How do people ignore aluminum in vaccines? Escapes me. We, or I, now know about aluminum pots, canned beverages, aluminum in baking pow, talc, all kinds of foods, and rid them from our lives, yet, injecting aluminum directly into the blood stream is somehow not toxic.
Haven't people seen the non-stop commercials on child cancer, to please donate, when we as parents gave our children cancer. Does anyone know a slow drip of formaldehyde causes leukemia. Sixty does of vaccine is a slow drip. I go nutz when I see these commercials.
From years of focusing on mercury, it seems. Mercury was allowed to be questioned and scapegoated (though it certainly isn’t good) while aluminum continued to fly under the radar.
You can make anything out of aluminum, not so much mercury. The aluminum industry is a behemoth, and it does not care who it kills, maims or injures. We know cigarettes are bad. Yet we couldn’t kill the industry, so it was allowed to live so it could pay the victims…while creating new victims, but this time they were warned. Any industry that grows beyond a certain level, will no longer have the final consumer’s best interest at heart. Money IS the root of all evil.
Please help them. Why do so many assume that because these facts are so obvious , that those who don’t see …reality are just plain stupid.
Even the academic language used in these amazing bodies of work….make them inaccessible to so many. Not to mention the length.
It’s not necessarily about a short attention span . It can be overwhelming to constantly read words , sentences and paragraphs which are filled with very sophisticated academic language.
basically agree - altho i really do appreciate Unbekomings efforts, these articles are WAY too long - (most people probably resort to skimming) - and often overly intellectualized - esp when the author Esc is involved - yikes! those are like wading thru thick murky substance to reach the encrusted pearls hidden within.
Nice one. Loads in there to take away. Aren't we constantly consuming Aluminium: cookware; pots and pans; drinking bottles, kitchen foil, etc. Shouldn't Exley and Bigtree be trying to get all 'Vaccines off the market. at least warn of the dangers.? They're both full on pro Vaxxers; childhood and beyond. Injections for health, guys..!!
McCullough and The wellness creeps are exactly the same. Stop the Nanoparticles; the Adjuvants; the mRNA [??] let's tweek and fine tune those babies: but stay with the Science. The Vaxx programms in general. We will take you all down the yellow brick road, to a brighter future. Where we've curbed the appetite of the medical cartels. And smacked a few wrists at the big slightly out of hand Pharmaceutical companies....
Oh, and btw, We got rid of some politicians as well. So we are super good to go: don't forget your polling cards,..!!? A Brave New World Awaits, my lovelies. It's the 'Mistakes were Made' Gang. Again.
It seems to me [['cynical' old me; maybe it's a 'mental health disorder'. I should be on medication?]
that all this chat about the 'constituents' of 'vaccines', simply keeps 'vaccines' on the conveyor belt.
Almost, ironically, keeping them spotlit and viable...
Oh well. If it doesn't kill you, maybe it makes you stronger..!!!
I think it's fine to warn the public about aluminum pans and the dangers of using them. Let's suppose all kitchen ware manufacturers adopted your advice and decided to get rid of their aluminum product line. They introduced a new line, with an less expensive version from China that they tested and had no aluminum. How much do you think it would cost? Even the Made in China version may well be too expensive.
Manufacturers (those with no agenda) respond to consumer demand. If the public shows a willingness to spend more money on kitchen essentials (as opposed to gadgets), then you will see 'no aluminum' pans and kitchen gadgets; otherwise you will see an announcement on their web page that the product has been discontinued. Those wishing to keep costs down will substitute the aluminum with something else and they won't tell you. At least, procedures and herbal recipes are available without a paywall on how to get rid of aluminum. What they replace it with may be worse.
