I agree with Liam: if you can show them how THIS is a lie, then they can see how THAT is a lie! That was the premise of my book: if we can see how the last 200 years were created, we can see what’s wrong with our current world and spot the fallacies: https://www.unorthodoxtruth.com/
While reading this, I was thinking of you Franklin. If anyone out there is searching for more truth, Franklin and his https://www.unorthodoxtruth.com/ is an excellent resource!
There is an excellent documentary on Prime I believe. Takes you through the De Vere evidence. It made it clear to me that Shakespeare did not write any of those plays and such. Shakespeare : the truth behind the name. On prime.
Makes me wonder who is behind that version of the Bible. Also, who was behind organised religions? This is even more important to know than the Shakespeare hoax.
Don't all Bibles go back to Sumerian time knockoffs? Beyond that, it's always the gooberment needing to control the peeps, .. Somehow the Masons fit into this ... I think I just repeated myself. Just Like Shakespeare was said to be Francis Bacon I think it was. AND Who REALLY was King James is up for debate fer sure!
You make a good case here. The idea of known authors such as Johnson and Marlowe being Shakespeare has never worked for me. They no more resemble Shakespeare (or one another) than Pope resembles Dryden.
However, a single author of substantial education and political experience who is unknown under his own signature...now that does make sense. So well done!
Absolutely outstanding; the best I've ever read on the subject.
Homer also seems like a compilation of oral tradition from various sources.
The closest analogy in the 20th century is probably the Beatles: they couldn't play the same piece the same way twice. :) Also, popular songs and movies in English have colonized the world. There are people who even consider rap "music"!
Common myths abound and keep the mind imprisoned between the walls of its beliefs. Here is my collection of the American Mind:
Very interesting! Would you please give us an available resource that discusses the Masonic symbolism in "Shakespeare's" plays that you mention. Thank you very much.
found and downloaded pdf ... thx. looks interesting. and Hall appears to have been really into it all (the "secret teachings," et al), ie, it's "friendly fire" not oppositional, so probably even worse than what he describes.
The myths surrounding Shakespeare have striking similarity with the myths surrounding Pasteur, both of which persist to this day; in fact they are both born in similar climates of political, economic and social influences and the strong desire to build a national character that would dominate the world, no matter how much that strategy was based upon lies and deception; is humanity somehow still better off whether "genius" is contrived or not and contributed to wrongful authors? Well, only if we are content to live in a pseudo reality or false matrix and relinquish the honest pursuit of truth as imaginary and unattainable and we already know the consequences arising from making that choice; truths, historical or otherwise, have a way of eventually breaking free because they have a life that can't be denied forever...whether we can handle it or not!
Thanks very much for the shout out Unbekoming. I'll give it a close read later. The great irony is that the plays are destructive to and mock humanity, women and romantic love and are nothing to be celebrated beyond their remarkable ability to deceive. Case in point: Romeo and Juliet:
An 81 yo Englishman named William Shakespeare was the second person in Britain to receive the Covid-19 vaccination on 8 December 2020 at University Hospital in Coventry. His name was splashed all over the news media.
Oh Romeo, oh Romeo, where art thou Romeo? Here I is. Awesome essay and fits the common life so completely. It always comes down to time, who has the time to research every lie only a man with a life of Riley and little worries. The common man can be fed what they want and, in most cases, will just accept it or not even give it a second thought. Herd mentality, follow the science, Shakespeare, it's all the same. They have kept our ride so full of tragedy we never get to deep dive and find what this trip is all about. Retirement can give u this time, don't waste it and please above all pass this knowledge on to the mind full of mush for future reference. We don't have to be pawns we can become the King.
Imagine the ancient Greek goddess Athena, who is famously depicted in art wearing a helmet and holding a spear along with a shield, symbolizing wisdom, warfare, and strategy. She is often shown with an owl and the spear, a symbol of her military prowess and courage...... Shake Spear.
Both articles are nicely written , but untrue in the fundamental claim.
Magic absolutely does exist.. Genius can appear in a pauper , even a relatively non-connected one. The collective unconscious is a real thing and I first bumped into it at around age 4 . It may seem surreal if you havnt discovered it for yourself, but a huge firmament of densely packed world knowledge is out there and it's like a pre-internet version of the internet.
It probably helps if you fraternise with a few smart and well travelled people. I suspect a child born in a byre who only interacts with pigs might struggle a bit to find the enlightened zone, but I think even that might be possible.
I used to describe it as the 'ether' as a child.. it was the best word I could find. I think Akashic field may be a name for the same type of thing.
Much of the worlds information is inside, in an inner realm ... and I think it important for kids to learn that fact also.
Shakespeare was no doubt a ploy ... but it neednt be the case .
