Dribs and drabs of info I have picked up during my years on earth, all coming together in this major article. Golden nuggets spoken once and done, obviously gaining no headway, just validated my connection of piecing these nuggets together. Rappoport's Matix and AIDS reporting are epic. Warburg also.
I don't labor on the subject but I have often wondered why people with a seemingly good diet get cancer and those with a reckless lifestyle never get it. And don't even mention genetics which absolutely never made any sense to me.
I've cornered the market on my kitchen living with my sister, 2 old gray mares, so I do all the cooking which I love to do. I also make delicious desserts we both look forward to. The scourge of my life I have not eliminated, although completely aware of the consequences.
I'll spend a good 2 hours making a meal, call her in and we eat midday. Two hours later we'll have a liquor laced cannoli as good as Little Italy can make in NYC. Or maybe a Basque cheesecake or TiraMisu for 2. I know. Don't even go there.
It was never planned that way, but we have gotten used to eating once a day. Twice if you count dessert. She takes a snack to her room and I always seem to go to bed hungry. I just know eating before bed wrecks my sleep pattern, so I don't do it. Unlike thirst, I drink Fiji all day when I'm not thirsty, I don't eat when I'm not hungry, unless I'm sick which I never am. I don't consider cancer. If it befalls me I know there are other treatments. The American Cancer Society is not valuable, credible or even a blip on my health radar other than, stay away.
Great comment. I eat in a 6 hour time period. 18 hours a day I fast (besides liquids). I am an old gray mare (59 yo) who loves sweets and baked goods. At 112 lbs, I weigh less than I did in high school. I feel OK, I am on no prescription medications.
My sister died of chemo overdose at the age of 53 from her "treatment" of breast cancer. My father died at the age of 56 of radiation poisoning from his "treatment" of lymphoma. When and if I "get cancer" I will do NO treatment. I have seen the cancer treatment torture and death up close. Not for me.
What tragedy, I am so sorry for you family losses. I don't worry also. Dessert is incorporated into our diet daily. Even if I don't bake I must have that scoop of ice cream with my own made Magic Shell that's so easy to make. Making everything from scratch allows me to use organic ingredients which has eliminated the interior aisles in a grocery store that I never travel down.
Since life expectancy from untreated cancer is said to be 12 years versus literal months if an allopath treats you, the choice is easy. It's not likely I'll ever find out anyway, since I do no testing and don't see doctors unless I've suffered a car crash. Ignorance can be bliss.
"The medical establishment's failure to cure cancer ... isn't a failure of effort but a failure of understanding." I don't believe it's a "failure" at all but intentional. They know exactly what they're doing and how to cure it, just don't care to.
If you are deficient in vitamin D, your immune system can't produce E-Cadherin, a substance that surrounds cancer cells so they do not cause metastasis. Allows the T cells time to destroy them. Glucose turbo charges cancer cell growth. Reduce or eliminate in take. Humans are magnificent biological machines and we keep disrupting the microbiome and biological functions by ill conceived medical protocols. Eliminating stress in daily life is essential, because chronic stress negatively impacts immune systems ability to protect.
This was a very precise article and speaks volumes to our lived experience. Faced with a Stage iv pancreatic cancer diagnosis four years ago, all we were offered was palliative chemo with a 6 month to a year prognosis. We were gobsmacked. After the shock wore off, we dove into research and discovered the whole metabolic approach. Long story short, we created our own protocol to take alongside chemo... implemented a lot of things this article mentions. It was not supported by our medical team (surprise, surprise) but we did it anyway, knowing the risks in doing so for our circumstance were very low... afterall, death was supposed to be swift anyway and we realized he had absolutely nothing to lose. Now, here we are four years later with an ongoing NED status and giving the mainstream medical community the middle finger. PS, we use "we" as we are a husband and wife team who went through every step of this together: one as the patient, the other as the caregiver but both now on the same mission!
