I think the entire vitamin-mineral gambit is completely turned inside out. When you see how most vitamins are constructed into pills, you get a much different sensation than what may be found in real food. And no I do not need iodine, magnesium or extra iron.
If anything, what the body requires is a trickle of a few items to keep its charge in balance. Artificially adding vits and mins into foods is a losers game. Foods, other than the highly processed variety, contain extremely complex molecules that provide with the body requires.
Medicine and science have no clue as to how the body really works as they are both part of a gigantic marketing scheme using drugs, vaccines and supplements to keep you off balance, out of sync, ill and diseased...all so they can hook you into their lifelong destruction machine...which you pay for through the teeth.
Nothing in this discussion addresses research that would prove that the higher the blood value of the active form of Vitamin D, that the risk of disease states diminish. Is sunlight more complex and more effective in stimulating good health. My view, yes! There are studies that have determined that specific wave lengths of red light spectrum stimulate the pituitary gland for good health.
If you live in Alaska, you only have one choice. Take Vitamin D from it's synthetic form to boost blood value. There is a correlation between depression and suicide rates that indicate Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor. Majority of Americans are D deficient due to life style issues.
PS: Recall reading about a women who was diagnosed with MS and spend her working career indoors under fluorescent lights. Decided to follow her dream, went to Colorado to a horse ranch high in the mountains, and broke horses. Lot's of sunshine and good exercise and good food. MS disappeared!
I like to preserve the anonymity & proclivity of my "vital amines" with K.I.S.S. — Eat nose-to-tail (offal) grass-fed or wild animal products ; & avoid sugar, pills & synthetic "seed oils". Sunlight or cod liver oil (UV lamp & sauna in winter).
Reading in detail how this research is performed, one can only conclude that man has gone completely mad. Attempting to understand the world through decomposition and materialism is clearly insanity, and yields little or nothing of value, at least in the organic realm. What drives this madness? Defective insects scrabbling across the plane, worshiping their electrical fire, all of their programing focused on maintenance of their control schema. What are we?
I am 67 years old. I live in Vermont, 6-ft, 193-lbs, 7% body fat, 125/80 bp, 60 bpm HR. I work out almost daily (~30 minutes max), I eat real food, no consistent junk food, I take no pharmaceuticals, and I have been taking the StarPower Vitamin D formulation every day for twenty-three years, beginning at age 44.
I recently had a comprehensive blood draw through Labcorp that included a complete blood count with differential, a comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1c, testosterone, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and a full urinalysis. The same blood draw also measured my serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. I then analyzed these results against established biomarkers of biological aging.
The estimate that came back stopped me in my tracks.
Based on the available markers — weighted against the peer-reviewed literature on blood-based aging biomarkers — my estimated biological age is approximately 51 years, against a chronological age of 67. That is a gap of roughly 16 years.
From the Book the Sunlight Solution. Dr William F Supple
Fascinating, your work is absolutely amazing. Question: I read that there are many studies linking higher vitamin d blood levels to better health and avoidance of disease. Please explain. Thank you.
I am 67 years old. I live in Vermont, 6-ft, 193-lbs, 7% body fat, 125/80 bp, 60 bpm HR. I work out almost daily (~30 minutes max), I eat real food, no consistent junk food, I take no pharmaceuticals, and I have been taking the StarPower Vitamin D formulation every day for twenty-three years, beginning at age 44.
I recently had a comprehensive blood draw through Labcorp that included a complete blood count with differential, a comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1c, testosterone, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and a full urinalysis. The same blood draw also measured my serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. I then analyzed these results against established biomarkers of biological aging.
The estimate that came back stopped me in my tracks.
Based on the available markers — weighted against the peer-reviewed literature on blood-based aging biomarkers — my estimated biological age is approximately 51 years, against a chronological age of 67. That is a gap of roughly 16 years.
.....a LOT of people understandably DON'T want to HEAR it, but - VERY soon (within NEXT decade) will be exceedingly DANGEROUS to be exposed to sunlight for even MINOR durations (say, an HOUR) as the Earth's electromagnetic field weakens to SUCH an extent that there is LITTLE protection against ultraviolet-spectrum damage, PROFOUND biological compromises by HIGH-density PROTON (threat of irreversible ACIDOSIS) electron streams, COMBINATIONS of same as well as OTHER space-originating radiation / charged particles, plasma discharges and LOSS of ability to synthesize INFRARED for maintenance of material COHERENCE (organic, artificial ALIKE - meaning, the END of AIR travel may be NEAR).....it's a CRUCIAL conversation I'm PREPARING (best as possible) to START.....
I think the entire vitamin-mineral gambit is completely turned inside out. When you see how most vitamins are constructed into pills, you get a much different sensation than what may be found in real food. And no I do not need iodine, magnesium or extra iron.
If anything, what the body requires is a trickle of a few items to keep its charge in balance. Artificially adding vits and mins into foods is a losers game. Foods, other than the highly processed variety, contain extremely complex molecules that provide with the body requires.
