I'm one of the statistical 200 who rec'd a "false alarm" at age 54. I was probably pressured to get an "updated mammogram" by a "mainstream medicine" nurse practitioner who said I ought to get "caught up" on my mammogram record. After the false alarm mammo, I was pressured to get a sonogram looking for "calcifications". That test was also a false alarm.
After those events, I re-examined what I knew about mammography and did more research on it. After hearing Dr. Christiane Northrup, MD-ObGyn report facts about the pressure inflicted by a mammograph machine on breast tissue, how it risked DCIS rupture, I carefully decline to get more mammos, since 2008. There are safer, less invasive screening methods, such as thermography. I encourage all women to learn about them.
Almost 40 years ago I had a surgery and the doctor OB- thaught me how to do I breast exam. I have done it thousands of times, usually under the shower. I do not think I will get cancer since I eat very little processed food, lots of fruit and veggies, moderate meat. I avoid cities with lots of air pollution, and radiation, never carry my phone unless absolutely needed.
I recently read that all that radiation from Xrays CAUSES cancer, and also the biopsies, the prodding, the cutting, - the whole regular medical world.
I so appreciate all the info I get from your emails. It is the first email I open when it comes in. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for the huge service you bring to me and others.
What’s interesting to me is that individual cancer cells within a tumor can sport hundreds or thousands of what appears to be nonsense mutations.
And if you look across the whole tumor, in some cases, you can literally have millions of different mutations. The point is I have a different view of this then most everyone else. I see this teleologically, so that these cells are purposefully accumulating mutations for the sake of slowing everything down. If you think about it, cancer is really a situation where those tissues have dropped off from the electrical grid. They are essentially acting as their own sort of community, isolated from the rest of the body.
But in conjunction to this, these tissues also go into a sort of Hibernation. Or at least they can, if they are not aggressive and actively growing. This is why one person can live for many many years with cancer and maybe not even know it. It’s because those particular cancer cells are more or less in a dormant state. Of course, other people can have very aggressive, fast growing cancers.
But the point is with cancer, the body tries to clamp things down into a tight space, or nothing can get in or out. Almost like a trashcan that gets sealed off from the rest of the body. That’s what it wants to do anyway. So it slows things down, metabolically, Clamps the tissues via YAP/TAZ protein activation, allows for calcium to flood in, fibrosis to go crazy, deuterium to accumulate, all of which forms a virtual vise to keep things contained.
Of course, modern science comes in and obliterates these tissues with chemo and radiation - and spreads toxicity everywhere…so it seems to be a contradiction to what the body actually is trying to accomplish
So good to read your post I have been saying this for years but I am not a medical professional so have always been discounted as some sort of alternative hippy. It stands to reason if you take a biopsy you open Pandora’s box so the cancer spreads.
"The answer seems to lie in the wound left by the biopsy itself. Unlike a lesion in healthy tissue that heals and resolves, the study shows that in a tumor context, this wound remains active for weeks—or even months—creating an inflammatory microenvironment favorable to metastasis. Most notably, there is a persistent accumulation of M2-type macrophages—also known as M2-like or M24 macrophages—surrounding the biopsy needle track. These macrophages are not hostile to the tumor; on the contrary, they support its survival and expansion....
Using mouse models, the researchers observed how a single biopsy increased the number of cancer cells reaching the lungs, translating to systemic dissemination. But the most intriguing part was identifying the biochemical culprit: the enzyme COX-2, which is activated by the trauma of the biopsy and produces prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). This molecule, under the hypoxic conditions of the wound, further promotes M2 polarization and sustains the inflammatory loop via the EP2 receptor."
-------
So ultimately what the paper is saying is that a biopsy might promote metastasis under certain conditions, especially if surgical removal of the tumor is delayed afterward.
Of course what they don't admit is that surgeries rarely remove the whole tumor microenvironment. Surgeons typically aim for "clear margins," which amounts to a pre-defined rim of surrounding tissue - it does not mean all the dangerous stuff is removed.
