When DNA Dissolves: The Unraveling of Modern Medicine's Greatest Deception and Why Your Genes Can't Be Read, Viruses Can't Be Found, and PCR Tests Measure Nothing
🚨Introducing the Revolutionary “Viral Isolation™ Method” 🚨
Because Who Needs the Scientific Method When You Have Consensus™?
Are you a virologist looking to isolate a virus but don’t want to deal with pesky scientific principles? Do you long for a world where assumptions are facts, controls are optional, and results are whatever you need them to be? Well, look no further! With Viral Isolation™, you, too, can bypass every fundamental step of the scientific method and still get published!
🎉 Special Features – Now with ZERO Adherence to the Scientific Method! 🎉
🔬 Step 1: Skip Direct Observation!
Why waste time finding a virus in nature when you can just assume it exists? Don’t worry—no one in ‘virology’ has ever observed a virus as a distinct, independent entity directly from a sick person’s fluids. If they haven’t done it in over a century, why start now?
💡 Bonus: Instead of isolating a virus, just declare symptoms = virus. Got a cough? Must be a virus! Fever? Definitely a virus! Ate bad sushi? Yep - virus!!
📏 Step 2: The Hypothesis-Free Hypothesis™!
Real science requires an Independent Variable (IV) (the thing being tested), but who has time for that? Since we never actually isolate a virus, we’ll just assume it’s there. Science is hard—so let’s just skip the part where we identify our IV!
🧐 Scientific Method Violation:
✅ No purified virus? No problem! Just declare the existence of one and move on.
✅ Symptoms are vague? Who cares? A fever must mean viral infection!
✅ What about controls? HAHAHA, good one.
🧪 Step 3: Experimental Design... Or Lack Thereof!
Time to “prove” viral replication! But instead of isolating and testing a virus, let’s throw patient samples into a blender of monkey kidney cells, toxic antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and a battery of chemicals! What could go wrong?
🧬 Pro-Tip: When the monkey kidney cells start dying from all the poison you added, just call it a Cytopathic Effect (CPE) and claim the virus did it! (Ignore the fact that control experiments show the same results without a virus—just pretend those don’t exist!)
📸 Step 4: The Electron Microscope Magic Show!
Now, let’s get some ‘proof.’ Instead of isolating and purifying a virus, just snap a picture of the cellular debris from our CPE Toxicity Soup™ and say, “See? That blob right there—totally a virus.”
🔍 Fun Fact: If someone asks why you didn’t purify and separate the virus, just roll your eyes and mutter, “You don’t understand virology.” That’ll shut them up!
📊 Step 5: Data Manipulation & Narrative Control!
Science should be about unbiased analysis... but where’s the fun in that? With Viral Isolation™, you can:
✅ Assemble ‘viral genomes’ on a computer, even if no complete ‘genome’ was found! (Computers never make mistakes.)
✅ Use PCR to ‘detect’ tiny ‘genetic fragments,’ from a ‘virus’ never proven to exist.
✅ Ignore all contradictory evidence, and call anyone who questions your methods a science denier™!
🧠 Step 6: Declare Success No Matter What!
In real science, if an experiment fails, the hypothesis should be rejected. But with Viral Isolation™, failure is never an option!
🚫 Found no actual virus? Publish anyway!
🚫 Control experiments contradict your results? Ignore them!
🚫 No reproducibility? Silence the skeptics!
🌟 SPECIAL BONUS! – Support the Digital Biosecurity State! 🌟
By believing in this groundbreaking Non-Scientific Methodology™, YOU, too, can:
💰 Enable the Biosecurity State™ – The more viruses we ‘find,’ the more lockdowns, mandates, and surveillance we can justify!
📉 Help Crush Small Businesses! – Nothing says ‘progress’ like eliminating those pesky local shops and centralizing power!
🛑 Contribute to The Great Reset™! – Because why have freedom when you can have digital IDs, carbon quotas, and endless health passports?
🚀 ORDER NOW! 🚀
For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts! ™ 💥
I love your sarcasm, but unfortunately, most of what you've written is true. There is no science today--it's pure BS! Louis Pasteur was a complete FRAUD yet he's still credited for discovering the Rabies Virus. None have ever been isolated... So, why are vaccines still being promoted for our children and animals? It’s simple …GREED, POWER, and CONTROL.
Thank you, Nancy! 🙏 Glad my sarcasm resonated — though, like you said, it’s a bit tragic when the ‘jokes’ are mostly true. Pasteur really did have the kind of résumé where you wonder if ‘science’ was just a side hustle between PR gigs. And the rabies virus? Still on the milk carton under Missing Since 1885.
As for why the jabs keep getting pushed — you nailed it: Greed, Power, Control. It’s the unholy trinity that makes Big Harma’s world go ‘round.
Does this article imply that all the cop and robber documentaries where the prosecution claims "We found his DNA at the crime scene" are knowingly lying? In other words the cops are telling the forensic chemists what they will conclude from their test? Witness tampering in other words.
Once you realize DNA has never proven to exist, a lot of fields fall by the wayside (are eviscerated).
Forensics loses its star witness overnight — no ‘matches’ from crime scenes, no ‘DNA’ databases, no paternity tests, no ‘genetic’ fingerprints to wave in front of a jury.
Medicine takes a massive hit — ‘genetic’ testing, ‘precision’ medicine, ‘gene’ therapy, m’RNA’ ‘vaccines,’ and the entire diagnostics industry built on PCR vanish into thin air.
Biology itself would need rewriting — no molecular blueprint for life, no genetic code, no way to map ancestry or talk about ‘mutations’ in the way we’ve been told.
Agriculture would be stripped of GMOs and ‘genetic’ engineering, while biotech companies would watch whole empires crumble without the ability to splice, edit, or patent ‘genetic’ material.
Even space science would have to rip up its search criteria for alien life, because right now they’re looking for ‘DNA/RNA’ signatures that may never have existed in the first place.
In short, remove DNA from the picture and you don’t just knock out a few bricks — you collapse the entire skyscraper of modern molecular science, law enforcement, and biotech.
A mate sent HIS spit to a dog ‘DNA’ testing company, pretending it was his dog’s. The results? 37% Border Collie, 22% Labrador, 15% Beagle, 13% Spaniel, 13% Terrier — and a note: ‘strong herding instinct.’
