Have you always wanted a career monetizing pseudoscience? 😱🔬
Do you possess the confidence to identify an invisible pathogen without it being present? 👨⚖️🦠
Can you transform a mysterious collection of cellular debris, laboratory chemicals, and animal torture experiments into tomorrow's global emergency? 🌍🚨
If so, your future begins here! 🎉
At Missing Virus Labs, our viroLIEgists proudly continue a tradition of finding certainty where lesser minds might inconveniently demand evidence. 🏆
Ideal candidates must have a proven track record of:
🧪 Assaulting monkey 🐒 kidney cell cultures with enough antibiotics, enzymes, detergents, reagents, and solvents to dissolve any potential evidence.
🔬 Shouting "Virus!" when the cells you just poisoned, starved, and chemically assaulted begin falling apart.
💻 Converting toxic cell breakdown into "viral genomes" using advanced computational imagination and several metric tons of assumptions.
🖼️ Slapping arrows on grayscale Jackson Pollock-style EM images and triumphantly announcing, "See? Virus!" 🦠
📈 Interpreting every result through the proven scientific principle that if the answer is known beforehand, the experiment becomes much easier.
🎯 Mastering the art of conflating "evidence of a virus" with "evidence that something dissolved in my petri dish."
🔄 Applying circular reasoning with professional precision by using assumptions to validate conclusions generated from assumptions.
📢 Injecting toxic cell cultures into the eyes, brains, and reproductive organs of laboratory animals to make them sick... sorry, to prove "viral transmission."
🏅 Preferred Qualifications:
✅ Ability to look baffled when asked simple questions about controls.
✅ Comfortable replacing dictionary definitions of isolation with a word salad explaining why isolation now means adding stuff.
✅ Experience publicly pontificating on the epidemiological progress of a virus nobody can locate.
✅ Passion for recommending toxic jabs, supplements, and antivirals to combat entirely hypothetical threats.
🌟 Employee Benefits Include:
💰 Unlimited funding for pseudoscience.
📺 Frequent television appearances as an expert on things that cannot be shown.
🏆 Opportunities to fabricate exciting new variants whenever public attention begins to wander.
Remember:
🪬 At Missing Virus Labs, we don't let a lack of evidence get in the way of quarterly earnings and your bonuses. 📈💰💷💶💴💵💰
✨ We simply process the evidence until it learns how to cooperate. ✨ ☣️😄🦠
📉 Shares in Missing Virus Labs plunged today after investors discovered that laughter, unlike the company's flagship product, can actually be demonstrated. ☣️🦠🤣
Great stuff Unbekoming. Methinks you wrote this in regard to yesterday's comment. All I can say is wow - the more I learn, the less I know. Again, thank you.
Here is a single link from the British Medical Journal (which I believe is the oldest on the planet) - and even that does not begin to tell the whole story... https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139
The only thing transmissible are the lies, propaganda and BS surrounding the medical mafia. Don't let them catch you because they will give you much more than just a cold.
If I use this article as ammo, I can say that I am exposed to less toxins than before, since I have not been 'sick' with anything for a couple of years. My diet hasn't changed and in fact due to costs, may have gotten worse.
Love all your articles and I am from a scientific/engineering background so they really resonate with me, I have started looking at health from a business framing,
Germ theory, allopathic medicine is essentially a business model that is now basically a monopoly, vaccines and pharmaceuticals being a subscription model.
I have tried talking about the things you write about from a scientific evidence perspective and either get blank looks or for some reason when you provide scientific evidence against the current model, it gets labelled a conspiracy theory most of the time
Streaming services, spotify, Netflix, uber etc, some are further down the road in terms of the model, medicine being one of the earliest adopters of the model.
Q: there is an inbuilt preference to follow a line of reasoning that says your symptoms are a disease you caught that you can't do anything about over it the result of a toxic load in the environment generated by industry and modern society
Part of the answer : Corporate Conflict of Interest: The same chemical, industrial, and agricultural conglomerates that produce environmental toxins (such as pesticides, microplastics, and industrial pollutants) often share major shareholders or board members with pharmaceutical companies. Investigating environmental "toxic load" as a root cause directly threatens the profitability of these powerful industries.
"Toxic load" is highly complex. Humans are exposed to low levels of thousands of different chemicals simultaneously (from air pollution and tap water to ultra-processed food packaging). It is nearly impossible to design a standard clinical trial that proves how a lifetime of this cumulative, low-level toxic mixture causes a chronic illness. Because it cannot be easily measured by standard metrics, the system largely ignores it.
If you want to look deeper into this specific conflict, let me know if you would like to explore:
The history of the Flexner Report and how it eliminated alternative, holistic medical paradigms.