A Midwestern Doctor argues that bras may be associated with breast cancer, primarily through a mechanism involving compression of breast tissue and impaired lymphatic drainage. Here’s the section on bras in the article: How Your Clothes and Their Materials Shape Your Health (01/18/26): https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/i/184945604/bras
I continually tell people this and other information. Sadly or irritatingly I am just treat like a kook or naysayer. Having this information from someone else might help.
when I asked a few friends why they kept going for more mammograms after complaining about the pain, and how there was nothing to see on the pic because of dense tissue, they said 'because it is free!' Insurance pays for it... I wonder if insurance paid for amputating a leg would they do it?
i shall shed - no tears - when the separation occurs and these victimizers are rejected of GOD. i shall remember the harm caused and know these exalted ones in white coats always had an idea floating inside their head that what they practiced was without merit . But they proceeded anyway without any repentance.....Sayonara, sayonara, sayonara, we can no longer bring ourselves to look upon you . And our Hope will rest in ' Thy Kingdom come , Thy Will be Done ' . ............ .........blessings everyone
Serendipity I think? I just ordered some books by Dr. Peter. They are already underway.
I am reading your Baking Soda book - very interesting. In Belgium we call it Stomach Salt! I never took it but I do use it in the household. Interesting fact you mention, to use it together with Epsom (magnesium) salts. Since I can not use it on its own, I am going to try that Sunday when I do not have to go out. Magnesium causes me to have to stay close to a bathroom LOL.
As someone who has been into health and nutrition studies sixty five years...and reversed every problem by simply eliminating the cause...the medical Industry and our government would not like my findings...it would put the Medical Industry out of business.
I'm one of the statistical 200 who rec'd a "false alarm" at age 54. I was probably pressured to get an "updated mammogram" by a "mainstream medicine" nurse practitioner who said I ought to get "caught up" on my mammogram record. After the false alarm mammo, I was pressured to get a sonogram looking for "calcifications". That test was also a false alarm.
After those events, I re-examined what I knew about mammography and did more research on it. After hearing Dr. Christiane Northrup, MD-ObGyn report facts about the pressure inflicted by a mammograph machine on breast tissue, how it risked DCIS rupture, I carefully decline to get more mammos, since 2008. There are safer, less invasive screening methods, such as thermography. I encourage all women to learn about them.
Almost 40 years ago I had a surgery and the doctor OB- thaught me how to do I breast exam. I have done it thousands of times, usually under the shower. I do not think I will get cancer since I eat very little processed food, lots of fruit and veggies, moderate meat. I avoid cities with lots of air pollution, and radiation, never carry my phone unless absolutely needed.
I recently read that all that radiation from Xrays CAUSES cancer, and also the biopsies, the prodding, the cutting, - the whole regular medical world.
QT imaging and BeSound
I just recently read of an abbreviated MRI as an option???
What amazes me is the amount of women who believe that the treatment "cured" them. I often wonder if it is the "belief" that cures them.
Their "Cures" did not remove the cause of the problem...and eventually it will be too late.
I so appreciate all the info I get from your emails. It is the first email I open when it comes in. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for the huge service you bring to me and others.
Same here.
I couldn’t agree more !!!
What’s interesting to me is that individual cancer cells within a tumor can sport hundreds or thousands of what appears to be nonsense mutations.
And if you look across the whole tumor, in some cases, you can literally have millions of different mutations. The point is I have a different view of this then most everyone else. I see this teleologically, so that these cells are purposefully accumulating mutations for the sake of slowing everything down. If you think about it, cancer is really a situation where those tissues have dropped off from the electrical grid. They are essentially acting as their own sort of community, isolated from the rest of the body.
But in conjunction to this, these tissues also go into a sort of Hibernation. Or at least they can, if they are not aggressive and actively growing. This is why one person can live for many many years with cancer and maybe not even know it. It’s because those particular cancer cells are more or less in a dormant state. Of course, other people can have very aggressive, fast growing cancers.
But the point is with cancer, the body tries to clamp things down into a tight space, or nothing can get in or out. Almost like a trashcan that gets sealed off from the rest of the body. That’s what it wants to do anyway. So it slows things down, metabolically, Clamps the tissues via YAP/TAZ protein activation, allows for calcium to flood in, fibrosis to go crazy, deuterium to accumulate, all of which forms a virtual vise to keep things contained.
