We are one of the families that "lit the fire" well before the Poling case. We sued Phrma vaccine makers in 2002 after years of research and consultation with other families that had been dismissed in State Courts. Our attorneys alleged that it was Thimerosal ( Hg) as preservative and therefore not part of the "vaccine" and not subject to NCVIA 1986, which triggered the poisoning of our son ( underlying conditions not known) and subsequent diagnoses (several) which began with PDD-NOS and then into "autism". They sued in U.S. District Court, which had not been done before. They got the case in front of Judge Weinstein, the mass tort presiding Judge who handled Agent Orange and Tobacco in NY State. The facts were incontrovertible and the case was "stayed". First time ever.
Congress attached the 'Eli Lilly" rider to the upcoming Homeland Security Act weeks later making it "official" that Thimerosal was protected as well. The fix was in. The Judge accepted the motion to dismiss by the defendants and we were on the way to USCFC under the VICP. We were utlimately dismissed by the technicality of the 36 month statute of limitations. NO tolling there. Even for minors. Niether if one is rendered incompetent. Contrary to all civil law in any State or U.S. Distrcit Court jurisdiction of tort claims. The Special Masters in USCFC are puppets of the "kangaroo" administrative rules set by the Congress. We and many more were denied due process and the SCOTUS refused to hear the appeals ( see Cloer v. HHS). Our case was behind theirs as the line of petitioners went.
Our son is 34 now. He requires 24/7/365 care and we do whatever it takes. It is our entire lives. We'd guess, just based on the Poling standard that we are owed at least $25 million. The pain and suffering is incalcuable.
He recieved mulitple vaccines from multi-dose vials one day at around 18 months, had 104 fever and life as we knew it was over. For four people. Not one.
In 1994 at time of the incocualtions, the only reference I had ever heard to "austim" was 'Rain Man." Since then, the wordsmiths of the defintions have massaged and manipulated the condition over and over to avoid exactly what the Polin case proved. It is purposeful bullshit. The only thing that ever mattered was the money. Some were and still are being sacfriced today.
The 'village" is not safe. We only pretend to be "civiilzed." Those who have profited from all of this would string me up in a minute if I sought retribution by those laws of the jungle. We pretend to be "free."
In addtion to caring for my family, all that I can represent is the truth of the matter. I have done my best to support the work that RFK has done, while full well understanind the level of money and influence we are trying to overcome. Thank you.
I cannot even imagine the difficult journey you and your family have been on since the day your son was poisoned. Between the gaslighting, lack of support, and legal battles to the day-to-day struggles of being a caregiver, I do not know what justice would look like to make things acceptable. Thank you for sharing, and thank you for fighting for truth.
Wow, thank you for sharing that. I cannot imagine what you and your family have had to endure. I've been well aware of the vaccine/autism connection since seeing 'Vaxxed', probably in 2018, knew the covid op was a scam from the outset, and now that we've gone through that it couldn't be clearer that the entire notion of our present society being "civilized" is absurd. The power/control psychos orchestrating what we experience today have shown their hand to many of us now that their pathology is centered around continual ritualistic sacrifice.
We need hundreds of doctors who know the truth to come forward. Until that happens, things look hopeless. The government is in the grip of huge Pharma conglomerates. Perhaps they will take their cowardice to their graves. (I understand your reference to the law of the jungle but prefer not to comment on that further.)
First, it would take hundered of thousands of physicians to become "refuseniks." Along those lines and with respect to "law of the jungle", the entire systemic rot is of such an insitutional scale, that it would be analagous to a declaration of war by one country upon another. I can't "kill" an ideology. Only try to change it while pursuing justice in a way that our Founders prescribed.
FRAUD AND DECEPTION FOR PROFIT. THIS IS THE CONTEXT OF VACCINE-RELATED CORRUPTION. When massive financial interests lie behind medical research, the question should not merely be, "What does the consensus say?" but rather, "How was that consensus reached, and who funded the studies that support it?"
For years, Children’s Health Defense has published articles, analyses, and reviews questioning the conclusions of fraudulent, misleading studies that claim vaccines have no link to autism—pointing out that these studies often contain significant limitations and potential conflicts of interest.
Is it biologically inconsequential to administer so many vaccines—with their various antigens, adjuvants, and other components—to an organism whose immune system and brain are still developing? This is precisely the kind of question that should be investigated with complete independence, examining not only each vaccine individually but also the effects of cumulative exposure and various combinations.