Vaccines are the low hanging fruit because it is something over which the government has 100% control and can force industry compliance. Consumer goods, like pots and pans, they can publish guidelines, or recommendations, but can't really force industry compliance since unlike vaccines, the government is not a stakeholder (it shouldn't be but that's another discussion). The only thing industry understands is consumer boycotts, like Bud Light. It wasn't the government that forced the issue on Anheuser-Busch, it was anti-DEI activists who were skilled in social media and they got the largely non-partisan beer drinkers to buy another brand, for example Coors.
RFK, Jr and his FDA are educating the public about aluminum dangers by taking on Big Pharma. Kitchen essentials-that is up to us to Bud Light corporations still making aluminum kitchen tools. Dr. McCollough is a doctor and he is joining the fight against vaccine adjuvants. He can speak on why adjuvants are bad, but he is also not a vax manufacturer who has done research on preservatives. I am not absolving the parties including our government for what I believe is intentional poisoning of the population and I just like everyone else would love to see Nuremberg trials for big pharma executives and government bureaucrats who forced this fraudulent science. It does not follow that I also wish the government to be more tyrannical in telling businesses how to run their business.
Where is personal responsibility? There are non-aluminum pans out there and they are more expensive. Is the American consumer willing to pay 2-3x more for something that Walmart gets from China? Note in this scenario it is not the government that is tasked with changing corporate behavior. It is us, the consumer.
I copied and pasted the Danish studies into AI (the one in Google) and this is its response.
I’m not a vaccine advocate but how does one reply back to this:
While the regulatory history cited in your excerpt is accurate regarding the origins of the 0.85 mg limit, modern clinical data and toxicological modeling have since provided the safety validation that critics argue was missing from the original 1940s and 50s standards.
Historical vs. Modern Safety Context
Regulatory Origins (1947–1952): The 0.85 mg limit was indeed initially codified in the mid-20th century based on empirical effectiveness—specifically, identifying the amount of aluminum required to maximize the "adjuvant effect" (the boost in immune response) while minimizing painful local reactions.
Safety Re-evaluation: While the 0.85 mg standard has remained unchanged, it has been subjected to extensive re-validation. In 2011 and again in updated models through 2025, pharmacokinetic studies using isotopic aluminum-26 demonstrated that the aluminum from vaccines is gradually released into the bloodstream and excreted by the kidneys, remaining well below the Minimal Risk Level (MRL) established by the ATSDR.
Recent Definitive Safety Data (2025–2026)
The most significant challenge to the claim that current limits are "no longer relevant" came from a July 2025 landmark study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine:
Scale: It tracked 1.2 million children in Denmark over 24 years (1997–2018).
Findings: Researchers found no association between cumulative aluminum exposure from vaccines and 50 different chronic health conditions, including autism, asthma, ADHD, and various autoimmune disorders.
Dose-Response: The study analyzed varying levels of cumulative exposure (up to 4.5 mg in the first two years of life) and found no "dose-response" effect, meaning children who received more aluminum were not at higher risk for these conditions than those who received less.
Summary of Current Regulatory Stance
As of 2026, the FDA and global health organizations like Gavi maintain the 0.85 mg limit because:
Clinical Track Record: Decades of real-world use have not produced the systemic toxicity predicted by theoretical models.
Low Systemic Load: The total aluminum burden from the standard pediatric schedule remains a small fraction of the lifetime aluminum exposure from food and environmental sources.
Recent Evidence: Modern, large-scale epidemiological studies (like the 2025 Danish cohort) have specifically addressed the "cumulative exposure" concern and found no evidence of long-term harm.
"Safety Re-evaluation: While the 0.85 mg standard has remained unchanged, it has been subjected to extensive re-validation. In 2011 and again in updated models through 2025, pharmacokinetic studies using isotopic aluminum-26 demonstrated that the aluminum from vaccines is gradually released into the bloodstream and excreted by the kidneys, remaining well below the Minimal Risk Level (MRL) established by the ATSDR."
