20 Comments
User's avatar
David S's avatar

Great synopsis. Thank you. I assume you’ve seen Del Bigtree’s documentary and read Aaron Siri’s book “Vaccines Amen”. I continue to be astounded by the resistance of more than half the population to face the truth about vaccines. Disturbing to say the least.

Big E's avatar

The link to An Inconvenient Study is here: https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/. This page includes the trailer, movie, and the study.

Mary C's avatar

Which DB documentary? Vaxxed?

David S's avatar

An inconvenient study. Came out this year.

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

❤️🌞❤️Sincere thank you … i will be short and sweet…… hygiene.

Barbara Charis's avatar

Thanks for all the research Lies are Unbekoming has done. The world is in desperate need of the truth you are providing. Those who sit back and trust in medical "Experts" without doing any research themselves are doomed. Over 40 years ago, I bought The Missing Link in the Medical Curriculum: which is Food Chemistry in Relationship to Body Chemistry by Dr. Jay M. Hoffman. It produced a great deal of food for thought about what the human body needs in order to be healthy. I did nutritional consultations for 30 years...and people are all unique, even in the same family; their foods and food requirements differ. Medical doctors don't appear to understand what occurs, when they prescribe drugs or inject vaccines into the human bloodstream. The function of the human bloodstream is to carry nutrients from unprocessed food, not lab-created substances. Nutrients nourish the organs, glands and cells in the body creating health. The matter in drugs and vaccines do not belong in the human bloodstream. They damage the organs, glands and cells, which provide energy and good health. Vaccine matter entering directly into the bloodstream is carried to the brain. The substances in vaccines harm the Pitutiary and the Hypothalamus Glands which create: thinking, logic, memory, analyzation, speech, balance, coordination, motor skills, etc.. and the Pineal Gland, which is thought to be our seat of consciousness, guiding us as to what is right or wrong. In light of this awareness, I have come to the conclusion that the Medical industry's drugs and vaccines have done a great deal of harm and very little good for humanity.

rtko's avatar

I was having a chat with Claude the other day about how many placebo trials were done with inert substances. Claude came out with a list of trials and I asked for links to their documentation. A few interchanges later Claude admitted that none of the vaccines on the current schedule has ever had a safety test using an inert placebo. The placebos are always another vaccine or something with the adjuvants from the vaccine being tested.

Crixcyon's avatar

You trust the HHS, FDA and CDC at your own risk. All of these agencies are captured and controlled by the greedy ghouls of big pharma. If that book were to be published, it would be 100% lies and propaganda. The Pink book is written in the blood of humanity.

Michael D Ivey's avatar

Brilliant logical summary (as usual) of the intentionally skewed statistics used to justify the practice of vaccination!

There’s one odd aspect of the “Audio Deep Dive:” Knowing of your stance on the issue of “viruses” (“No Virus”) — which I share — the Audio Deep Dive refers to the “measles virus” and the “polio virus” as if they were real causal entities for those conditions without any qualification. You usually put some type of qualifier in your Author’s Note for such orthodox statements, so I was surprised to hear that without a qualifier. The essay itself doesn't do that, referring to viruses only as something the orthodoxy would say.

Manfred Johann Schmuckerschlag's avatar

Let me add.:

-

Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases - Table of Contents

https://www.cdc.gov/pinkbook/hcp/table-of-contents/index.html

„The Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, a.k.a. the "Pink Book" provides physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with the most comprehensive information on routinely used vaccines and the diseases they prevent.

Official book title: Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases

This is the "The Pink Book: Course Textbook - 14th Edition (2021)".

-

Appendix B: Vaccines

https://www.cdc.gov/pinkbook/hcp/table-of-contents/appendix-b-vaccines.html

„For Health Care Providers“

May 9, 2024

-

This I got a couple of weeks / a couple of days ago - and excerpt from the book - unfortunately it seems that the table has been removed from the current issue ( or I am not able to find it )

-

Categories of common vaccine ingredients decoded.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/categories-of-common-vaccine-ingredients

Sasha Latypova - Aug 21, 2026

... introducing a table of "Vaccine Ingredients" from the 13th Ed. (2018 - when I got it right )

-

And I found the table here too.

