Not relevant....there are plenty of non Jewish folk more than happy to go along with this. Blaming all the members of one single religion is unacceptable
The idea that the Rothschilds are behind everything is being perpetuated by anglosaxon observers. Nial Ferguson is a court Historian and thus subservient to the powerful Angloamerican establishment that he avoids scrutinising. Docherty and Macgregor are not Court Historians as may be seen when they make good use of Carroll Quigley's exposure of that establishment and how it or actually the British dominating circles behind that establishment caused the world war.
.
But all anglosaxons believe or want to convince others that the Rothschilds are pulling the strings.
.
I however dispute that. My view is that the anglosaxons mean to maintaining the jews isolated and distrusted while on the same time the anglosaxons benefit from the role of the jewish bankers. Always serving the empire but simultaneously being prevented from having a similar role in collaborating with the rivals of the anglosaxons. The fact that the British was deeply involved both in encouraging nazism and zionism raises much less interest among anglosaxon authors than to posit the usual theory about the jewish bankers. But no bankers are allowed to be so called international bankers. Because that would mean market economy not forced to favour the Anglosaxon Empire.
.
Nazism and zionism both functioned as a way to prevent such jews from having fruitful relations with Germany and Russia.
Not to mention how The Protocols of The Elders of Zion influenced those who read it. And there is evidence Britain was behind it. Both under Lord Palmerston and later under Edward VII.
Despite both Germany and Russia having had such relations before. What escapes the attention of many opinionated people is how Britain has threatened the bankers against becoming too friendly to Britains rivals. If the jews had assimilated among Britains rivals it would have been much more difficult to prevent the kind of collaboration that Britain feared.
.
Zionism and the Israel project was not originally a Jewish request. But an entirely British imperial project. The British had to talk the court jews into the project. Had the Jews themselves been the driving force behind it they wouldnt know for how long the anglosaxons would have been ready to support it.
.
When the project originated from the anglosaxons who simultaneously built the absurd idea about British Israelism they did signal to the jews that they were quite serious about it. And years before Theodore Herzl became a zionist the anglosaxons already hade established a Christian Zionist Lobby in the US. Something usually omitted when AIPAC is mentioned. It wasnt founded until 31 years after the Christian Zionist Lobby.
The anglosaxons are the only party who benefits from the overuse of the antisemitism argument.
It only makes everybody hate the jews.
So it pushes them into more dependence on the anglosaxons.
.
The current genocide committed by the fascist regime in Israel fits that pattern. The world is rising around the weakening empire. So the jewish bankers have to be held closer. That is achieved by encouraging the jews to make themselves even more hated. But they are not encouraged to play nice.
.
Rabin tried and died
.
I suggest that everything connected with nazism and zionism was created in Britains interest and as we know is still defended by them. It is a way for the anglosaxons to control banking by isolating the numerically inferior jewish group and making it difficult for them to have any independence from the anglosaxons. There are signs that this type of relation already existed between the jewish money lenders and the Venetian Oligarchy at the time when that oligarchy transplanted itself to Northern Europe and with time turned Britain itself into an oligarchy. The Venetian agents of influence in the 16th century informed the English Monarchy about both the Talmud and the Kabbalah. Since that time English Kings have had a ceremony where they say they are Kings of Israel.
.
King Charles III more recently also went through such a ceremony. And he visited his ancestors who are buried in Jerusalem. But that doesnt mean a picture where a Rothschild presses his finger in Charles chest means anything other than propaganda in Britains interest. It doesnt prove the anglosaxons are serving the jews. It only means you are the target of a psychological manipulation.
.
There are more details worth mentioning but I cut it short for now.
I appreciate your mini-essay and agree the Jewish banking establishment is a later addition to an already entrenched exploitation mindset. As an antidote, I enjoy reading, say, Michael Hudson since he explains the post WWII monetary devices of Bretton Woods clearly and doesn't seem overly interested in the Rothschilds/Warburgs/Rockefellers. If we go all the way back to the Crusades and the five factions of Christianity vying for dominance, it's the descendants of the Roman Oligarchs who won and became official dogma. We are the children of the Roman Empire with more deadly weapons.
