This is a phenomenal piece of work. Thank you. I've spent the past almost six years unlearning all that I thought I knew and understood. It's been exhilarating, but profoundly depressing. I ran our baby clinic for twenty years, which now fills me with horror. There's so much to learn. Hopefully the lies are unravelling, but we've some way to go-the pathogen model is deeply embedded in our culture's psyche.
Thank you for this open statement of yours. It's always a consolation to see medical professionals "seeing the light" and recognizing they were trapped in a system of lies and deception all their life. Virusmania certainly a great book and eye-opener.
Yet another paradigm that will hopefully unravel is cancer. Which is a topic for all of us. Even if we are lucky personally there will be friends and relatives battling with this. What you will read here is even worse in its implications by a dimension or two. Please spread and share if it rhymes with you. We need medical professionals to wake us all up what has been going on there. For well over 100 years as it seems.
Trial by Jury – The Case of the Missing Corona ‘Virus’
[The camera zooms in on the courtroom packed with reporters, their pens poised. The aspiring viroLIEgist sits nervously at the witness stand, fidgeting with a stack of lab notes. Across from him stands the sharp-dressed attorney, Mr. Rigorous, known for his devastating cross-examinations. Behind him, the jury watches intently]
Judge: [Hammering the gavel] Order in the court! Mr. Rigorous, you may proceed with your cross-examination.
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] Thank you, Your Honor. [He approaches the viroLIEgist] Dr. Specimen, you claim to have isolated a novel corona virus, is that correct?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Uh, yes, yes. We have a robust methodology –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Robust, you say? [He winks at the jury] Let’s start at the beginning. Did you, at any point, isolate and purify this so-called “virus” directly from the fluids of a sick patient?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, not exactly. You see, direct purification from fluids is unnecessary because –
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in, eyebrows raised] Unnecessary? I see. What you’re telling us is that you skipped the part where you would actually prove there’s a virus in the patient’s mucus?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] We used a well-established protocol. Instead, we combined the
patient’s mucus with a monkey kidney cell culture, starved it, and –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting with mock concern] Oh, so you took a patient’s mucus, mixed it with cells from an entirely different species, starved those cells, poisoned them with toxic chemicals, antibiotics, and, what was it again, fetal bovine serum?
Dr. Specimen: Well, yes, that’s standard –
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] “Standard.” So, after this biological disaster, when the cells inevitably broke down and died, you claimed that was evidence of a virus?
Dr. Specimen: [Getting defensive] Yes! The cytopathic effect is what –
Mr. Rigorous: [Smirking] Cytopathic effect! Ah, the mysterious code for “we poisoned cells and
watched them die.” Tell me, Dr. Specimen, what proof do you have that the breakdown of these poisoned, malnourished cells was caused by a virus rather than, say… the toxic soup you created?
Dr. Specimen: [Stammering] Well, it’s what the literature says and, um… everyone knows –
Mr. Rigorous: [Cutting in] “Everyone knows?” [He gestures dramatically to the jury] I believe
this court would prefer evidence over gossip, Doctor. Now, let’s talk about the ’genome’ you supposedly ‘discovered.’ You took this toxic brew, fed it into a machine, and then used some software to assemble ’genetic’ pieces, correct?
Dr. Specimen: Yes, yes, we sequenced the ’genome’ –
Mr. Rigorous: [Raising his voice] Ah, sequenced! You mean the software took fragments and tried to fit them together, like a biological jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces?
Dr. Specimen: [Defensively] It’s highly sophisticated software!
Mr. Rigorous: [Sarcastically] Sophisticated? Doctor, if I fed a pile of shredded newspaper into that machine, would it also “reconstruct” War and Peace?
[The jury chuckles. Dr. Specimen looks increasingly uncomfortable]
Dr. Specimen: [Panicking] No, no! It’s different. This is how we create the viral genome.
Mr. Rigorous: [Slyly] Create, you say? So, we’re not finding a virus – we’re creating one?
Interesting choice of words, Doctor. Now, did you ever attempt to prove that this Frankenstein creation could naturally infect a healthy host?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, no. We injected lab animals with the toxic cell culture, and when they got sick –
Mr. Rigorous: [Mocking] Sick from your toxic brew? And that, Doctor, is what you call “evidence” of transmission? You didn’t try something simple, like, I don’t know, letting the sick patient sneeze on a healthy person?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] Natural transmission doesn’t work well in the lab! It’s much cleaner to inject -
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Cleaner? Cleaner to torture animals with direct injections of this toxic sludge you call a “virus”? [He lets the words hang in the air.] Doctor, do you have any explanation for why you skipped natural transmission altogether, or is it because – oh, I don’t know – it never works?
[The courtroom erupts with murmurs. Dr. Specimen is visibly sweating]
Mr. Rigorous: [Turning to the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, this man would have you believe that by starving cells, poisoning them, and injecting that toxic concoction into helpless animals, he’s “proving” a virus exists. All without ever isolating or purifying anything! Is this science… or sleight of hand?
[He paces dramatically, letting the tension build]
Mr. Rigorous: One last thing, Doctor. After injecting animals with this ‘viral’ brew, did you ever attempt to purify the “virus” again from those animals to confirm it was there?
Dr. Specimen: [Almost whispering] No…
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in] No? You never bothered to re-isolate the virus, because that would expose the fact it wasn’t there in the first place, wouldn’t it?
[Dr. Specimen is completely defeated, sinking lower in his seat]
Mr. Rigorous: [Addressing the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case. We are dealing with
scientific fraud on a monumental scale, a fraud that never once demonstrated the existence of a virus through proper isolation or purification. It’s smoke and mirrors! I leave it in your capable hands to deliver justice.
[The jury nods thoughtfully as they leave the room to deliberate. After a brief pause, they return, their verdict ready]
Judge: Members of the jury, have you reached a verdict?
Jury Foreperson: [Standing] We have, Your Honor. We find the defendant… guilty of scientific fraud!
Judge: [Solemnly] Very well. [He turns to Dr. Specimen] For crimes against logic and reason, and for misleading the public in the name of science, I hereby sentence you to… [He smirks] a life term as the head of the National Institute of Infectious Arse-covering and Deception -NIIAD.
[The courtroom erupts in gasps and laughter as the viroLIEgist is dragged out, wailing in ‘protest’]
The Rockefellers set up an institution in New York that focused on virology in 1901. It was first named the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research but is now simply called Rockefeller University. It has produced both plenty of new viruses and Nobel prize winners. For example, the guy who claims to have discovered the Hepatitis B virus in the 1950s, Dr Saul Krugman, was trained there.
The Rockefellers are the richest and most influential and powerful dynasty in America. No one gets to be president unless they are Rockefeller-approved. The Rockers are high level masons - think something like Supreme Most Worshipful Grand Master of the Most Important Lodge in the United States type masons. People like say Trump are far lower level - they take orders, not give them.
Covid was a freemasonic psychological operation. The detection of a virus is more or less irrelevant. Major operations like 911, invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and Covid, are not made by anyone in the US government working for a pay cheque, and that includes the current chump in chief.
I'm with you most of the way here, Gecko, until “The detection of a virus is more or less irrelevant.”
