The worst of all - it has been known for so long, many books are available, but when someone is diagnosed with cancer, instead of first trying some harmless procedures, they run to the surgeon so the tumors can spread. I have known for at least 30 years that cutting into tumors spreads them and I am nowhere near medically trained. this was in a magazine back in Belgium where I lived at the time. People read this but it does not sink in. We are all so trained (brainwashed) to trust our doctors! I think the one good thing that came out of the coronamania is, that at least some people started to question the knowledge of their doctors.
When my wife was diagnosed with Lymphoma, we were told not to use supplements because it interferes with the work of the chemo. That is BS. I defied that order, and the oncologist said to me he was amazed how well my wife was tolerating CHOPS! He went on to say: Do not tell me what you are doing but keep doing it! The B cell lymphoma was suppressed for almost ten years because her immune system was working better and all changed when the physicians prescribed two drugs that are immune suppressing. I also went to a Lymphoma meeting where a young women in a sharp business attire complained to the speaker that she did not understand why the speaker was casting the doubt on using nutritional supplementation. She said she was treated for Lymphoma twice and was told that she was on death door and they could do no more. She explained she decided to go with alternative treatment in holistic ways and the lymphoma disappeared. After ward I ask the Sloan Kettering speaker privately why she spoke in that manner. It was how she kept her job at the cancer hospital. Speak the party line. Privately, she suggested that milk thistle would be of value in fighting the cancer. She did not know that was already part of the regimen that I was using and my Dr friend gave me his formula called Ultra Glutathione to do the job! The treating oncologist suggested a 50% increase in CHOP rounds to destroy all the the cancer cells. We bought the BS hook, line and sinker. It was a money making scheme to increase the income of the oncologist and the drug manufacturer. If I knew then what I know now, my wife would still be here. WE lived together for almost 50 years and only difference was she was sun shy because she was fair skinned and I embraced the sun. Her D was 9 ng's and mine was 50 ng's. I have never had a cancer diagnosis. Unbecoming keeps taking the dermatologists negative views on D and the Endocrinologists are in the Vitamin D camp. Medicine men in general still do not understand the true role of Vitamin D. Keeping it that way builds their income.
I understand now why you insist on the vitamin D, but you say yourself also that you got yours the natural way. I read 2 years ago, when my friend, who is always outside, and myself, quite a bit outside, both got a shortage. The test the doctor does seems to measure your chemical D, not the total. I do not trust doctors with anything right now. Probably have to be close to death before one sees me. PS there are also food items that help build vit. D I just read something about that. I do not trust the chemical in the jar at all after reading where it was made and how. And what it actually is (poison)
Sunshine is the cheapest and best route! But, when you live in the north and it is winter you need to supplement. Testing for low D is required. Calling it a rat poison is BS.
I hope there is a hell and if there is that there is a special place there for oncologists... they cause immense needless suffering with their useless toxic potions.
Doctor Moerman was a Dutch family doctor. He healed around 60 cancer patients given up by regular medicine with nothing but diet. Several were still alive when he passed away in his mid 80s, more than 20 years later. I even was able to buy a booklet here in the US, he is known here, too
Budwig was a German nurse, there is still a website with her methods.
I am not sure if the Huxcey clinic is still operating in Mexico, he had to run from the US.
There are several books of the Gerson diet, which is not my thing. But if one is sick one tries everything - at least I do.
Since several people I know had cancer I started reading up on it. Not that any of them listened to me. But who knows one or other day it might help someone
Thanks. I know about dokter Moerman. But what I meant is, I wouldn't know where to go for a professional. I would definitely look into all those books, and there are more of course. But I wouldn't know of practitioner, who would be allowed to give alternative care. I think it isn't allowed to open a clinic for alternative cancer care. In Germany they do exist. And even if there was one here, I am pretty sure I'd never be able to afford it.
I think the financial side also might hold people back.
I have read the German clinic's price years ago and yes, that was very expensive. Huxcey was I think 1500 $ for a life long provision of the herbal remedies but that too, is years ago.
As to doctors who would really help you I am at a loss there, too. It is hard enough to find someone who does not push all kinds of vaxxines and meds, let go someone who knows about alternatives. In Belgium my ex went to a homeopath a few times, with a reimboursement of 10% at the time.