Explains why he’s always rounding us up at the pub. Makes you wonder what human ancestry tests would say if we all sent dog spit instead…
I get the problem you're pointing out, but you don't answer his question. Did he find a half-sister via DNA ancestry testing? If so--and other lines of inquiry could, we presume, confirm the half-sisterlyness--what WAS the company looking at if not the "DNA"?
Hi, Scott. Thanks for reaching out — and for recognizing that my mate who goes rounds on pints down the pub probably isn’t a mix of four dog breeds. I think he’ll be relieved you see how absurd that is. Makes you wonder about the claims of ’DNA’ testing, doesn’t it?
And sure — is it possible to find a person without a ’DNA’ test? Absolutely. People have been finding long-lost relatives for centuries through records, family connections, and a bit of detective work — and in today’s world, it’s even easier with algorithmic search powers, social media, and digital footprints. You’ve even got supermarket chains sending 16-year-olds discounts on baby clothes a month or two before they know they’re pregnant.
Also, let’s go back to first principles. If you’re claiming to have a DNA test, you’d surely need to prove DNA exists, right? That ’evidence’ consists of torturing biological material with a battery of acids and chemicals to produce a gooey white precipitate. I’d suggest that isn’t the sacred molecule of life — wouldn’t you?
Just about 2 weeks ago I started to listen to the YT channel Time of Crime. I'd put it on while driving.
I very soon realized a constant theme to all the stories: Unsolved Murders in the 70s, 80s and 90s....where DNA forensics was in its infancy. A). They always have a "fragment" of DNA. B). Testing methods were somewhat lacking, and C) Someone in the 2020s took a fancy to these unsolved cases, and through the use of MODERN DNA testing, they caught the murderer!!!
And without a doubt they all show the animated "Spiraling DNA" double helix graphic!
Watch a few for yourself and come back and tell me if I'm lying :)
"For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts! ™"💥
Is "superficialise" a word? If so, the DNA test is a sure way to superficialise humanity and life itself. (Also, it can make semites of certain who only wish to be such. Handy that.)
I can't understand let alone prove a bloody thing...but DNA just reeks of moon landings, dissolving jetliners, Trump's ear and Chinese lab-leaks.
And viruses? For that we need a new expression: post-confirmed prediscovery. (I thought you'd like it.)
yeah, the deep state would never kill random people to run a fake to install someone into power. like evah... they are the good guyz. Hollywood agrees.
The technical term is p0c0PrD1...because the switch between upper and lower case and the pointless numerals make it sound sciency. Plus it's a bitch to type and irritates the hell out of the common punters.
Thank you for engaging with Jamie Andrews. I would like to make it very clear that I fully support his efforts and would like to take this opportunity to thank him for fighting HARD against those people who tried to discredit him and anyone who supports him.
This has resulted in a schism, a division within the No Virus community and I welcome that too because it highlighted who is genuinely seeking truth and who is controlling the opposition.
It is very important that we quickly dispense with bogus 'science' and move onto proving the real root causes of disease. This is paramount, vital and essential for ALL living things. Not just human beings.
SCIENCE BREAKTHROUGH!! 'DNA ISOLATION' – NOW WITH MODERN TECHNOLOGY, BUT STILL A BIT… 1869! 🚨
(Brought to you by Circular Reasoning & the Reification Fallacy Brothers – perfect support for your confirmation bias!!)
🕺SCIENTISTS HAVE DONE IT AGAIN!! ⚗️
Armed with fancy lab coats, shiny high-speed centrifuges, and an unyielding belief in technology over common sense, researchers have once again isolated ’DNA’ 🧬🧬... and honestly, not much has changed since Miescher’s day!
💥 How did we do it? Simple!! With a modern ’DNA’ isolation kit—packed with technical jargon, sleek plasticware, and the same 19th century chemistry, now with extra spin cycles!
🧬 Introducing: Tortured DNA Precipitate™ – Now in 100% Modernized Old-School Purity!
🚨 THE 7-STEPS OF MODERN DNA ISOLATION (BECAUSE WHY CHANGE WHAT WORKS, RIGHT?) 🚨
✅ Step 1: Homogenize your biological sample – Fancy word for smashing biological material into goo. Now with high-speed glass beads, but still the same classic destruction Miescher would recognize.
✅ Step 2: Add lysis buffer – A modernized acid bath to dissolve what we just obliterated. Because if we liquefy enough stuff, DNA must be in there somewhere!
✅ Step 3: Precipitate DNA with alcohol – Ethanol or isopropanol remains the go-to magic trick for making genetic material appear. If it's been the gold standard for decades, it must still be cutting-edge! 🍸🧬
✅ Step 4: Centrifuge the liquid goo – Spin it at ludicrous speeds until something clumps at the bottom. The high-speed equivalent of “let's see what sticks.”
✅ Step 5: Discard the supernatant – Toss out everything except what we hope is DNA. This part is highly scientific because we decided the good stuff is in the pellet.
✅ Step 6: Wash the DNA pellet – Rinse and repeat, because adding 70% ethanol means it’s “pure” now.
✅ Step 7: Elute in buffer – Congratulations! If it’s not quite right, just keep running it through until it looks like DNA. Because science! (Pro tip: TE buffer or nuclease-free water, because if it’s not in that, it’s probably not DNA).
🎉GENIUS! BUT WAIT... IS THIS REALLY DNA? 🤔
🔥 Critics say: Pulverizing, dissolving, spinning, and filtering biological mush might not be the best way to ‘isolate’ a ‘genetic’ molecule.
We say: Why mess with a system that’s been working (on assumption) since 1869?!
Besides, if DNA didn’t exist, then how did we extract this tortured precipitate? 🤷♂️ #CheckmateCritics
FREQUENTLY AVOIDED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
🧐 Q: If DNA is the molecule of life, why does it need to be ‘isolated’ by harsh chemicals?
🔬 A: Silence, please. We’re doing science.
🧐 Q: Why don’t we just isolate a fully intact, unmodified DNA molecule?
🔬 A: Because then we wouldn’t need grant money to keep “discovering” it.
🧐 Q: Isn’t this just circular reasoning?
🔬 A: Absolutely not! We assumed DNA exists, looked for DNA, and found what we assumed. That’s called scientific rigor.