How many mothers would have their kids jabbed — enrolling them as guinea pigs on a diabolical childhood quackccine schedule — if they knew viruses had never been proven to exist? I submit it would have been far more challenging to PsyOP the public and financially devastate their lives had people understood the fraud of germ theory and its satanic spawn, viroLIEgy.
Virology is one Lie. Genetic origin of cancer another. How many more?
Courtesy of alter systems:
The Gene Myth Serves Profit and Control
The "genetic origin" of cancer is a foundational myth of Rockefeller medicine, built after the Flexner Report (1910) when the Rockefeller Foundation took control of U.S. medical education. It redirected focus from empirical, naturalistic healing traditions toward laboratory chemistry and patentable pharmaceuticals. Once research funding and curricula came under that model, any observation inconsistent with the gene-determinism narrative was summarily dismissed — including work showing that:
- Parasites and microbial organisms were found in (and sometimes transmitted by) tumors.
- Cancer incidence correlated more strongly with toxic exposure, immune suppression, and parasitic loads than with inherited genes.
- Genes, in many cases, merely respond to environmental insult or infection, not cause the disease de novo.
The "genome project" was a breathtakingly expensive mirage — it produced no cure, no major predictive biomarkers of cancer risk, and no understanding of causation that could prevent disease. But it created hundreds of billions in research spending, patents, and grants.
The primary fallacy of pharmakeia and its grand theory of a "virus" is that it claims that a "virus" has no metabolism. It exists un-animated as a pure parasite. But even a parasite must metabolize energy to initiate the parasitic extraction of energy from a host.
When I took cell physiology at university they taught us the Krebs Cycle and photosynthesis. I had to learn about something called dissimilatory sulfate reduction when I later encountered anaerobic bacteria living 3,000 meters deep in the earth's crust that ate oil and metabolized it into methane. But not once have I encountered a defined energy pathway describing how a "virus" survives, so instead we get discussions on whether a "virus" is alive or dead, but never a discussion regarding how something can exist and be animated without a metabolism. It's like something ushered straight out of hell - a forever undead organism.
Some kind of energy must be fixated and expended to begin the parasitic process of extracting energy from the host. Even if for only a second. Pharmekeia makes no sense on the grounds of claiming that its "virus" is no more than an inert catalyst for the mass transcription of RNA. There are ALWAYS energy inputs.
While I agree about the weakness of current virology in realistically explaining disease, it is a problem distinct from the actual existence of the particles concerned independent of what their real role in nature is. I enclose part of a scientific article of Boris Ikhlov where he shows a list of viruses with their concommitant calculated microwave torsional resonances.
In that document is cited one reference with experimental confirmation namely for human
influenza virus, that was killed with a microwave resonance.
Yang SC, Lin HC, Liu TM, Lu JT, Hung WT, Huang YR, Tsai YC, Kao CL, Chen SY, Sun CK. Efficient Structure Resonance Energy Transfer from Microwaves to Confined Acoustic Vibrations in Viruses. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 9;5:18030. doi: 10.1038/srep18030. PMID: 26647655; PMCID: PMC4673452.
.
Ikhlov claims it works for subharmonics.
Other data is based on a theoretical formula for the torsional resonance frequencies tabulated
I list it since it shows how some scientists other than in medicine dont doubt their existence and trust the physics of DNA and RNA torsional vibrations as something real
In another article Ikhlov showed experimental confirmation relating to E-Coli. Its experimentally confirmed resonance was at 10.14GHz Resonance width was around 10MHz at 21 C
I dont know if this table will be legible after pasting it.
If not I apologize. The calculated frequencies lie between 44 and 372GHz
Table 1: Physical characteristics of virus genomes.
Name Length Genome f1, GHz f2, GHz Multiplicity
Monkeypox virus 196 858 bp DNA 49,0 9,804 5
Variola major virus 240 000 bp DNA 44,4 11,100 4
Adenoviridae 34-36 тыс. bp DNA 118 - 114 - -
Human respiratory
syncytial virus, HRSV 15 277 bp DNA 176 10,351 17
Rhinovirus 10 000 nRNA 217,5 10,357 21
Hepatitis B virus, HBV 3200 n DNA f3 - -
HIV-1 9180 2 RNA 230,23 10,010 23
Coxsackievirus 7396 bp DNA 252,9 10,116 25
Ebola virus Zaire 18 959 RNA 226,56 10,298 22
E.v. Sudan 18 875 RNA 227,07 10,321 22
E.v.Bundibugyo 18 940 RNA 226,68 10,3035 22
Influenza viruses 7000-8500 n vRNA 372, 86-338, 37 - -
LMFAO! So this dude wants us to separate “virology can’t explain disease” from the “actual existence of particles” — the same particles that have never been isolated, purified, or seen doing anything outside a poisoned monkey kidney soup — and now we’re supposed to believe they have microwave torsional resonances?
Bro, the only thing twisting is your logic, the only thing resonating is the collective facepalm, and the only audience for your imaginary cooties is a very confused unicorn doing yoga at 3 GHz.
Tant qu'une particule n'est pas isolée - purifiée, il est impossible d'affirmer qu'il s'agit d'un virus. Il n'y a pas écrit "virus" dessus et comme jamais cet isolement- purification n'a été réalisé, personne ne sait à quoi ressemble un virus prétendumment pathogène. Parce qu'il faut, après avoir isolé strictement cette particule suspectée de tout le reste, la tester en la mettant en contact avec un être humain. Si cet être humain tombe malade (de la maladie en question) et que certains autres critères sont ensuite safisfaits, on peut alors affirmer que cette particule est un virus pathogène. Comme jamais aucun virus n'a suivi ce parcours de "particule suspecte" à "test sur être humain", toutes les histoires de virus sur lesquels seraient effectués certains travaux sont bidons. Leurs auteurs se dispersent en oubliant les fondamentaux.
So you dude dont want to separate those questions but want them entangled making it harder to sort it out. That tells us that you are an irrational secterist without scientific culture. We are probably both critical of how medical science is degenerated but you prefer to turn it into matters of group think.
Peter, if you’re going to make claims about viruses, you need to provide actual evidence of their existence. There is none that adheres to the scientific method — unless you’re planning to hold up the viroLIEgists’ so-called ’gold standard’ of proof: poisoning monkey kidney cell cultures and calling the resulting cytopathic effects a virus. Please tell me you don’t subscribe to that level of pseudoscience?
No I dont trust that witches brew they use to claim things about isolation of anything.
But I am not going to make claims of my own. I reported how it is viewed by nonmedical scientists. The reason people claim it doesnt exist is that it is not proven to spread disease and without that proof it is neither clear what the target entity is.
.
Therefore the scepticism is warranted. However DNA molecules as well as RNA are seen as existing entities. And there are a host of strings with the basepairs being the assumed constituents. With numbers from a thousand up to billions. They are seen as being coded with a 64 bit code. Like in a modern computer.
.
Now viruses are but one of the simpler entities built with that basic material. It isnt odd that the biological world needs an advanced system for maintenance. One opinion about what they do is that they constitute part of the bodies cleaning staff. It takes unhealthy molecular material apart as one specialised task that bacteria would take more time to handle. If they even could handle it.
.
This way of viewing viruses explains why there would need to be a great variety of them suited to different tasks to speed up the maintenance of the body content.
That idea I think is closer to Béchamp's old theory.
.