Specific legal and medical case studies, such as the fight to recognize Dupont's PFAS ("forever chemicals") or glyphosate (Roundup) as root causes of chronic illness.
How the emerging field of Epigenetics is trying to bridge the gap by proving how environmental toxins turn disease genes on and off.
The problem with this kind of reasoning is that science cannot prove a LOT of things that we know to be true. Science cannot prove the existence of the human soul but I know that the soul exists and is real and true and every human group ever on the planet has believed in some sort of life after death, and that we are more than our bodies. But-Science cannot "prove" it. Huh, how about that?
Science cannot prove telepathy but I know it exists. Science cannot prove that yawns are contagious but we all know they are. I could go on and on with all the things that are true that science just cannot seem to prove.
The Scientific Method has definite limits that scientists hate to discuss. What are the limits of science?
We all know that contagion exists, we have all caught a cold from someone. Or not. But we've all caught colds. Who knows why? There are no doubt a multitude of reasons and contagion is only one of them. Contagion does exist despite the inability of Science to 'prove' it. It is common sense. it's obvious. "Proving" it is beyond science because SO MUCH OF LIFE IS beyond science!
Quarantine of the sick has been practiced for centuries to good effect. Quarantine of the well is where "science" as public policy went insane. Vaccinating healthy people and babies is almost always insane. It is science madness.
Health and sickness are profound and mysterious aspects of the human condition and the truth of them is only partially available to explanation by science- as is literally everything else about life. SCIENCE IS VERY LIMITED.
The truth is that we do not need to fear virus. That's the really beautiful news! Our immune systems are miraculous. We do not need to vaccinate. Vaccination is the lie. That's where's science lies. Science sometimes can really make men mad.
It's essentially the same, in reverse, with all the 'virus deniers' out there who criticize other's moral character for not accepting their own faith in "no-virus". They have become religious fundamentalists of science while thinking they are freedom fighters!! It's quite bizarre, but science can make men mad.
Nowadays everyone has their own science like everyone has their own religion. So we need freedom of science like we have freedom of religion. Because "science" is limited, because science can masquerade as the truth, because science can lie, and because science can make mistakes. Science can also be awesome and beautiful, but it needs to stay in it's lane.
Vaccination by definition is FOR healthy people. Vaccines are preventitive, by definition. The “madness” on display here, is such a display of confidence while totally misconstruing the fundamental nature of vaccines wrt public health. Historically, they have worked wonders. An amazing achievement of society and public health.
Saying that no one should vaccinate and that “our immune systems are miraculous” is actually super ableist. One should be more careful.
Regarding the study on the Hebridean island: the volunteers were mostly medical students at Aberdeen, recruited to spend the long summer vacation on the island. The introduction of the farmer was right at the end, in September. Exactly the time, in this part of the world, when “colds” start to become “common”.
Killingley et al. (2022) conducted the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study, inoculating 36 seronegative young adults (ages 18–29) intranasally with wild-type virus. Approximately 53% became infected, with high viral loads peaking at ~5 days. Viable virus was shed from the nose for up to ~10 days. Symptoms were mild-to-moderate, with 89% of infected participants symptomatic and 83% developing anosmia.
If I use this article as ammo, I can say that I am exposed to less toxins than before, since I have not been 'sick' with anything for a couple of years. My diet hasn't changed and in fact due to costs, may have gotten worse.
☣️ MISSING VIRUS LABS ☣️
🚨 NOW HIRING! 🚨
Position: Senior ViroLIELgist
Have you always wanted a career monetizing pseudoscience? 😱🔬
Do you possess the confidence to identify an invisible pathogen without it being present? 👨⚖️🦠
Can you transform a mysterious collection of cellular debris, laboratory chemicals, and animal torture experiments into tomorrow's global emergency? 🌍🚨
If so, your future begins here! 🎉
At Missing Virus Labs, our viroLIEgists proudly continue a tradition of finding certainty where lesser minds might inconveniently demand evidence. 🏆
Ideal candidates must have a proven track record of:
🧪 Assaulting monkey 🐒 kidney cell cultures with enough antibiotics, enzymes, detergents, reagents, and solvents to dissolve any potential evidence.
🔬 Shouting "Virus!" when the cells you just poisoned, starved, and chemically assaulted begin falling apart.
💻 Converting toxic cell breakdown into "viral genomes" using advanced computational imagination and several metric tons of assumptions.
🖼️ Slapping arrows on grayscale Jackson Pollock-style EM images and triumphantly announcing, "See? Virus!" 🦠
📈 Interpreting every result through the proven scientific principle that if the answer is known beforehand, the experiment becomes much easier.