LIMITED-TIME OFFER! ORDER YOUR "PURE" DNA TODAY!
🚀 For just $9.99, we’ll send you a vial of freshly extracted nucleic acid sludge—scooped straight from our high-speed vortex of molecular destruction ⚗️
📞 Call 1-800-DNA-FAKE now, and we’ll throw in an extra vial of ethanol-based buffer—FREE!🧬🕺
💰 Hurry! Supplies are infinite (because we can always dissolve more cells).
🚨 WARNING: MAY CONTAIN ZERO ACTUAL DNA!!
☠️ Side effects include: extreme skepticism, spontaneous questioning of mainstream science, and an uncontrollable urge to expose scientific fraud.
Today's sponsor: The ’DNA’ Extraction Group™ – “Still smashing stuff since 1869!”
If there is one thing the international organised criminals detest it is ridicule and you do it with aplomb and panache. Skills in marketing (aka lying) are seriously under-rated, don't you think? xx
Amazing. I believe the whole enchilada. We have been taken for a ride for the last 200 years of medical quackery...what is now called allo-pathetic medicine.
I am wondering about the science of forensics. If DNA is a farce, wouldn't that upset this science used by law enforcement?
I would encourage the interviewer/owner of this substack to re-evaluate Mr Andrew's claims. According to journalist Eric F Coppolino who interviewed him his virology control studies project may not even exist. https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/wheres-your-data-planet-waves-fm
You either need to have close to zero research skills or be as perverted as this creep to call on 'proof' from him to try and discredit the control studies. Either way people reading your comment must know that you are fucking retarded. They can just review the below information on him:
Kary Mullis sp? Developed the PCR test. Shortly before the epidemic of malpractice killing fields took off he announced PCR testing would be worthless for a virus. He died shortly there after a very unexpected pulmonary infection. The dude was aerosolized. The deep Democrats needed him out of the way to perpetrate the fraud.
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION! Kary Mullis was a FRAUD, both as a mainstream "scientist" AND when he was PRETENDING to be a so-called "dissident"! All honest and scientifically literate people in today's novirus community are VERY AWARE of these facts by now! Anyone else who says anything different is a LIAR or an idiot or BOTH! I was THERE in the old "AIDS" dissident movement! I MET MULLIS...a few times, in fact. I even co-produced a very famous SEMINAR where Mullis was our key note speaker way back in 1997! I KNOW what I am talking about!
In addition to all the questionable background detailed in reference #1 above, Mullis's last biotech company which he "founded" had received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense DARPA program to the tune of at least *$2MILLION*!! SOME DISSIDENT! LOL!
.....???.....Yeah I DO KNOW what the F I'm talking about, as I originally stated in my post above! However, I HAVE taken the liberty of EDITING my above post since some of it was copied and pasted from another post I made which was one which compelled me to use a more BLUNT TONE! Thanks for pointing this out to me.... I GUESS....??
Thanks for the link. I found this out a few months ago on commietube. As a skinny carnivore I eat a lot of cheese to maintain my weight. I've found so many different cheeses from so many different countries since and they taste better too.
I’m happy for Mr Andrews to demonstrate the falsity of claims made by scientists, but his work on the topic of DNA https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/dissolving-dna-illusions isn’t rigourous, relies too much on AI chat and fails to include any proper analyses of the end products of his experiments.
He also seems to lack an understanding of how genetic material is proposed to be organised in the cell. He seems to think DNA exists as a strand in isolation but the proposed understanding is that it is tightly wrapped around histone proteins and organised into nucleosomes which are proposed to prevent strands of DNA from becoming entangled and reducing the risk of damage.
Jamie claims that DNA has never been photographed using electron microscopy, but it is claimed that nucleosomes connected by DNA have been photographed using electron microscopy in the photograph from the 1970’s linked below. If he wants to be taken seriously he needs to be more rigorous in his research and rely less on AI.
Mr. Andrew’s sounds a little apologetic about his geology degree!! I studied biology and geology ending up with 2 degrees. I found geology an all inclusive science which demanded much critical thinking, whereas biology demanded more memorization. So to me, a degree in geology has much to admire.
I'm not a scientist nor do I have a very scientific mind, however, outside science there are certain facts that speak very loudly. I can accept that anything a person refuting The ScienceTM claims might be true about the shoddiness of the scientific work BUT something must be being matched when people go on ancestry and similar sites and find that they are matched to a man their mother later confesses was a man she had a secret brief affair with - and these are not isolated cases. There's a term - NPE - Not Parent Expected. Even ONE case is very difficult to put down to chance but obviously if there's a term for it, it cannot be all that rare.
In the case of viruses, I accept that those of us who don't believe in viruses are not under obligation to explain what does cause the sickness that is currently put down to viruses because there are so many possible causes, however, when it's a case of science actually producing a result I think it would be good for those debunking DNA to explain what scientific work allows ancestry to match people to their "unexpected" parent.
OK, so I can accept that sperm donors can be matched to children through records and there might be other kinds of matches where records can be used but it's difficult to see how those whose mothers have secret affairs can be matched without "real" science happening - it might not be DNA but it would surely be some kind of genuinely scientific matching. The link I gave initially is to a site which only has two NPEs on it and they are both by donor sperm but on the site below, for example, some of the matching is where the paternity is not something that would be on records. Of course, in some cases the supposed "unexpected" father may not even be the real father but where a mother confesses to an affair - an example I came across in another discussion - it is the real father and it's hard to see how the match can't have some scientific basis - it's too needle-in-a-haystack for it to be chance.
So you have linked to an anonymous story on reddit? This is about the lowest form of "hear say" evidence possible for a start. The fact that you can't tell that the story is completely made up is rather alarming too.
This person claims the site Ancestry said his dad wasn't his real dad which is basically impossible to tell... ESPECIALLY given that he "figures out" (by apparently looking at pictures on social media) his actually dad is his uncle who would share almost identical "genes". There are thousands of some such tripe stories that are just Circular reasoned..." I know they were my long lost sister..... because Ancestry told me so".
It is reading *something* as I explain again in great detail in numerous other articles it is not just completely "made up" so that in small pools of people usually 2 or 3 potential fathers, unless the mother is a complete whore, it is possible to get a rough idea especially when matched against all other physical attributes which as Dan Krane the leading forensics expert openly says they MUST have all this information PRIOR to testing.