It is claimed that the natural DNA contains the code of some viruses.
The established science explains that as something that happened during evolution and that some virus once hijacked the DNA. But that explanation may well be wrong if it is like I sketched above about viruses being part of the cleaning staff. If that is the case it would be convenient to have a template for cloning often used maintenance equipment.
.
Another idea that may or may not be compatible with the first is that viruses are warning messages emitted by an injured cell.
.
Sometimes the issues are so harmful due to the effect of toxines that the organism has a better chance of surviving if it goes partly suicidal so the destructed part's material may be reused by the healthy part of the organism. And when the issue is even worse the whole organism may be instructed to kill itself.
.
Nature will then be reusing everything from the corps.
.
That theory seems to be logically possible. Even though the less extreme aspects that a virus is a message to its environment seems very reasonable as part of the operation of our bodies.
.
Proteines inside the cells are both there for transports to and fro the cell nucleus and there are other functions in a cell that mimic the functioning of a city with transport and signalling. So signalling to the environment with special coded messages also seems natural.
Peter, none of what you wrote addresses my question. I asked for actual scientific evidence of a virus that doesn’t rely on poisoning monkey kidney cells and rebranding the resulting cell death as ’isolation.’ Instead of evidence, you gave me a stream of speculative metaphors about cleaning crews, warning messages, apoptosis, and what you personally imagine viruses might do. That’s not science — it’s storytelling.
So let’s try again: Do you have any empirical evidence for a virus as a real, independent entity, or are you just avoiding the question?
Why on earth am I required to answer about something I dont consider serious science.
.
You seem to have got stuck into some kind of police action against a narrative I never supported. Relax!
.
There is a reason why I called it a witches brew.
.
But DNA is real and RNA. ( I am aware that some opinions even doubting that they do exist but those who argue in that manner havent suggested any alternative explanation about how the body is organised. As long as they dont have that I stick to the established view of the type of molecules we are dealing with.) Its chemical structure is known. It is also known how it is resonant to UV light and I have already covered the torsional resonances. Viruses are of the DNA and RNA types. These matters of resonances are according to scientists not just thermal effects. For example it has been suggested that UV light may disturb the DNA or RNA strings so they might have torsional resonances excited.
.
Those strings may be examples of certain code sequences that are specialised on breaking down chemical substances that the body needs to clense itself from otherwise the body's all transport lines would clog and the organism would die.
.
How do you suppose the body would handle its massive production of waste unless it had some subtleties like that operating on a regular basis. I dont care if those code snippets are called viruses or something else.
You didnt read attentively. If you had read it you would have noticed that there were two examples of experimental verification of the nonthermal effects this is about.
For example I mentioned the test of the theory using E-Coli Bacteria. It is easier since they are bigger than viruses but still follow the same formula so the resonance frequency is lower. millimeter wave equipment is probably expensive. But 10 GHz is easier to access. The resonance was sharp 10MHz i e one thousand of the center frequency. The theory is simple. The resonance frequency is predicted to be
21.75 THz divided by the square root of the number of Base pairs. This means RNA viruses are predicted to have higher resonance frequencies by a factor of about 1.4 compared with the corresponding DNA resonance
For example human chromosomes are predicted to have resonances in the neighbourhood of mobile phone frequencies and Bluetooth.
Since women and men have different numbers of X chromosomes mens resonance signals might be half that of women for that particular chromosome.
I dont know if this has been confirmed experimentally but if so it may be held secret
It is possible that the resonances are not well resolved due to the conditions in the warm body of a living creature.
You start every military campaign by declaring how the enemy is doing nasty things to little babies. By the time the yarns are debunked, people are so deeply engaged in the war that nobody cares about whether the Bosch were actually tossing Belgian babies from bayonet to bayonet. (What about those baby-baking Gazans?)
Once Covid became a way of life with its demands. fears, rituals and expenditures, few cared about Chinese lab-leak yarns and none wondered about the reality of invisible wrigglies, etc. People had their King James Version of disease for a sense of solidarity, and they had their rigmaroles for a sense of control. Dogma and ritual made the reality. Vaccine injury and lockdown provided the deaths needed to keep belief strong.
What is it they say about a lie streaking out the door while the truth is pulling on its socks?
From the beginning, the Founding Fathers sought to construct a nation in which government would never again become the master of the people. In the Constitution, they enshrined principles they believed essential to human liberty—principles rooted in history, philosophy, and the hard lessons learned under governments so extreme they burned people alive for alleged crimes of personal conscience.
Among these ideas, one stands out as both extraordinary and uniquely revolutionary: the prohibition against direct federal taxation of individual citizens.
Many constitutional scholars recognize this not as a technical detail, but as the key building block of freedom itself. For a government that cannot reach directly into the pockets of its citizens must remain accountable to them. It must govern by consent of the governed, not by the barrel of a gun in the hands of the military which was entrusted to their command.
To early Americans, this was the meaning of liberty.
To say I am free—to say we are free—was to know that one’s labor, property, and private life were not at the immediate disposal of the state.
The freedom from direct federal taxation was not merely an economic preference; it was a moral barrier, a civic safeguard, designed to prevent office holders in the government from amassing the financial power to dominate those it governs.
This principle—simple, elegant, and bold—helped make possible the world’s first large-scale free citizenry – the middle class.
Yet today, that freedom is being stripped away and the middle class wiped out.
If we are to live as beings created by God, endowed with dignity, reason, and moral agency, we must not silently allow the traitors to enslave us. And our only peaceful and constitutional pathway forward is for we ourselves to reclaim our rightful place in the processes of government.
The Reality of Modern Governance
It is now a well-known and easily demonstrated fact that the members of the United States Congress—and the state legislatures— do not read, evaluate, or debate the vast majority of the legislation on which they vote. This is not speculation; it is mathematical certainty.
Each year, approximately nine thousand bills are introduced— at a rate of roughly fifty-five bills every day. Many of these bills run hundreds of pages; some exceed five hundred pages. And no human being, no matter how committed, can evaluate tens of thousands of pages of legislative text per day.
As a result, legislators have no choice but to vote “as recommended by staff.”
Not as directed by the people.
Not after deliberation.
Not through constitutional debate.
Thus, the permanent bureaucracy—unelected, unaccountable, and unknown to the public—has effectively become the mind guiding the hands of elected lawmakers. The representatives vote, but the staff govern and we the people suffer the result as we are completely removed from making the decisions that determine our future.
This is not the representative republic the Constitution established.
Our founding documents call for a government of the people, by the people, and for the people—not a government by the recommendations of staff, no matter how well-intentioned they may or may not be.
A Constitutional and Technological Remedy
To correct this unconstitutional drift, we must acknowledge a profound and obvious truth:
Modern technology now makes it possible for the people to participate meaningfully and directly in the legislative process on a scale the Founders could only have imagined.
We now possess the tools—instant digital distribution of legislative text, and artificial intelligence capable of aggregating the responses. Using these tools, each congressional district could form a body of up to fifty thousand informed, responsible, and qualified citizen-participants, hereafter called Amplified Voters (AVs).
The Role of Amplified Voters
These Amplified Voters would have the responsibility of passing judgment on each line, sentence, and concept of legislation being evaluated. With the assistance of unbiased AI, these individual judgments can be aggregated, analyzed, and made publicly known with complete transparency.