🎯 Mastering the art of conflating "evidence of a virus" with "evidence that something dissolved in my petri dish."
🔄 Applying circular reasoning with professional precision by using assumptions to validate conclusions generated from assumptions.
📢 Injecting toxic cell cultures into the eyes, brains, and reproductive organs of laboratory animals to make them sick... sorry, to prove "viral transmission."
🏅 Preferred Qualifications:
✅ Ability to look baffled when asked simple questions about controls.
✅ Comfortable replacing dictionary definitions of isolation with a word salad explaining why isolation now means adding stuff.
✅ Experience publicly pontificating on the epidemiological progress of a virus nobody can locate.
✅ Passion for recommending toxic jabs, supplements, and antivirals to combat entirely hypothetical threats.
🌟 Employee Benefits Include:
💰 Unlimited funding for pseudoscience.
📺 Frequent television appearances as an expert on things that cannot be shown.
🏆 Opportunities to fabricate exciting new variants whenever public attention begins to wander.
Remember:
🪬 At Missing Virus Labs, we don't let a lack of evidence get in the way of quarterly earnings and your bonuses. 📈💰💷💶💴💵💰
✨ We simply process the evidence until it learns how to cooperate. ✨ ☣️😄🦠
Apply today!
LOL!
Sign me up--NOT.
The perfect overview accompanied by a laugh and a smile.
Can’t beat that with a stick !!!
MASSIVE THANKS! 👍👍😄
At Missing Virus Labs, the only thing we've successfully isolated is laughter at our expense. ☣️🦠😂
Nevertheless, we refuse to give up. Deception is still profitable, even if convincing people gets more challenging by the day. 💰🎭📉😄
Couldn’t have said it better !!!
DEEPLY APPRECIATED! 🙏👍🥂
Have a wonderful day!! 😄
And now a market update...
📉 Shares in Missing Virus Labs plunged today after investors discovered that laughter, unlike the company's flagship product, can actually be demonstrated. ☣️🦠🤣
Great stuff Unbekoming. Methinks you wrote this in regard to yesterday's comment. All I can say is wow - the more I learn, the less I know. Again, thank you.
Yes, I had it in my bank of essays and brought it forward after I saw your comment.
The more I learn, the more I learn doctors know almost nothing about healing and are literally a danger to our health.
Here is a single link from the British Medical Journal (which I believe is the oldest on the planet) - and even that does not begin to tell the whole story... https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139
The only thing transmissible are the lies, propaganda and BS surrounding the medical mafia. Don't let them catch you because they will give you much more than just a cold.
Those Spanish Flu studies wouldn’t get anywhere near the ethics committee these days.
Knowing that millions of their colleagues died what incentive induced those sailors to volunteer?
If I use this article as ammo, I can say that I am exposed to less toxins than before, since I have not been 'sick' with anything for a couple of years. My diet hasn't changed and in fact due to costs, may have gotten worse.
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Thanks for the ‘ammo’ for upcoming discussions with people still in the dark!
Wow….great article!
Love all your articles and I am from a scientific/engineering background so they really resonate with me, I have started looking at health from a business framing,
Germ theory, allopathic medicine is essentially a business model that is now basically a monopoly, vaccines and pharmaceuticals being a subscription model.
I have tried talking about the things you write about from a scientific evidence perspective and either get blank looks or for some reason when you provide scientific evidence against the current model, it gets labelled a conspiracy theory most of the time
Streaming services, spotify, Netflix, uber etc, some are further down the road in terms of the model, medicine being one of the earliest adopters of the model.
I had a chat with AI
https://www.google.com/search?q=is+Germ+theory%2C+allopathic+medicine+is+essentially+a+business+model+that+is+now+basically+a+monopoly%2C+vaccines+and+pharmaceuticals+being+a+subscription+model&sca_esv=a82350b6429375af&ei=88Igaq-kNrmYseMPrJuQ0Ac&iflsig=AFdpzrgAAAAAaiDRA0emUyoSIkW970oGk7H6U794InnS&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz&udm=50&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3u6MWRtAr31GIrXLfiKhJJ8rW39M0T_N8wn3kINg3nQk-dwTV6GiRqsz_UCAHf8NRZyLKsY-V5C5ynqrPD1mUAJQ8aWXTrBgQIoCzS4BTgwqw6_B7gbQ52nPH8GPLFPk3OM318UJioR0SKlWt7yxtxRuuc__lZTt_gSqCshRqw_ivGkWrQ&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfChhn6sb0zCXRoMUdXF7v8FDHYnZlK8pIRJgr2iWzTIvCUCNcvCTp6hyBnTOnnvV4uBCjCakde1vXTblBLMndM7ZY7RpUcQ9heoSH8ZYnyX2D4A5g9Tk1zqqltkoRSxaHxgoU92pvG7l9btwmK_oZjQiXc2TH-LXNk&aioh=3&csuir=1&mtid=yMMgasqoF_bhseMP4oahsA4
and basically ended up here
Q: there is an inbuilt preference to follow a line of reasoning that says your symptoms are a disease you caught that you can't do anything about over it the result of a toxic load in the environment generated by industry and modern society
Part of the answer : Corporate Conflict of Interest: The same chemical, industrial, and agricultural conglomerates that produce environmental toxins (such as pesticides, microplastics, and industrial pollutants) often share major shareholders or board members with pharmaceutical companies. Investigating environmental "toxic load" as a root cause directly threatens the profitability of these powerful industries.