There's more than one story, Jamie, and they could all be made up but I don't discount information on the basis that it could be made up - I assess it by how convincing it seems combined with there being a reasonable number of examples. Of course, many people do reject information on the basis it could be made up and I can't argue with that.
We each have our criteria for believing things and if you're looking at the science and it looks shoddy and you look at the results and many of them are bad then how can you do otherwise than reject it? All I can say is that to me the NPE stories feel genuine and in some cases at least I don't see how the information to connect people could be on record so I cannot help believing there's some kind of "real" science involved. However, I'll certainly allow that not all the information points in that direction, it's just that what seems compelling to me does.
I remember being taught at school the importance of source however I've since learnt that source is fairly meaningless. What I rely on much more than any individual source is triangulation - how do all the pieces of information fit together and then i make inferences from the "jigsaw" created by all the bits of information.
Apparently, Jamie does not understand [read is willfully ignoring the fact] that CPE does not necessarily imply the presence of a virus, many toxic drugs or poor culture conditions do produce CPE. Because he knows nothing about biology, not his area of expertise, his culture conditions induce cell stress and some CPE.
Jamie is a complete fraud and his denying of DNA is even more ridiculous than his denying of viruses. He is a con artist, a fraud.
Please follow the link to where Marc deeply embarrases himself by debunking his own claims himself then trying to lie his way out. The only fraud is him.
Reuters reported on Monday that the Annals of Internal Medicine will not retract the 2025 study, which analyzed data from 1.2 million Danish children and focused on vaccines that contain aluminum.
...........
MRI scans, X-rays, and more leaked online in major breach - over a million healthcare devices affected, here's what we know.
Vaccines are not the only vector of attack; the Food Chain Does Plenty of Damage Too. New Report: Americans Get More Than HALF of their Diet from Cancer Causing Foods
As the study concludes, Americans get half of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods (UPFs). https://tinyurl.com/4typpu5k
UPFs are loaded with preservatives, chemicals, and thickening agents to make them not only last longer, but also addictive. It's even worse for the younger generation who get 2/3ds of their calories from UPFs.
People below the poverty line were about 20% more likely to eat UPF's than those with higher incomes. Sandwiches and baked sweets were the most common UPFs.
Modat found more than 1.2 million misconfigured devices leaking info
This includes MRI scans, X-rays, and other sensitive files, together with patient contact data
The healthcare industry needs a proactive approach to cybersecurity, researchers warn
.......
Do You Want to Eat Fake Butter? Company Funded by Bill Gates Wants to Know?
A thought? We have no freedom of expression. 532 pensioners were arrested protesting about the genocide in Palestine. Every single one was released without charge after tea and biscuits at several local police stations.
The British government and its Gag Laws have failed to convince British bobbies of the legitimacy of proscribing peaceful protesters as domestic terrorists.
🚨Introducing the Revolutionary “Viral Isolation™ Method” 🚨
Because Who Needs the Scientific Method When You Have Consensus™?
Are you a virologist looking to isolate a virus but don’t want to deal with pesky scientific principles? Do you long for a world where assumptions are facts, controls are optional, and results are whatever you need them to be? Well, look no further! With Viral Isolation™, you, too, can bypass every fundamental step of the scientific method and still get published!
🎉 Special Features – Now with ZERO Adherence to the Scientific Method! 🎉
🔬 Step 1: Skip Direct Observation!
Why waste time finding a virus in nature when you can just assume it exists? Don’t worry—no one in ‘virology’ has ever observed a virus as a distinct, independent entity directly from a sick person’s fluids. If they haven’t done it in over a century, why start now?
💡 Bonus: Instead of isolating a virus, just declare symptoms = virus. Got a cough? Must be a virus! Fever? Definitely a virus! Ate bad sushi? Yep - virus!!
📏 Step 2: The Hypothesis-Free Hypothesis™!
Real science requires an Independent Variable (IV) (the thing being tested), but who has time for that? Since we never actually isolate a virus, we’ll just assume it’s there. Science is hard—so let’s just skip the part where we identify our IV!
🧐 Scientific Method Violation:
✅ No purified virus? No problem! Just declare the existence of one and move on.
✅ Symptoms are vague? Who cares? A fever must mean viral infection!
✅ What about controls? HAHAHA, good one.
🧪 Step 3: Experimental Design... Or Lack Thereof!
Time to “prove” viral replication! But instead of isolating and testing a virus, let’s throw patient samples into a blender of monkey kidney cells, toxic antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and a battery of chemicals! What could go wrong?
🧬 Pro-Tip: When the monkey kidney cells start dying from all the poison you added, just call it a Cytopathic Effect (CPE) and claim the virus did it! (Ignore the fact that control experiments show the same results without a virus—just pretend those don’t exist!)
📸 Step 4: The Electron Microscope Magic Show!
Now, let’s get some ‘proof.’ Instead of isolating and purifying a virus, just snap a picture of the cellular debris from our CPE Toxicity Soup™ and say, “See? That blob right there—totally a virus.”
🔍 Fun Fact: If someone asks why you didn’t purify and separate the virus, just roll your eyes and mutter, “You don’t understand virology.” That’ll shut them up!
📊 Step 5: Data Manipulation & Narrative Control!
Science should be about unbiased analysis... but where’s the fun in that? With Viral Isolation™, you can:
✅ Assemble ‘viral genomes’ on a computer, even if no complete ‘genome’ was found! (Computers never make mistakes.)
✅ Use PCR to ‘detect’ tiny ‘genetic fragments,’ from a ‘virus’ never proven to exist.
✅ Ignore all contradictory evidence, and call anyone who questions your methods a science denier™!
🧠 Step 6: Declare Success No Matter What!
In real science, if an experiment fails, the hypothesis should be rejected. But with Viral Isolation™, failure is never an option!
🚫 Found no actual virus? Publish anyway!
🚫 Control experiments contradict your results? Ignore them!
🚫 No reproducibility? Silence the skeptics!
🌟 SPECIAL BONUS! – Support the Digital Biosecurity State! 🌟
By believing in this groundbreaking Non-Scientific Methodology™, YOU, too, can:
💰 Enable the Biosecurity State™ – The more viruses we ‘find,’ the more lockdowns, mandates, and surveillance we can justify!