Under such a system, the elected representative’s vote becomes a formality—a procedural act reflecting the clearly expressed and publicly documented will of the citizens themselves.
This does not abolish representative government.
It restores representative government by placing final legislative judgment back in the hands of the people where it is supposed to be; where our ancestors intended it to reside in the Constitution.
Toward a New Era of Self-Governance
By embracing this model, America—and ultimately all nations that desire liberty—would reclaim the ability to steer into the future through lawful, peaceful, and participatory means.
This is not a break from the Constitution.
It is a return to the Constitution.
A return to accountability.
A return to the foundational belief that government is the servant of the people, not their master.
If we choose this path, we choose to walk hand in hand with God.
If we reject it, we surrender not only our hard won human rights but the very principle of free will. It is our exercise of free will which literally defines us as human beings and places us as the absolute crown of God’s holy creation.
An eye-opening must read publication. Beats every contemporary thriller and fills in many gaps in history. A great thanks to the author team & Unbekoming for featuring this. Makes a great Christmas present for friends & family still on the other side.
If you look around a bit the first edition (without the update on the global criminal CV19 scam ) can be found as a pdf.
Famous Rants by the Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0: Selected from his 26,000 pages, 30,000 daily news stories, 50,000+ sources contained in 650 blog posts and 450 videos in 2 Books. 'The Magical Inventions of Nikola Tesla' at TeslaLeaks.com and 'Nuremberg 2.0' The International Public Grand Jury vs Covid Measures and Crimes Against Humanity at NurembergTrials.net
Here's a couple rants on Bitchute from a few years ago.
Chief Justice Of Nuremberg 2.0 Predicts 33+ Aspects of Covid Plannedemic on December 26th 2019 1AM on the Rise of the Jedi Podcast https://www.bitchute.com/video/w8yAIeAJHr8A
Breaking! FDA Finally Admits It: At Least 10 Healthy Kids Likely Died from COVID Vaccines https://covidreason.substack.com/p/breaking-fda-finally-admits-it-at Breaking: FDA to tighten vaccine rules after memo ties COVID-19 shot to 96 child deaths reported to VAERS, with only 1% reporting to the system. Meaning, up to 10,000 children may have died due to Covid Vaccines and any number of injuries due to Myocarditis and blood clotting risk. In addition, the CDC also cited the vaccine mandates as 'coercive and dishonest'; specifically fired director Rochelle Walensky as 'dishonest and manipulative'; breaking the Nuremberg Codes on informed consent and coersion. The FDA also aims to cancel all approvals for vaccines that only create antibodies and do not prevent any diseases. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5626374-fda-vaccine-rules-child-covid-deaths/ Nuremberg 2.0 Public Trial Begins vs Top 100 Wanted for Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity (NurembergTrails.net) Chief Justice presents the evidence on their Most Wanted posters for printing and distribution where legal and lawful. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/nuremberg-20-public-trial-begins
The 19th C novelist Paul Bourget in 1922 wrote in L'Illustration and in his 1929 boo Au Service de L'order p.199, the quip 'I was wrong, the microbe is nothing, the ground is everything.' It was apocryphal, Emile Rous and Louis Vaillard were the doctors at Pasteur's death bed. Terrain theory is not a holistic theory; pathogenic bacteria and virions can trigger symptoms even in healthy people. Strong, healthy farmers still contract anthrax from animals. Terrain theory omits the difference in how toxic load from pathogens affects healthy bodies, which if high enough will cause symptoms, unless in the case of HIV for example, there is a genetic anomaly in a subpopulation that does not allow the virus to enter the cell to replicate. A truly holistic approach considers the dynamic between the strength of the external assault on the body, including healthy bodies. Susceptibility is not purely related to the soil, although the soil matters greatly but within parameters.
Don't know about pasteur death bed details (thanks for pointing out at least one counter story) but it's crystal clear to me that <something> from the outside can and does cause disease.
Large scale: If i put a flesh-eating snail fluke (just pick something awful that exists, like the ear brain worm in Star Trek, Wrath of Khan, e.g.) in someone, it will cause damage. How much? How quickly? How irreparably -- depends on the terrain and mitigations. But the outside element will cause problems.
Small scale: poisonous things like mercury, which can delay, disrupt, befuddle, and block many biochemical reactions, can and do cause problems. How much, how often, how bad, etc. see above.
Very Small scale: super high energy particles from radioactive material can cause damage. Put your hand in front of some radioactive plutonium for a while and report back. There will be damage. How much, etc. see above.
So it's crystal fucking clear 'outside things can and do cause damage'. Lest anyone think that's not the case -- go experiment on yourself and report back.
Now, the punchline, whether there are things at a small scale like viruses which cause problems? Epically possible. But as this post amply points out, we're still very much in the dark and exploitative and incorrect phase of this kind of medicine. I don't want anyone to stop looking for <things>, but i sure as hell don't want us to close eyes and ears and say "there's nothing there!". I am NOT repeat NOT asserting that's what is being said in this excellent essay, i just want to ensure we move forward with exploration.
It is a dynamic between external assaults and the body's ability to deal with them, whether it is via the liver, immune system, kidneys, skin etc. ART has dropped the mortality rate hugely for HIV infected patients because the drugs suppress the virus. It is designed to do that, and it works. It does not cure. It has side effects, but the patient can live decades longer than if they didn't have access to the treatment. It would be harmful to convince those infected with HIV, that they were not, because viruses don't exist, so no need for ART. If they believed the theory and refused the drugs, millions would die.
This book helped me to understand some basics over the last almost 6 years, I acquired the German edition. It is highly recommendable and also includes the bird flu and swine flu experiences in the past.
I read the first and 2nd editions of Virus Mania. The 1st edition was well edited but the 2nd edition had major typos. I bought the 3rd edition (reviewed in this post) but ended up returning it due to the tiny font size and lots of obvious typos.
This is a phenomenal piece of work. Thank you. I've spent the past almost six years unlearning all that I thought I knew and understood. It's been exhilarating, but profoundly depressing. I ran our baby clinic for twenty years, which now fills me with horror. There's so much to learn. Hopefully the lies are unravelling, but we've some way to go-the pathogen model is deeply embedded in our culture's psyche.
Thank you for this open statement of yours. It's always a consolation to see medical professionals "seeing the light" and recognizing they were trapped in a system of lies and deception all their life. Virusmania certainly a great book and eye-opener.
Yet another paradigm that will hopefully unravel is cancer. Which is a topic for all of us. Even if we are lucky personally there will be friends and relatives battling with this. What you will read here is even worse in its implications by a dimension or two. Please spread and share if it rhymes with you. We need medical professionals to wake us all up what has been going on there. For well over 100 years as it seems.
https://fenbendazole.substack.com/p/new-book-cancer-is-a-parasite-kill
Trial by Jury – The Case of the Missing Corona ‘Virus’
[The camera zooms in on the courtroom packed with reporters, their pens poised. The aspiring viroLIEgist sits nervously at the witness stand, fidgeting with a stack of lab notes. Across from him stands the sharp-dressed attorney, Mr. Rigorous, known for his devastating cross-examinations. Behind him, the jury watches intently]
Judge: [Hammering the gavel] Order in the court! Mr. Rigorous, you may proceed with your cross-examination.