These ideas made so much sense a few decades ago… my concern at this point is that we have so many potential harmful factors that I dont really know how we would tell what was what . Would you leave all cancers even if they were cutting off vital blood supply ?
2 people in my family ignored my advice and had standard medical cancer treatment years ago and it worked .. a local guy had 2 huge brain cancers removed a decade ago and is now seemingly fine. Would he have survived without that extensive surgery ??
What if cancer is a response to parasitic cysts ?? do we really have reason to believe all parasites are only there for our good, ultimately ?? I’ve taken a close look at quite a few parasites and I wasnt reassured. Many things would happily kill us I think, deciding our life had already tipped too far into the negative. Medicine attempting to rebalance the books might not be such a bad thing ?
I’ve cared for animals riddled with parasites .. letting them heal naturally, and they died ..
I’m left feeling it’s all rather confusing and people have the right to choose whichever way they want to attempt to address their ails.
I stick with natural health but I am aware it is an indulgence because it takes so much more time and effort .. in much of the world you would be sacked or bullied or worse if you walked around with a visible tumour .. :( .
This article addressed excising tumors that obstruct vital pathways. I have used Ivermectin on my animals and always NEVER vaccinating them, no matter what the so-called legal consequences be. I don't believe a body will heal naturally by injecting poison into it.
Same here . I've used ivermectin and peroxide at times when they helped and at other times they made things worse, which is why I think it is all immensely fluid and depends on all the other constellations of factors . I wont use ivermectin on animals cos it damages the surrounding ecology and I'm in a nature reserve.
One of the few things I doubt would help at all is the 'injectibles' . It all sounds so contrived. Do they really have any proof they work at all ??
To your question, NO, absolutely not. I cured my dogs ear infections with Ivermectin. It was my last resort after 6 vet visits where nothing was achieved. Lately he went lame and I used DMSO. Total relief was in a couple hours. He was walking like a natural man he is.
i understand they think we are overusing too few antibiotics and will create drug resistance .. so they want more targeted medications. It just doesnt sound feasible to me. We have a wide range of things that are anti-biotic so i think we could afford to experiment more widely . Even better we can explore ways to feed/heal the area . There seem to be so many options. Well done fixing that ear :) .
I believe Dr's prescribe antibiotics to a dangerous level. What I can't understand is why they tell you to take the entire series of pills even tho apparent wellness has returned by day2. That caused an overdose in me that only a hospital visit for anaphylaxis could fix. I've never touch them again
Not wanting to overwhelm with info , but the Bristol Natural Cancer clinic supposedly failed to cure people . Many of us were hugely disappointed at the time but I would love to know the details as to how this was 'proven' . Whose research would I trust ?
In recent years carnivore and keto diets have claimed to markedly improve health , but the Invisible Rainbow guy and various others have warned that EMF pollution actually reverses that trend. Meat and dairy are worse for your health once you factor in EMFs. So it's a moving target.
Japanese cancer researchers implicated all kinds of plant foods in cancer proclivity .. black pepper was one that stuck in my mind . Sweet potatoes can be healthy for some, tho many contain a mold which had dire health effects for people and livestock. Any plant with heavy metals in combining with magnetoelectricity might wind up doing more harm than good. It's all astonishingly complex now.. Friends have tried to synthesize all this knowledge into hugely complex decision support databases .. but it is mind bogglingly complicated . .
It's vital that we maintain the right to explore natural health but we may have a few casualties along the way.
Meat/protein is hard on the kidneys. The kidneys are already not working too good when you have cancer. Eating stuff hard on the kidneys when you have cancer may not be the best way to go.
Though I guess when people just eat meat and stop the ultra processed foods they may feel a bit better as they aren't getting all the extra toxic processed crap they are used to getting. Also meat tends to make you feel fuller longer too.
I have seen many people do well on Keto till after awhile they don't do well. Maybe they weren't getting all their vitamins they needed.