Of course, modern science comes in and obliterates these tissues with chemo and radiation - and spreads toxicity everywhere…so it seems to be a contradiction to what the body actually is trying to accomplish
So good to read your post I have been saying this for years but I am not a medical professional so have always been discounted as some sort of alternative hippy. It stands to reason if you take a biopsy you open Pandora’s box so the cancer spreads.
I say trust your gut. Check out this 2025 paper:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10772461/?fbclid=IwY2xjawUaoMxwZG9mAWV4dG4DYWVtAjEwAGJyaWQRMU40UXA0TGp2UmFYQXVGMklzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeQL1JHJjaDDD_qNhsPnAqzQ8NdVeJ4VlfqIBudtvkLQO_1e3rlW3SKGlB0JQ_aem_ohgkcYKAQXQJrr02nmwdrQ
-----
"The answer seems to lie in the wound left by the biopsy itself. Unlike a lesion in healthy tissue that heals and resolves, the study shows that in a tumor context, this wound remains active for weeks—or even months—creating an inflammatory microenvironment favorable to metastasis. Most notably, there is a persistent accumulation of M2-type macrophages—also known as M2-like or M24 macrophages—surrounding the biopsy needle track. These macrophages are not hostile to the tumor; on the contrary, they support its survival and expansion....
Using mouse models, the researchers observed how a single biopsy increased the number of cancer cells reaching the lungs, translating to systemic dissemination. But the most intriguing part was identifying the biochemical culprit: the enzyme COX-2, which is activated by the trauma of the biopsy and produces prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). This molecule, under the hypoxic conditions of the wound, further promotes M2 polarization and sustains the inflammatory loop via the EP2 receptor."
-------
So ultimately what the paper is saying is that a biopsy might promote metastasis under certain conditions, especially if surgical removal of the tumor is delayed afterward.
Of course what they don't admit is that surgeries rarely remove the whole tumor microenvironment. Surgeons typically aim for "clear margins," which amounts to a pre-defined rim of surrounding tissue - it does not mean all the dangerous stuff is removed.
Thank you
A Midwestern Doctor argues that bras may be associated with breast cancer, primarily through a mechanism involving compression of breast tissue and impaired lymphatic drainage. Here’s the section on bras in the article: How Your Clothes and Their Materials Shape Your Health (01/18/26): https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/i/184945604/bras
Thank you for this book.
I continually tell people this and other information. Sadly or irritatingly I am just treat like a kook or naysayer. Having this information from someone else might help.
when I asked a few friends why they kept going for more mammograms after complaining about the pain, and how there was nothing to see on the pic because of dense tissue, they said 'because it is free!' Insurance pays for it... I wonder if insurance paid for amputating a leg would they do it?
Probably! Some people just love free stuff. Like COVID shots 💉 and donuts 🍩 , for example.
i shall shed - no tears - when the separation occurs and these victimizers are rejected of GOD. i shall remember the harm caused and know these exalted ones in white coats always had an idea floating inside their head that what they practiced was without merit . But they proceeded anyway without any repentance.....Sayonara, sayonara, sayonara, we can no longer bring ourselves to look upon you . And our Hope will rest in ' Thy Kingdom come , Thy Will be Done ' . ............ .........blessings everyone
https://healthimpactnews.com/2023/medical-doctors-and-their-idolaters-will-not-be-welcome-in-the-kingdom-of-god/
Serendipity I think? I just ordered some books by Dr. Peter. They are already underway.
I am reading your Baking Soda book - very interesting. In Belgium we call it Stomach Salt! I never took it but I do use it in the household. Interesting fact you mention, to use it together with Epsom (magnesium) salts. Since I can not use it on its own, I am going to try that Sunday when I do not have to go out. Magnesium causes me to have to stay close to a bathroom LOL.
Purchased. Thanks for your work. I’ve been doing QT imaging. Not sure how I would proceed if it were to find something. Maybe cryotherapy.
https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/what-you-eat-what-you-watch-how-you?r=5u4zc&utm_medium=ios
As someone who has been into health and nutrition studies sixty five years...and reversed every problem by simply eliminating the cause...the medical Industry and our government would not like my findings...it would put the Medical Industry out of business.
Exactly. They are all in for the money, and they have known from the start.