Or we could go farther back to the first five hundred years of the Byzantine Empire and those political machinations. Certainly the Black Venetian Nobility enter into the picture as do the Freemasons and the Jesuits so pointing the finger of blame might just be an exercise in futility.
As Pogo said, "we have met the enemy and he is us."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the essay on the international banking system, while accurate, is outdated. All of the information in the essay was available 20 years ago. Since the European Union was formed, the new international banking center is Brussels Belgium---- ot Basel. They are looking forward to the North American Union being formed, and then the eight other economic regions being formed to make the original 10 as planned over 100 years ago. Henry Kissinger often talked about the 10 economic regions being planned for the one world government, as most of those plans originated in the Rockefeller think tanks in the mid-1950s and probably before. The agreement at Brettonwoods was the beginning of putting everything down on paper, but I suspect The 10 economic unions were probably planned before the formation of the federal reserve bank in the United States in 1913.
If you want a complete history on the formation of those plans beginning in England about 1870, buy a copy of "the creature from Jekyll Island"
The original idea behind the new economic world order was to reduce or take away the sovereignty of each independent nation, and make it subservient to the economic union that the nation belong to, which intern would be subservient to whoever was elected president or king over the 10 economic regions. In revelation, the last book in the New Testament, it describes how the antichrist will be elected as the new ruler of these 10 economic unions, which by this time, Ihave become a one world government enabled by the United Nations in the world health organization.
This government, although appearing to be very benevolent towards people and promoting peace in the beginning, actually turns into a radically totalitarian government which controls everyone's speech, movement, bank account, health insurance, etc. Basically, you can't make a move without being a servant to the new world orders rules. The punishment for not taking the number, or having it printed on your forehead or your hand, is beheading.
I am no historian, just someone who likes to read books a lot, so I have read several books in the bibliography list myself----but there is so much more new information in the last 25 years that has not been included, I just feel that people need to be informed that the reason the globalists and the banking system have been so diametrically opposed to Donald Trump is because he has always stated he will support the constitution and wants to keep American sovereignty----America is the one country that is actually preventing totalitarian takeover of the world to form the new economic world order.
The majority of people have absolutely no idea about what is happening behind the scenes, although there are many more millions informed now than there was 25 years ago, ----but probably not enough to stop it.
Thank you - "wealth transfer" vs. "wealth creation" vs. "wealth allocation." That is the battlefield. Reading - "Tragedy & Hope 101" by Joseph Plummer.
Vehicles of wealth transfer - War, big Govt (taxes, the administrative State, big money influence), Pandemics, etc.
From AlterAI https://alter.systems/ - "POSIWID stands for “The Purpose Of a System Is What It Does.”
This principle, coined by systems theorist Stafford Beer, is elegantly subversive. It dismantles the illusion that institutions or systems should be judged by their stated mission—their glossy, PR-friendly “purpose statements”—and instead insists they be judged by their actual outcomes."
This essay vividly reframes what most mainstream narratives treat as a technical or accidental debt crisis into a structural phenomenon — where the mechanics of money creation, interest, and central bank coordination actively shape global power. It’s a reminder that finance isn’t just markets and models; it’s architecture with political and human consequences.
This is one of the grossest things I have ever read in my life. May they all be reborn as the cockroaches they truly are and squished for a thousand lifetimes. 🤢
All money is debt of the creator. If a country can't pay, that debt can be waved away with the flick of a pen, or that very same debt can be weaponized to rape, pillage, and completely obliterate a country, it's all down to a 500 pound fat-cat banker
This piece nails the machinery. I want to add one destabilizing thought experiment that actually reinforces your thesis rather than undermines it.
Imagine the usual suspects—central bankers, IMF technocrats, BIS governors, dynastic families—aren’t the apex at all, but interfaces. Middle management. Heat shields.