Again I have seen the benefits of Keto and think anyone doing Keto should have their kidneys checked once in awhile.
Yes agreed. If Firstenberg is correct tho , that stuff worked well prior to 5g rollouts. The meat and dairy facilitates heating of the body via emfs .. so what was good in the past will now start backfiring. I personally improved with a carni diet for a few weeks but now feel better without any meat .. Even kidney disease used to heal with keto/carni diets but that now may not be the case. It may well be its good to have a change of diet for a short while to jumpstart healing , but see how complex its all becoming. With recent medications most of us wont know what’s what either. So much rapid change in so many areas these days. We will muddle through as ever , but its getting a bit head spinny isnt it :/
Nah, not me. I just eat as much organic fruit, berries and melons that I can find, and drink clean water. Yes they try to ruin that too. After that though I don't think much about it for myself. This cleans out the lymph and helps maintain health the best way there is I think.
You are thinking for yourself tho... when it comes to helping others with manifest problems, it becomes more complicated. Hence all the current court cases .. court cases which will have big implications for the rest of us I think.
There's a better explanation for why ivermectin and fenbenzadole works on cancer.
They are anti parasite drugs. If we properly understand that parasites also sequester toxins (like in tuna, parasites isolate mercury which helps the fish operate without issues), then the mechanism is clear.
These drugs help enhance the body's elimination pathways which take away the toxic food that parasites live on.
That's also why they work on cancer, which also sequesters toxins and debris.
Holy crap! You went there. "The connection between nutrition and cancer extends far beyond simple calorie counting. Animal proteins, particularly when consumed in excess, can thicken blood vessel walls up to eight times normal thickness, severely restricting oxygen delivery to cells. This creates precisely the hypoxic conditions that force cells to shift to fermentation metabolism. Populations consuming primarily plant-based diets show dramatically lower cancer rates, suggesting that dietary protein sources significantly impact cancer risk."
I want you to know when the Keto people come out of the wood work to crucify you. that I support you. I many not be here with words, but I am there for you in spirit, eating watermelon from afar.
I do not know what causes cancer (and neither does anyone else!). The Human Genome Projects assertion that they know what sequences of nucleic acid\bases are causing cancer is equivalent to snake oil sales exaggerating their knowledge and understanding.
A lot of biopsies are labeled pre-cancerous as a cover-your-ass endeavor. One out of every 4 asymptomatic prostate biopsies of men over 55 will show cancer yet few of them will go on to grow or metastasize without any treatment.
Breast imaging improvements led to detection of calcifications which are benign in the majority of which. The approach used to be to follow up in six months to see if there was growth and change. However, with the help of the legal malpractice profession and law suits and the benefit to imagers, this approach was abandoned and every noted calcification is biopsied. (After all, who has time for law suits, licensing may be jeopardized and it is a personal problem of the patent. Sarcasm here.) The old protocol of mastectomy has been shown to have no better outcomes than just lumpectomy. We are in uncharted waters!
"I do not know what causes cancer (and neither does anyone else!)." Well I will take a stab at it though I never stepped foot in a medical classroom. Cancer is your body's inability to get rid of it's waste properly so it backs up kind of like you kitchen sink backs up if things are not properly flowing through the pipes.
Now that I have solved the cancer riddle, where is my million, no zillion dollars?
Restoration of feelings of personal responsibility would go a long way in the meantime. If patients had to pay for what gets done, like with their autos, they would be more discerning, and there is the problem because he who pays the piper still calls the tune. Mistreatment and misdiagnosis would fall under malpractice but you are correct that there is no downside to the caretaker for excessive actions and an incentive in reimbursement. Not only that but malpractice insurance will mandate that the AMA, etc. opinions are standard of care that must be followed for insurance and hospitals require insurance to work within. The whole field is locked down. If Ray Peat offered his services he would find that a bevy of lawyers and others who would come down on him harder than Alex Jones. However, this would be a real thing rather than a show. you might want to add "proven" to the new theories suggestion otherwise one ends up with warpspeed mRNA injections. Incorrect ideas may be old, but they are not "knowledge". Good insights on your part.