The holistics here within a few hours driving are mostly fake. There are some, but only in or near the big cities, which would mean almost 3 hours. Sad isn't it. Real healing is very hard to find, we are on our own.
I got diagnosed with that "ductal carcinoma in situ" twice. This from mammograms. I got surgery and radiation therapy. In retrospect, I probably would have chosen not to do that. Now I have Chronic Lymphocyte Leukemia and I have to ask if the radiation didn't contribute to that.
I have taken to calling all this "the breast cancer franchise." I finally told the oncologists I didn't want to take any more of their estrogen lowering drugs, so they don't follow me anymore. I go once a year and get a thermogram. They have all been fine for the last ten years.
I learned from C. Northrup MD-obGyn, (NYT best selling author on women's health), that mammogram machines compress breast tissue on average, 44 pds/psi. Thats enough to rupture a DCIS. Needle biopsies do similar, they open the duct, metastasis risk follows.
Institutional medicine in USA is full of risks related to "hi-tech" mediclne.
The doctors love their expensive technology and machinery and need to use it on patients in order to pay it off.
A year ago, my 62-year-old friend was told by doctors that they were "worried" about something they saw on his kidney x-rays. They wanted to perform a biopsy using their new robotic machine.
He said no, thanks, and is still alive today, doing well on alternative therapies.
I remember years ago when I used to trust dentists, but not anymore.
I did a search online for holistic dentists and found a good one in town. He's old-school, doesn't make me get x-rays every year since I don't need them.
Indeed. My Dad at 91 was diagnosed with colon cancer and did have a section of his colon removed as it was causing him terrible pain. But upon the suggestion to get chemo, he politely declined. And never had a recurrence. Chemo would have killed him and he's now 95.
Lately, I've been watching videos by Dr. Robert Morse. He's a healing naturopath and speaks about cancer and everything else. He has a youtube channel and also his own website:
I've never had a mammogram and never will. I'm in my 60s now so I'm about 20 mammograms behind. I just don't see a reason to pay someone to painfully smash my breasts between cold glass plates.
Out of dozens of people I have known diagnosed with cancer, I don't recall any surviving past five years, or even four years or even three years. They say that chemo breaks down the immune system. If this was true, then you would die in a month or two from some spooky germs or viruses.
I don't think there is an immune system protecting you from these silly lies. Your body is designed to protect you from toxins and poisons and tumors are a part of that protection. Medical science is dollar driven with health being the anti-thesis. Your doctor goes to the poor house if you are not ill and diseased.
I know a few survivors, but they were mainly ones diagnosed following routine screening. Like the article says, how many had a tumour that was never going to bother them, but got added as a survival stat for drug X. And for some it was just caught early enough to treat.
It takes a brave person to resist the oncology system as my husband found out when his bowel was blocked by a tumour with life threatening consequences. Thanks to my research, which revealed much of what you’ve said, he resisted the chemo that was ‘offered’ as an adjuvant to surgery. In these circumstances, I can’t help wondering if it would have been at all possible to treat the tumour without surgery? https://valerienelson.substack.com/p/a-tale-about-cancer?
I was diagnosed stage-3 colon cancer, and had surgery. I refused chemo. The oncologist explained that chemo would give me a 30% better chance of survival. I had read that, still being alive at the five-year mark, was considered survival, and that didn't sound all that worth-it knowing how sick chemo made you. I did my best trying diet and supplements that were supposed to help, and went back teaching school 10 days after surgery. It's been almost 12 years since diagnosis, and I'm happily retired and enjoying my life.
Many thanks. What an evil web of lies they have weaved. Get poisoned to be healed of poisoning, yeah right.
Oncologist anagrams to:
- is clot goon
- gits co loon
- got oil cons
'Oil cons' might be the petrochemicals used to poison you.
As I have mentioned before I believe, I had immunotherapy in 2020 for a stage 1 melanoma. I had 9 sessions until I stopped having worked out what was the real cause of my palsy leading to the supposed diagnosis (only one lab report).
Immunotherapy supposed to be better than chemo but I suspect it may just be less toxic
The main issue is of ocurse no one asks about diet let alone anything else. Oncologists are basically a waste of space, grossly overpaid to cause more harm than good, if any.
I came to realise that chemo poisoning couldn't be good for the body. I gather though that certain chemicals can neutralise others but one has to know what one is doing. Chemo is just bung in a load of toxic stuff without even checking what the individual's body chemistry is like.
