100's if not 1000's of sites have been 86th since I got my 1st computer in 2004. Lots of truth back then. I took notes. Now we have google AI, lying thru their teeth. The data collected from 2004, in my eyes, proved beyond shadow of doubt that cancer came initially from Salk's vaccine which contained HeLa cancer cells, to wit, Salk finally admitted "OOPS!! Pasteur finally admitted, "Yup, ya got me, never proved contagion".
The power of the Rockefeller's cannot be overstated. They are behemoth blood suckers, Death Inc. We have no free speech, no free press. Nothing and no one will stop these monsters. Except us. Dumbed down folks, incurious, don't know, don't care will suffer the most. They know that we know that they know. There's always Plan B for them.
Chemtrail and food poisoning should work. Those pesky farmers growing natural foods? No problem. Flood the area or burn it down, maybe a nice chemical derailment to poison the water, that'll do. Why is there so much death, destruction, unnatural unbelievable weather patterns that folks believe is climate change? Just ask the Rockefellers.
I was reading an old book. Around 1980's. It said in the early 1900's very few people got cancer. Cancer was so rare that doctors would call on other doctors to come see this patient as they were an "interesting case." Though one can argue that life expectancy was lower back then. I believe life expectancy was lowered because of lack of anti-biotics though.
Yet today, the overuse of anti-biotics comes with many side effects. I personally only take them for a day. Doctors are too quick to demand that the entire prescription be taken, don't miss a day. That became a red flag for me. By n large, I don't take them ever. Twenty years ago I read, Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins. Give it a go.
Got the book already. Yes anti-biotics should be used sparingly. The trick is to eat right, take care of your body, so you don't get sick in the first place.
Perhaps the fake pandemic and depopulation injections were a test? It revealed people to be of two kinds: Those who blindly follow the rulers of the earth, and those who follow the King of Heaven.
Even though statistics clearly show that most cases of cancer are cured - our medical systems have no scientific or medical test for cancer cured, and as a result, it is not possible to prove that any case (much less 50,000 cases) of cancer has been cured AND therefore it is not possible to prove any case was "cured by" a specific action or treatment.
Not only can the lawyer advise the judge and jury that "the case is not about cancer cures" they can also safely point out that no case of CURED has been proven - because no proof is possible.
But it's not just cancer. The same is true of any non-infectious disease, from dietary malnutrition and toxicity to Alzheimer's, arthritis, autism, autoimmune disease, back pain, bloat, Crohn's, depression, diabetes, epilepsy, fibromyalgia , gout, heart disease, hypertension, even obesity and scurvy. Cured is not medically defined.
We might ask if cured is medically defined for any disease? Yes. Cured is medically defined for an infectious disease cured by an approved medicine - antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral, or antiparasitic medicine. If the case is cured by any treatment that is not currently approved - then not just "cured," but also "cured by" cannot be proven. That's why "there is no cure for the common cold, influenza, measles, or COVID. There are no approved cures for these diseases and no scientific or medical test of cured.
They may first need to prove that cancer exists. My brother went to the doctor because he was feeling short of breath at times, probably due to 5G. They told him he had lung cancer and ended up killing him with radiation and chemo. From the time he was told he had cancer to the day he died was 18 days. Before he went to the doctor, we were cutting and hauling trees.
Interesting... I think once a diagnosis is made, it's done. It is probably very difficult to prove a diagnosis was wrong, especially after the patient is dead....
This is an amazing analogy and beautifully written in a succinct clear manner. Nowadays, there's so much info from substack that it's hard to read long over-detailed posts. So, I appreciate your style. On the X pages of a few US oncologists, I've posed the following question. I don't live in the US, but this is something I heard several decades ago and don't know if it is still true. What I wanted to know was if any modality of treating cancer, outside of surgery/chemo and radiation, is illegal in the US. None of these people thought it worthwhile to respond to me.
Wondering if the C19 bioweapon purposely included cancer in the form of turbo cancer to dispell the ability of alt meds to cure or extend life expectancy ergo Big Pharma playing fast and loose with stats again to prove their system of slice/dice, burn and poison works better?
Pfizer batches starting with E produce most injuries and death
Pfizer’s batches F produce magnetic bodily capabilities
Wonder if other alphabetic batches have “special” inhumane treats for us to be discovered?
100's if not 1000's of sites have been 86th since I got my 1st computer in 2004. Lots of truth back then. I took notes. Now we have google AI, lying thru their teeth. The data collected from 2004, in my eyes, proved beyond shadow of doubt that cancer came initially from Salk's vaccine which contained HeLa cancer cells, to wit, Salk finally admitted "OOPS!! Pasteur finally admitted, "Yup, ya got me, never proved contagion".