Amazing Info!!! Everyone should read and study this info. It all makes sense. God bless you for the time and energy it took to put it all together. What a labor of love. Thank you!
It’s not a simple issue, as we can see from $$$ pumped into maintaining cancer. The mechanism appears to be complex and not standardised, rather being (at least to some extent) dependent on the person. The “person” consists of the body and the mind, and I guess that prospects of treatment depend a lot on the attitude of the person, on the mental approach to a new - and decisive - situation in life.
The final act is the same for all of us, so it’s not a question of escaping death. Understanding what is happening in the body is greatly empowering. Not believing doctors and their talking points is a primary safeguard for survival. Balancing what the hospital medicine can offer with alternative approaches may be crucial.
All health problems are like “Stop” signs: wait, look around, make corrections (if you can), and definitely change something in your life. Only you know what has to be changed. Maybe it will help resolve the health problem, maybe not. Still, worth trying.
The essay is fantastic up to the point that you recommend fasting and the keto diet for cancer. If toxins are causing stress, cutting out all healthy carbs that traditional cultures ate such as whole grains, or partially milled grains, sweet vegetables and fruit would stress the body more. Fasting would do the same. Another approach that I've seen work is to remove toxins from food, the body and environment, and eat nourishing foods. This makes more sense and has worked given the premise that the body is isolating toxins as tumors. I've seen this work over decades of recommending it as long as the person doesn't choose toxic treatments.
Dribs and drabs of info I have picked up during my years on earth, all coming together in this major article. Golden nuggets spoken once and done, obviously gaining no headway, just validated my connection of piecing these nuggets together. Rappoport's Matix and AIDS reporting are epic. Warburg also.
I don't labor on the subject but I have often wondered why people with a seemingly good diet get cancer and those with a reckless lifestyle never get it. And don't even mention genetics which absolutely never made any sense to me.
I've cornered the market on my kitchen living with my sister, 2 old gray mares, so I do all the cooking which I love to do. I also make delicious desserts we both look forward to. The scourge of my life I have not eliminated, although completely aware of the consequences.
I'll spend a good 2 hours making a meal, call her in and we eat midday. Two hours later we'll have a liquor laced cannoli as good as Little Italy can make in NYC. Or maybe a Basque cheesecake or TiraMisu for 2. I know. Don't even go there.
It was never planned that way, but we have gotten used to eating once a day. Twice if you count dessert. She takes a snack to her room and I always seem to go to bed hungry. I just know eating before bed wrecks my sleep pattern, so I don't do it. Unlike thirst, I drink Fiji all day when I'm not thirsty, I don't eat when I'm not hungry, unless I'm sick which I never am. I don't consider cancer. If it befalls me I know there are other treatments. The American Cancer Society is not valuable, credible or even a blip on my health radar other than, stay away.
Great comment. I eat in a 6 hour time period. 18 hours a day I fast (besides liquids). I am an old gray mare (59 yo) who loves sweets and baked goods. At 112 lbs, I weigh less than I did in high school. I feel OK, I am on no prescription medications.
My sister died of chemo overdose at the age of 53 from her "treatment" of breast cancer. My father died at the age of 56 of radiation poisoning from his "treatment" of lymphoma. When and if I "get cancer" I will do NO treatment. I have seen the cancer treatment torture and death up close. Not for me.
What tragedy, I am so sorry for you family losses. I don't worry also. Dessert is incorporated into our diet daily. Even if I don't bake I must have that scoop of ice cream with my own made Magic Shell that's so easy to make. Making everything from scratch allows me to use organic ingredients which has eliminated the interior aisles in a grocery store that I never travel down.
Since life expectancy from untreated cancer is said to be 12 years versus literal months if an allopath treats you, the choice is easy. It's not likely I'll ever find out anyway, since I do no testing and don't see doctors unless I've suffered a car crash. Ignorance can be bliss.