📉 Help Crush Small Businesses! – Nothing says ‘progress’ like eliminating those pesky local shops and centralizing power!
🛑 Contribute to The Great Reset™! – Because why have freedom when you can have digital IDs, carbon quotas, and endless health passports?
🚀 ORDER NOW! 🚀
For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts! ™ 💥
I love your sarcasm, but unfortunately, most of what you've written is true. There is no science today--it's pure BS! Louis Pasteur was a complete FRAUD yet he's still credited for discovering the Rabies Virus. None have ever been isolated... So, why are vaccines still being promoted for our children and animals? It’s simple …GREED, POWER, and CONTROL.
Thank you, Nancy! 🙏 Glad my sarcasm resonated — though, like you said, it’s a bit tragic when the ‘jokes’ are mostly true. Pasteur really did have the kind of résumé where you wonder if ‘science’ was just a side hustle between PR gigs. And the rabies virus? Still on the milk carton under Missing Since 1885.
As for why the jabs keep getting pushed — you nailed it: Greed, Power, Control. It’s the unholy trinity that makes Big Harma’s world go ‘round.
I have subscribed to your Substack on the grounds of comments made here. Thank you! xx
Thank you for subscribing. Marketing and lies? No, never… oh, wait — “Safe and effective.” Ah yes, it’s all coming back now. 💀💉💀💉💀💉💦💀👹
Me too!
Exactly 👌🏽
Does this article imply that all the cop and robber documentaries where the prosecution claims "We found his DNA at the crime scene" are knowingly lying? In other words the cops are telling the forensic chemists what they will conclude from their test? Witness tampering in other words.
Once you realize DNA has never proven to exist, a lot of fields fall by the wayside (are eviscerated).
Forensics loses its star witness overnight — no ‘matches’ from crime scenes, no ‘DNA’ databases, no paternity tests, no ‘genetic’ fingerprints to wave in front of a jury.
Medicine takes a massive hit — ‘genetic’ testing, ‘precision’ medicine, ‘gene’ therapy, m’RNA’ ‘vaccines,’ and the entire diagnostics industry built on PCR vanish into thin air.
Biology itself would need rewriting — no molecular blueprint for life, no genetic code, no way to map ancestry or talk about ‘mutations’ in the way we’ve been told.
Agriculture would be stripped of GMOs and ‘genetic’ engineering, while biotech companies would watch whole empires crumble without the ability to splice, edit, or patent ‘genetic’ material.
Even space science would have to rip up its search criteria for alien life, because right now they’re looking for ‘DNA/RNA’ signatures that may never have existed in the first place.
In short, remove DNA from the picture and you don’t just knock out a few bricks — you collapse the entire skyscraper of modern molecular science, law enforcement, and biotech.
Then how did I find my half sister the dna and ancestry.com?
How is it I’m able to connect with family members I didn’t even know I had?
A mate sent HIS spit to a dog ‘DNA’ testing company, pretending it was his dog’s. The results? 37% Border Collie, 22% Labrador, 15% Beagle, 13% Spaniel, 13% Terrier — and a note: ‘strong herding instinct.’
Explains why he’s always rounding us up at the pub. Makes you wonder what human ancestry tests would say if we all sent dog spit instead…
I get the problem you're pointing out, but you don't answer his question. Did he find a half-sister via DNA ancestry testing? If so--and other lines of inquiry could, we presume, confirm the half-sisterlyness--what WAS the company looking at if not the "DNA"?
Hi, Scott. Thanks for reaching out — and for recognizing that my mate who goes rounds on pints down the pub probably isn’t a mix of four dog breeds. I think he’ll be relieved you see how absurd that is. Makes you wonder about the claims of ’DNA’ testing, doesn’t it?
And sure — is it possible to find a person without a ’DNA’ test? Absolutely. People have been finding long-lost relatives for centuries through records, family connections, and a bit of detective work — and in today’s world, it’s even easier with algorithmic search powers, social media, and digital footprints. You’ve even got supermarket chains sending 16-year-olds discounts on baby clothes a month or two before they know they’re pregnant.
Also, let’s go back to first principles. If you’re claiming to have a DNA test, you’d surely need to prove DNA exists, right? That ’evidence’ consists of torturing biological material with a battery of acids and chemicals to produce a gooey white precipitate. I’d suggest that isn’t the sacred molecule of life — wouldn’t you?
Just about 2 weeks ago I started to listen to the YT channel Time of Crime. I'd put it on while driving.
I very soon realized a constant theme to all the stories: Unsolved Murders in the 70s, 80s and 90s....where DNA forensics was in its infancy. A). They always have a "fragment" of DNA. B). Testing methods were somewhat lacking, and C) Someone in the 2020s took a fancy to these unsolved cases, and through the use of MODERN DNA testing, they caught the murderer!!!
And without a doubt they all show the animated "Spiraling DNA" double helix graphic!
Watch a few for yourself and come back and tell me if I'm lying :)
Enjoy!
https://m.youtube.com/@TimeOfCrime/videos
Dag, good one. What about the DNA tests proving you're the father. Uh, oh!!
If you are married to a white woman, are yourself a white man, and you are presented with a newly born black baby...immediately seek a divorce!!!
Still gonna hafta pay de child support, bro.
YES!
No not really. I don't think they are "knowingly lying"..
LOL
Intellectual honesty!
OMG 😆 I FREAKING LOVE THIS!! This is brilliant, much needed, and so well done. 👏‼️💖
MASSIVE THANKS!! GREATLY APPRECIATED!!
Hilarious. Thank you :-)
HUGE THANKS!! 👍👍
🌟Brilliant!😆 And great use of emojis earned a follower from me. 😜👍
Huge thanks, Lex!! 🙏 Now if only we had the monkey kidney cell culture being poisoned emoji 🐒🧫☠️—viroLIEgy’s favorite ’proof’ of isolation.
Outstanding!
"For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts! ™"💥
Much appreciated—glad it resonated!
"...low price of your critical thinking skills..." really says it all. I'm tradmarking it!
Thanks!!
: D
Dear, T’ree! Here’s hoping that once the core message is trademarked, it really takes root—branching out so more folks twig to the fraud of viroLIEgy.
LOL!! Pleasure!!
Thank God someone said it, especially about DNA.
Is "superficialise" a word? If so, the DNA test is a sure way to superficialise humanity and life itself. (Also, it can make semites of certain who only wish to be such. Handy that.)