-> perfect example of what is wrong, please see Masson et al., 2018
Jeff Berwick, the Dollar Vigilante, has a 3 year old son who is unvacinated. The little boy is as healthy as a horse. Now, here is what \Brian Shilhavy, etc say about vaccines:
Also Dr. Sherry Tenpenny who is on X as @BusyDrT and Dr. Andrew Zywiec, MD who is on X as @AndrewZywiecMD who wrote “No vaccines are safe. ZERO. I am begging you to listen. In time, all truth will come out. In the meantime, DON NOT VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN. I have seen THOUSANDS of vaccine injury [sic] in the last year alone. Is the ‘for the greater good’ argument finally losing its grip on you? 11:03 AM 12/24/24 371K Views
And Dr. Sherry Tenpenny wrote Not just the children! Stop vexing all humans and pets !
Is there any way that you amazing authors might also cater for those of us who do not speak…..,academia ?
Please try to include us via a short synopsis? I get that you are already overwhelmingly busy. And that such a synopsis required great skill. But please consider it ?
May God continue to bless you n yours in your vital work.
excellent points. and maybe i missed it, but the fact that they used 0.85 mg of aluminum as the minimum required to produce the desired immune response - well i guess that is the ideal amount that ensures sufficient poisoning - in just one dose - irrespective of body size - to reveal it's immediate disastrous effects (aka "immune response").
How do people ignore aluminum in vaccines? Escapes me. We, or I, now know about aluminum pots, canned beverages, aluminum in baking pow, talc, all kinds of foods, and rid them from our lives, yet, injecting aluminum directly into the blood stream is somehow not toxic.
Haven't people seen the non-stop commercials on child cancer, to please donate, when we as parents gave our children cancer. Does anyone know a slow drip of formaldehyde causes leukemia. Sixty does of vaccine is a slow drip. I go nutz when I see these commercials.
From years of focusing on mercury, it seems. Mercury was allowed to be questioned and scapegoated (though it certainly isn’t good) while aluminum continued to fly under the radar.
You can make anything out of aluminum, not so much mercury. The aluminum industry is a behemoth, and it does not care who it kills, maims or injures. We know cigarettes are bad. Yet we couldn’t kill the industry, so it was allowed to live so it could pay the victims…while creating new victims, but this time they were warned. Any industry that grows beyond a certain level, will no longer have the final consumer’s best interest at heart. Money IS the root of all evil.
You are exactly right.
Please help them. Why do so many assume that because these facts are so obvious , that those who don’t see …reality are just plain stupid.
Even the academic language used in these amazing bodies of work….make them inaccessible to so many. Not to mention the length.
It’s not necessarily about a short attention span . It can be overwhelming to constantly read words , sentences and paragraphs which are filled with very sophisticated academic language.
basically agree - altho i really do appreciate Unbekomings efforts, these articles are WAY too long - (most people probably resort to skimming) - and often overly intellectualized - esp when the author Esc is involved - yikes! those are like wading thru thick murky substance to reach the encrusted pearls hidden within.
If I was asked to explain the rudiments of my now past, profession . I would need at least as much time n space as esk uses.
Each time I have asked him to explain, he has somehow made time to do so.
Personally I deeply appreciate him and his work.
Blessings to you n yours.
How do have time to crank out all these essays?. I think your work is extraordinary.
Nice one. Loads in there to take away. Aren't we constantly consuming Aluminium: cookware; pots and pans; drinking bottles, kitchen foil, etc. Shouldn't Exley and Bigtree be trying to get all 'Vaccines off the market. at least warn of the dangers.? They're both full on pro Vaxxers; childhood and beyond. Injections for health, guys..!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeORYSHoRUc [[{if you can stand to listen to them: at least the last five or ten minutes]]].
McCullough and The wellness creeps are exactly the same. Stop the Nanoparticles; the Adjuvants; the mRNA [??] let's tweek and fine tune those babies: but stay with the Science. The Vaxx programms in general. We will take you all down the yellow brick road, to a brighter future. Where we've curbed the appetite of the medical cartels. And smacked a few wrists at the big slightly out of hand Pharmaceutical companies....
