British Peerage)The Marriage: James Rothschild married Nicky Hilton, but historically, Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild’s sister Alice and other British Rothschilds integrated deeply into the British peerage.
I think I understand your point better now. You're not saying "it's all the Rothschilds" or "it's all the Jews." You're arguing that the Rothschilds became part of a broader network of European aristocratic and financial families through marriage.
I don't dispute that elite families often married other elite families. That's true of the Habsburgs, Windsors, Bourbons, Roman nobility, banking families, industrial dynasties, and countless others.
Where I remain unconvinced is the next step. Intermarriage shows social and financial connections. It doesn't, by itself, prove a single, coordinated organization directing world events over centuries. To establish that, you'd need evidence of common planning, common decision-making, and continuity of purpose—not simply family trees.
So I don't reject the existence of elite networks. I question whether the evidence supports the much stronger claim of a continuous 6,000-year governing conspiracy.
So we can see its not the Rothschilds, its Royalty. They have married into virtually all the Royal houses. Hence there is really like one big family. Also they are clearly not the top, look at there titles, the highest a Barron... So yes blaming them for ALL the world's ills is poor scholarship
"No direct Rothschild or immediate marital relative has ever held the title of King or Queen. While they have married into families with distant royal ties (like the House of Ligne or Italian papal royalty), European reigning royal houses (like the British Windsors or Spanish Bourbons) strictly married within other reigning Christian royal houses during the 19th and early 20th centuries, preventing the Rothschilds from entering the absolute top tier of royalty."
They are bad people bottom line, throw out the last name, throw out the ( possibility ) that they are of Jewish decent. The mentality alone is dark and very unreasonable. People in their position have absolutely no reason to cry racial stigmas anyway, it a tactic, and a petty one at that. Do a little digging, use a little cause and effect analysis. They are inbreeders, this is documented, and the ties they have are other than honorable follow the money, think about the odds. Then stand up for them!!!!
Remember that part when Luke learns Vader is his father? Or what about the one where Jacob and Esau are brothers? I think this story is so much more ancient and so much weirder than its modern form, its current cast. Maybe it’s ugly, but didn’t it explode and grow? Am I a victim of it or only alive because of it? Even though I know, I still don’t. I found myself in this story, lost as always. Do I now pick up my saber and Leeroy Jenkins my way into the devil’s layer? Or do I render unto Caesar?
The cross-temporal currency conversions are way out. For instance 450 million loaned would translate to a number vastly higher than the 13 billion shown.
“I don’t believe you can have an honest discussion of British Empire without discussing and understanding The Rothschilds.”
This quote captures everything! You can’t understand the world unless you understand the British Empire and you can’t understand the British Empire unless you understand the Rothschilds
Along with the British Empire, we should know who actually came up with that term and that’s the man known as John Dee.
He’s the magician who created the world that we have today and his tinkering of dark focuses could very well explain why would world is the way it is: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-man-behind-the-british-empire
And here’s an article on how the Rothschilds created the modern “Pro-Israel/Zionist” movement: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-polarizing-complexity-of-the-f06
Question 26, 41
"Under the guise of conservation, the GEF has been instrumental in establishing "protected areas" that often result in displacing indigenous populations, particularly African pastoralists, from their traditional lands."
This is happening with the Maasai people in Tanzania today.
What ever happened to the US debt free silver dollar? In 1963 the US treasury was responsible for issuing the silver dollar and also Secretary Service ID credentials. After 1963 there was no more silver dollar, but plenty of Secret Service ID’s. Go figure!
Great article. I wonder what piqued my interest in the Rothschilds? The History of Money?
Eustace Mullins, most definitely. Later Dean Henderson's Big Oil. But one summer day, I was about 10, I laid under a low hanging limb of a lilac tree in my back yard. There was a massive spider web between the low limb and a much higher one. I took a closer look and found numerous fruit flies, mosquitos and one large fly. I wanted to rescue the fly. I stayed there for some time.