I can't understand let alone prove a bloody thing...but DNA just reeks of moon landings, dissolving jetliners, Trump's ear and Chinese lab-leaks.
And viruses? For that we need a new expression: post-confirmed prediscovery. (I thought you'd like it.)
"Trump's ear"
🤡
I'd be with you on Trump's ear if it weren't for the guy behind him WHO DIED.
And in the Brave New World...the last thing you can get away with is a media faking a death, isn't it?
Ahh, the good ole ear graze guy dies conflation. Is Trump’s ear the control?
yeah, the deep state would never kill random people to run a fake to install someone into power. like evah... they are the good guyz. Hollywood agrees.
"Jesus' purse"
I like it and I'm stealing it.
The technical term is p0c0PrD1...because the switch between upper and lower case and the pointless numerals make it sound sciency. Plus it's a bitch to type and irritates the hell out of the common punters.
But the kids can dance to it....
Banging written interview with Jamie!
Please note that in question 10 there is a typo: Floors should be spelled 'flaws'.
Question 16 requires highlighting (for layout consistency).
Thank you for engaging with Jamie Andrews. I would like to make it very clear that I fully support his efforts and would like to take this opportunity to thank him for fighting HARD against those people who tried to discredit him and anyone who supports him.
This has resulted in a schism, a division within the No Virus community and I welcome that too because it highlighted who is genuinely seeking truth and who is controlling the opposition.
It is very important that we quickly dispense with bogus 'science' and move onto proving the real root causes of disease. This is paramount, vital and essential for ALL living things. Not just human beings.
Brilliant summary Frances
SCIENCE BREAKTHROUGH!! 'DNA ISOLATION' – NOW WITH MODERN TECHNOLOGY, BUT STILL A BIT… 1869! 🚨
(Brought to you by Circular Reasoning & the Reification Fallacy Brothers – perfect support for your confirmation bias!!)
🕺SCIENTISTS HAVE DONE IT AGAIN!! ⚗️
Armed with fancy lab coats, shiny high-speed centrifuges, and an unyielding belief in technology over common sense, researchers have once again isolated ’DNA’ 🧬🧬... and honestly, not much has changed since Miescher’s day!
💥 How did we do it? Simple!! With a modern ’DNA’ isolation kit—packed with technical jargon, sleek plasticware, and the same 19th century chemistry, now with extra spin cycles!
🧬 Introducing: Tortured DNA Precipitate™ – Now in 100% Modernized Old-School Purity!
🚨 THE 7-STEPS OF MODERN DNA ISOLATION (BECAUSE WHY CHANGE WHAT WORKS, RIGHT?) 🚨
✅ Step 1: Homogenize your biological sample – Fancy word for smashing biological material into goo. Now with high-speed glass beads, but still the same classic destruction Miescher would recognize.
✅ Step 2: Add lysis buffer – A modernized acid bath to dissolve what we just obliterated. Because if we liquefy enough stuff, DNA must be in there somewhere!
✅ Step 3: Precipitate DNA with alcohol – Ethanol or isopropanol remains the go-to magic trick for making genetic material appear. If it's been the gold standard for decades, it must still be cutting-edge! 🍸🧬
✅ Step 4: Centrifuge the liquid goo – Spin it at ludicrous speeds until something clumps at the bottom. The high-speed equivalent of “let's see what sticks.”
✅ Step 5: Discard the supernatant – Toss out everything except what we hope is DNA. This part is highly scientific because we decided the good stuff is in the pellet.
✅ Step 6: Wash the DNA pellet – Rinse and repeat, because adding 70% ethanol means it’s “pure” now.
✅ Step 7: Elute in buffer – Congratulations! If it’s not quite right, just keep running it through until it looks like DNA. Because science! (Pro tip: TE buffer or nuclease-free water, because if it’s not in that, it’s probably not DNA).
🎉GENIUS! BUT WAIT... IS THIS REALLY DNA? 🤔
🔥 Critics say: Pulverizing, dissolving, spinning, and filtering biological mush might not be the best way to ‘isolate’ a ‘genetic’ molecule.
We say: Why mess with a system that’s been working (on assumption) since 1869?!
Besides, if DNA didn’t exist, then how did we extract this tortured precipitate? 🤷♂️ #CheckmateCritics
FREQUENTLY AVOIDED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
🧐 Q: If DNA is the molecule of life, why does it need to be ‘isolated’ by harsh chemicals?
🔬 A: Silence, please. We’re doing science.
🧐 Q: Why don’t we just isolate a fully intact, unmodified DNA molecule?
🔬 A: Because then we wouldn’t need grant money to keep “discovering” it.
🧐 Q: Isn’t this just circular reasoning?
🔬 A: Absolutely not! We assumed DNA exists, looked for DNA, and found what we assumed. That’s called scientific rigor.
LIMITED-TIME OFFER! ORDER YOUR "PURE" DNA TODAY!
🚀 For just $9.99, we’ll send you a vial of freshly extracted nucleic acid sludge—scooped straight from our high-speed vortex of molecular destruction ⚗️
📞 Call 1-800-DNA-FAKE now, and we’ll throw in an extra vial of ethanol-based buffer—FREE!🧬🕺
💰 Hurry! Supplies are infinite (because we can always dissolve more cells).
🚨 WARNING: MAY CONTAIN ZERO ACTUAL DNA!!
☠️ Side effects include: extreme skepticism, spontaneous questioning of mainstream science, and an uncontrollable urge to expose scientific fraud.
Today's sponsor: The ’DNA’ Extraction Group™ – “Still smashing stuff since 1869!”
Beautifully analyzed and exposed!
Really appreciate the positive feedback! Cheers again!
If there is one thing the international organised criminals detest it is ridicule and you do it with aplomb and panache. Skills in marketing (aka lying) are seriously under-rated, don't you think? xx
Love it! 👌🏽
HUGE THANKS!! GREATLY APPRECIATED!!
Amazing. I believe the whole enchilada. We have been taken for a ride for the last 200 years of medical quackery...what is now called allo-pathetic medicine.
I am wondering about the science of forensics. If DNA is a farce, wouldn't that upset this science used by law enforcement?
Allopathetic… such a great word! 👏🏽 I will use it going forward
I sort of was thinking along the same lines. "Definitely you are the daddy and by the way we found your DNA at a 2003 crime scene."