I read an interesting bit last week; I can’t remember where though
The articles contained a notion that there bacteria are transported into tumor. I thought it was odd since I thought someone had established that fungus was encased by the wall.
I too am intrigued by the “Toxin Sequestration Theory” put forth by Senef, Cozzetto and Coles. I’m not sure what to think about Cole’s statements about parasites being beneficial against other testimonies that drugs like Fenbendazole have cured people’s cancers by reducing parasites. It’s logical that parasites hang out where there’s an abundant food supply and toxins and our bodies reactions to them may be creating that environment. Wouldn’t it be great if the NIH and the National Cancer Institute would study this kind of stuff? I know, there’s no money in it, but there are plenty of scientists out there who would love to be doing this kind of work. Maybe we should create a “People’s Institute of Health”.
If I get cancer (again) esp if advanced, I’m going to Sanoviv in Mexico. I have a good friend who just got back and had nothing but good things to say about their unconventional treatments.
There is a lot to unpack here and a lot here worth questioning, especially around overdiagnosis, nutrition, financial incentives, and whether some treatments truly improve survival rather than simply change a number.
After more than thirty years in medicine, I have also learned something else: skepticism has to work both ways.
Questioning conventional medicine can be healthy. Blindly trusting conventional medicine is not. But neither is replacing one unquestioned belief system with another.
Fear has a way of pushing us toward certainty. We want someone to tell us who is right, who is wrong, what caused the problem, and what will fix it. Once we find an explanation that fits what we already believe, the temptation is to stop questioning.
That is where I think we have to be careful.
I have said for years: just because you may be suspicious of establishment medicine, perhaps for good reason, does not mean you should accept everything from non-establishment experts.
The goal should never be to defend a medical institution or tear one down. It should be to keep asking questions, remain open to being wrong, and follow the evidence wherever it leads.
I don't trust any person who willingly gave another person the experimental poison covid "vaccine" no matter if this was a pharmacist or nurse or medical doctor.
Millions died and/or were permanently injured/disabled.
No one has yet been charged with manslaughter or aggravated assault for doing this to another human being, the crimes against humanity.
I share the frustration over how little accountability there has been for what the public was told during COVID.
What troubles me most is how certainty replaced honest scientific discussion. We were given very confident statements about efficacy, transmission, and even the origins of the virus, while people raising legitimate questions were too often dismissed or silenced rather than debated.
Natural immunity is one example. We knew early on that people who had recovered from COVID developed meaningful immune protection. NIH reported in early 2021 that antibodies after prior infection were associated with a substantially lower risk of reinfection, and that immune memory persisted for months.
Yet I watched healthy people who had recently recovered from COVID, sometimes with documented antibodies, being strongly encouraged to vaccinate as though their prior infection meant very little. Even research available at the time showed that previously infected people mounted a very strong immune response after infection and vaccination.
There were also physicians and scientists arguing that natural immunity and population immunity deserved a larger role in the discussion. Too often, disagreement itself became suspect.
That is what bothers me.
Medicine advances through questioning, disagreement, and the willingness to admit when we do not know something. When uncertainty is presented as certainty and dissent is treated as dangerous, trust is eventually destroyed.
And once that trust is gone, getting it back is very difficult.
What you wrote to the the Six year Old is absolutely right...You don't try to cut it our (or kill it with radiation.) I learned on my own body, when i got a rapidly growing tumor in 1976. Two doctors wanted to perform immediate surgery or they would give me 'no guarantees.' I opted for prayer and a book came into my life on raw fruit and vegetables. I eliminated one food a nutritional doctor had told me to eat some months earlier...dairy. In less than three months the tumor was gone. Twelve years later, in 1988, I developed another ugly bulbous growth with spikes coming out of it above my right breast...I didn't bother going to a doctor. I just checked what I was eating. Noted that I was consuming lots of honey in my many cups of herb tea daily. I stopped the honey. In less than three months this growth was entirely disappeared only a little pink spot remained. .I learned nothing grows without a fuel. Eliminate the fuel and it will starve and shrink the growth. In 2007, my ex-husband developed pancreatic cancer...and our two daughters started feeding him...and brought the tumor marker down, where it barely existed, However, his 'esteemed' doctor insisted that he should keep on with the chemo. On top of this, the doctor handed him a can of Ensure. I said to the doctor, " isn't the first item High Fructose corn syrup?" The doctor wasn't happy with my question and replied, "He needs to gain weight." My ex-husband really loved the Ensure and the tumor took off like gangbusters...He was gone in less than three months. I tried to help him, but he would not listen to me...I told him not to do the chemo and offered to take care of him and feed him. He called me 'a fraud and a quack' and said that his expensive Beverly Hills doctor was going to save him. His expensive Beverly Hills doctor accelerated his demise.