The following passage from the article stood out to me: “When Prospero announces he'll "drown his book" at The Tempest's end, he's not just renouncing magic—he's demonstrating the English virtue of pragmatic action over Continental mysticism.” …In my opinion, the elites (or whatever you want to call them) knew and know full-well the power of the Aether, and they have been using this to their great advantage. They use the this knowledge to suppress and control the masses while convincing the majority of us that our true nature (our divinity) is fantasy. It sounds absolutely bonkers to most, but “Magic absolutely does exist” (just not in the way most think about “magic”).
The main problem I had with JK Rowling was that she didnt believe in magic. Schooled a whole generation to believe in theatrical magic rather than the real thing.
She's a front. She didn't write the books. Someone else did. Harry Potter is a psyop and social engineering project as well as a moneymaker. Clever, these freemasons:).
You think so ?? I’d never thought it through. Is there any evidence ? I’ve had a repulsion from her books since they first came out. Just no interest. Not sure if they repelled me or I repelled them. She made a lot of money for sure.
I would suggest the internet, even the name "the Cloud", is a false imitation of the ether, an attempt for us to depend on its curated, monitored and controlled network moulding our minds, so we don't use the actual ether itself or our own biofield which connects us. Add Artificial Intelligence as both oracle and supreme being and you get the makings of total control and a world religion.
Yup, indeed. It kicked in at around around the same time as many people were reaching a more subtle consciousness also. Kind of pipping it at the post. I think AI is the tower of Babel/ Antichrist type entity .. the true consciousness is the one it usurped . It’s tricky to live in both worlds.. sort of steampunk half technology - half enlightenment :/ .
I would, thankyou ! I was hesitating about spelling it Aether too. Does look better that way.
I havn't yet found limits to that realm, so god knows what it's capable of.
RL Stevenson used to sit on the same beach as me and apparently little goblin/pixies came to him with snippets of ideas for his books. It may sound odd but I feel I know just what he meant by that.
People who stare at computers and TVs are missing 'soooooooo' much.
Shakespeare wasnt an uncommon name at the time and many families had pseudonyms . My family did. So the idea that a gentleman farmer might have access to genius, whilst most of his family were illiterate, is quite possible, in theory at least.
Hmmmm. How would the untrained novice recognize a 'genius idea,' and with what knowledge, experience, and desire to experiment and develop the genius idea, DO anything with it? Can you name 3-4 of these "can and do" untrained novices who have EVER gone anywhere with some genius idea that dropped out of the sky?
Surely, a 'novice' car repairer could have a 'genius idea' land effortlessly on him -- ASSUMING you ignore some years of car repair, some struggling to find a 'fix' for some new problem, some experience with similar or related problem, which the magnificent human brain can occasionally put together into a genius idea? But how it that not just plain old human inbuilt skill at recognizing patterns?
And a tyro 'suddenly' getting a 'genius idea' out of the aether for a new instrument or a new musical pattern... yet without experience, with or without training in music, without ANY way to develop or built or publicize or display the 'genius idea' -- so what?
No offense intended, I am baffled by the idea that an uneducated, untrained, inexperienced, anyone could trip over a genius idea and recognize it!
because genius is a thing of beauty. .. and intelligence. It draws you in . It is ‘self evident. I can only say that because Ive experienced it . I knew very complex things I never learned from a book and I had not TV . it was ‘in the aether’ .. It has taken me many years to realise that lots of folks cant see the aether. I really dont know how to explain it to someone who cant see it but the ‘air’ is full of ‘information ‘ . I think someone called it a noosphere ? The air is packed full of dense information and you can read it and it kind of teaches you in the same way the internet can these days… it was there long before the internet so that’s basically how it’s done. You can research idiots savants for a glimpse of it maybe .
I agree with Liam: if you can show them how THIS is a lie, then they can see how THAT is a lie! That was the premise of my book: if we can see how the last 200 years were created, we can see what’s wrong with our current world and spot the fallacies: https://www.unorthodoxtruth.com/
From dinosaurs to viruses, evolutions and space, we’ve been duped into believing into a whole lot of fallacies: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth
While reading this, I was thinking of you Franklin. If anyone out there is searching for more truth, Franklin and his https://www.unorthodoxtruth.com/ is an excellent resource!
Cathleen! Thank you so much for this stamp of support! It’s greatly appreciated!
Except he doesn’t know the ultimate truth about the Creator and His Truth (revealed in His Word!!) 📜
There is an excellent documentary on Prime I believe. Takes you through the De Vere evidence. It made it clear to me that Shakespeare did not write any of those plays and such. Shakespeare : the truth behind the name. On prime.
Psalm 46 in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. the translation was completed around 1610—when Shakespeare was 46 years old
The 46th word from the beginning of Psalm 46 is "shake".
The 46th word from the end (excluding the word Selah) is "spear".