I need to read this article again to see if I can resolve what I thought before with "it is all one big computer model".
The PsyOp runs in both directions:
A). Convict a criminal based upon "DNA evidence".
B). Using " DNA evidence" those "wrongly convicted and behind bars" are at last being released and set FREE!! Think "The Innocence Project"!!
Either way, DNA For DA WIN!!
I still think 'DNA IS PISS' ranks as one of the greatest substack's I've read. I just know we'd get on well.
Straw bale beats stone btw. :)
Oh shit I forgot I wasn't on Jamie's substack. Apologies and wonderful questions and interview.
I've shared
I would encourage the interviewer/owner of this substack to re-evaluate Mr Andrew's claims. According to journalist Eric F Coppolino who interviewed him his virology control studies project may not even exist. https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/wheres-your-data-planet-waves-fm
You either need to have close to zero research skills or be as perverted as this creep to call on 'proof' from him to try and discredit the control studies. Either way people reading your comment must know that you are fucking retarded. They can just review the below information on him:
https://hudsonvalleyone.com/2018/08/04/metoo-comes-to-town/
https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/planet-waves-eric-francis/kingston-ny-anatoly-ryzhenko-1484803
https://t.me/DarksidePapersChat/123302
Kary Mullis sp? Developed the PCR test. Shortly before the epidemic of malpractice killing fields took off he announced PCR testing would be worthless for a virus. He died shortly there after a very unexpected pulmonary infection. The dude was aerosolized. The deep Democrats needed him out of the way to perpetrate the fraud.
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION! Kary Mullis was a FRAUD, both as a mainstream "scientist" AND when he was PRETENDING to be a so-called "dissident"! All honest and scientifically literate people in today's novirus community are VERY AWARE of these facts by now! Anyone else who says anything different is a LIAR or an idiot or BOTH! I was THERE in the old "AIDS" dissident movement! I MET MULLIS...a few times, in fact. I even co-produced a very famous SEMINAR where Mullis was our key note speaker way back in 1997! I KNOW what I am talking about!
See:
1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fbpYott1Mdw_BuuiE6_rjO_7Xr5Z_PdoxtK3fNZI9Gc
2. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/the-mullis-mirage
3. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/new-kary-mullis-was-not-killed-by
and Jamie Andrews agreess with me, and he has also written a great critical analysis of Mullis' silly book here:
4. https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-dancing-naked-in-the
In addition to all the questionable background detailed in reference #1 above, Mullis's last biotech company which he "founded" had received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense DARPA program to the tune of at least *$2MILLION*!! SOME DISSIDENT! LOL!
Do you? Do you know what the F?
.....???.....Yeah I DO KNOW what the F I'm talking about, as I originally stated in my post above! However, I HAVE taken the liberty of EDITING my above post since some of it was copied and pasted from another post I made which was one which compelled me to use a more BLUNT TONE! Thanks for pointing this out to me.... I GUESS....??
Pfizer is quietly slipping GMO Enzyme into 90% of American cheese —and it's nowhere on the Label. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/pfizer-quietly-slipping-gmo-enzyme-into-90-of-american-cheese-and-its-nowhere-on-the-label/
Thanks for the link. I found this out a few months ago on commietube. As a skinny carnivore I eat a lot of cheese to maintain my weight. I've found so many different cheeses from so many different countries since and they taste better too.
Your little Community Supported Aggriculture sometimes has cheezes too.
I’m happy for Mr Andrews to demonstrate the falsity of claims made by scientists, but his work on the topic of DNA https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/dissolving-dna-illusions isn’t rigourous, relies too much on AI chat and fails to include any proper analyses of the end products of his experiments.
He also seems to lack an understanding of how genetic material is proposed to be organised in the cell. He seems to think DNA exists as a strand in isolation but the proposed understanding is that it is tightly wrapped around histone proteins and organised into nucleosomes which are proposed to prevent strands of DNA from becoming entangled and reducing the risk of damage.
Jamie claims that DNA has never been photographed using electron microscopy, but it is claimed that nucleosomes connected by DNA have been photographed using electron microscopy in the photograph from the 1970’s linked below. If he wants to be taken seriously he needs to be more rigorous in his research and rely less on AI.
https://www.ornl.gov/blog/beads-string-discovering-nucleosome-0
After sharing this information with Katherine Watt her promotional note for this interview was made "unavailable."
Mr. Andrew’s sounds a little apologetic about his geology degree!! I studied biology and geology ending up with 2 degrees. I found geology an all inclusive science which demanded much critical thinking, whereas biology demanded more memorization. So to me, a degree in geology has much to admire.
I'm not a scientist nor do I have a very scientific mind, however, outside science there are certain facts that speak very loudly. I can accept that anything a person refuting The ScienceTM claims might be true about the shoddiness of the scientific work BUT something must be being matched when people go on ancestry and similar sites and find that they are matched to a man their mother later confesses was a man she had a secret brief affair with - and these are not isolated cases. There's a term - NPE - Not Parent Expected. Even ONE case is very difficult to put down to chance but obviously if there's a term for it, it cannot be all that rare.
https://notparentexpected.ca/f/my-npe-story-by-barbara-a
In the case of viruses, I accept that those of us who don't believe in viruses are not under obligation to explain what does cause the sickness that is currently put down to viruses because there are so many possible causes, however, when it's a case of science actually producing a result I think it would be good for those debunking DNA to explain what scientific work allows ancestry to match people to their "unexpected" parent.
That's explained in comprehensive detail in the linked articles.
Which one would you recommend I read first?
This one specifically addresses ancestry as well as forensics sequencing and Gene editing.
https://open.substack.com/pub/controlstudies/p/the-dna-hoax-0a2?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=27c5yh
OK, so I can accept that sperm donors can be matched to children through records and there might be other kinds of matches where records can be used but it's difficult to see how those whose mothers have secret affairs can be matched without "real" science happening - it might not be DNA but it would surely be some kind of genuinely scientific matching. The link I gave initially is to a site which only has two NPEs on it and they are both by donor sperm but on the site below, for example, some of the matching is where the paternity is not something that would be on records. Of course, in some cases the supposed "unexpected" father may not even be the real father but where a mother confesses to an affair - an example I came across in another discussion - it is the real father and it's hard to see how the match can't have some scientific basis - it's too needle-in-a-haystack for it to be chance.