I received this comment. I don't believe it was to me..I did not recommend drugs in my comment. I got rid of a tumor by simply eliminating the food, which caused it.
Then there's my elderly neighbor who after being diagnosed with prostate cancer immediately started treatments without getting a second opinion.
I saw him the other day. He said he's had four radiation treatments so far. I told him to eat some fruit. He responded that he can't eat any fruit or cruciferous vegetables because they would interfere with his radiation.
He won't listen to my advise about alternative methods, get a second opinion, etc.
I don't see a bright future for him, unfortunately.
Thanks for this ... it confirms what I already knew:
Now it gets interesting.
If the steroids fail to cure my boy, then almost certainly he’s got cancer. She informs me that if this is the diagnosis then chemotherapy is the recommended treatment.
I reiterate that we will not treat the cancer and tell her that from my observations all that chemo and radiation do is prolong suffering. I explained that if I am ever diagnosed with cancer I will turn down offers of chemo and radiation, enjoy whatever time I have left before the pain starts… then off myself. There is no way I am going to poison my body and lose that period of normalcy before the cancer spreads. The same goes for my dog.
She says with animals it is different. We do not try to cure the cancer as we do with humans rather we try to manage it (i.e. prolong the misery).
FWIW - our dog, 6 yo German Shorthair, recently had ‘water’ diarrhea - vet not available to see her right then, but gave us a probiotic to try over the weekend.
However, we suspected possible Giardia - found on the www it’s treated with FenBen, gave her Fenbendazole that we had on hand (for our use). It Turned around in less than 24 hours. We strongly suspect that the canal she runs around on daily walk / runs - that was also being dredged at the time - may have been the source.
For people - FWIW - we take Ivermectin preventively, periodically - for cancer, COVID, etc - and in the form of pet meds, so no Rx is needed.
Just mentioning in case you haven’t come across these options / info already.
Thank you for this article. My 58-year-old neighbor was diagnosed with colon cancer - stage 4 - a year ago. He was shocked beyond belief. He went thru all the traditional treatments, chemo, radiation, surgery, etc. He told me 10 days ago, he is now healthy, no cancer. He took the COVID jab for his work; blames the "outbreak" of cancer in the community on the water. Question: Can someone explain to me zeta potential like I am a 6-year-old? I have researched and watched videos and am still not clear on what it is and how it would affect the body. Thank you again.
Some of what you discuss was already known to me. However, learning the new material and hearing the story with full and revealing details only makes the sordid and nefarious behavior of modern medicine even more ghoulish than I had imagined. The most dangerous parasites walking the earth are known as physicians and they are bred and nurtured by a massive industry of enabling vampires.
The worst of all - it has been known for so long, many books are available, but when someone is diagnosed with cancer, instead of first trying some harmless procedures, they run to the surgeon so the tumors can spread. I have known for at least 30 years that cutting into tumors spreads them and I am nowhere near medically trained. this was in a magazine back in Belgium where I lived at the time. People read this but it does not sink in. We are all so trained (brainwashed) to trust our doctors! I think the one good thing that came out of the coronamania is, that at least some people started to question the knowledge of their doctors.