Children become ill due to reactions triggered by vaccines. Despite adjustments, there are 11 recommended vaccines, plus another 6 administered based on medical criteria—all of which can lead to illness and death. Furthermore, there is another critical issue: the immense vaccination burden placed on some children during the very first months of life.
A landmark peer-reviewed study reveals that vaccination is a significant risk factor for autism. Most importantly, by systematically evaluating all known risk factors for autism, the study finds that routine childhood vaccination—both in terms of combined doses and early administration—represents a significant, modifiable risk factor for autism within a broader, multifactorial framework. We observe that 79% of the studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 out of 136) presented evidence consistent with a link between vaccines and autism. This evidence converged across the epidemiological, clinical, mechanistic, toxicological, and neuropathological domains.
McCullough explains to Schmitt—a first-time father who declined all vaccines for his baby—a report recently published by the McCullough Foundation in the *Journal of Independent Medicine* regarding risk factors for autism. Key findings:
----Healthy, full-term infants with no family history of autism and no maternal exposure have no predisposing risk factors and remain healthier if they do not receive any vaccines during childhood.
And the sad reality is that a lot of people, including plenty of parents, will not even entertain the notion of fraud and manipulated studies, and so will not consider lesser known studies that conflict with the institutional narrative because vaccination is the central ritual of the modern religion labeled "Science" today.
Yes, I believe one of the biggest problems is that we have stopped questioning what is presented to us as truth. Science should always be open to debate and to new evidence. Having doubts means exercising our right to think and to seek answers for ourselves. Considering various points of view is a powerful aid in developing critical thinking.
Actually I think the opposite is happening, people are beginning to finally question. It has been a long and bumpy road and we are certainly not there yet, but perhaps the car is speeding up
Yes, it is a positive development that more and more people are taking an interest in learning about the dangers of vaccines—by listening to those who have experienced adverse effects and demanding transparency from pharmaceutical companies, which have concealed many risks for the sake of financial gain. Questioning, verifying information, and demanding answers should always be part of critical thinking. Indeed, people are beginning to move in that direction.👍🙏🏼😊
A survey by KFF and The Washington Post conducted among 2,716 American parents.
Three key findings:
—35% believe that childhood vaccines do not undergo sufficient safety testing before being recommended.
—26% believe that too many childhood vaccines are recommended.
—16% report having delayed or skipped one or more vaccines for their children.
Big pharma and the medical mafia could murder 20 million people and every drug and vaccine would still be said to be totally safe and effective...no questions asked or allowed. This is where we are at. A stage of total corruption by the medical mafia and government.
I think the emotional trauma this causes all of us who understand the dangers of vaccination, who must witness these regressions in babies and adults, these families being devastated, that trauma is also intended. Who would we be if we did not get poisoned from day 1?
"The concealment is not that the thing is not described. The concealment is that it is described in a vocabulary that makes it unavailable for recognition under the name that would allow its implications to be seen."
Profound and far-reaching as to the corner into which we have been driven. It begins to explain why truth (as Jesus said) is best served by an unadorned, accurate, "yes" or "no." Everything more is suspect, either accusation or exculpation.
Dear Unbekoming: thank you (as always!) for seeking knowledge in freedom. Are you familiar with the work of the late Tinus Smits (a Dutch M.D.)? His “Autism Beyond Despair” is a compilation of case histories of his treating autism and getting remarkable results.
I think Hannah's story deserves to be heard and examined with care. But I also believe there's an important difference between acknowledging a particular injury and drawing conclusions about an entire medical practice. Girard's ideas offer an interesting way of looking at institutions and power, but an interpretation still needs evidence. We owe that to the people whose lives are at the center of these discussions.
It is an important distinction. Especially if she were the only example of that particular injury, though, what's everyone so afraid of? With so many vaccine injuries alleged and documented, what's so special about hers that it required a court order and hush money? I don't need to know the specifics of her injury or even understand the science to draw an unflattering conclusion about the morals of the people who don't want me to learn it: In that context the only people who can benefit from silence and ignorance are con men.