Now introduce an unknown variable: call them Genies. Long-lived beings, centuries not decades, never public, never documented, never subpoenaed. They don’t run institutions. They design incentive systems and let humans operate them.
Suddenly several puzzles resolve themselves:
Why the same debt architecture persists across centuries despite wars, revolutions, and “exposures.”
Why no scandal ever touches the core.
Why human elites behave like well-paid custodians, not sovereign owners.
Why the system is cruel but calibrated—extractive without collapsing its host.
In that frame, money isn’t just a tool of control. It’s the perfect one: abstract, technical, impersonal. Humans enforce it on themselves. Debt becomes a self-policing mechanism. No whips, no armies—just arithmetic.
The Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Volckers, IMF enforcers? They take the blame, sign the papers, age out, die. The architects remain unnamed because they never appear in the story at all.
You don’t have to believe in Genies to see the point. The system behaves as if its designers are non-human in timescale, patience, and emotional detachment. Whether that’s literal beings, inherited institutional intelligence, or something stranger almost doesn’t matter.
Your essay exposes the machine.
This lens explains why smashing the visible operators never stops it.
Well, it's as obvious as day then, the crooks must be treated as the traitors of humanity that they are. Refocus attention on the only war that matters. They cant hide any longer, they muat br brought into the court of natural justice. When you steal from the collectivw world, the world will punish in equal measure. Paymemt for such sins inbound with each individual who is enlightened about the ponzi scheme.
In the 1970’s the borrower owned almost 100% of the interest rate risk which Paul Volker used to great effect. Then the majority of housing debt was owned by local banks using a variety of different products to manage their interest rate risk. Fannie and Freddie were bit players in the mortgage world. Today Fannie and Freddie dominate the mortgage world they have assumed all of the interest rate risk which used to be owned by either the borrower or a local lender. They are financed themselves with what is essentially variable rate money (their bond portfolio has to be redone almost once every three years). So what happens if a new Paul Volker attempts to triple interest rates again? I as the mortgagee who has sub 4% 30’year fixed rate will do anything not to prepay that low interest rate. The duration of the mortgages lengthen out dramatically from the normal 7 years. So who is taking the hit ? It’s not the borrowers this time? Yes Fannie and Freddie sold the bonds to someone else so are those bond holders going to suffer? And if so why on earth would they ever buy new ones to keep the system going? Does it all end up on the Federal Reserve balance sheet via a massive QE increase which would just result in massive inflationary pressures
🏦 NOW HIRING: BIS OLIGARCH
Office: Bank for International Swindlements 🐍💰
Location: Basel (jurisdiction: global, consequences: total)
Compensation: Unlimited liquidity, permanent immunity
Start Date: Immediately — the next “unexpected” crisis is already scheduled ⏰💣
POSITION OVERVIEW
🔥 High Priest of the Global Debt Cult
🔥 Orchestrate economic destruction while insisting markets are “free”
🔥 Operate above nations, beyond law, and outside public comprehension
🔥 Ensure money remains imaginary, debt eternal, and blame forever external
REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS
💳 Lifelong devotion to the debt-based money system. If it isn’t loaned at interest it doesn’t exist
🫧 Proven success inflating bubbles you later call “irrational exuberance”
📉 Talent for engineering boom-bust cycles that always enrich insiders
🖨️ Ability to create trillions digitally while blaming inflation on vibes, weather, poor people
🏚️ Track record of destroying savings, pensions, and wages without losing your calm voice
🧊 Skilled at triggering and prolonging recessions, then lobbying to remove oversight
🏦 Extensive history of bailing out banks while insisting moral hazard applies only to everyone else
🎭 Expert in socializing losses, privatizing gains, and rebranding theft as “stability”
🗳️ Willingness to override elected governments “for their own good”
🌍 Experience converting sovereign nations into permanent debt colonies
🕶️ Attendance at secret meetings where “nothing is decided” and everything is aligned
📱 Enthusiasm for CBDCs, biometric IDs, programmable money, and permission-based living
🔒 Ability to design a digital gulag that feels modern, inclusive, and user-friendly
🧬 Talent for reframing control as equity, surveillance as safety, and obedience as trust
PERSONAL TRAITS
😌 Calm priestly demeanor while detonating economies
🐍 Forked tongue wrapped in velvet reassurance
🧠 Absolute certainty that the public must never understand how money works
🥂 Total insulation from consequences, inflation, or reality
WHAT WE OFFER
🏰 Headquarters with sovereign immunity and no extradition
💸 Unlimited access to freshly conjured money
✈️ Davos panels, private flights, lifetime protection from prosecution
🎬 A starring role in the managed decline of civilization (streaming rights retained)
APPLY NOW!!