Do you have a comment on that?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AncestryDNA/comments/14r0d8z/found_out_my_dad_isnt_my_biological_father_at_27/
So you have linked to an anonymous story on reddit? This is about the lowest form of "hear say" evidence possible for a start. The fact that you can't tell that the story is completely made up is rather alarming too.
This person claims the site Ancestry said his dad wasn't his real dad which is basically impossible to tell... ESPECIALLY given that he "figures out" (by apparently looking at pictures on social media) his actually dad is his uncle who would share almost identical "genes". There are thousands of some such tripe stories that are just Circular reasoned..." I know they were my long lost sister..... because Ancestry told me so".
It is reading *something* as I explain again in great detail in numerous other articles it is not just completely "made up" so that in small pools of people usually 2 or 3 potential fathers, unless the mother is a complete whore, it is possible to get a rough idea especially when matched against all other physical attributes which as Dan Krane the leading forensics expert openly says they MUST have all this information PRIOR to testing.
There's more than one story, Jamie, and they could all be made up but I don't discount information on the basis that it could be made up - I assess it by how convincing it seems combined with there being a reasonable number of examples. Of course, many people do reject information on the basis it could be made up and I can't argue with that.
We each have our criteria for believing things and if you're looking at the science and it looks shoddy and you look at the results and many of them are bad then how can you do otherwise than reject it? All I can say is that to me the NPE stories feel genuine and in some cases at least I don't see how the information to connect people could be on record so I cannot help believing there's some kind of "real" science involved. However, I'll certainly allow that not all the information points in that direction, it's just that what seems compelling to me does.
I notice AI sources/sites Reddit alot.
Bizarre if you consider it for a split-second....I mean, of ALL the material on the world wide web?
Unless of course, there is an agenda for a specific narrative.
I remember being taught at school the importance of source however I've since learnt that source is fairly meaningless. What I rely on much more than any individual source is triangulation - how do all the pieces of information fit together and then i make inferences from the "jigsaw" created by all the bits of information.
Oooh, look, Jamie is defending his "work" on substack, he fools the non scientist with his USDA-grade prime BS arguments, but not real scientists.
Here, I completely demolish his virology control studies: https://x.com/marc_g_wathelet/status/2018762629276180750
Apparently, Jamie does not understand [read is willfully ignoring the fact] that CPE does not necessarily imply the presence of a virus, many toxic drugs or poor culture conditions do produce CPE. Because he knows nothing about biology, not his area of expertise, his culture conditions induce cell stress and some CPE.
Jamie is a complete fraud and his denying of DNA is even more ridiculous than his denying of viruses. He is a con artist, a fraud.
Please follow the link to where Marc deeply embarrases himself by debunking his own claims himself then trying to lie his way out. The only fraud is him.
Nice try, Jamie. Yes, follow the link that exposes Jamie’s fraud.
Exactly. Explain how I found a half sister I didn’t even know I had.
That's interesting, Te. Would you be willing to share some details?
Great.
Stillbirth Surge Connected to COVID Shot?
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/stillbirth-surge-connected-to-covid-shot-corruption-in-schools-mothers-2b/
Welcome back to “Good Morning CHD,” a daily show where we feature many unique guests and cover a variety of topics related to children’s health.
.....
Medical Journal Rejects Kennedy's Call for Retraction of Vaccine Study.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/rfk-jr-slapped-down-medical-212734947.html
Reuters reported on Monday that the Annals of Internal Medicine will not retract the 2025 study, which analyzed data from 1.2 million Danish children and focused on vaccines that contain aluminum.
...........
MRI scans, X-rays, and more leaked online in major breach - over a million healthcare devices affected, here's what we know.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/mri-scans-x-rays-and-more-leaked-online-in-major-breach-over-a-million-healthcare-devices-affected-here-s-what-we-know/ar-AA1KkBLc?ocid=BingNewsVerp
...
Vaccines are not the only vector of attack; the Food Chain Does Plenty of Damage Too. New Report: Americans Get More Than HALF of their Diet from Cancer Causing Foods
As the study concludes, Americans get half of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods (UPFs). https://tinyurl.com/4typpu5k
UPFs are loaded with preservatives, chemicals, and thickening agents to make them not only last longer, but also addictive. It's even worse for the younger generation who get 2/3ds of their calories from UPFs.
People below the poverty line were about 20% more likely to eat UPF's than those with higher incomes. Sandwiches and baked sweets were the most common UPFs.
Modat found more than 1.2 million misconfigured devices leaking info
This includes MRI scans, X-rays, and other sensitive files, together with patient contact data
The healthcare industry needs a proactive approach to cybersecurity, researchers warn
.......
Do You Want to Eat Fake Butter? Company Funded by Bill Gates Wants to Know?
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/scott-mcclallen/2025/08/10/do-you-want-to-eat-fake-butter-bill-gates-wants-to-know-n2661651
Discover the controversy around Bill Gates' FDA-approved fake butter made from carbon.
.....
[Video] New fee for asking questions at the doctor's office.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keUJyfu0-r4
.....
Waste from agricultural plants poisoned the US town’s water with PFAS, lawsuits allege.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/11/wastewater-perdue-pfas-lawsuits
Some Salisbury, Maryland, residents say the contaminated water from Perdue Farms’ local plant has sickened them.
......
[Video] Beware new doctor's office hidden fees.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGSTQQx4pnw
....
ROFLOL: Cows Are Now Being Trained to Pee in Designated Places in an Attempt to Prevent Global Warming
https://www.greenmatters.com/.../cows-are-now-being...
Nitrous Oxide, a greenhouse gas emitted from cows' body waste, harms the atmosphere and is 25 times more harmful than CO2.
Spare a thought for UK freedom of expression
A thought? We have no freedom of expression. 532 pensioners were arrested protesting about the genocide in Palestine. Every single one was released without charge after tea and biscuits at several local police stations.
The British government and its Gag Laws have failed to convince British bobbies of the legitimacy of proscribing peaceful protesters as domestic terrorists.
Thank you for your erudite comment...The concerning part of The Act is its collateral
damage...Ordinary life is more complicated than it need ever be...
Oh the foundation is rotten.
Tom Cowan shows this very clearly.