When my wife was diagnosed with Lymphoma, we were told not to use supplements because it interferes with the work of the chemo. That is BS. I defied that order, and the oncologist said to me he was amazed how well my wife was tolerating CHOPS! He went on to say: Do not tell me what you are doing but keep doing it! The B cell lymphoma was suppressed for almost ten years because her immune system was working better and all changed when the physicians prescribed two drugs that are immune suppressing. I also went to a Lymphoma meeting where a young women in a sharp business attire complained to the speaker that she did not understand why the speaker was casting the doubt on using nutritional supplementation. She said she was treated for Lymphoma twice and was told that she was on death door and they could do no more. She explained she decided to go with alternative treatment in holistic ways and the lymphoma disappeared. After ward I ask the Sloan Kettering speaker privately why she spoke in that manner. It was how she kept her job at the cancer hospital. Speak the party line. Privately, she suggested that milk thistle would be of value in fighting the cancer. She did not know that was already part of the regimen that I was using and my Dr friend gave me his formula called Ultra Glutathione to do the job! The treating oncologist suggested a 50% increase in CHOP rounds to destroy all the the cancer cells. We bought the BS hook, line and sinker. It was a money making scheme to increase the income of the oncologist and the drug manufacturer. If I knew then what I know now, my wife would still be here. WE lived together for almost 50 years and only difference was she was sun shy because she was fair skinned and I embraced the sun. Her D was 9 ng's and mine was 50 ng's. I have never had a cancer diagnosis. Unbecoming keeps taking the dermatologists negative views on D and the Endocrinologists are in the Vitamin D camp. Medicine men in general still do not understand the true role of Vitamin D. Keeping it that way builds their income.
I understand now why you insist on the vitamin D, but you say yourself also that you got yours the natural way. I read 2 years ago, when my friend, who is always outside, and myself, quite a bit outside, both got a shortage. The test the doctor does seems to measure your chemical D, not the total. I do not trust doctors with anything right now. Probably have to be close to death before one sees me. PS there are also food items that help build vit. D I just read something about that. I do not trust the chemical in the jar at all after reading where it was made and how. And what it actually is (poison)
Sunshine is the cheapest and best route! But, when you live in the north and it is winter you need to supplement. Testing for low D is required. Calling it a rat poison is BS.
I hope there is a hell and if there is that there is a special place there for oncologists... they cause immense needless suffering with their useless toxic potions.
I've offended one of them by reposting this https://paulmarik.substack.com/p/treat-the-patient-not-just-the-tumor/comments
For me this is quite new information, but honestly I if I got cancer tomorrow I would have no clue where to go other than regular medicine here in NL
Doctor Moerman was a Dutch family doctor. He healed around 60 cancer patients given up by regular medicine with nothing but diet. Several were still alive when he passed away in his mid 80s, more than 20 years later. I even was able to buy a booklet here in the US, he is known here, too
Budwig was a German nurse, there is still a website with her methods.
I am not sure if the Huxcey clinic is still operating in Mexico, he had to run from the US.
There are several books of the Gerson diet, which is not my thing. But if one is sick one tries everything - at least I do.
Since several people I know had cancer I started reading up on it. Not that any of them listened to me. But who knows one or other day it might help someone
Thanks. I know about dokter Moerman. But what I meant is, I wouldn't know where to go for a professional. I would definitely look into all those books, and there are more of course. But I wouldn't know of practitioner, who would be allowed to give alternative care. I think it isn't allowed to open a clinic for alternative cancer care. In Germany they do exist. And even if there was one here, I am pretty sure I'd never be able to afford it.
I think the financial side also might hold people back.
I have read the German clinic's price years ago and yes, that was very expensive. Huxcey was I think 1500 $ for a life long provision of the herbal remedies but that too, is years ago.
As to doctors who would really help you I am at a loss there, too. It is hard enough to find someone who does not push all kinds of vaxxines and meds, let go someone who knows about alternatives. In Belgium my ex went to a homeopath a few times, with a reimboursement of 10% at the time.
The holistics here within a few hours driving are mostly fake. There are some, but only in or near the big cities, which would mean almost 3 hours. Sad isn't it. Real healing is very hard to find, we are on our own.
This would no doubt work if you started once you have cancer... https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/a-near-fool-proof-cure-for-cancer/
You are certainly a very prolific writer.
I got diagnosed with that "ductal carcinoma in situ" twice. This from mammograms. I got surgery and radiation therapy. In retrospect, I probably would have chosen not to do that. Now I have Chronic Lymphocyte Leukemia and I have to ask if the radiation didn't contribute to that.
I have taken to calling all this "the breast cancer franchise." I finally told the oncologists I didn't want to take any more of their estrogen lowering drugs, so they don't follow me anymore. I go once a year and get a thermogram. They have all been fine for the last ten years.