That eagerness to ignore and evade Hannah Poling doesn't exist in isolation, either. People who spent years studying science to get their degrees should be better at facing reality and asking hard questions about the conventional wisdom of their trade. They make it very easy to draw very negative conclusions about the practice of medicine, and their religious fervor for vaccines is just part of it. They're almost narcissistic in their inability to hear criticism. Whether you tell them that their mistakes are the third-leading cause of death to the tune of 50,000 or 500,000 deaths annually or anything in between, they refuse to hear it or to do anything material about it. The deaths keep happening, unabated. There's no concerted, serious, industry-wide effort to reduce them the way there has been in, say, the airline industry. The mere fact that people who are supposed to be practicing the art and science of medicine fight tooth and nail to avoid changing, regardless of the topic, makes it almost impossible to grant that their motives are benevolent and that their ethics are rational.
I suspect that the reason for the hushing of this case to make it disappear is because the government (those manufacturing vaccines which would connect with the military) would have fully understood the mechanisms involved with the harm done to children due to an acute reaction leading to autism. There is also a metabolic dysfunction of mitochondria connected with some cancers and yet there remains a refusal to further fund such studies that have shown reduction in tumors and health improvements that address this dysfunction because the only institutional treatment allowed is radiation/chemo and surgery. Successful and far less invasive and safer treatments are not allowed in the allopathic, profit-based system. Look up Thomas Seyfried if you are not aware of this and interested.
If you look deeply into the history of vaccination and dig into all of the lies and lack of any convincing evidence to support the institutional claims, beginning with smallpox, I think it's quite straight forward to be able to draw a conclusion about the practice of vaccination.
This is an excellent piece, thank you. One question I have is why couldn't the Poling family continue the lawsuit and not accept the settlement? If that had happened it would have been publicly exposed and they still would probably have received the funding for Hannah since their's was such a strong case. I am not a legal person but this seems like it would have been the right thing to do for other families down the line.
We are one of the families that "lit the fire" well before the Poling case. We sued Phrma vaccine makers in 2002 after years of research and consultation with other families that had been dismissed in State Courts. Our attorneys alleged that it was Thimerosal ( Hg) as preservative and therefore not part of the "vaccine" and not subject to NCVIA 1986, which triggered the poisoning of our son ( underlying conditions not known) and subsequent diagnoses (several) which began with PDD-NOS and then into "autism". They sued in U.S. District Court, which had not been done before. They got the case in front of Judge Weinstein, the mass tort presiding Judge who handled Agent Orange and Tobacco in NY State. The facts were incontrovertible and the case was "stayed". First time ever.
Congress attached the 'Eli Lilly" rider to the upcoming Homeland Security Act weeks later making it "official" that Thimerosal was protected as well. The fix was in. The Judge accepted the motion to dismiss by the defendants and we were on the way to USCFC under the VICP. We were utlimately dismissed by the technicality of the 36 month statute of limitations. NO tolling there. Even for minors. Niether if one is rendered incompetent. Contrary to all civil law in any State or U.S. Distrcit Court jurisdiction of tort claims. The Special Masters in USCFC are puppets of the "kangaroo" administrative rules set by the Congress. We and many more were denied due process and the SCOTUS refused to hear the appeals ( see Cloer v. HHS). Our case was behind theirs as the line of petitioners went.
Our son is 34 now. He requires 24/7/365 care and we do whatever it takes. It is our entire lives. We'd guess, just based on the Poling standard that we are owed at least $25 million. The pain and suffering is incalcuable.
He recieved mulitple vaccines from multi-dose vials one day at around 18 months, had 104 fever and life as we knew it was over. For four people. Not one.
In 1994 at time of the incocualtions, the only reference I had ever heard to "austim" was 'Rain Man." Since then, the wordsmiths of the defintions have massaged and manipulated the condition over and over to avoid exactly what the Polin case proved. It is purposeful bullshit. The only thing that ever mattered was the money. Some were and still are being sacfriced today.
The 'village" is not safe. We only pretend to be "civiilzed." Those who have profited from all of this would string me up in a minute if I sought retribution by those laws of the jungle. We pretend to be "free."
There is no liberty without justice.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/3853
What has happened to your family, and to other families, is beyond a medical travesty...This is evil on a "civilizational" scale.
I'm so very sorry.
In addtion to caring for my family, all that I can represent is the truth of the matter. I have done my best to support the work that RFK has done, while full well understanind the level of money and influence we are trying to overcome. Thank you.
I cannot even imagine the difficult journey you and your family have been on since the day your son was poisoned. Between the gaslighting, lack of support, and legal battles to the day-to-day struggles of being a caregiver, I do not know what justice would look like to make things acceptable. Thank you for sharing, and thank you for fighting for truth.