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] Thank you, Your Honor. [He approaches the viroLIEgist] Dr. Specimen, you claim to have isolated a novel corona virus, is that correct?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Uh, yes, yes. We have a robust methodology –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Robust, you say? [He winks at the jury] Let’s start at the beginning. Did you, at any point, isolate and purify this so-called “virus” directly from the fluids of a sick patient?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, not exactly. You see, direct purification from fluids is unnecessary because –
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in, eyebrows raised] Unnecessary? I see. What you’re telling us is that you skipped the part where you would actually prove there’s a virus in the patient’s mucus?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] We used a well-established protocol. Instead, we combined the
patient’s mucus with a monkey kidney cell culture, starved it, and –
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting with mock concern] Oh, so you took a patient’s mucus, mixed it with cells from an entirely different species, starved those cells, poisoned them with toxic chemicals, antibiotics, and, what was it again, fetal bovine serum?
Dr. Specimen: Well, yes, that’s standard –
Mr. Rigorous: [Grinning] “Standard.” So, after this biological disaster, when the cells inevitably broke down and died, you claimed that was evidence of a virus?
Dr. Specimen: [Getting defensive] Yes! The cytopathic effect is what –
Mr. Rigorous: [Smirking] Cytopathic effect! Ah, the mysterious code for “we poisoned cells and
watched them die.” Tell me, Dr. Specimen, what proof do you have that the breakdown of these poisoned, malnourished cells was caused by a virus rather than, say… the toxic soup you created?
Dr. Specimen: [Stammering] Well, it’s what the literature says and, um… everyone knows –
Mr. Rigorous: [Cutting in] “Everyone knows?” [He gestures dramatically to the jury] I believe
this court would prefer evidence over gossip, Doctor. Now, let’s talk about the ’genome’ you supposedly ‘discovered.’ You took this toxic brew, fed it into a machine, and then used some software to assemble ’genetic’ pieces, correct?
Dr. Specimen: Yes, yes, we sequenced the ’genome’ –
Mr. Rigorous: [Raising his voice] Ah, sequenced! You mean the software took fragments and tried to fit them together, like a biological jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces?
Dr. Specimen: [Defensively] It’s highly sophisticated software!
Mr. Rigorous: [Sarcastically] Sophisticated? Doctor, if I fed a pile of shredded newspaper into that machine, would it also “reconstruct” War and Peace?
[The jury chuckles. Dr. Specimen looks increasingly uncomfortable]
Dr. Specimen: [Panicking] No, no! It’s different. This is how we create the viral genome.
Mr. Rigorous: [Slyly] Create, you say? So, we’re not finding a virus – we’re creating one?
Interesting choice of words, Doctor. Now, did you ever attempt to prove that this Frankenstein creation could naturally infect a healthy host?
Dr. Specimen: [Squirming] Well, no. We injected lab animals with the toxic cell culture, and when they got sick –
Mr. Rigorous: [Mocking] Sick from your toxic brew? And that, Doctor, is what you call “evidence” of transmission? You didn’t try something simple, like, I don’t know, letting the sick patient sneeze on a healthy person?
Dr. Specimen: [Flustered] Natural transmission doesn’t work well in the lab! It’s much cleaner to inject -
Mr. Rigorous: [Interrupting] Cleaner? Cleaner to torture animals with direct injections of this toxic sludge you call a “virus”? [He lets the words hang in the air.] Doctor, do you have any explanation for why you skipped natural transmission altogether, or is it because – oh, I don’t know – it never works?
[The courtroom erupts with murmurs. Dr. Specimen is visibly sweating]
Mr. Rigorous: [Turning to the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, this man would have you believe that by starving cells, poisoning them, and injecting that toxic concoction into helpless animals, he’s “proving” a virus exists. All without ever isolating or purifying anything! Is this science… or sleight of hand?
[He paces dramatically, letting the tension build]
Mr. Rigorous: One last thing, Doctor. After injecting animals with this ‘viral’ brew, did you ever attempt to purify the “virus” again from those animals to confirm it was there?
Dr. Specimen: [Almost whispering] No…
Mr. Rigorous: [Leaning in] No? You never bothered to re-isolate the virus, because that would expose the fact it wasn’t there in the first place, wouldn’t it?
[Dr. Specimen is completely defeated, sinking lower in his seat]
Mr. Rigorous: [Addressing the jury] Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case. We are dealing with
scientific fraud on a monumental scale, a fraud that never once demonstrated the existence of a virus through proper isolation or purification. It’s smoke and mirrors! I leave it in your capable hands to deliver justice.
[The jury nods thoughtfully as they leave the room to deliberate. After a brief pause, they return, their verdict ready]
Judge: Members of the jury, have you reached a verdict?
Jury Foreperson: [Standing] We have, Your Honor. We find the defendant… guilty of scientific fraud!
Judge: [Solemnly] Very well. [He turns to Dr. Specimen] For crimes against logic and reason, and for misleading the public in the name of science, I hereby sentence you to… [He smirks] a life term as the head of the National Institute of Infectious Arse-covering and Deception -NIIAD.
[The courtroom erupts in gasps and laughter as the viroLIEgist is dragged out, wailing in ‘protest’]
Priceless, as usual! Always worth waiting for...
Massive thanks for the positive feedback!! Greatly appreciated!!
Have you checked this out already? Really blows your mind. When you thought you've seen it all and read it all. The mafia as we know it.
https://fenbendazole.substack.com/p/new-book-cancer-is-a-parasite-kill
The Rockefellers set up an institution in New York that focused on virology in 1901. It was first named the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research but is now simply called Rockefeller University. It has produced both plenty of new viruses and Nobel prize winners. For example, the guy who claims to have discovered the Hepatitis B virus in the 1950s, Dr Saul Krugman, was trained there.
The Rockefellers are the richest and most influential and powerful dynasty in America. No one gets to be president unless they are Rockefeller-approved. The Rockers are high level masons - think something like Supreme Most Worshipful Grand Master of the Most Important Lodge in the United States type masons. People like say Trump are far lower level - they take orders, not give them.
Covid was a freemasonic psychological operation. The detection of a virus is more or less irrelevant. Major operations like 911, invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and Covid, are not made by anyone in the US government working for a pay cheque, and that includes the current chump in chief.
These clowns are mere facilitators.
I'm with you most of the way here, Gecko, until “The detection of a virus is more or less irrelevant.”
How many mothers would have their kids jabbed — enrolling them as guinea pigs on a diabolical childhood quackccine schedule — if they knew viruses had never been proven to exist? I submit it would have been far more challenging to PsyOP the public and financially devastate their lives had people understood the fraud of germ theory and its satanic spawn, viroLIEgy.
Virology is one Lie. Genetic origin of cancer another. How many more?
Courtesy of alter systems:
The Gene Myth Serves Profit and Control
The "genetic origin" of cancer is a foundational myth of Rockefeller medicine, built after the Flexner Report (1910) when the Rockefeller Foundation took control of U.S. medical education. It redirected focus from empirical, naturalistic healing traditions toward laboratory chemistry and patentable pharmaceuticals. Once research funding and curricula came under that model, any observation inconsistent with the gene-determinism narrative was summarily dismissed — including work showing that:
- Parasites and microbial organisms were found in (and sometimes transmitted by) tumors.