Oh, and btw, We got rid of some politicians as well. So we are super good to go: don't forget your polling cards,..!!? A Brave New World Awaits, my lovelies. It's the 'Mistakes were Made' Gang. Again.
It seems to me [['cynical' old me; maybe it's a 'mental health disorder'. I should be on medication?]
that all this chat about the 'constituents' of 'vaccines', simply keeps 'vaccines' on the conveyor belt.
Almost, ironically, keeping them spotlit and viable...
Oh well. If it doesn't kill you, maybe it makes you stronger..!!!
Absolutely clear and helpful response. Thank you so much .
Ps but then again I enjoy sarcasm.
I think it's fine to warn the public about aluminum pans and the dangers of using them. Let's suppose all kitchen ware manufacturers adopted your advice and decided to get rid of their aluminum product line. They introduced a new line, with an less expensive version from China that they tested and had no aluminum. How much do you think it would cost? Even the Made in China version may well be too expensive.
Manufacturers (those with no agenda) respond to consumer demand. If the public shows a willingness to spend more money on kitchen essentials (as opposed to gadgets), then you will see 'no aluminum' pans and kitchen gadgets; otherwise you will see an announcement on their web page that the product has been discontinued. Those wishing to keep costs down will substitute the aluminum with something else and they won't tell you. At least, procedures and herbal recipes are available without a paywall on how to get rid of aluminum. What they replace it with may be worse.
Vaccines are the low hanging fruit because it is something over which the government has 100% control and can force industry compliance. Consumer goods, like pots and pans, they can publish guidelines, or recommendations, but can't really force industry compliance since unlike vaccines, the government is not a stakeholder (it shouldn't be but that's another discussion). The only thing industry understands is consumer boycotts, like Bud Light. It wasn't the government that forced the issue on Anheuser-Busch, it was anti-DEI activists who were skilled in social media and they got the largely non-partisan beer drinkers to buy another brand, for example Coors.
RFK, Jr and his FDA are educating the public about aluminum dangers by taking on Big Pharma. Kitchen essentials-that is up to us to Bud Light corporations still making aluminum kitchen tools. Dr. McCollough is a doctor and he is joining the fight against vaccine adjuvants. He can speak on why adjuvants are bad, but he is also not a vax manufacturer who has done research on preservatives. I am not absolving the parties including our government for what I believe is intentional poisoning of the population and I just like everyone else would love to see Nuremberg trials for big pharma executives and government bureaucrats who forced this fraudulent science. It does not follow that I also wish the government to be more tyrannical in telling businesses how to run their business.
Where is personal responsibility? There are non-aluminum pans out there and they are more expensive. Is the American consumer willing to pay 2-3x more for something that Walmart gets from China? Note in this scenario it is not the government that is tasked with changing corporate behavior. It is us, the consumer.
Speaking of which, someone needs to publish a guide on safe kettles to use, preferably with a temperature gauge.
yeah i often wonder about the stainless steel kettle/cookware i am using.
"Unavoidably unsafe."
Wyeth (now Pfizer) explaining to Reagan why they needed immunity from prosecution.
Unavoidably unsafe. All you need to know.
I copied and pasted the Danish studies into AI (the one in Google) and this is its response.
I’m not a vaccine advocate but how does one reply back to this:
While the regulatory history cited in your excerpt is accurate regarding the origins of the 0.85 mg limit, modern clinical data and toxicological modeling have since provided the safety validation that critics argue was missing from the original 1940s and 50s standards.
Historical vs. Modern Safety Context
Regulatory Origins (1947–1952): The 0.85 mg limit was indeed initially codified in the mid-20th century based on empirical effectiveness—specifically, identifying the amount of aluminum required to maximize the "adjuvant effect" (the boost in immune response) while minimizing painful local reactions.