Wow, thank you for sharing that. I cannot imagine what you and your family have had to endure. I've been well aware of the vaccine/autism connection since seeing 'Vaxxed', probably in 2018, knew the covid op was a scam from the outset, and now that we've gone through that it couldn't be clearer that the entire notion of our present society being "civilized" is absurd. The power/control psychos orchestrating what we experience today have shown their hand to many of us now that their pathology is centered around continual ritualistic sacrifice.
We need hundreds of doctors who know the truth to come forward. Until that happens, things look hopeless. The government is in the grip of huge Pharma conglomerates. Perhaps they will take their cowardice to their graves. (I understand your reference to the law of the jungle but prefer not to comment on that further.)
First, it would take hundered of thousands of physicians to become "refuseniks." Along those lines and with respect to "law of the jungle", the entire systemic rot is of such an insitutional scale, that it would be analagous to a declaration of war by one country upon another. I can't "kill" an ideology. Only try to change it while pursuing justice in a way that our Founders prescribed.
FRAUD AND DECEPTION FOR PROFIT. THIS IS THE CONTEXT OF VACCINE-RELATED CORRUPTION. When massive financial interests lie behind medical research, the question should not merely be, "What does the consensus say?" but rather, "How was that consensus reached, and who funded the studies that support it?"
For years, Children’s Health Defense has published articles, analyses, and reviews questioning the conclusions of fraudulent, misleading studies that claim vaccines have no link to autism—pointing out that these studies often contain significant limitations and potential conflicts of interest.
Is it biologically inconsequential to administer so many vaccines—with their various antigens, adjuvants, and other components—to an organism whose immune system and brain are still developing? This is precisely the kind of question that should be investigated with complete independence, examining not only each vaccine individually but also the effects of cumulative exposure and various combinations.
Children become ill due to reactions triggered by vaccines. Despite adjustments, there are 11 recommended vaccines, plus another 6 administered based on medical criteria—all of which can lead to illness and death. Furthermore, there is another critical issue: the immense vaccination burden placed on some children during the very first months of life.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/autism/
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/autism/vaccines-and-autism/?itm_term=autism-page
A landmark peer-reviewed study reveals that vaccination is a significant risk factor for autism. Most importantly, by systematically evaluating all known risk factors for autism, the study finds that routine childhood vaccination—both in terms of combined doses and early administration—represents a significant, modifiable risk factor for autism within a broader, multifactorial framework. We observe that 79% of the studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 out of 136) presented evidence consistent with a link between vaccines and autism. This evidence converged across the epidemiological, clinical, mechanistic, toxicological, and neuropathological domains.
McCullough explains to Schmitt—a first-time father who declined all vaccines for his baby—a report recently published by the McCullough Foundation in the *Journal of Independent Medicine* regarding risk factors for autism. Key findings:
----Healthy, full-term infants with no family history of autism and no maternal exposure have no predisposing risk factors and remain healthier if they do not receive any vaccines during childhood.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/peer-reviewed-study-finds-vaccination-major-risk-factor-autism/5926313 (June 2026)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/dr-mccullough-maha-went-wrong/5930839 By Dr. Peter McCullough (June 2026)
And the sad reality is that a lot of people, including plenty of parents, will not even entertain the notion of fraud and manipulated studies, and so will not consider lesser known studies that conflict with the institutional narrative because vaccination is the central ritual of the modern religion labeled "Science" today.
Yes, I believe one of the biggest problems is that we have stopped questioning what is presented to us as truth. Science should always be open to debate and to new evidence. Having doubts means exercising our right to think and to seek answers for ourselves. Considering various points of view is a powerful aid in developing critical thinking.
Actually I think the opposite is happening, people are beginning to finally question. It has been a long and bumpy road and we are certainly not there yet, but perhaps the car is speeding up
Yes, it is a positive development that more and more people are taking an interest in learning about the dangers of vaccines—by listening to those who have experienced adverse effects and demanding transparency from pharmaceutical companies, which have concealed many risks for the sake of financial gain. Questioning, verifying information, and demanding answers should always be part of critical thinking. Indeed, people are beginning to move in that direction.👍🙏🏼😊
A survey by KFF and The Washington Post conducted among 2,716 American parents.