The spider moved painfully slow to a bug, laid atop it and bug-be-gone. Had a siesta and moved onto the next. I waited. Then I went inside to bring some lemonade outside with me and again, took up my viewing position. After quite a long time, only the fly remained on the web and the spider was back to it's original position before it began it's repast.
Was the spider waiting till it knew no resistance would be encountered not knowing if the fly was dead? Was the spider just full and saved the fly for his last tasty meal? I left and came back. I saw the spider quickly race to the fly and squirt some nasty fluid onto the fly, that it had awakened and tried to free itself, to no avail. I turned away. This play was not so entertaining after all. It had distressed me greatly. Sixty years later I remember it clearly. No better analogy of power than the fly in the spider web.
Spiders need to eat too:).
Very good..
There are many elements here that could be considered antisemitic, particularly due to its use of classic tropes often associated with conspiracy theories surrounding the Rothschild family. Here’s a breakdown of elements that are especially concerning and can signal antisemitic undertones:
1. Overemphasis on “Hidden” or “Invisible” Power
Referring to the Rothschild family as a “force” with secretive and “invisible” influence over global affairs resembles the antisemitic trope of a Jewish family or group covertly manipulating world events. This narrative implies that the Rothschilds operate in shadows, hidden from the public eye, and exert near-total control over global systems, which mirrors themes in traditional antisemitic propaganda.
2. Comparison to Supervillains
The line likening the Rothschilds to Voldemort, or a “he who must not be named” figure, demonizes the family as an omnipotent, malevolent presence, a narrative often used in antisemitic rhetoric to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as threats to society.
3. References to Political Manipulation and Financial Control
Claims about grooming political leaders, controlling global institutions, and orchestrating financial crises for their gain align closely with antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish people exerting undue influence over politics and finance. These claims often echo older tropes about Jewish bankers or financiers, fostering harmful stereotypes.
4. Comparisons to Spiders in a Web
The analogy describing the Rothschilds as spiders controlling webs in a garden recalls language historically used to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as schemers who entrap others. Associating Jewish people with spiders or webs has a long history in antisemitic propaganda, and the image of webs extending covertly through society furthers this harmful stereotype.
5. Depiction as Controllers of Global Crises
The idea that the Rothschilds thrive off wars and crises, orchestrating destruction to rebuild “stronger networks,” implies that they intentionally exploit or create human suffering for profit. This paints the family as not only opportunistic but fundamentally evil, which reinforces antisemitic notions of Jewish people as puppeteers of global conflict.
6. Generalization of Influence Across History and Industry
The article implies that the Rothschilds alone have maintained control over international finance, politics, and technology for centuries, which exaggerates their real influence and reduces complex historical developments to the actions of a single family. This simplification is often a hallmark of conspiracy theories, which unjustly attribute significant societal changes or conflicts to Jewish individuals or families.
7. Implication of Dual Loyalties and Collusion with Elite Groups
Phrases like “invisible empire” and the “Club of the Isles” evoke an image of secretive Jewish networks working within and across elite circles, an antisemitic trope suggesting that Jewish people have hidden loyalties or engage in exclusive alliances with powerful entities to control societies.
In Summary
While some valid historical criticisms could be made about wealth accumulation and influence, the article employs rhetoric and imagery commonly associated with antisemitic conspiracy theories. These elements combine to paint a picture of the Rothschilds that aligns more with long-standing prejudices and stereotypes than with objective critique. Such language risks reinforcing harmful narratives rather than offering a balanced or factual account of the Rothschilds’ historical role in finance and industry.
If you do a real serious deep dive into the rothchild linage, going back further than even the name Rothchild you will come across things that will change the way you think. There is a lot of documentation that suggests they are not Jewish but of Turkish descent. They have been implicated in horrible things, and if you follow the money, it becomes undeniable that that they have been in some very dark and dishonest situations. It also becomes very apparent that that would stand to gain from a lot of traffic events. Calling a duck a duck and not a cow isn’t very antisemitic.