Safety Re-evaluation: While the 0.85 mg standard has remained unchanged, it has been subjected to extensive re-validation. In 2011 and again in updated models through 2025, pharmacokinetic studies using isotopic aluminum-26 demonstrated that the aluminum from vaccines is gradually released into the bloodstream and excreted by the kidneys, remaining well below the Minimal Risk Level (MRL) established by the ATSDR.
Recent Definitive Safety Data (2025–2026)
The most significant challenge to the claim that current limits are "no longer relevant" came from a July 2025 landmark study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine:
Scale: It tracked 1.2 million children in Denmark over 24 years (1997–2018).
Findings: Researchers found no association between cumulative aluminum exposure from vaccines and 50 different chronic health conditions, including autism, asthma, ADHD, and various autoimmune disorders.
Dose-Response: The study analyzed varying levels of cumulative exposure (up to 4.5 mg in the first two years of life) and found no "dose-response" effect, meaning children who received more aluminum were not at higher risk for these conditions than those who received less.
Summary of Current Regulatory Stance
As of 2026, the FDA and global health organizations like Gavi maintain the 0.85 mg limit because:
Clinical Track Record: Decades of real-world use have not produced the systemic toxicity predicted by theoretical models.
Low Systemic Load: The total aluminum burden from the standard pediatric schedule remains a small fraction of the lifetime aluminum exposure from food and environmental sources.
Recent Evidence: Modern, large-scale epidemiological studies (like the 2025 Danish cohort) have specifically addressed the "cumulative exposure" concern and found no evidence of long-term harm.
Googled are totally captured !
Unless it’s basic ….use it at your own risk.
predator not prey (big G)
I’m not sure what you mean yantra ?
meaning G is not so much being captured ("prey") as it is being a predator (dis-info spreader not to mention massive surveillance machine).
Thank you so much for drawing my attention to my use of our language. I agree with you absolutely !
Blessings to you n yours.
"Safety Re-evaluation: While the 0.85 mg standard has remained unchanged, it has been subjected to extensive re-validation. In 2011 and again in updated models through 2025, pharmacokinetic studies using isotopic aluminum-26 demonstrated that the aluminum from vaccines is gradually released into the bloodstream and excreted by the kidneys, remaining well below the Minimal Risk Level (MRL) established by the ATSDR."
-> perfect example of what is wrong, please see Masson et al., 2018
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013417303380?via%3Dihub
For the Danish study, see Crépeaux et al., 2026
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X25002238
Jeff Berwick, the Dollar Vigilante, has a 3 year old son who is unvacinated. The little boy is as healthy as a horse. Now, here is what \Brian Shilhavy, etc say about vaccines:
https://vaccineimpact.com/2023/mislabeling-vaccination-deaths-for-50-years/
Also Dr. Sherry Tenpenny who is on X as @BusyDrT and Dr. Andrew Zywiec, MD who is on X as @AndrewZywiecMD who wrote “No vaccines are safe. ZERO. I am begging you to listen. In time, all truth will come out. In the meantime, DON NOT VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN. I have seen THOUSANDS of vaccine injury [sic] in the last year alone. Is the ‘for the greater good’ argument finally losing its grip on you? 11:03 AM 12/24/24 371K Views
And Dr. Sherry Tenpenny wrote Not just the children! Stop vexing all humans and pets !
Thank you!!! Happy to read it!!
Is there any way that you amazing authors might also cater for those of us who do not speak…..,academia ?
Please try to include us via a short synopsis? I get that you are already overwhelmingly busy. And that such a synopsis required great skill. But please consider it ?
May God continue to bless you n yours in your vital work.
And in your personal lives.
excellent points. and maybe i missed it, but the fact that they used 0.85 mg of aluminum as the minimum required to produce the desired immune response - well i guess that is the ideal amount that ensures sufficient poisoning - in just one dose - irrespective of body size - to reveal it's immediate disastrous effects (aka "immune response").
Excellent
Thank you!
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.