American Cancer Society will anagram to:
- I ye cancer creation scam
Tells it as it is.
"The medical establishment's failure to cure cancer ... isn't a failure of effort but a failure of understanding." I don't believe it's a "failure" at all but intentional. They know exactly what they're doing and how to cure it, just don't care to.
It is not profitable to cure cancer. Cause it, yes, just not cure.
Except occasionally just to encourage the others!
Not only would it not be profitable but it's also a great depopulation tool.
If you are deficient in vitamin D, your immune system can't produce E-Cadherin, a substance that surrounds cancer cells so they do not cause metastasis. Allows the T cells time to destroy them. Glucose turbo charges cancer cell growth. Reduce or eliminate in take. Humans are magnificent biological machines and we keep disrupting the microbiome and biological functions by ill conceived medical protocols. Eliminating stress in daily life is essential, because chronic stress negatively impacts immune systems ability to protect.
This was a very precise article and speaks volumes to our lived experience. Faced with a Stage iv pancreatic cancer diagnosis four years ago, all we were offered was palliative chemo with a 6 month to a year prognosis. We were gobsmacked. After the shock wore off, we dove into research and discovered the whole metabolic approach. Long story short, we created our own protocol to take alongside chemo... implemented a lot of things this article mentions. It was not supported by our medical team (surprise, surprise) but we did it anyway, knowing the risks in doing so for our circumstance were very low... afterall, death was supposed to be swift anyway and we realized he had absolutely nothing to lose. Now, here we are four years later with an ongoing NED status and giving the mainstream medical community the middle finger. PS, we use "we" as we are a husband and wife team who went through every step of this together: one as the patient, the other as the caregiver but both now on the same mission!
These ideas made so much sense a few decades ago… my concern at this point is that we have so many potential harmful factors that I dont really know how we would tell what was what . Would you leave all cancers even if they were cutting off vital blood supply ?
2 people in my family ignored my advice and had standard medical cancer treatment years ago and it worked .. a local guy had 2 huge brain cancers removed a decade ago and is now seemingly fine. Would he have survived without that extensive surgery ??
What if cancer is a response to parasitic cysts ?? do we really have reason to believe all parasites are only there for our good, ultimately ?? I’ve taken a close look at quite a few parasites and I wasnt reassured. Many things would happily kill us I think, deciding our life had already tipped too far into the negative. Medicine attempting to rebalance the books might not be such a bad thing ?
I’ve cared for animals riddled with parasites .. letting them heal naturally, and they died ..
I’m left feeling it’s all rather confusing and people have the right to choose whichever way they want to attempt to address their ails.
I stick with natural health but I am aware it is an indulgence because it takes so much more time and effort .. in much of the world you would be sacked or bullied or worse if you walked around with a visible tumour .. :( .
This article addressed excising tumors that obstruct vital pathways. I have used Ivermectin on my animals and always NEVER vaccinating them, no matter what the so-called legal consequences be. I don't believe a body will heal naturally by injecting poison into it.
Same here . I've used ivermectin and peroxide at times when they helped and at other times they made things worse, which is why I think it is all immensely fluid and depends on all the other constellations of factors . I wont use ivermectin on animals cos it damages the surrounding ecology and I'm in a nature reserve.
One of the few things I doubt would help at all is the 'injectibles' . It all sounds so contrived. Do they really have any proof they work at all ??
To your question, NO, absolutely not. I cured my dogs ear infections with Ivermectin. It was my last resort after 6 vet visits where nothing was achieved. Lately he went lame and I used DMSO. Total relief was in a couple hours. He was walking like a natural man he is.
i understand they think we are overusing too few antibiotics and will create drug resistance .. so they want more targeted medications. It just doesnt sound feasible to me. We have a wide range of things that are anti-biotic so i think we could afford to experiment more widely . Even better we can explore ways to feed/heal the area . There seem to be so many options. Well done fixing that ear :) .