Put together: "Shake" + "spear" = Shakespeare.
This makes sense if we live in a simulated reality.
It’s much more than “simulated,” but you’re on to something here!
Makes me wonder who is behind that version of the Bible. Also, who was behind organised religions? This is even more important to know than the Shakespeare hoax.
Don't all Bibles go back to Sumerian time knockoffs? Beyond that, it's always the gooberment needing to control the peeps, .. Somehow the Masons fit into this ... I think I just repeated myself. Just Like Shakespeare was said to be Francis Bacon I think it was. AND Who REALLY was King James is up for debate fer sure!
You make a good case here. The idea of known authors such as Johnson and Marlowe being Shakespeare has never worked for me. They no more resemble Shakespeare (or one another) than Pope resembles Dryden.
However, a single author of substantial education and political experience who is unknown under his own signature...now that does make sense. So well done!
Absolutely outstanding; the best I've ever read on the subject.
Homer also seems like a compilation of oral tradition from various sources.
The closest analogy in the 20th century is probably the Beatles: they couldn't play the same piece the same way twice. :) Also, popular songs and movies in English have colonized the world. There are people who even consider rap "music"!
Common myths abound and keep the mind imprisoned between the walls of its beliefs. Here is my collection of the American Mind:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/in-the-prison-of-the-american-mind
Very interesting! Would you please give us an available resource that discusses the Masonic symbolism in "Shakespeare's" plays that you mention. Thank you very much.
The Secret Teachings of All Ages, Manley Hall, 1928, Chapter 38.
found and downloaded pdf ... thx. looks interesting. and Hall appears to have been really into it all (the "secret teachings," et al), ie, it's "friendly fire" not oppositional, so probably even worse than what he describes.
The myths surrounding Shakespeare have striking similarity with the myths surrounding Pasteur, both of which persist to this day; in fact they are both born in similar climates of political, economic and social influences and the strong desire to build a national character that would dominate the world, no matter how much that strategy was based upon lies and deception; is humanity somehow still better off whether "genius" is contrived or not and contributed to wrongful authors? Well, only if we are content to live in a pseudo reality or false matrix and relinquish the honest pursuit of truth as imaginary and unattainable and we already know the consequences arising from making that choice; truths, historical or otherwise, have a way of eventually breaking free because they have a life that can't be denied forever...whether we can handle it or not!
Thanks very much for the shout out Unbekoming. I'll give it a close read later. The great irony is that the plays are destructive to and mock humanity, women and romantic love and are nothing to be celebrated beyond their remarkable ability to deceive. Case in point: Romeo and Juliet:
https://robertfrederick.substack.com/p/the-occult-shakespeare-the-hidden?r=1iqqju
Cheers, RF
It is no coincidence that the first person in the UK to receive the jab was a "William Shakespeare" and Hancock couldn't conceal his mirth.
An 81 yo Englishman named William Shakespeare was the second person in Britain to receive the Covid-19 vaccination on 8 December 2020 at University Hospital in Coventry. His name was splashed all over the news media.
He has now died of an "unrelated" stroke.
:).
Liam Scheff's book is one of the most fascinating reads ever. Highly recommend.
I remember Joseph Sobran accepting the De Vere authorship back in the 90s. I believe he wrote a book about it.
I almost stop listening near the beginning. Your words were oppositional to my understanding of history. It was like I had to kick down a fence.
I kicked it down and a whole new realm opened in my mind. To say I'm flabbergasted is an unstatement.
The genius of this Shakespeare operation is unparalleled. I'm wondering why everything that could be beautiful is turned against humanity?
Is that what life was meant to be or not to be?
Oh Romeo, oh Romeo, where art thou Romeo? Here I is. Awesome essay and fits the common life so completely. It always comes down to time, who has the time to research every lie only a man with a life of Riley and little worries. The common man can be fed what they want and, in most cases, will just accept it or not even give it a second thought. Herd mentality, follow the science, Shakespeare, it's all the same. They have kept our ride so full of tragedy we never get to deep dive and find what this trip is all about. Retirement can give u this time, don't waste it and please above all pass this knowledge on to the mind full of mush for future reference. We don't have to be pawns we can become the King.
Imagine the ancient Greek goddess Athena, who is famously depicted in art wearing a helmet and holding a spear along with a shield, symbolizing wisdom, warfare, and strategy. She is often shown with an owl and the spear, a symbol of her military prowess and courage...... Shake Spear.
Both articles are nicely written , but untrue in the fundamental claim.
Magic absolutely does exist.. Genius can appear in a pauper , even a relatively non-connected one. The collective unconscious is a real thing and I first bumped into it at around age 4 . It may seem surreal if you havnt discovered it for yourself, but a huge firmament of densely packed world knowledge is out there and it's like a pre-internet version of the internet.