- Cancer incidence correlated more strongly with toxic exposure, immune suppression, and parasitic loads than with inherited genes.
- Genes, in many cases, merely respond to environmental insult or infection, not cause the disease de novo.
The "genome project" was a breathtakingly expensive mirage — it produced no cure, no major predictive biomarkers of cancer risk, and no understanding of causation that could prevent disease. But it created hundreds of billions in research spending, patents, and grants.
The primary fallacy of pharmakeia and its grand theory of a "virus" is that it claims that a "virus" has no metabolism. It exists un-animated as a pure parasite. But even a parasite must metabolize energy to initiate the parasitic extraction of energy from a host.
When I took cell physiology at university they taught us the Krebs Cycle and photosynthesis. I had to learn about something called dissimilatory sulfate reduction when I later encountered anaerobic bacteria living 3,000 meters deep in the earth's crust that ate oil and metabolized it into methane. But not once have I encountered a defined energy pathway describing how a "virus" survives, so instead we get discussions on whether a "virus" is alive or dead, but never a discussion regarding how something can exist and be animated without a metabolism. It's like something ushered straight out of hell - a forever undead organism.
Some kind of energy must be fixated and expended to begin the parasitic process of extracting energy from the host. Even if for only a second. Pharmekeia makes no sense on the grounds of claiming that its "virus" is no more than an inert catalyst for the mass transcription of RNA. There are ALWAYS energy inputs.
Very astutely pointed out!
While I agree about the weakness of current virology in realistically explaining disease, it is a problem distinct from the actual existence of the particles concerned independent of what their real role in nature is. I enclose part of a scientific article of Boris Ikhlov where he shows a list of viruses with their concommitant calculated microwave torsional resonances.
https://www.clinvirologyjournal.com/articles/ijcv-aid1046.php Published: July 18, 2022
In that document is cited one reference with experimental confirmation namely for human
influenza virus, that was killed with a microwave resonance.
Yang SC, Lin HC, Liu TM, Lu JT, Hung WT, Huang YR, Tsai YC, Kao CL, Chen SY, Sun CK. Efficient Structure Resonance Energy Transfer from Microwaves to Confined Acoustic Vibrations in Viruses. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 9;5:18030. doi: 10.1038/srep18030. PMID: 26647655; PMCID: PMC4673452.
.
Ikhlov claims it works for subharmonics.
Other data is based on a theoretical formula for the torsional resonance frequencies tabulated
I list it since it shows how some scientists other than in medicine dont doubt their existence and trust the physics of DNA and RNA torsional vibrations as something real
In another article Ikhlov showed experimental confirmation relating to E-Coli. Its experimentally confirmed resonance was at 10.14GHz Resonance width was around 10MHz at 21 C
I dont know if this table will be legible after pasting it.
If not I apologize. The calculated frequencies lie between 44 and 372GHz
Table 1: Physical characteristics of virus genomes.
Name Length Genome f1, GHz f2, GHz Multiplicity
Monkeypox virus 196 858 bp DNA 49,0 9,804 5
Variola major virus 240 000 bp DNA 44,4 11,100 4
Adenoviridae 34-36 тыс. bp DNA 118 - 114 - -
Human respiratory
syncytial virus, HRSV 15 277 bp DNA 176 10,351 17
Rhinovirus 10 000 nRNA 217,5 10,357 21
Hepatitis B virus, HBV 3200 n DNA f3 - -
HIV-1 9180 2 RNA 230,23 10,010 23
Coxsackievirus 7396 bp DNA 252,9 10,116 25
Ebola virus Zaire 18 959 RNA 226,56 10,298 22
E.v. Sudan 18 875 RNA 227,07 10,321 22
E.v.Bundibugyo 18 940 RNA 226,68 10,3035 22
Influenza viruses 7000-8500 n vRNA 372, 86-338, 37 - -
A (H3N2) 13 628 n RNA 267,228 8,35 32
Coronaviruses 26-30 тыс. n RNA 193,47-180,11 - -
SARS-CoV-2 29 903 RNA 180,402 10,022 18
LMFAO! So this dude wants us to separate “virology can’t explain disease” from the “actual existence of particles” — the same particles that have never been isolated, purified, or seen doing anything outside a poisoned monkey kidney soup — and now we’re supposed to believe they have microwave torsional resonances?
Bro, the only thing twisting is your logic, the only thing resonating is the collective facepalm, and the only audience for your imaginary cooties is a very confused unicorn doing yoga at 3 GHz.
Tant qu'une particule n'est pas isolée - purifiée, il est impossible d'affirmer qu'il s'agit d'un virus. Il n'y a pas écrit "virus" dessus et comme jamais cet isolement- purification n'a été réalisé, personne ne sait à quoi ressemble un virus prétendumment pathogène. Parce qu'il faut, après avoir isolé strictement cette particule suspectée de tout le reste, la tester en la mettant en contact avec un être humain. Si cet être humain tombe malade (de la maladie en question) et que certains autres critères sont ensuite safisfaits, on peut alors affirmer que cette particule est un virus pathogène. Comme jamais aucun virus n'a suivi ce parcours de "particule suspecte" à "test sur être humain", toutes les histoires de virus sur lesquels seraient effectués certains travaux sont bidons. Leurs auteurs se dispersent en oubliant les fondamentaux.
So you dude dont want to separate those questions but want them entangled making it harder to sort it out. That tells us that you are an irrational secterist without scientific culture. We are probably both critical of how medical science is degenerated but you prefer to turn it into matters of group think.
Peter, if you’re going to make claims about viruses, you need to provide actual evidence of their existence. There is none that adheres to the scientific method — unless you’re planning to hold up the viroLIEgists’ so-called ’gold standard’ of proof: poisoning monkey kidney cell cultures and calling the resulting cytopathic effects a virus. Please tell me you don’t subscribe to that level of pseudoscience?
No I dont trust that witches brew they use to claim things about isolation of anything.
But I am not going to make claims of my own. I reported how it is viewed by nonmedical scientists. The reason people claim it doesnt exist is that it is not proven to spread disease and without that proof it is neither clear what the target entity is.
.
Therefore the scepticism is warranted. However DNA molecules as well as RNA are seen as existing entities. And there are a host of strings with the basepairs being the assumed constituents. With numbers from a thousand up to billions. They are seen as being coded with a 64 bit code. Like in a modern computer.
.
Now viruses are but one of the simpler entities built with that basic material. It isnt odd that the biological world needs an advanced system for maintenance. One opinion about what they do is that they constitute part of the bodies cleaning staff. It takes unhealthy molecular material apart as one specialised task that bacteria would take more time to handle. If they even could handle it.
.
This way of viewing viruses explains why there would need to be a great variety of them suited to different tasks to speed up the maintenance of the body content.
That idea I think is closer to Béchamp's old theory.
.
It is claimed that the natural DNA contains the code of some viruses.
The established science explains that as something that happened during evolution and that some virus once hijacked the DNA. But that explanation may well be wrong if it is like I sketched above about viruses being part of the cleaning staff. If that is the case it would be convenient to have a template for cloning often used maintenance equipment.
.
Another idea that may or may not be compatible with the first is that viruses are warning messages emitted by an injured cell.
.