Turfseer. Spoken like a true Rothschild/ Zionist apologist. Bravo. To deny is to confirm.
https://youtu.be/7UbZbTh9cWY?si=x4mVqQlrTr94qxf5
Its goes back before Babylon to Sumer, this guy traces the current bloodlines to 6000 year, using the same game of usery, temple banking, religion etc
I don't dismiss the possibility that powerful families, banking interests, religious institutions, and political elites have exercised enormous influence throughout history. That's hardly controversial. Where I become skeptical is when that history is reduced to a single, continuous 6,000-year conspiracy carried out by one bloodline or network. That requires a level of evidence far beyond recurring names, similar institutions, or shared genetic markers.
My criticism of the Rothschild article wasn't that elites never exist or never coordinate. It was that it relied on tropes portraying one family as an almost supernatural, hidden force directing world events. Extending the timeline back to Sumer doesn't, by itself, resolve those evidentiary concerns. The question isn't whether powerful elites have existed—they clearly have. The question is whether the evidence supports one continuous organization controlling civilization across six millennia. Those are two very different claims.
Its a 2 hour of video of evidence, watch it 1st, then lets pick apart the facts.
Where I definitely see a continuous theme
1. Temple banking
2. Slave / Tax farming
3. Religious motifs
Exposed Infant" or "The Floating Chest" (The Origin: Sumer (c. 2300 BCE)The Figure: Sargon of Akkad, the first empire-builder of history.The earliest known version of this story belongs to Sargon. According to the Sargon Birth Legend (a Neo-Assyrian text likely based on older oral traditions), Sargon was born illegitimately to a high priestess who could not keep him.
Next Moses. The Figure: Moses, the lawgiver of Israel.The biblical account in Exodus 2 parallels the Sargon legend closely, likely adapting the well-known Mesopotamian trope to tell a subversive story of liberation
The Variation: India & Greece (Ancient Antiquity)The motif was not limited to the Near East; it appeared across Indo-European cultures to mark heroes of divine parentage.India (Mahabharata): Karna, son of the sun god Surya and Princess Kunti, is born illegitimately. To hide her shame, Kunti places him in a basket and floats him down the Ganga (or Ashva) river
The Imperial Legend: Rome (c. 750 BCE / 3rd Century BCE text)The Figures: Romulus and Remus, founders of Rome.The Romans utilized this trope to claim divine favor from Mars.The Vessel: A basket or trough.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone to watch a two-hour documentary before they can question its conclusions. If there's a specific piece of evidence you think is compelling, I'd be happy to discuss that.
As for the examples you cite, recurring themes like temple banking, taxation, slavery, or flood/exposed-child myths don't, by themselves, establish a continuous 6,000-year conspiracy. Historians have long recognized that cultures borrow stories, institutions, and religious motifs from one another. The Moses and Sargon parallels, for example, are well known and debated, but they don't demonstrate an unbroken elite bloodline directing civilization.
I'm open to evidence. What I'm skeptical of is the leap from "these patterns recur throughout history" to "therefore the same bloodline has secretly controlled history for six millennia." That's an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence.
Predictable comment, it had to come from someone. Nothing to do with antisemitism, all to do with what the Rothschilds have done are doing. Except that there are examples of their own antisemitism, unless it's good old-fashioned class and money snobbery.
Where I do agree with you is aome lazy scholarship where people will say its ALL the Rothschilds and ALL Jewish
House of Aldobrandini (Black Nobility)The Marriage: Baron David de Rothschild (head of the French branch) married Princess Olimpia Aldobrandini in 1974.
House of Habsburg (Imperial Austria)The Marriage: Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild married Countess Hildegard von Auersperg in 1946.
House of Ligne (Belgian Royalty)The Marriage: Philippe de Nicolay (a Rothschild descendant via the French branch) married Princess Sophie de Ligne.
House of Borghese (Black Nobility)The Connection: Through the marriage to Princess Olimpia Aldobrandini, the Rothschilds are linked to the Borghese family (Olimpia's mother was a Borghese).
House of Thurn und Taxis (German Princely House)The Marriage: Baroness Minka von Rothschild (of the Austrian branch) married Prince Alexander von Thurn und Taxis.