It probably helps if you fraternise with a few smart and well travelled people. I suspect a child born in a byre who only interacts with pigs might struggle a bit to find the enlightened zone, but I think even that might be possible.
I used to describe it as the 'ether' as a child.. it was the best word I could find. I think Akashic field may be a name for the same type of thing.
Much of the worlds information is inside, in an inner realm ... and I think it important for kids to learn that fact also.
Shakespeare was no doubt a ploy ... but it neednt be the case .
Try meditating a bit maybe.
The following passage from the article stood out to me: “When Prospero announces he'll "drown his book" at The Tempest's end, he's not just renouncing magic—he's demonstrating the English virtue of pragmatic action over Continental mysticism.” …In my opinion, the elites (or whatever you want to call them) knew and know full-well the power of the Aether, and they have been using this to their great advantage. They use the this knowledge to suppress and control the masses while convincing the majority of us that our true nature (our divinity) is fantasy. It sounds absolutely bonkers to most, but “Magic absolutely does exist” (just not in the way most think about “magic”).
The main problem I had with JK Rowling was that she didnt believe in magic. Schooled a whole generation to believe in theatrical magic rather than the real thing.
"She" is a cutout.
what do you mean ??
She's a front. She didn't write the books. Someone else did. Harry Potter is a psyop and social engineering project as well as a moneymaker. Clever, these freemasons:).
You think so ?? I’d never thought it through. Is there any evidence ? I’ve had a repulsion from her books since they first came out. Just no interest. Not sure if they repelled me or I repelled them. She made a lot of money for sure.
I would suggest the internet, even the name "the Cloud", is a false imitation of the ether, an attempt for us to depend on its curated, monitored and controlled network moulding our minds, so we don't use the actual ether itself or our own biofield which connects us. Add Artificial Intelligence as both oracle and supreme being and you get the makings of total control and a world religion.
Yup, indeed. It kicked in at around around the same time as many people were reaching a more subtle consciousness also. Kind of pipping it at the post. I think AI is the tower of Babel/ Antichrist type entity .. the true consciousness is the one it usurped . It’s tricky to live in both worlds.. sort of steampunk half technology - half enlightenment :/ .
It's going to be fooling a lot of people, but they are ripe to be fooled. Awakening is not for everyone. But truth has never been democratic.
Yeowoman, you’d like my collection of articles on the aether: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-aether-is-what-its-all-about
I would, thankyou ! I was hesitating about spelling it Aether too. Does look better that way.
I havn't yet found limits to that realm, so god knows what it's capable of.
RL Stevenson used to sit on the same beach as me and apparently little goblin/pixies came to him with snippets of ideas for his books. It may sound odd but I feel I know just what he meant by that.
People who stare at computers and TVs are missing 'soooooooo' much.
Shakespeare wasnt an uncommon name at the time and many families had pseudonyms . My family did. So the idea that a gentleman farmer might have access to genius, whilst most of his family were illiterate, is quite possible, in theory at least.
In what way untrue!?
In what way untrue!?
The idea that genius ideas cant just land effortlessly on an untrained novice ... They can and they do, regularly.
I really like Shakespeare and I think whoever wrote it was helping people to function at a more subtle level akin to real genius.
Hmmmm. How would the untrained novice recognize a 'genius idea,' and with what knowledge, experience, and desire to experiment and develop the genius idea, DO anything with it? Can you name 3-4 of these "can and do" untrained novices who have EVER gone anywhere with some genius idea that dropped out of the sky?
Surely, a 'novice' car repairer could have a 'genius idea' land effortlessly on him -- ASSUMING you ignore some years of car repair, some struggling to find a 'fix' for some new problem, some experience with similar or related problem, which the magnificent human brain can occasionally put together into a genius idea? But how it that not just plain old human inbuilt skill at recognizing patterns?
And a tyro 'suddenly' getting a 'genius idea' out of the aether for a new instrument or a new musical pattern... yet without experience, with or without training in music, without ANY way to develop or built or publicize or display the 'genius idea' -- so what?
No offense intended, I am baffled by the idea that an uneducated, untrained, inexperienced, anyone could trip over a genius idea and recognize it!
because genius is a thing of beauty. .. and intelligence. It draws you in . It is ‘self evident. I can only say that because Ive experienced it . I knew very complex things I never learned from a book and I had not TV . it was ‘in the aether’ .. It has taken me many years to realise that lots of folks cant see the aether. I really dont know how to explain it to someone who cant see it but the ‘air’ is full of ‘information ‘ . I think someone called it a noosphere ? The air is packed full of dense information and you can read it and it kind of teaches you in the same way the internet can these days… it was there long before the internet so that’s basically how it’s done. You can research idiots savants for a glimpse of it maybe .