Because democracy is messy.
And money should never belong to the people who earn it.
This vacancy proudly sponsored by:
🐍 The Bank of Boot on Your Neck — a proud subsidiary of inevitability™ 🐍
You left out they must be jewish or a shabbos goy they control via blackmail care of Mossad pedo operations and the like.
Not relevant....there are plenty of non Jewish folk more than happy to go along with this. Blaming all the members of one single religion is unacceptable
I did blame shabbos goys who are not jewish.
The idea that the Rothschilds are behind everything is being perpetuated by anglosaxon observers. Nial Ferguson is a court Historian and thus subservient to the powerful Angloamerican establishment that he avoids scrutinising. Docherty and Macgregor are not Court Historians as may be seen when they make good use of Carroll Quigley's exposure of that establishment and how it or actually the British dominating circles behind that establishment caused the world war.
.
But all anglosaxons believe or want to convince others that the Rothschilds are pulling the strings.
.
I however dispute that. My view is that the anglosaxons mean to maintaining the jews isolated and distrusted while on the same time the anglosaxons benefit from the role of the jewish bankers. Always serving the empire but simultaneously being prevented from having a similar role in collaborating with the rivals of the anglosaxons. The fact that the British was deeply involved both in encouraging nazism and zionism raises much less interest among anglosaxon authors than to posit the usual theory about the jewish bankers. But no bankers are allowed to be so called international bankers. Because that would mean market economy not forced to favour the Anglosaxon Empire.
.
Nazism and zionism both functioned as a way to prevent such jews from having fruitful relations with Germany and Russia.
Not to mention how The Protocols of The Elders of Zion influenced those who read it. And there is evidence Britain was behind it. Both under Lord Palmerston and later under Edward VII.
Despite both Germany and Russia having had such relations before. What escapes the attention of many opinionated people is how Britain has threatened the bankers against becoming too friendly to Britains rivals. If the jews had assimilated among Britains rivals it would have been much more difficult to prevent the kind of collaboration that Britain feared.
.
Zionism and the Israel project was not originally a Jewish request. But an entirely British imperial project. The British had to talk the court jews into the project. Had the Jews themselves been the driving force behind it they wouldnt know for how long the anglosaxons would have been ready to support it.
.
When the project originated from the anglosaxons who simultaneously built the absurd idea about British Israelism they did signal to the jews that they were quite serious about it. And years before Theodore Herzl became a zionist the anglosaxons already hade established a Christian Zionist Lobby in the US. Something usually omitted when AIPAC is mentioned. It wasnt founded until 31 years after the Christian Zionist Lobby.
The anglosaxons are the only party who benefits from the overuse of the antisemitism argument.
It only makes everybody hate the jews.
So it pushes them into more dependence on the anglosaxons.
.
The current genocide committed by the fascist regime in Israel fits that pattern. The world is rising around the weakening empire. So the jewish bankers have to be held closer. That is achieved by encouraging the jews to make themselves even more hated. But they are not encouraged to play nice.
.
Rabin tried and died
.