House of Gramont (French Ducal House)The Marriage: Baroness Marguerite de Rothschild married the Duc de Gramont in 1878.
House of Wagram (Napoleonic Nobility)The Marriage: Bertha Clara von Rothschild married the Prince de Wagram in 1882.
House of Brandolini d'Adda (Venetian Nobility)The Marriage: Marie Angliviel de la Beaumelle (daughter of Baroness Béatrice de Rothschild) married Count Brandino Brandolini d'Adda.
House of Bismarck (Prussian Iron Chancellor)The Marriage: Hannah Mathilde von Rothschild married Maximilian von Goldschmidt-Rothschild
House of FitzGerald (British Peerage)The Marriage: James Rothschild married Nicky Hilton, but historically, Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild’s sister Alice and other British Rothschilds integrated deeply into the British peerage.
I think I understand your point better now. You're not saying "it's all the Rothschilds" or "it's all the Jews." You're arguing that the Rothschilds became part of a broader network of European aristocratic and financial families through marriage.
I don't dispute that elite families often married other elite families. That's true of the Habsburgs, Windsors, Bourbons, Roman nobility, banking families, industrial dynasties, and countless others.
Where I remain unconvinced is the next step. Intermarriage shows social and financial connections. It doesn't, by itself, prove a single, coordinated organization directing world events over centuries. To establish that, you'd need evidence of common planning, common decision-making, and continuity of purpose—not simply family trees.
So I don't reject the existence of elite networks. I question whether the evidence supports the much stronger claim of a continuous 6,000-year governing conspiracy.
So we can see its not the Rothschilds, its Royalty. They have married into virtually all the Royal houses. Hence there is really like one big family. Also they are clearly not the top, look at there titles, the highest a Barron... So yes blaming them for ALL the world's ills is poor scholarship
"No direct Rothschild or immediate marital relative has ever held the title of King or Queen. While they have married into families with distant royal ties (like the House of Ligne or Italian papal royalty), European reigning royal houses (like the British Windsors or Spanish Bourbons) strictly married within other reigning Christian royal houses during the 19th and early 20th centuries, preventing the Rothschilds from entering the absolute top tier of royalty."
They are bad people bottom line, throw out the last name, throw out the ( possibility ) that they are of Jewish decent. The mentality alone is dark and very unreasonable. People in their position have absolutely no reason to cry racial stigmas anyway, it a tactic, and a petty one at that. Do a little digging, use a little cause and effect analysis. They are inbreeders, this is documented, and the ties they have are other than honorable follow the money, think about the odds. Then stand up for them!!!!
If you in fact haven’t done the research then your words do more damage then you might think.
pffffft.
Yikes!
What can we do about it? I think you’ll find that 8 billion people can do quite a lot about it. If they are pointed in the right direction.
And they own the C19 vac patent. In 2015, 4 years before the …
Fantastic as always.!
Remember that part when Luke learns Vader is his father? Or what about the one where Jacob and Esau are brothers? I think this story is so much more ancient and so much weirder than its modern form, its current cast. Maybe it’s ugly, but didn’t it explode and grow? Am I a victim of it or only alive because of it? Even though I know, I still don’t. I found myself in this story, lost as always. Do I now pick up my saber and Leeroy Jenkins my way into the devil’s layer? Or do I render unto Caesar?
"while carefully stressing that this is being done despite rather than because of their Jewish identity"
Haha, yeah right. That's why otherwise Jews play such positive roles in their host societies. 109 and counting.
Great work. It’s quite hard, as stated in the article, to evaluate their contemporary influence owing to their obscurant financial practices.
The cross-temporal currency conversions are way out. For instance 450 million loaned would translate to a number vastly higher than the 13 billion shown.
Dear Unbekoming
David Irving was a guest at my home in 2012 for a couple of days...
I will publish on EarthNewspaper.com on Monday.
For Fear Of The Jews.
Love Is The Answer
Mark R. Elsis
The Fugitive Wants Your I.D.
...one MOSIP o'you
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/the-fugitive-wants-your-id