I learned from C. Northrup MD-obGyn, (NYT best selling author on women's health), that mammogram machines compress breast tissue on average, 44 pds/psi. Thats enough to rupture a DCIS. Needle biopsies do similar, they open the duct, metastasis risk follows.
Institutional medicine in USA is full of risks related to "hi-tech" mediclne.
The doctors love their expensive technology and machinery and need to use it on patients in order to pay it off.
A year ago, my 62-year-old friend was told by doctors that they were "worried" about something they saw on his kidney x-rays. They wanted to perform a biopsy using their new robotic machine.
He said no, thanks, and is still alive today, doing well on alternative therapies.
Maybe Dentists are similar.
I remember years ago when I used to trust dentists, but not anymore.
I did a search online for holistic dentists and found a good one in town. He's old-school, doesn't make me get x-rays every year since I don't need them.
Indeed. My Dad at 91 was diagnosed with colon cancer and did have a section of his colon removed as it was causing him terrible pain. But upon the suggestion to get chemo, he politely declined. And never had a recurrence. Chemo would have killed him and he's now 95.
Lately, I've been watching videos by Dr. Robert Morse. He's a healing naturopath and speaks about cancer and everything else. He has a youtube channel and also his own website:
https://drmorses.tv/
I've never had a mammogram and never will. I'm in my 60s now so I'm about 20 mammograms behind. I just don't see a reason to pay someone to painfully smash my breasts between cold glass plates.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Out of dozens of people I have known diagnosed with cancer, I don't recall any surviving past five years, or even four years or even three years. They say that chemo breaks down the immune system. If this was true, then you would die in a month or two from some spooky germs or viruses.
I don't think there is an immune system protecting you from these silly lies. Your body is designed to protect you from toxins and poisons and tumors are a part of that protection. Medical science is dollar driven with health being the anti-thesis. Your doctor goes to the poor house if you are not ill and diseased.
Keep 'em sick, keep 'em broke.
I know a few survivors, but they were mainly ones diagnosed following routine screening. Like the article says, how many had a tumour that was never going to bother them, but got added as a survival stat for drug X. And for some it was just caught early enough to treat.
Maddening, just maddening.
It takes a brave person to resist the oncology system as my husband found out when his bowel was blocked by a tumour with life threatening consequences. Thanks to my research, which revealed much of what you’ve said, he resisted the chemo that was ‘offered’ as an adjuvant to surgery. In these circumstances, I can’t help wondering if it would have been at all possible to treat the tumour without surgery? https://valerienelson.substack.com/p/a-tale-about-cancer?
I was diagnosed stage-3 colon cancer, and had surgery. I refused chemo. The oncologist explained that chemo would give me a 30% better chance of survival. I had read that, still being alive at the five-year mark, was considered survival, and that didn't sound all that worth-it knowing how sick chemo made you. I did my best trying diet and supplements that were supposed to help, and went back teaching school 10 days after surgery. It's been almost 12 years since diagnosis, and I'm happily retired and enjoying my life.
Your story is very encouraging, thanks so much for sharing it.
Many thanks. What an evil web of lies they have weaved. Get poisoned to be healed of poisoning, yeah right.
Oncologist anagrams to:
- is clot goon
- gits co loon
- got oil cons
'Oil cons' might be the petrochemicals used to poison you.
As I have mentioned before I believe, I had immunotherapy in 2020 for a stage 1 melanoma. I had 9 sessions until I stopped having worked out what was the real cause of my palsy leading to the supposed diagnosis (only one lab report).
Immunotherapy supposed to be better than chemo but I suspect it may just be less toxic
The main issue is of ocurse no one asks about diet let alone anything else. Oncologists are basically a waste of space, grossly overpaid to cause more harm than good, if any.
Explain it to a sixty year old:
Avoid oncologists like the plague.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in?utm_source=publication-search
I am relatively new to both You & Patrick Coles. I have found that I have had basic questions regarding cancer & metastasis that now seems answerable.
It never made sense to me to add poisonous material to treat “cancer”. Then the chemo releases the products it had walled up. Double whammy.
I assumed that removing the structure with the toxins was a possible solution. I am getting the sense that is not a viable answer either.
As I read on, I see surgery has its issues.
I came to realise that chemo poisoning couldn't be good for the body. I gather though that certain chemicals can neutralise others but one has to know what one is doing. Chemo is just bung in a load of toxic stuff without even checking what the individual's body chemistry is like.