Sometimes the issues are so harmful due to the effect of toxines that the organism has a better chance of surviving if it goes partly suicidal so the destructed part's material may be reused by the healthy part of the organism. And when the issue is even worse the whole organism may be instructed to kill itself.
.
Nature will then be reusing everything from the corps.
.
That theory seems to be logically possible. Even though the less extreme aspects that a virus is a message to its environment seems very reasonable as part of the operation of our bodies.
.
Proteines inside the cells are both there for transports to and fro the cell nucleus and there are other functions in a cell that mimic the functioning of a city with transport and signalling. So signalling to the environment with special coded messages also seems natural.
Peter, none of what you wrote addresses my question. I asked for actual scientific evidence of a virus that doesn’t rely on poisoning monkey kidney cells and rebranding the resulting cell death as ’isolation.’ Instead of evidence, you gave me a stream of speculative metaphors about cleaning crews, warning messages, apoptosis, and what you personally imagine viruses might do. That’s not science — it’s storytelling.
So let’s try again: Do you have any empirical evidence for a virus as a real, independent entity, or are you just avoiding the question?
Why on earth am I required to answer about something I dont consider serious science.
.
You seem to have got stuck into some kind of police action against a narrative I never supported. Relax!
.
There is a reason why I called it a witches brew.
.
But DNA is real and RNA. ( I am aware that some opinions even doubting that they do exist but those who argue in that manner havent suggested any alternative explanation about how the body is organised. As long as they dont have that I stick to the established view of the type of molecules we are dealing with.) Its chemical structure is known. It is also known how it is resonant to UV light and I have already covered the torsional resonances. Viruses are of the DNA and RNA types. These matters of resonances are according to scientists not just thermal effects. For example it has been suggested that UV light may disturb the DNA or RNA strings so they might have torsional resonances excited.
.
Those strings may be examples of certain code sequences that are specialised on breaking down chemical substances that the body needs to clense itself from otherwise the body's all transport lines would clog and the organism would die.
.
How do you suppose the body would handle its massive production of waste unless it had some subtleties like that operating on a regular basis. I dont care if those code snippets are called viruses or something else.
There still is no proof. You can't label the frequencies when you didn't know what you had in the first place.
You didnt read attentively. If you had read it you would have noticed that there were two examples of experimental verification of the nonthermal effects this is about.
For example I mentioned the test of the theory using E-Coli Bacteria. It is easier since they are bigger than viruses but still follow the same formula so the resonance frequency is lower. millimeter wave equipment is probably expensive. But 10 GHz is easier to access. The resonance was sharp 10MHz i e one thousand of the center frequency. The theory is simple. The resonance frequency is predicted to be
21.75 THz divided by the square root of the number of Base pairs. This means RNA viruses are predicted to have higher resonance frequencies by a factor of about 1.4 compared with the corresponding DNA resonance
For example human chromosomes are predicted to have resonances in the neighbourhood of mobile phone frequencies and Bluetooth.
Since women and men have different numbers of X chromosomes mens resonance signals might be half that of women for that particular chromosome.
I dont know if this has been confirmed experimentally but if so it may be held secret
It is possible that the resonances are not well resolved due to the conditions in the warm body of a living creature.
You start every military campaign by declaring how the enemy is doing nasty things to little babies. By the time the yarns are debunked, people are so deeply engaged in the war that nobody cares about whether the Bosch were actually tossing Belgian babies from bayonet to bayonet. (What about those baby-baking Gazans?)
Once Covid became a way of life with its demands. fears, rituals and expenditures, few cared about Chinese lab-leak yarns and none wondered about the reality of invisible wrigglies, etc. People had their King James Version of disease for a sense of solidarity, and they had their rigmaroles for a sense of control. Dogma and ritual made the reality. Vaccine injury and lockdown provided the deaths needed to keep belief strong.
What is it they say about a lie streaking out the door while the truth is pulling on its socks?
Today
We in America stand at a profound crossroads.
From the beginning, the Founding Fathers sought to construct a nation in which government would never again become the master of the people. In the Constitution, they enshrined principles they believed essential to human liberty—principles rooted in history, philosophy, and the hard lessons learned under governments so extreme they burned people alive for alleged crimes of personal conscience.
Among these ideas, one stands out as both extraordinary and uniquely revolutionary: the prohibition against direct federal taxation of individual citizens.
Many constitutional scholars recognize this not as a technical detail, but as the key building block of freedom itself. For a government that cannot reach directly into the pockets of its citizens must remain accountable to them. It must govern by consent of the governed, not by the barrel of a gun in the hands of the military which was entrusted to their command.
To early Americans, this was the meaning of liberty.
To say I am free—to say we are free—was to know that one’s labor, property, and private life were not at the immediate disposal of the state.
The freedom from direct federal taxation was not merely an economic preference; it was a moral barrier, a civic safeguard, designed to prevent office holders in the government from amassing the financial power to dominate those it governs.
This principle—simple, elegant, and bold—helped make possible the world’s first large-scale free citizenry – the middle class.
Yet today, that freedom is being stripped away and the middle class wiped out.
If we are to live as beings created by God, endowed with dignity, reason, and moral agency, we must not silently allow the traitors to enslave us. And our only peaceful and constitutional pathway forward is for we ourselves to reclaim our rightful place in the processes of government.
The Reality of Modern Governance
It is now a well-known and easily demonstrated fact that the members of the United States Congress—and the state legislatures— do not read, evaluate, or debate the vast majority of the legislation on which they vote. This is not speculation; it is mathematical certainty.
Each year, approximately nine thousand bills are introduced— at a rate of roughly fifty-five bills every day. Many of these bills run hundreds of pages; some exceed five hundred pages. And no human being, no matter how committed, can evaluate tens of thousands of pages of legislative text per day.
As a result, legislators have no choice but to vote “as recommended by staff.”
Not as directed by the people.
Not after deliberation.
Not through constitutional debate.
Thus, the permanent bureaucracy—unelected, unaccountable, and unknown to the public—has effectively become the mind guiding the hands of elected lawmakers. The representatives vote, but the staff govern and we the people suffer the result as we are completely removed from making the decisions that determine our future.
This is not the representative republic the Constitution established.
Our founding documents call for a government of the people, by the people, and for the people—not a government by the recommendations of staff, no matter how well-intentioned they may or may not be.
A Constitutional and Technological Remedy
To correct this unconstitutional drift, we must acknowledge a profound and obvious truth:
Modern technology now makes it possible for the people to participate meaningfully and directly in the legislative process on a scale the Founders could only have imagined.
We now possess the tools—instant digital distribution of legislative text, and artificial intelligence capable of aggregating the responses. Using these tools, each congressional district could form a body of up to fifty thousand informed, responsible, and qualified citizen-participants, hereafter called Amplified Voters (AVs).
The Role of Amplified Voters
These Amplified Voters would have the responsibility of passing judgment on each line, sentence, and concept of legislation being evaluated. With the assistance of unbiased AI, these individual judgments can be aggregated, analyzed, and made publicly known with complete transparency.
Under such a system, the elected representative’s vote becomes a formality—a procedural act reflecting the clearly expressed and publicly documented will of the citizens themselves.
This does not abolish representative government.
It restores representative government by placing final legislative judgment back in the hands of the people where it is supposed to be; where our ancestors intended it to reside in the Constitution.