I believe Dr's prescribe antibiotics to a dangerous level. What I can't understand is why they tell you to take the entire series of pills even tho apparent wellness has returned by day2. That caused an overdose in me that only a hospital visit for anaphylaxis could fix. I've never touch them again
'in theory' it's so you have thoroughly cleared the bugs rather than just knocked them and caused them to develop resistance ..
🎯
Not wanting to overwhelm with info , but the Bristol Natural Cancer clinic supposedly failed to cure people . Many of us were hugely disappointed at the time but I would love to know the details as to how this was 'proven' . Whose research would I trust ?
In recent years carnivore and keto diets have claimed to markedly improve health , but the Invisible Rainbow guy and various others have warned that EMF pollution actually reverses that trend. Meat and dairy are worse for your health once you factor in EMFs. So it's a moving target.
Japanese cancer researchers implicated all kinds of plant foods in cancer proclivity .. black pepper was one that stuck in my mind . Sweet potatoes can be healthy for some, tho many contain a mold which had dire health effects for people and livestock. Any plant with heavy metals in combining with magnetoelectricity might wind up doing more harm than good. It's all astonishingly complex now.. Friends have tried to synthesize all this knowledge into hugely complex decision support databases .. but it is mind bogglingly complicated . .
It's vital that we maintain the right to explore natural health but we may have a few casualties along the way.
Meat/protein is hard on the kidneys. The kidneys are already not working too good when you have cancer. Eating stuff hard on the kidneys when you have cancer may not be the best way to go.
Though I guess when people just eat meat and stop the ultra processed foods they may feel a bit better as they aren't getting all the extra toxic processed crap they are used to getting. Also meat tends to make you feel fuller longer too.
I have seen many people do well on Keto till after awhile they don't do well. Maybe they weren't getting all their vitamins they needed.
Again I have seen the benefits of Keto and think anyone doing Keto should have their kidneys checked once in awhile.
Yes agreed. If Firstenberg is correct tho , that stuff worked well prior to 5g rollouts. The meat and dairy facilitates heating of the body via emfs .. so what was good in the past will now start backfiring. I personally improved with a carni diet for a few weeks but now feel better without any meat .. Even kidney disease used to heal with keto/carni diets but that now may not be the case. It may well be its good to have a change of diet for a short while to jumpstart healing , but see how complex its all becoming. With recent medications most of us wont know what’s what either. So much rapid change in so many areas these days. We will muddle through as ever , but its getting a bit head spinny isnt it :/
Nah, not me. I just eat as much organic fruit, berries and melons that I can find, and drink clean water. Yes they try to ruin that too. After that though I don't think much about it for myself. This cleans out the lymph and helps maintain health the best way there is I think.
You are thinking for yourself tho... when it comes to helping others with manifest problems, it becomes more complicated. Hence all the current court cases .. court cases which will have big implications for the rest of us I think.
There's a better explanation for why ivermectin and fenbenzadole works on cancer.
They are anti parasite drugs. If we properly understand that parasites also sequester toxins (like in tuna, parasites isolate mercury which helps the fish operate without issues), then the mechanism is clear.
These drugs help enhance the body's elimination pathways which take away the toxic food that parasites live on.
That's also why they work on cancer, which also sequesters toxins and debris.
Sorry it wasn't clear.
Parasites isolate mercury in tuna.
Without the parasites, the mercury would damage them.
This is phenomenal work.
Holy crap! You went there. "The connection between nutrition and cancer extends far beyond simple calorie counting. Animal proteins, particularly when consumed in excess, can thicken blood vessel walls up to eight times normal thickness, severely restricting oxygen delivery to cells. This creates precisely the hypoxic conditions that force cells to shift to fermentation metabolism. Populations consuming primarily plant-based diets show dramatically lower cancer rates, suggesting that dietary protein sources significantly impact cancer risk."