People’s Institute of Health! I like it.
I read an interesting bit last week; I can’t remember where though
The articles contained a notion that there bacteria are transported into tumor. I thought it was odd since I thought someone had established that fungus was encased by the wall.
I guess my point is there is a lot to learn.
Hi, I think you replied to my comment by mistake rather than rtko.
thanks
I too am intrigued by the “Toxin Sequestration Theory” put forth by Senef, Cozzetto and Coles. I’m not sure what to think about Cole’s statements about parasites being beneficial against other testimonies that drugs like Fenbendazole have cured people’s cancers by reducing parasites. It’s logical that parasites hang out where there’s an abundant food supply and toxins and our bodies reactions to them may be creating that environment. Wouldn’t it be great if the NIH and the National Cancer Institute would study this kind of stuff? I know, there’s no money in it, but there are plenty of scientists out there who would love to be doing this kind of work. Maybe we should create a “People’s Institute of Health”.
If I get cancer (again) esp if advanced, I’m going to Sanoviv in Mexico. I have a good friend who just got back and had nothing but good things to say about their unconventional treatments.
There is a lot to unpack here and a lot here worth questioning, especially around overdiagnosis, nutrition, financial incentives, and whether some treatments truly improve survival rather than simply change a number.
After more than thirty years in medicine, I have also learned something else: skepticism has to work both ways.
Questioning conventional medicine can be healthy. Blindly trusting conventional medicine is not. But neither is replacing one unquestioned belief system with another.
Fear has a way of pushing us toward certainty. We want someone to tell us who is right, who is wrong, what caused the problem, and what will fix it. Once we find an explanation that fits what we already believe, the temptation is to stop questioning.
That is where I think we have to be careful.
I have said for years: just because you may be suspicious of establishment medicine, perhaps for good reason, does not mean you should accept everything from non-establishment experts.
The goal should never be to defend a medical institution or tear one down. It should be to keep asking questions, remain open to being wrong, and follow the evidence wherever it leads.
Truth deserves that kind of humility.
I don't trust any person who willingly gave another person the experimental poison covid "vaccine" no matter if this was a pharmacist or nurse or medical doctor.
Millions died and/or were permanently injured/disabled.
No one has yet been charged with manslaughter or aggravated assault for doing this to another human being, the crimes against humanity.
I share the frustration over how little accountability there has been for what the public was told during COVID.
What troubles me most is how certainty replaced honest scientific discussion. We were given very confident statements about efficacy, transmission, and even the origins of the virus, while people raising legitimate questions were too often dismissed or silenced rather than debated.
Natural immunity is one example. We knew early on that people who had recovered from COVID developed meaningful immune protection. NIH reported in early 2021 that antibodies after prior infection were associated with a substantially lower risk of reinfection, and that immune memory persisted for months.
Yet I watched healthy people who had recently recovered from COVID, sometimes with documented antibodies, being strongly encouraged to vaccinate as though their prior infection meant very little. Even research available at the time showed that previously infected people mounted a very strong immune response after infection and vaccination.
There were also physicians and scientists arguing that natural immunity and population immunity deserved a larger role in the discussion. Too often, disagreement itself became suspect.
That is what bothers me.
Medicine advances through questioning, disagreement, and the willingness to admit when we do not know something. When uncertainty is presented as certainty and dissent is treated as dangerous, trust is eventually destroyed.
And once that trust is gone, getting it back is very difficult.
What you wrote to the the Six year Old is absolutely right...You don't try to cut it our (or kill it with radiation.) I learned on my own body, when i got a rapidly growing tumor in 1976. Two doctors wanted to perform immediate surgery or they would give me 'no guarantees.' I opted for prayer and a book came into my life on raw fruit and vegetables. I eliminated one food a nutritional doctor had told me to eat some months earlier...dairy. In less than three months the tumor was gone. Twelve years later, in 1988, I developed another ugly bulbous growth with spikes coming out of it above my right breast...I didn't bother going to a doctor. I just checked what I was eating. Noted that I was consuming lots of honey in my many cups of herb tea daily. I stopped the honey. In less than three months this growth was entirely disappeared only a little pink spot remained. .I learned nothing grows without a fuel. Eliminate the fuel and it will starve and shrink the growth. In 2007, my ex-husband developed pancreatic cancer...and our two daughters started feeding him...and brought the tumor marker down, where it barely existed, However, his 'esteemed' doctor insisted that he should keep on with the chemo. On top of this, the doctor handed him a can of Ensure. I said to the doctor, " isn't the first item High Fructose corn syrup?" The doctor wasn't happy with my question and replied, "He needs to gain weight." My ex-husband really loved the Ensure and the tumor took off like gangbusters...He was gone in less than three months. I tried to help him, but he would not listen to me...I told him not to do the chemo and offered to take care of him and feed him. He called me 'a fraud and a quack' and said that his expensive Beverly Hills doctor was going to save him. His expensive Beverly Hills doctor accelerated his demise.
