Toxic By Design: “Hot Lots” and how to avoid them.
Can this really be happening?
I first came across the idea of “bad batches” on Telegram, I think. A gentleman by the name of Craig Paardekooper, a UK researcher, did the following analysis on the Moderna jabs. In summary, the reported adverse reactions when analysed against their batch numbers WERE NOT RANDOM.
Craig Paardekooper - Death by Alphabet Final Update
This article is a good summary of the video:
“Death by Alphabet: Moderna batch codes and associated deaths”
The batches with J, K, L and M are the most toxic and in the category ending in 20A.
The batches with A, B, C, D, E and F belong to the less toxic category which is the category of batches ending in 21A .
The less toxic have all killed people. The weakest dose has still hurt many.
-
This video demonstrates that –
1. there are different ranges of toxicity for different batches.
2. These ranges of toxicity are distinct from each other.
3. These ranges of toxicity are each labelled with a different letter of the alphabet
4. Toxicity decreases in a linear fashion as the alphabetic designation ascendsAs a result, batches can cause 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, or 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.
Moderna has labelled their vaccine batches in accordance with their toxicity.
If you produce thousands of batches of a product, in this instance Covid jabs, and they produce adverse reactions, the pattern of those adverse reactions should be random. They are not.
I have to admit, I found it interesting at the time but didn’t know how to think about it or for that matter whether it was true or not. It was one man’s analysis, and I had never heard of him before, so I put it to one side and didn’t think about it again.
That was until I watched this recent interview with Mike Yeadon. Many of you know who Mike is and if you don’t, he does a great job of rolling out his CV in the first 15 minutes of the video.
Dr. Mike Yeadon and Reiner Fuellmich and Wolfgang Wodarg
I strongly recommend the video, it’s just over two hours but Yeadon covers a lot of ground and does a wonderful job of recapping important aspects of the last two years.
But the main thrust of the interview was the further analysis of this issue of toxic batches. Yeadon and a separate team had further analysed Paardekooper’s work and confirmed his thesis. That’s good enough for me.
There are essentially two types of batches. Those that are very dangerous and those that are far less dangerous.
The following three slides tell the story best.
This first slide does a side by side comparison of the base data as compared to flu vaccines.
Over 10 years there have been 22,334 Lots of flu vaccines that have caused 906 deaths in the US.
This compares with 24,945 Lots of Covid jabs, over 12 months, causing 7,335 deaths (to the point of that analysis, it’s much higher now). Obviously, these are only reported numbers that don’t take into account a URF (Under Reporting Factor).
So, about the same number of Lot Numbers (these Lot Numbers are grouped into Batches).
This second slide is really the Control.
Here we see all 22,000+ Flu Lots on the X-axis (horizontal) and each Lot’s AR numbers (Adverse Reaction) on the Y-axis. What you see quite easily is the “static” of the ARs with the overwhelming majority in the 1-2 AR per Lot range. You can see a couple of outliers, or HOT LOTS as Yeadon calls them.
One of the obvious conclusions is that of Pharma’s ability to produce incredibly consistent product at extremely high volumes over very long periods of time. In fact, when it comes to manufacturing standards there would not be another industry with better quality manufacturing capability. This is a critical point to remember as you look at this third slide.
What you are now looking at might be one of the strangest (and possibly most sinister) charts of the last two years.
To fully understand the chart, please watch the Yeadon interview.
But, in a nutshell, about 10% of the Lots produce 90% of the Adverse Reactions.
This is a truly stunning finding.
Most lots are not dangerous (based on short term AR reports) but a small percentage are Highly Toxic.
This is NOT manufacturing error. Remember these people are the best in the world at manufacturing exactly the same thing 10s of millions of times. They don’t make “mistakes” like this.
So, if it’s not a mistake, then what is it?
One way to understand this chart, is that IT IS NOT THE SAME STUFF.
The Deadly Lots are different from the other Lots.
I am sure you are asking the question: If this is true, why would they do that? This calls for speculation, and I’m not going to do that. Yeadon has some pretty hard views on what is going on, and I urge you to watch the full interview to come to terms with his analysis and speculation.
What I am more interested in is whether this is true or likely to be true, and for me the answer is YES, it is true.
This website, built by Craig is the main resource, that seems to be regularly updated with all the data made available in an easy to use manner.
How Bad is my Batch ?
How Bad is my Batch ? (Back up)
For example, if you are in Australia and have or are thinking of taking Pfizer, you go to this page:
Pfizer Outside of USA (howbadismybatch.com)
Enter your Batch Code and look at the results.
It is a truly incredible resource.
Here is a health warning from the page:
Health Warning :
According to data reported in VAERS, reproduced here, adverse events triggered by Pfizer batches have varied widely.
70% of the batches are associated with only 1 or 2 deaths per batch, but a small % of the batches appear to be more toxic - being associated with 10 x, 20 x, 30 x , 40 x, 50 x, 100 x or even 200 x the number of deaths compared to the less harmful 70% of the batches.
Therefore, members of the public should be wary of the batch they are receiving, and doctors and nurses should ALWAYS check the batch number before administering it, to see of it is associated with an excessive number of deaths
What do we do with this information?
I’ve been interested from day one with figuring out what is true and then finding the most useful application of that truth. For all those people forced to get one of the genetic jabs I wrote this:
I think this new knowledge can now be added to our risk management toolkit if you HAVE TO take the jab or a booster.
Make your Dr aware of this issue and this site (it MIGHT rattle them out of his deep sleep).
Before you let them inject you, check the batch number and if you are not happy with it, get then to find another vial. If all vials are from the same batch (and it’s a tox batch) then simply make another appointment with another Dr.
I think this information is the most concrete risk reducing information available to us so far.
Boosters
Here is data on Boosters inside and outside the US (updated monthly).
Recent Batches (howbadismybatch.com)
Robert Malone
The first shot was fine. No issues.
The second shot almost did me in. As in I almost died.
After the injection, I had the usual fatigue, muscle-ache and then the palpitations started, as well as shortness of breath. Within a couple days, it got worse - I am not someone who goes to the doctor easily, but luckily for me, I happened to have a routine appointment with my physician. She cuffed me and my systolic blood pressure was through the roof. As she is also a cardiologist, she had more tests run, started me on high blood pressure meds and we got it under control. I kind of feel like I owe her my life. A call out to the fantastic Dr. C. Bove.
Robert checked out the site www.howbadismybatch.com, and low and behold, the second Moderna jab that almost killed him was one of the 5% of deadly Moderna batches.
Steve Kirsch
Here Steve raises some concerns about the analysis. Overall, I don’t agree with his concerns because if they were problems of transit, storage or temperature, you would still end up with random patterns. The analysis is pretty clear by Craig first and then in Yeadon’s presentation that there are clear patterns in the data. It is not random.
Celia Farber
Celia is a serious journalist. One of the best.
Here is correspondence between her and Dr Dave Rasnick:
“I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London. Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group.
Three of his conclusions:
· The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
· Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total.
· 1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients.
Craig Paardekooper
Craig has done simply incredible work here. He gets all the credit for first doing the analysis and publishing his findings in Oct 2021 I believe.
Here is Craig’s BitChute Channel, he has several videos worth watching:
Craig-Paardekooper (bitchute.com)
His small YouTube Channel
Here is a link to a shared folder in which I’ve put several of his written pieces on the subject:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AlBmJY-fbVChhtwmOvb4qq42QG4wIg?e=Je3RXx
Thank you for compiling this in one resource. I am so happy to have just recently found your substack.
Has anyone does a "terrain risk" correction, yet?