8 Comments
User's avatar
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

The worst of all - it has been known for so long, many books are available, but when someone is diagnosed with cancer, instead of first trying some harmless procedures, they run to the surgeon so the tumors can spread. I have known for at least 30 years that cutting into tumors spreads them and I am nowhere near medically trained. this was in a magazine back in Belgium where I lived at the time. People read this but it does not sink in. We are all so trained (brainwashed) to trust our doctors! I think the one good thing that came out of the coronamania is, that at least some people started to question the knowledge of their doctors.

Don's avatar

Maddening, just maddening.

Rebecca Lee (maybeitsmercury)'s avatar

You are certainly a very prolific writer.

I got diagnosed with that "ductal carcinoma in situ" twice. This from mammograms. I got surgery and radiation therapy. In retrospect, I probably would have chosen not to do that. Now I have Chronic Lymphocyte Leukemia and I have to ask if the radiation didn't contribute to that.

I have taken to calling all this "the breast cancer franchise." I finally told the oncologists I didn't want to take any more of their estrogen lowering drugs, so they don't follow me anymore. I go once a year and get a thermogram. They have all been fine for the last ten years.

Retired Medical-Tech Writer's avatar

I learned from C. Northrup MD-obGyn, (NYT best selling author on women's health), that mammogram machines compress breast tissue on average, 44 pds/psi. Thats enough to rupture a DCIS. Needle biopsies do similar, they open the duct, metastasis risk follows.

Institutional medicine in USA is full of risks related to "hi-tech" mediclne.

Crixcyon's avatar

Out of dozens of people I have known diagnosed with cancer, I don't recall any surviving past five years, or even four years or even three years. They say that chemo breaks down the immune system. If this was true, then you would die in a month or two from some spooky germs or viruses.

I don't think there is an immune system protecting you from these silly lies. Your body is designed to protect you from toxins and poisons and tumors are a part of that protection. Medical science is dollar driven with health being the anti-thesis. Your doctor goes to the poor house if you are not ill and diseased.

Dr Linda's avatar

I am relatively new to both You & Patrick Coles. I have found that I have had basic questions regarding cancer & metastasis that now seems answerable.

It never made sense to me to add poisonous material to treat “cancer”. Then the chemo releases the products it had walled up. Double whammy.

I assumed that removing the structure with the toxins was a possible solution. I am getting the sense that is not a viable answer either.

As I read on, I see surgery has its issues.

rtko's avatar

I too am intrigued by the “Toxin Sequestration Theory” put forth by Senef, Cozzetto and Coles. I’m not sure what to think about Cole’s statements about parasites being beneficial against other testimonies that drugs like Fenbendazole have cured people’s cancers by reducing parasites. It’s logical that parasites hang out where there’s an abundant food supply and toxins and our bodies reactions to them may be creating that environment. Wouldn’t it be great if the NIH and the National Cancer Institute would study this kind of stuff? I know, there’s no money in it, but there are plenty of scientists out there who would love to be doing this kind of work. Maybe we should create a “People’s Institute of Health”.

Dr Linda's avatar

Thank you for this essay. It helped me organize thoughts.

I have had many questions recently. The answers seem straight forward.