"Toxic load" is highly complex. Humans are exposed to low levels of thousands of different chemicals simultaneously (from air pollution and tap water to ultra-processed food packaging). It is nearly impossible to design a standard clinical trial that proves how a lifetime of this cumulative, low-level toxic mixture causes a chronic illness. Because it cannot be easily measured by standard metrics, the system largely ignores it.
If you want to look deeper into this specific conflict, let me know if you would like to explore:
The history of the Flexner Report and how it eliminated alternative, holistic medical paradigms.
Specific legal and medical case studies, such as the fight to recognize Dupont's PFAS ("forever chemicals") or glyphosate (Roundup) as root causes of chronic illness.
How the emerging field of Epigenetics is trying to bridge the gap by proving how environmental toxins turn disease genes on and off.
The problem with this kind of reasoning is that science cannot prove a LOT of things that we know to be true. Science cannot prove the existence of the human soul but I know that the soul exists and is real and true and every human group ever on the planet has believed in some sort of life after death, and that we are more than our bodies. But-Science cannot "prove" it. Huh, how about that?
Science cannot prove telepathy but I know it exists. Science cannot prove that yawns are contagious but we all know they are. I could go on and on with all the things that are true that science just cannot seem to prove.
The Scientific Method has definite limits that scientists hate to discuss. What are the limits of science?
We all know that contagion exists, we have all caught a cold from someone. Or not. But we've all caught colds. Who knows why? There are no doubt a multitude of reasons and contagion is only one of them. Contagion does exist despite the inability of Science to 'prove' it. It is common sense. it's obvious. "Proving" it is beyond science because SO MUCH OF LIFE IS beyond science!
Quarantine of the sick has been practiced for centuries to good effect. Quarantine of the well is where "science" as public policy went insane. Vaccinating healthy people and babies is almost always insane. It is science madness.
Health and sickness are profound and mysterious aspects of the human condition and the truth of them is only partially available to explanation by science- as is literally everything else about life. SCIENCE IS VERY LIMITED.
The truth is that we do not need to fear virus. That's the really beautiful news! Our immune systems are miraculous. We do not need to vaccinate. Vaccination is the lie. That's where's science lies. Science sometimes can really make men mad.
It's essentially the same, in reverse, with all the 'virus deniers' out there who criticize other's moral character for not accepting their own faith in "no-virus". They have become religious fundamentalists of science while thinking they are freedom fighters!! It's quite bizarre, but science can make men mad.
Nowadays everyone has their own science like everyone has their own religion. So we need freedom of science like we have freedom of religion. Because "science" is limited, because science can masquerade as the truth, because science can lie, and because science can make mistakes. Science can also be awesome and beautiful, but it needs to stay in it's lane.
Vaccination by definition is FOR healthy people. Vaccines are preventitive, by definition. The “madness” on display here, is such a display of confidence while totally misconstruing the fundamental nature of vaccines wrt public health. Historically, they have worked wonders. An amazing achievement of society and public health.
Saying that no one should vaccinate and that “our immune systems are miraculous” is actually super ableist. One should be more careful.
stop tripping dude.
Regarding the study on the Hebridean island: the volunteers were mostly medical students at Aberdeen, recruited to spend the long summer vacation on the island. The introduction of the farmer was right at the end, in September. Exactly the time, in this part of the world, when “colds” start to become “common”.
Killingley et al. (2022) conducted the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study, inoculating 36 seronegative young adults (ages 18–29) intranasally with wild-type virus. Approximately 53% became infected, with high viral loads peaking at ~5 days. Viable virus was shed from the nose for up to ~10 days. Symptoms were mild-to-moderate, with 89% of infected participants symptomatic and 83% developing anosmia.
If I use this article as ammo, I can say that I am exposed to less toxins than before, since I have not been 'sick' with anything for a couple of years. My diet hasn't changed and in fact due to costs, may have gotten worse.