-

Vaccine Ingredients

https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/ingredients/

... with the link to the CDC cut - probably from the 13th Ed. too

-

This is poisioning life in general - for decades or even ages.

Now it comes to an end - and it is already decided.

Sarah's avatar

I find the use of Fear as a Coercive tactic is prevalent in Society.

Best outcome occurs when we are enabled to Think for Ourselves!!!! And Act accordingly, of course!

Sarah's avatar

More indepth analysis.

Thank you!!

mani malagón's avatar

¡¡ Well done !!

A protected monopoly, vaccines here in the US of A, will always carefully craft a "preventive & protective narrative" around their snake-oil. There are so many ways to shatter the vax illusion, or rather propaganda, of "scientific rigor." Here's one: 𝗧𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗼𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸, -𝘐𝘴 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘰 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦?

https://captainmanimalagonusnret.substack.com/p/to-prick-or-not-to-prick

𝗔𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁. The paper reviews randomized controlled trials using various placebo formulations and examines studies employing unvaccinated populations as controls. Findings reveal fundamental methodological flaws in current placebo design, with 𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚜. Studies using unvaccinated populations, while methodologically valuable, face substantial confounding variables that limit causal inference. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚢𝚜𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚊𝚏𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚏𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚌𝚢 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚖𝚜.

=> 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙤 𝘾𝙪𝙡𝙩 𝙎𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚

Hurricane60's avatar

Most of the decline curve discussion is about death from diseases. I read a comment in someone's substack post regarding Aaron Siri's book Vaccines, Amen. The commenter, in defense of the MMR vaccine, poses the question as to whether the 10s of thousands of measles of hospitalizations back in the time of introduction could ever justify the stoppage of the current MMR vaccine.

Similar to your unpacking of death decline curves, I should be able to go to some data source and see a decline in hospitalizations and other morbidity statistics. Furthermore, I should be able to go to a source that compares hospitalizations in the period after the MMR vaccine was introduced and find some kind of comparison between hospitalizations between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

I know that the previously mentioned Aaron Siri, was the attorney that sued the CDC for studies showing a comparison overall health between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The CDC ultimately conceded that they did not have such studies. This leads me to be believe that a study of hospitalizations of vaccinated and unvaccinated do not exist.

Do you have information about whether such a comparison for hospitalizations for the MMR vaccinated and unvaccinated exist? If answered in one your books, I am glad to buy so I can look it up and you don't need to reply just a reference to a page or chapter.

Useless Liberal's avatar

.

My favorite parts of Covid:

#384

Sewing patches

Onto the arms

Of the Vaccinated.

.

Ana Victoria Hinojosa García's avatar

El ébola para el que no hay vacuna: cómo el brote de Congo vuelve a poner a prueba al continente africano

La epidemia de Bundibugyo supera los 5.200 casos y suma 2.476 muertes: avanza más rápido que cualquier brote anterior

Recibirán 70.000 dosis de Ervebo, una vacuna contra otro virus del ébola cuya eficacia frente a Bundibugyo se desconoce

Ébola sin vacuna: el brote del Congo pone a prueba a África https://share.google/GXqqTkMX7SUddnY0K

Natasha Rasmussen's avatar

There’s a disturbing misrepresentation in the opening of your article of the quotation:

“During the 1920s, 100,000 to 200,000 cases of diphtheria (140 to 150 cases per 100,000 population) and 13,000 to 15,000 deaths were reported each year. After diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccines became available in the 1940s, the number of cases gradually declined to about 19,000 in 1945 (15 cases per 100,000 population). A more rapid decrease began with implementation of a universal childhood vaccination program which included diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccines beginning in the late 1940s.”

Your comment: “Read the middle sentence twice. Cases dropped from between 100,000 and 200,000 down to 19,000 before the universal childhood vaccination program began.”

I read the middle sentence multiple times…it clearly says AFTER diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccines became available in the 1940s.”

What am I missing/misunderstanding?