The power of the Rockefeller's cannot be overstated. They are behemoth blood suckers, Death Inc. We have no free speech, no free press. Nothing and no one will stop these monsters. Except us. Dumbed down folks, incurious, don't know, don't care will suffer the most. They know that we know that they know. There's always Plan B for them.
Chemtrail and food poisoning should work. Those pesky farmers growing natural foods? No problem. Flood the area or burn it down, maybe a nice chemical derailment to poison the water, that'll do. Why is there so much death, destruction, unnatural unbelievable weather patterns that folks believe is climate change? Just ask the Rockefellers.
I agree that jabs are the number one cause of cancer followed by foods and liquids, and various deliberate concocted environmental poisons.
I was reading an old book. Around 1980's. It said in the early 1900's very few people got cancer. Cancer was so rare that doctors would call on other doctors to come see this patient as they were an "interesting case." Though one can argue that life expectancy was lower back then. I believe life expectancy was lowered because of lack of anti-biotics though.
Yet today, the overuse of anti-biotics comes with many side effects. I personally only take them for a day. Doctors are too quick to demand that the entire prescription be taken, don't miss a day. That became a red flag for me. By n large, I don't take them ever. Twenty years ago I read, Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins. Give it a go.
Got the book already. Yes anti-biotics should be used sparingly. The trick is to eat right, take care of your body, so you don't get sick in the first place.
Awesome article!!
The main cause of cancer is getting a cancer diagnosis from a test or scan. Cancer rates would plummet if all testing stopped and scans were banned:).
Whole heartedly agree!
No. These days Jesus would likely be aborted upon conception by these evil bastards.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/notes-on-public-education-and-litigation
Perhaps the fake pandemic and depopulation injections were a test? It revealed people to be of two kinds: Those who blindly follow the rulers of the earth, and those who follow the King of Heaven.
Even though statistics clearly show that most cases of cancer are cured - our medical systems have no scientific or medical test for cancer cured, and as a result, it is not possible to prove that any case (much less 50,000 cases) of cancer has been cured AND therefore it is not possible to prove any case was "cured by" a specific action or treatment.
Not only can the lawyer advise the judge and jury that "the case is not about cancer cures" they can also safely point out that no case of CURED has been proven - because no proof is possible.
But it's not just cancer. The same is true of any non-infectious disease, from dietary malnutrition and toxicity to Alzheimer's, arthritis, autism, autoimmune disease, back pain, bloat, Crohn's, depression, diabetes, epilepsy, fibromyalgia , gout, heart disease, hypertension, even obesity and scurvy. Cured is not medically defined.
We might ask if cured is medically defined for any disease? Yes. Cured is medically defined for an infectious disease cured by an approved medicine - antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral, or antiparasitic medicine. If the case is cured by any treatment that is not currently approved - then not just "cured," but also "cured by" cannot be proven. That's why "there is no cure for the common cold, influenza, measles, or COVID. There are no approved cures for these diseases and no scientific or medical test of cured.
To your health, tracy
They may first need to prove that cancer exists. My brother went to the doctor because he was feeling short of breath at times, probably due to 5G. They told him he had lung cancer and ended up killing him with radiation and chemo. From the time he was told he had cancer to the day he died was 18 days. Before he went to the doctor, we were cutting and hauling trees.
Interesting... I think once a diagnosis is made, it's done. It is probably very difficult to prove a diagnosis was wrong, especially after the patient is dead....
This is an amazing analogy and beautifully written in a succinct clear manner. Nowadays, there's so much info from substack that it's hard to read long over-detailed posts. So, I appreciate your style. On the X pages of a few US oncologists, I've posed the following question. I don't live in the US, but this is something I heard several decades ago and don't know if it is still true. What I wanted to know was if any modality of treating cancer, outside of surgery/chemo and radiation, is illegal in the US. None of these people thought it worthwhile to respond to me.
The question should be how many manifestations of Jesus have they incarcerated, dopped to yhe eyballs, lobotomised etc
Follow the money and it leads to beliefs that hate Christianity.
I'm not religious but the answer to your question is an obvious zero chance
Wondering if the C19 bioweapon purposely included cancer in the form of turbo cancer to dispell the ability of alt meds to cure or extend life expectancy ergo Big Pharma playing fast and loose with stats again to prove their system of slice/dice, burn and poison works better?
Pfizer batches starting with E produce most injuries and death
Pfizer’s batches F produce magnetic bodily capabilities
Wonder if other alphabetic batches have “special” inhumane treats for us to be discovered?
No they would call him a quak
JC told us to heal ourselves. updates on this available in ACIM.
Careful with acim. It's not Jesus speaking.
it's also partly the holy spirit/divine mother.
the ego would have me/us doubt this.
One of my favorite and most re-posted articles!
Wow! Powerful truth.
The links to Jon's newsletters both failed for me. I was able to type the URL in and navigate to it.