Three key findings:
—35% believe that childhood vaccines do not undergo sufficient safety testing before being recommended.
—26% believe that too many childhood vaccines are recommended.
—16% report having delayed or skipped one or more vaccines for their children.
https://www.kff.org/public-opinion/kff-the-washington-post-survey-of-parents/
Big pharma and the medical mafia could murder 20 million people and every drug and vaccine would still be said to be totally safe and effective...no questions asked or allowed. This is where we are at. A stage of total corruption by the medical mafia and government.
Yes, and the bribes, bullying and blackmail strategy has worked perfectly !!!
I think the emotional trauma this causes all of us who understand the dangers of vaccination, who must witness these regressions in babies and adults, these families being devastated, that trauma is also intended. Who would we be if we did not get poisoned from day 1?
"The concealment is not that the thing is not described. The concealment is that it is described in a vocabulary that makes it unavailable for recognition under the name that would allow its implications to be seen."
Profound and far-reaching as to the corner into which we have been driven. It begins to explain why truth (as Jesus said) is best served by an unadorned, accurate, "yes" or "no." Everything more is suspect, either accusation or exculpation.
Dear Unbekoming: thank you (as always!) for seeking knowledge in freedom. Are you familiar with the work of the late Tinus Smits (a Dutch M.D.)? His “Autism Beyond Despair” is a compilation of case histories of his treating autism and getting remarkable results.
"Underlying mitochondrial disease, which exacerbated her symptoms..."
Someone was negligent...and robbed an able-bodied child of her future...
When was the mitochondrial disease detected..?
"The Ancient Mechanism..." makes it unnecessarily conspiratorial...
I think Hannah's story deserves to be heard and examined with care. But I also believe there's an important difference between acknowledging a particular injury and drawing conclusions about an entire medical practice. Girard's ideas offer an interesting way of looking at institutions and power, but an interpretation still needs evidence. We owe that to the people whose lives are at the center of these discussions.
It is an important distinction. Especially if she were the only example of that particular injury, though, what's everyone so afraid of? With so many vaccine injuries alleged and documented, what's so special about hers that it required a court order and hush money? I don't need to know the specifics of her injury or even understand the science to draw an unflattering conclusion about the morals of the people who don't want me to learn it: In that context the only people who can benefit from silence and ignorance are con men.
That eagerness to ignore and evade Hannah Poling doesn't exist in isolation, either. People who spent years studying science to get their degrees should be better at facing reality and asking hard questions about the conventional wisdom of their trade. They make it very easy to draw very negative conclusions about the practice of medicine, and their religious fervor for vaccines is just part of it. They're almost narcissistic in their inability to hear criticism. Whether you tell them that their mistakes are the third-leading cause of death to the tune of 50,000 or 500,000 deaths annually or anything in between, they refuse to hear it or to do anything material about it. The deaths keep happening, unabated. There's no concerted, serious, industry-wide effort to reduce them the way there has been in, say, the airline industry. The mere fact that people who are supposed to be practicing the art and science of medicine fight tooth and nail to avoid changing, regardless of the topic, makes it almost impossible to grant that their motives are benevolent and that their ethics are rational.
"Almost impossible"?? I would remove "almost".
Yeah, at this point there's no "almost" about it. I shouldn't have hedged.
I suspect that the reason for the hushing of this case to make it disappear is because the government (those manufacturing vaccines which would connect with the military) would have fully understood the mechanisms involved with the harm done to children due to an acute reaction leading to autism. There is also a metabolic dysfunction of mitochondria connected with some cancers and yet there remains a refusal to further fund such studies that have shown reduction in tumors and health improvements that address this dysfunction because the only institutional treatment allowed is radiation/chemo and surgery. Successful and far less invasive and safer treatments are not allowed in the allopathic, profit-based system. Look up Thomas Seyfried if you are not aware of this and interested.
If you look deeply into the history of vaccination and dig into all of the lies and lack of any convincing evidence to support the institutional claims, beginning with smallpox, I think it's quite straight forward to be able to draw a conclusion about the practice of vaccination.
This is an excellent piece, thank you. One question I have is why couldn't the Poling family continue the lawsuit and not accept the settlement? If that had happened it would have been publicly exposed and they still would probably have received the funding for Hannah since their's was such a strong case. I am not a legal person but this seems like it would have been the right thing to do for other families down the line.
Even Dr Watson can see that vaccines cause autism in thousands of children.