Toward a New Era of Self-Governance
By embracing this model, America—and ultimately all nations that desire liberty—would reclaim the ability to steer into the future through lawful, peaceful, and participatory means.
This is not a break from the Constitution.
It is a return to the Constitution.
A return to accountability.
A return to the foundational belief that government is the servant of the people, not their master.
If we choose this path, we choose to walk hand in hand with God.
If we reject it, we surrender not only our hard won human rights but the very principle of free will. It is our exercise of free will which literally defines us as human beings and places us as the absolute crown of God’s holy creation.
The choice is ours.
The moment is now.
And history will record which road we chose.
I could not agree more
Extremely well said!
Fauci has to face jusctice.
An eye-opening must read publication. Beats every contemporary thriller and fills in many gaps in history. A great thanks to the author team & Unbekoming for featuring this. Makes a great Christmas present for friends & family still on the other side.
If you look around a bit the first edition (without the update on the global criminal CV19 scam ) can be found as a pdf.
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0 vs Covid Hoax ft 33 Ways "All I Do Is Win" https://www.bitchute.com/video/m38BhFJs2mIF
Famous Rants by the Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0: Selected from his 26,000 pages, 30,000 daily news stories, 50,000+ sources contained in 650 blog posts and 450 videos in 2 Books. 'The Magical Inventions of Nikola Tesla' at TeslaLeaks.com and 'Nuremberg 2.0' The International Public Grand Jury vs Covid Measures and Crimes Against Humanity at NurembergTrials.net
Here's a couple rants on Bitchute from a few years ago.
Black Pilled! Everything You're Taught in Schools is a Lie + Flattening The Curve https://bitchute.com/video/BO5zCXzPcwXI/
ChatGPT Gone Woke Part 1 - AI Making Intelligence "Artificial" With Fake-News! https://bitchute.com/video/KggYGMfF4WCZ/
Vladimir Zelenskyy Explains Impending Nuke Hoax Part 6 -English Translation- https://bitchute.com/video/Qwt7fLp9ess0/
Migrant Caravan Hoax At Crescendo As Republican's Push For Vaccine Mandates & Biometric Entry-Exit System https://www.bitchute.com/video/ck6CPpqtEK4z
Chief Justice Of Nuremberg 2.0 Predicts 33+ Aspects of Covid Plannedemic on December 26th 2019 1AM on the Rise of the Jedi Podcast https://www.bitchute.com/video/w8yAIeAJHr8A
https://facebook.com/riseofthejedi
Covid Scamdemic Day 1 - Fake Pictures, Deaths & Dummies, Medical Kidnapping & Killing of "Suspects" https://www.bitchute.com/video/mkcRFHGaabVw
1000 Years of Scamdemics Part 1 (1177-2019) - Flu-1918, Cholera-1818, Plague-1718... https://www.bitchute.com/video/yunyRxn9SjDf
Breaking! FDA Finally Admits It: At Least 10 Healthy Kids Likely Died from COVID Vaccines https://covidreason.substack.com/p/breaking-fda-finally-admits-it-at Breaking: FDA to tighten vaccine rules after memo ties COVID-19 shot to 96 child deaths reported to VAERS, with only 1% reporting to the system. Meaning, up to 10,000 children may have died due to Covid Vaccines and any number of injuries due to Myocarditis and blood clotting risk. In addition, the CDC also cited the vaccine mandates as 'coercive and dishonest'; specifically fired director Rochelle Walensky as 'dishonest and manipulative'; breaking the Nuremberg Codes on informed consent and coersion. The FDA also aims to cancel all approvals for vaccines that only create antibodies and do not prevent any diseases. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5626374-fda-vaccine-rules-child-covid-deaths/ Nuremberg 2.0 Public Trial Begins vs Top 100 Wanted for Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity (NurembergTrails.net) Chief Justice presents the evidence on their Most Wanted posters for printing and distribution where legal and lawful. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/nuremberg-20-public-trial-begins
The 19th C novelist Paul Bourget in 1922 wrote in L'Illustration and in his 1929 boo Au Service de L'order p.199, the quip 'I was wrong, the microbe is nothing, the ground is everything.' It was apocryphal, Emile Rous and Louis Vaillard were the doctors at Pasteur's death bed. Terrain theory is not a holistic theory; pathogenic bacteria and virions can trigger symptoms even in healthy people. Strong, healthy farmers still contract anthrax from animals. Terrain theory omits the difference in how toxic load from pathogens affects healthy bodies, which if high enough will cause symptoms, unless in the case of HIV for example, there is a genetic anomaly in a subpopulation that does not allow the virus to enter the cell to replicate. A truly holistic approach considers the dynamic between the strength of the external assault on the body, including healthy bodies. Susceptibility is not purely related to the soil, although the soil matters greatly but within parameters.
Don't know about pasteur death bed details (thanks for pointing out at least one counter story) but it's crystal clear to me that <something> from the outside can and does cause disease.
Large scale: If i put a flesh-eating snail fluke (just pick something awful that exists, like the ear brain worm in Star Trek, Wrath of Khan, e.g.) in someone, it will cause damage. How much? How quickly? How irreparably -- depends on the terrain and mitigations. But the outside element will cause problems.
Small scale: poisonous things like mercury, which can delay, disrupt, befuddle, and block many biochemical reactions, can and do cause problems. How much, how often, how bad, etc. see above.
Very Small scale: super high energy particles from radioactive material can cause damage. Put your hand in front of some radioactive plutonium for a while and report back. There will be damage. How much, etc. see above.
So it's crystal fucking clear 'outside things can and do cause damage'. Lest anyone think that's not the case -- go experiment on yourself and report back.
Now, the punchline, whether there are things at a small scale like viruses which cause problems? Epically possible. But as this post amply points out, we're still very much in the dark and exploitative and incorrect phase of this kind of medicine. I don't want anyone to stop looking for <things>, but i sure as hell don't want us to close eyes and ears and say "there's nothing there!". I am NOT repeat NOT asserting that's what is being said in this excellent essay, i just want to ensure we move forward with exploration.
It is a dynamic between external assaults and the body's ability to deal with them, whether it is via the liver, immune system, kidneys, skin etc. ART has dropped the mortality rate hugely for HIV infected patients because the drugs suppress the virus. It is designed to do that, and it works. It does not cure. It has side effects, but the patient can live decades longer than if they didn't have access to the treatment. It would be harmful to convince those infected with HIV, that they were not, because viruses don't exist, so no need for ART. If they believed the theory and refused the drugs, millions would die.
Such an important and influential book. Thank you for featuring it.
Here is a list I manage of landmark books on health and medicine (vaccines, pharma, etc.):
"RECOMMENDED BOOKS critical of the virus, magic bullet and vaccine theories"
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=123&name=3000_started_2022_10_29_blogpost_recommended_books_critical_of_the_virus_magic_bullet_and_vaccine_theories
This book helped me to understand some basics over the last almost 6 years, I acquired the German edition. It is highly recommendable and also includes the bird flu and swine flu experiences in the past.
I read the first and 2nd editions of Virus Mania. The 1st edition was well edited but the 2nd edition had major typos. I bought the 3rd edition (reviewed in this post) but ended up returning it due to the tiny font size and lots of obvious typos.