Saw this yesterday - I think Morrison should be questioned and held to account: 16 OCTOBER 2020 - Vaccination is not compulsory in Australia and it will not be compulsory to have a COVID 19 vaccine.
Letter from Scott Morrison, then Prime Minister of Australia
Elizabeth Hart Sep 16 2026
In my two previous articles I shared submissions I sent to then Prime Minister Scott Morrison in March 2020 and August 2020, asking if COVID-19 vaccination would be compulsory, and challenging the statistics being used to justify the COVID-19 response.
In October 2020, I received a letter under the signature of Scott Morrison, a letter which is reproduced in full below.
Of particular interest now is Morrison’s unequivocal statement:
“Vaccination is not compulsory in Australia and it will not be compulsory to have a COVID 19 vaccine.”
Note also from the final paragraph of Morrison’s letter:
“…we want to achieve the highest rate of vaccination possible. The Government will explore all avenues to achieve this goal, guided by the advice of medical and scientific experts.” (Emphasis added.)
In light of the vaccination mandates that spread across Australia following Morrison’s letter to me, there is much to be reviewed now.
For instance, consider the desire in October 2020 to “achieve the highest rate of vaccination possible”, and Morrison’s statement that the Government would “explore all avenues to achieve this goal, guided by the advice of medical and scientific experts”.
The ‘medical experts’ subsequently played a direct role in recommending vaccination mandates.
For example, on 29 June 2021, the AHPPC – chaired by Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and including the state and territory Chief Health Officers – recommended to National Cabinet that the residential aged care workforce be vaccinated against COVID-19 “as a condition of working in a residential aged care facility”. (See AHPPC statement attached.)
But how could the AHPPC, a committee including registered practitioners, recommend a vaccine mandate when practitioners administering vaccines had a personal obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for the medical intervention, e.g. as laid out in The Australian Immunisation Handbook under Valid consent?
How could practitioners obtain valid voluntary informed consent from people who were under threat of penalty, i.e. loss of livelihood, if they refused to comply?
Something to look forwards to if you volunteered to have a Covid vaccine, but look at the last 18 pages: Pfizer 158,000 vaccines Side Effects - what of Moderna - which a European Court ruled the BionTech for Pfizer stole from Moderna - so both Pfizer & Moderna have vaccines side effects which are injected on volunteering and which will lead to turbo cancers later on in life, I presuppose
Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release - which turbo cancer for you - last 18 pages?
The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years
Anybody who tells you these “vaccines” are safe is somewhere between hypnotized, dishonest, and malicious.
As these Pfizer documents lay bare, our bodies are nothing but their field of sadistic experimentation, their wealth gain, their total self-appointed right to destroy life, while raking in billions, maybe trillions, and even guilt-tripping their endless victims for not promoting “vaccines” once they have been crippled. Even the dead are expected to promote vaccines from the grave, via their surviving loved ones.
Yet you are an “anti-vaxxer.”
And this is a fate worse, they make clear, than death.
But no need to believe “anti-vaxxers” anymore—here’s the data from Pfizer, of everything these predators have “observed” in their victims, whose lives they are ostensibly so insistent upon “saving” and who were healthy before the shots, but spellbound by fear, and sacrificed by an unspeakably cold-blooded media
Celia Farber Dec 06, 2021
"If" the above PDF location is blocked, you can find it on Simply Confess which is free, posted a few days ago with some other "interesting" stuff, just scan back a bit - replace stars with https and .com
May 17 2024 (Reuters) - Moderna (MRNA.O) said on Friday the European Patent Office had upheld the validity of one of the company's key patents, presumably #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG , a win in an ongoing COVID-19 vaccine dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech (22UAy.DE) proving that Moderna owned the copyright for Covid-19 Neucloids from 2013.
Moderna could not have made their Covid vaccine without the Covid virus to work from which they had the patent for from 2013 or before.
BioNTech said the patent office's decision to maintain Moderna's European patent "does not change our unwavering and unequivocal stance that this patent is invalid."
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA - ModRNA DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA (mRNA) is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human".
Obvious Questions:
1) These vaccines are not mRNA and they never were, by US Supreme Court Law 2013 they are ModRNA DNA because they are patented.
2) To make the vaccines, Moderna first had to have the Covid-19 Neucloids virus to create them from, which Moderna did from before 2013.
3) Does a Gene Therapy modified, but previously Human, but now Trans Human, have any Legal Rights, as there does not seem to be any Laws in place relating to them.
4) If mRNA is the key to Heaven and universal to all "natural life forms" on this planet, what door does ModRNA DNA open at death?
5) What Legal Standing Does a genetically modified Trans Human (as above) owned by a biotechnology company or others, have, in a Human Court Of Law .
If the above link is blocked go to Simply Confess which is free, go back a few days and get the link from there (and some other stuff) replace the stars with https and .com
We're fortunate to have Unbekoming! This reminds me of Nevil Shute's novel, "On the Beach," the drama of the last livable place on Earth. In our case, it's a place to tell uncomfortable truths.
We are not surprised by this ….exposure of a system that is not just slack….it is wilfully blind…. and failing so badly that NOTHING ever changes. 🙈
There is Zero accountability.
Taxpayers are paying for a great deal of NOTHING.
It’s very disheartening & very wrong.
"paying for a great deal of NOTHING", and suffering, too!
Sounds like the old sayings,
Going through the motions.
That’s the way we have always done it.
Going along to get along.
Don’t rock the boat.