I suggest that everything connected with nazism and zionism was created in Britains interest and as we know is still defended by them. It is a way for the anglosaxons to control banking by isolating the numerically inferior jewish group and making it difficult for them to have any independence from the anglosaxons. There are signs that this type of relation already existed between the jewish money lenders and the Venetian Oligarchy at the time when that oligarchy transplanted itself to Northern Europe and with time turned Britain itself into an oligarchy. The Venetian agents of influence in the 16th century informed the English Monarchy about both the Talmud and the Kabbalah. Since that time English Kings have had a ceremony where they say they are Kings of Israel.
.
King Charles III more recently also went through such a ceremony. And he visited his ancestors who are buried in Jerusalem. But that doesnt mean a picture where a Rothschild presses his finger in Charles chest means anything other than propaganda in Britains interest. It doesnt prove the anglosaxons are serving the jews. It only means you are the target of a psychological manipulation.
.
There are more details worth mentioning but I cut it short for now.
"You're never the villain in your own story."
I appreciate your mini-essay and agree the Jewish banking establishment is a later addition to an already entrenched exploitation mindset. As an antidote, I enjoy reading, say, Michael Hudson since he explains the post WWII monetary devices of Bretton Woods clearly and doesn't seem overly interested in the Rothschilds/Warburgs/Rockefellers. If we go all the way back to the Crusades and the five factions of Christianity vying for dominance, it's the descendants of the Roman Oligarchs who won and became official dogma. We are the children of the Roman Empire with more deadly weapons.
Or we could go farther back to the first five hundred years of the Byzantine Empire and those political machinations. Certainly the Black Venetian Nobility enter into the picture as do the Freemasons and the Jesuits so pointing the finger of blame might just be an exercise in futility.
As Pogo said, "we have met the enemy and he is us."
Peter. Who’s the manipulator? And how?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the essay on the international banking system, while accurate, is outdated. All of the information in the essay was available 20 years ago. Since the European Union was formed, the new international banking center is Brussels Belgium---- ot Basel. They are looking forward to the North American Union being formed, and then the eight other economic regions being formed to make the original 10 as planned over 100 years ago. Henry Kissinger often talked about the 10 economic regions being planned for the one world government, as most of those plans originated in the Rockefeller think tanks in the mid-1950s and probably before. The agreement at Brettonwoods was the beginning of putting everything down on paper, but I suspect The 10 economic unions were probably planned before the formation of the federal reserve bank in the United States in 1913.
If you want a complete history on the formation of those plans beginning in England about 1870, buy a copy of "the creature from Jekyll Island"
The original idea behind the new economic world order was to reduce or take away the sovereignty of each independent nation, and make it subservient to the economic union that the nation belong to, which intern would be subservient to whoever was elected president or king over the 10 economic regions. In revelation, the last book in the New Testament, it describes how the antichrist will be elected as the new ruler of these 10 economic unions, which by this time, Ihave become a one world government enabled by the United Nations in the world health organization.
This government, although appearing to be very benevolent towards people and promoting peace in the beginning, actually turns into a radically totalitarian government which controls everyone's speech, movement, bank account, health insurance, etc. Basically, you can't make a move without being a servant to the new world orders rules. The punishment for not taking the number, or having it printed on your forehead or your hand, is beheading.
I am no historian, just someone who likes to read books a lot, so I have read several books in the bibliography list myself----but there is so much more new information in the last 25 years that has not been included, I just feel that people need to be informed that the reason the globalists and the banking system have been so diametrically opposed to Donald Trump is because he has always stated he will support the constitution and wants to keep American sovereignty----America is the one country that is actually preventing totalitarian takeover of the world to form the new economic world order.
The majority of people have absolutely no idea about what is happening behind the scenes, although there are many more millions informed now than there was 25 years ago, ----but probably not enough to stop it.
Excellent and balanced account of banking and geopolitics.
Thank you - "wealth transfer" vs. "wealth creation" vs. "wealth allocation." That is the battlefield. Reading - "Tragedy & Hope 101" by Joseph Plummer.
Vehicles of wealth transfer - War, big Govt (taxes, the administrative State, big money influence), Pandemics, etc.
From AlterAI https://alter.systems/ - "POSIWID stands for “The Purpose Of a System Is What It Does.”