Medicine and science have no clue as to how the body really works as they are both part of a gigantic marketing scheme using drugs, vaccines and supplements to keep you off balance, out of sync, ill and diseased...all so they can hook you into their lifelong destruction machine...which you pay for through the teeth.
Is that why they suggest taking K2 ? Saying that it directs calcium to bone rather than arteries, etc (supposedly…)
Just so hard to know what to believe anymore :-(
Thank you for walking us all the way back to the source. We’re told to know where our food comes from — we should apply the same maxim to beliefs.
Nothing in this discussion addresses research that would prove that the higher the blood value of the active form of Vitamin D, that the risk of disease states diminish. Is sunlight more complex and more effective in stimulating good health. My view, yes! There are studies that have determined that specific wave lengths of red light spectrum stimulate the pituitary gland for good health.
If you live in Alaska, you only have one choice. Take Vitamin D from it's synthetic form to boost blood value. There is a correlation between depression and suicide rates that indicate Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor. Majority of Americans are D deficient due to life style issues.
PS: Recall reading about a women who was diagnosed with MS and spend her working career indoors under fluorescent lights. Decided to follow her dream, went to Colorado to a horse ranch high in the mountains, and broke horses. Lot's of sunshine and good exercise and good food. MS disappeared!
So true!
💥💥💥👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Excellent history lesson. Reflects my own experience with too much vitamin D.
https://danmaiullo.substack.com/p/the-more-vitamin-d-the-better
Hmmmm. The link to the dinosaur article does not work. Was it quietly taken down? Dr Yoho at least admitted to being fooled by Agent 13111.
I like to preserve the anonymity & proclivity of my "vital amines" with K.I.S.S. — Eat nose-to-tail (offal) grass-fed or wild animal products ; & avoid sugar, pills & synthetic "seed oils". Sunlight or cod liver oil (UV lamp & sauna in winter).
Reading in detail how this research is performed, one can only conclude that man has gone completely mad. Attempting to understand the world through decomposition and materialism is clearly insanity, and yields little or nothing of value, at least in the organic realm. What drives this madness? Defective insects scrabbling across the plane, worshiping their electrical fire, all of their programing focused on maintenance of their control schema. What are we?
I am 67 years old. I live in Vermont, 6-ft, 193-lbs, 7% body fat, 125/80 bp, 60 bpm HR. I work out almost daily (~30 minutes max), I eat real food, no consistent junk food, I take no pharmaceuticals, and I have been taking the StarPower Vitamin D formulation every day for twenty-three years, beginning at age 44.
I recently had a comprehensive blood draw through Labcorp that included a complete blood count with differential, a comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1c, testosterone, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and a full urinalysis. The same blood draw also measured my serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. I then analyzed these results against established biomarkers of biological aging.
The estimate that came back stopped me in my tracks.
Based on the available markers — weighted against the peer-reviewed literature on blood-based aging biomarkers — my estimated biological age is approximately 51 years, against a chronological age of 67. That is a gap of roughly 16 years.
From the Book the Sunlight Solution. Dr William F Supple
https://starpower.substack.com/p/23-years-of-high-dose-vitamin-d-what?r=1wv58r&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true
Fascinating, your work is absolutely amazing. Question: I read that there are many studies linking higher vitamin d blood levels to better health and avoidance of disease. Please explain. Thank you.
Dr William f Supple has a great book too.
The sunlight solution.
exerpt from book.
I am 67 years old. I live in Vermont, 6-ft, 193-lbs, 7% body fat, 125/80 bp, 60 bpm HR. I work out almost daily (~30 minutes max), I eat real food, no consistent junk food, I take no pharmaceuticals, and I have been taking the StarPower Vitamin D formulation every day for twenty-three years, beginning at age 44.
I recently had a comprehensive blood draw through Labcorp that included a complete blood count with differential, a comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1c, testosterone, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and a full urinalysis. The same blood draw also measured my serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. I then analyzed these results against established biomarkers of biological aging.
The estimate that came back stopped me in my tracks.
Based on the available markers — weighted against the peer-reviewed literature on blood-based aging biomarkers — my estimated biological age is approximately 51 years, against a chronological age of 67. That is a gap of roughly 16 years.
Fascinating article, thank you. What wasn't clear to me was whether taking vit D helps with bone density?
.....a LOT of people understandably DON'T want to HEAR it, but - VERY soon (within NEXT decade) will be exceedingly DANGEROUS to be exposed to sunlight for even MINOR durations (say, an HOUR) as the Earth's electromagnetic field weakens to SUCH an extent that there is LITTLE protection against ultraviolet-spectrum damage, PROFOUND biological compromises by HIGH-density PROTON (threat of irreversible ACIDOSIS) electron streams, COMBINATIONS of same as well as OTHER space-originating radiation / charged particles, plasma discharges and LOSS of ability to synthesize INFRARED for maintenance of material COHERENCE (organic, artificial ALIKE - meaning, the END of AIR travel may be NEAR).....it's a CRUCIAL conversation I'm PREPARING (best as possible) to START.....
Who pays you to type this B.S. if you’re going to make claims like this you have to offer some proof.