I want you to know when the Keto people come out of the wood work to crucify you. that I support you. I many not be here with words, but I am there for you in spirit, eating watermelon from afar.
I've long suspected cancer is a symptom or improvised organ. The murderous attack on symptoms is a mark of modern "medicine".
I do not know what causes cancer (and neither does anyone else!). The Human Genome Projects assertion that they know what sequences of nucleic acid\bases are causing cancer is equivalent to snake oil sales exaggerating their knowledge and understanding.
A lot of biopsies are labeled pre-cancerous as a cover-your-ass endeavor. One out of every 4 asymptomatic prostate biopsies of men over 55 will show cancer yet few of them will go on to grow or metastasize without any treatment.
Breast imaging improvements led to detection of calcifications which are benign in the majority of which. The approach used to be to follow up in six months to see if there was growth and change. However, with the help of the legal malpractice profession and law suits and the benefit to imagers, this approach was abandoned and every noted calcification is biopsied. (After all, who has time for law suits, licensing may be jeopardized and it is a personal problem of the patent. Sarcasm here.) The old protocol of mastectomy has been shown to have no better outcomes than just lumpectomy. We are in uncharted waters!
"I do not know what causes cancer (and neither does anyone else!)." Well I will take a stab at it though I never stepped foot in a medical classroom. Cancer is your body's inability to get rid of it's waste properly so it backs up kind of like you kitchen sink backs up if things are not properly flowing through the pipes.
Now that I have solved the cancer riddle, where is my million, no zillion dollars?
Restoration of feelings of personal responsibility would go a long way in the meantime. If patients had to pay for what gets done, like with their autos, they would be more discerning, and there is the problem because he who pays the piper still calls the tune. Mistreatment and misdiagnosis would fall under malpractice but you are correct that there is no downside to the caretaker for excessive actions and an incentive in reimbursement. Not only that but malpractice insurance will mandate that the AMA, etc. opinions are standard of care that must be followed for insurance and hospitals require insurance to work within. The whole field is locked down. If Ray Peat offered his services he would find that a bevy of lawyers and others who would come down on him harder than Alex Jones. However, this would be a real thing rather than a show. you might want to add "proven" to the new theories suggestion otherwise one ends up with warpspeed mRNA injections. Incorrect ideas may be old, but they are not "knowledge". Good insights on your part.
This article is very similar to Sayer Ji of Green Med Info
Amazing Info!!! Everyone should read and study this info. It all makes sense. God bless you for the time and energy it took to put it all together. What a labor of love. Thank you!
It’s not a simple issue, as we can see from $$$ pumped into maintaining cancer. The mechanism appears to be complex and not standardised, rather being (at least to some extent) dependent on the person. The “person” consists of the body and the mind, and I guess that prospects of treatment depend a lot on the attitude of the person, on the mental approach to a new - and decisive - situation in life.
The final act is the same for all of us, so it’s not a question of escaping death. Understanding what is happening in the body is greatly empowering. Not believing doctors and their talking points is a primary safeguard for survival. Balancing what the hospital medicine can offer with alternative approaches may be crucial.
All health problems are like “Stop” signs: wait, look around, make corrections (if you can), and definitely change something in your life. Only you know what has to be changed. Maybe it will help resolve the health problem, maybe not. Still, worth trying.
Excellent info. Thank you.
Thank you. I have always believed this to be the case.
The essay is fantastic up to the point that you recommend fasting and the keto diet for cancer. If toxins are causing stress, cutting out all healthy carbs that traditional cultures ate such as whole grains, or partially milled grains, sweet vegetables and fruit would stress the body more. Fasting would do the same. Another approach that I've seen work is to remove toxins from food, the body and environment, and eat nourishing foods. This makes more sense and has worked given the premise that the body is isolating toxins as tumors. I've seen this work over decades of recommending it as long as the person doesn't choose toxic treatments.