Barbara - Thank you for sharing your journey. Wow!
You actually acted like a grown-up and took responsibility for your own health, and even tried to help your ex-husband, too.
You are a great role model for the rest of us regarding how to take charge!
Thanks for sharing Barbara, practical and very helpful.
While I agree to run from the docs and their “treatments” the other drugs you mention are still big pharma with horrific side effects.
I received this comment. I don't believe it was to me..I did not recommend drugs in my comment. I got rid of a tumor by simply eliminating the food, which caused it.
Sorry! It was meant to be to the post not you. Not sure how to fix that.
Then there's my elderly neighbor who after being diagnosed with prostate cancer immediately started treatments without getting a second opinion.
I saw him the other day. He said he's had four radiation treatments so far. I told him to eat some fruit. He responded that he can't eat any fruit or cruciferous vegetables because they would interfere with his radiation.
He won't listen to my advise about alternative methods, get a second opinion, etc.
I don't see a bright future for him, unfortunately.
Thanks for this ... it confirms what I already knew:
Now it gets interesting.
If the steroids fail to cure my boy, then almost certainly he’s got cancer. She informs me that if this is the diagnosis then chemotherapy is the recommended treatment.
I reiterate that we will not treat the cancer and tell her that from my observations all that chemo and radiation do is prolong suffering. I explained that if I am ever diagnosed with cancer I will turn down offers of chemo and radiation, enjoy whatever time I have left before the pain starts… then off myself. There is no way I am going to poison my body and lose that period of normalcy before the cancer spreads. The same goes for my dog.
She says with animals it is different. We do not try to cure the cancer as we do with humans rather we try to manage it (i.e. prolong the misery).
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/fuck-chemo-and-radiation-and-vaccines
I've posted some of your article here https://paulmarik.substack.com/p/medicine-should-be-done-with-the/comments
FWIW - our dog, 6 yo German Shorthair, recently had ‘water’ diarrhea - vet not available to see her right then, but gave us a probiotic to try over the weekend.
However, we suspected possible Giardia - found on the www it’s treated with FenBen, gave her Fenbendazole that we had on hand (for our use). It Turned around in less than 24 hours. We strongly suspect that the canal she runs around on daily walk / runs - that was also being dredged at the time - may have been the source.
For people - FWIW - we take Ivermectin preventively, periodically - for cancer, COVID, etc - and in the form of pet meds, so no Rx is needed.
Just mentioning in case you haven’t come across these options / info already.
Very best to you! 🙏
Good to hear you sorted that.
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/hoolio-lives
My dream is 20 dogs.... in a remote cabin away from people
Thank you for this article. My 58-year-old neighbor was diagnosed with colon cancer - stage 4 - a year ago. He was shocked beyond belief. He went thru all the traditional treatments, chemo, radiation, surgery, etc. He told me 10 days ago, he is now healthy, no cancer. He took the COVID jab for his work; blames the "outbreak" of cancer in the community on the water. Question: Can someone explain to me zeta potential like I am a 6-year-old? I have researched and watched videos and am still not clear on what it is and how it would affect the body. Thank you again.
I watched the 10-hour documentary, The Truth About Cancer, many years ago and I took notes as I watched.
We need to educate ourselves from as many knowledgeable sources as possible.
It's a war against them and us.
Some of what you discuss was already known to me. However, learning the new material and hearing the story with full and revealing details only makes the sordid and nefarious behavior of modern medicine even more ghoulish than I had imagined. The most dangerous parasites walking the earth are known as physicians and they are bred and nurtured by a massive industry of enabling vampires.