This principle, coined by systems theorist Stafford Beer, is elegantly subversive. It dismantles the illusion that institutions or systems should be judged by their stated mission—their glossy, PR-friendly “purpose statements”—and instead insists they be judged by their actual outcomes."
This essay vividly reframes what most mainstream narratives treat as a technical or accidental debt crisis into a structural phenomenon — where the mechanics of money creation, interest, and central bank coordination actively shape global power. It’s a reminder that finance isn’t just markets and models; it’s architecture with political and human consequences.
This is one of the grossest things I have ever read in my life. May they all be reborn as the cockroaches they truly are and squished for a thousand lifetimes. 🤢
All money is debt of the creator. If a country can't pay, that debt can be waved away with the flick of a pen, or that very same debt can be weaponized to rape, pillage, and completely obliterate a country, it's all down to a 500 pound fat-cat banker
In any event it's become pretty clear who the real parasites are if nothing else....The original Useless Eaters.
Also please see "Our Country, Then and Now" by Richard C. Cook
This piece nails the machinery. I want to add one destabilizing thought experiment that actually reinforces your thesis rather than undermines it.
Imagine the usual suspects—central bankers, IMF technocrats, BIS governors, dynastic families—aren’t the apex at all, but interfaces. Middle management. Heat shields.
Now introduce an unknown variable: call them Genies. Long-lived beings, centuries not decades, never public, never documented, never subpoenaed. They don’t run institutions. They design incentive systems and let humans operate them.
Suddenly several puzzles resolve themselves:
Why the same debt architecture persists across centuries despite wars, revolutions, and “exposures.”
Why no scandal ever touches the core.
Why human elites behave like well-paid custodians, not sovereign owners.
Why the system is cruel but calibrated—extractive without collapsing its host.
In that frame, money isn’t just a tool of control. It’s the perfect one: abstract, technical, impersonal. Humans enforce it on themselves. Debt becomes a self-policing mechanism. No whips, no armies—just arithmetic.
The Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Volckers, IMF enforcers? They take the blame, sign the papers, age out, die. The architects remain unnamed because they never appear in the story at all.
You don’t have to believe in Genies to see the point. The system behaves as if its designers are non-human in timescale, patience, and emotional detachment. Whether that’s literal beings, inherited institutional intelligence, or something stranger almost doesn’t matter.
Your essay exposes the machine.
This lens explains why smashing the visible operators never stops it.
That’s the real horror—and the real clarity.
—RIB
Well, it's as obvious as day then, the crooks must be treated as the traitors of humanity that they are. Refocus attention on the only war that matters. They cant hide any longer, they muat br brought into the court of natural justice. When you steal from the collectivw world, the world will punish in equal measure. Paymemt for such sins inbound with each individual who is enlightened about the ponzi scheme.
https://dangerousglobe.com/news/money-for-nothing/?doing_wp_cron=1766788354.6106579303741455078125. Our offering on the subject...a layman's view
In the 1970’s the borrower owned almost 100% of the interest rate risk which Paul Volker used to great effect. Then the majority of housing debt was owned by local banks using a variety of different products to manage their interest rate risk. Fannie and Freddie were bit players in the mortgage world. Today Fannie and Freddie dominate the mortgage world they have assumed all of the interest rate risk which used to be owned by either the borrower or a local lender. They are financed themselves with what is essentially variable rate money (their bond portfolio has to be redone almost once every three years). So what happens if a new Paul Volker attempts to triple interest rates again? I as the mortgagee who has sub 4% 30’year fixed rate will do anything not to prepay that low interest rate. The duration of the mortgages lengthen out dramatically from the normal 7 years. So who is taking the hit ? It’s not the borrowers this time? Yes Fannie and Freddie sold the bonds to someone else so are those bond holders going to suffer? And if so why on earth would they ever buy new ones to keep the system going? Does it all end up on the Federal Reserve balance sheet via a massive QE increase which would just result in massive inflationary pressures