That’s not my job.
I’m sure one can think of some more that are related, if I’m on track in my thinking ???
Saw this yesterday - I think Morrison should be questioned and held to account: 16 OCTOBER 2020 - Vaccination is not compulsory in Australia and it will not be compulsory to have a COVID 19 vaccine.
Letter from Scott Morrison, then Prime Minister of Australia
Elizabeth Hart Sep 16 2026
In my two previous articles I shared submissions I sent to then Prime Minister Scott Morrison in March 2020 and August 2020, asking if COVID-19 vaccination would be compulsory, and challenging the statistics being used to justify the COVID-19 response.
In October 2020, I received a letter under the signature of Scott Morrison, a letter which is reproduced in full below.
Of particular interest now is Morrison’s unequivocal statement:
“Vaccination is not compulsory in Australia and it will not be compulsory to have a COVID 19 vaccine.”
Note also from the final paragraph of Morrison’s letter:
“…we want to achieve the highest rate of vaccination possible. The Government will explore all avenues to achieve this goal, guided by the advice of medical and scientific experts.” (Emphasis added.)
In light of the vaccination mandates that spread across Australia following Morrison’s letter to me, there is much to be reviewed now.
For instance, consider the desire in October 2020 to “achieve the highest rate of vaccination possible”, and Morrison’s statement that the Government would “explore all avenues to achieve this goal, guided by the advice of medical and scientific experts”.
The ‘medical experts’ subsequently played a direct role in recommending vaccination mandates.
For example, on 29 June 2021, the AHPPC – chaired by Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and including the state and territory Chief Health Officers – recommended to National Cabinet that the residential aged care workforce be vaccinated against COVID-19 “as a condition of working in a residential aged care facility”. (See AHPPC statement attached.)
But how could the AHPPC, a committee including registered practitioners, recommend a vaccine mandate when practitioners administering vaccines had a personal obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for the medical intervention, e.g. as laid out in The Australian Immunisation Handbook under Valid consent?
How could practitioners obtain valid voluntary informed consent from people who were under threat of penalty, i.e. loss of livelihood, if they refused to comply?
https://substack.com/redirect/4bc2600b-2210-4995-b285-aa018b07821a?j=eyJ1IjoiNHJpanFkIn0.XkByYkhdfak5ZGBNvrvd_V3z8cWMZXPD5Nz7AjmvHCM
Something to look forwards to if you volunteered to have a Covid vaccine, but look at the last 18 pages: Pfizer 158,000 vaccines Side Effects - what of Moderna - which a European Court ruled the BionTech for Pfizer stole from Moderna - so both Pfizer & Moderna have vaccines side effects which are injected on volunteering and which will lead to turbo cancers later on in life, I presuppose
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release - which turbo cancer for you - last 18 pages?
The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years
Anybody who tells you these “vaccines” are safe is somewhere between hypnotized, dishonest, and malicious.
As these Pfizer documents lay bare, our bodies are nothing but their field of sadistic experimentation, their wealth gain, their total self-appointed right to destroy life, while raking in billions, maybe trillions, and even guilt-tripping their endless victims for not promoting “vaccines” once they have been crippled. Even the dead are expected to promote vaccines from the grave, via their surviving loved ones.
Yet you are an “anti-vaxxer.”
And this is a fate worse, they make clear, than death.
But no need to believe “anti-vaxxers” anymore—here’s the data from Pfizer, of everything these predators have “observed” in their victims, whose lives they are ostensibly so insistent upon “saving” and who were healthy before the shots, but spellbound by fear, and sacrificed by an unspeakably cold-blooded media
Celia Farber Dec 06, 2021
"If" the above PDF location is blocked, you can find it on Simply Confess which is free, posted a few days ago with some other "interesting" stuff, just scan back a bit - replace stars with https and .com
May 17 2024 (Reuters) - Moderna (MRNA.O) said on Friday the European Patent Office had upheld the validity of one of the company's key patents, presumably #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG , a win in an ongoing COVID-19 vaccine dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech (22UAy.DE) proving that Moderna owned the copyright for Covid-19 Neucloids from 2013.
Moderna could not have made their Covid vaccine without the Covid virus to work from which they had the patent for from 2013 or before.
BioNTech said the patent office's decision to maintain Moderna's European patent "does not change our unwavering and unequivocal stance that this patent is invalid."
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-wins-case-patent-dispute-with-pfizer-biontech-over-covid-shot-ft-reports-2024-05-17/
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA - ModRNA DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA (mRNA) is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human".
Obvious Questions:
1) These vaccines are not mRNA and they never were, by US Supreme Court Law 2013 they are ModRNA DNA because they are patented.
2) To make the vaccines, Moderna first had to have the Covid-19 Neucloids virus to create them from, which Moderna did from before 2013.
3) Does a Gene Therapy modified, but previously Human, but now Trans Human, have any Legal Rights, as there does not seem to be any Laws in place relating to them.
4) If mRNA is the key to Heaven and universal to all "natural life forms" on this planet, what door does ModRNA DNA open at death?
5) What Legal Standing Does a genetically modified Trans Human (as above) owned by a biotechnology company or others, have, in a Human Court Of Law .
If the above link is blocked go to Simply Confess which is free, go back a few days and get the link from there (and some other stuff) replace the stars with https and .com
We're fortunate to have Unbekoming! This reminds me of Nevil Shute's novel, "On the Beach," the drama of the last livable place on Earth. In our case, it's a place to tell uncomfortable truths.