I am familiar with this work. I think Perloff represents a common view among the well-informed. But all those I have encountered in texts dont seem to know about freemasonry to the necessary extent.
In the 19th century freemasonry was under Britains control. Britain also made zionism happen and Christian Zionism had its lobby in the US already in 1891, 31 years before AIPAC.. Modern zionism did not come about due to any initial jewish request. Presumably because the jews correctly anticipated that they would have to pay the bill for all expences. So even if jews had a potential motivation, that was not the reason why modern zionism together with the Israel project came to be pushed forward.
.
The unstated motive from Britains side was, in my view, that the British did not want a reformed world economy to encourage world trade in the interest of the many nations. The British wanted trade in such a way that they were the main beneficiary themselves. So Free Trade meant only to remove tariffs when it was to Britains advantage.
.
They had no restraint against using tariffs themselves even when they demanded from others to remove their tariffs and fomented wars to enforce it. The worlds most powerful Freemason Lord Palmerston was deeply involved all over the world. If he had just been a cabinet member like he was for many years, he would have been much less powerful.
.
Therefore the British needed a hold on the financiers who until then had been useful for Britain even though Britain simultaneously underminded their relations with Britains rivals.
This undermining didnt begin in 1858 but it appears that at that time 'The Protocols of the Elders of Sion' may have been supported by British Freemasonry at that time when the Rothschilds and Bismarck had made a deal. 40% of the translated document in 1906 originated from Maurice Joly and his handler was Adolphe Cremieux a french jew in the service of British Freemasonry. Cremieux was the leader of Scottish Rite in France and held a high position in Swizz Scottish Rite as well.
What Britain feared with 'international financiers' wasnt anything they did that was in Britain's favour. It was the way that would encourage Britains rivals and the development of non-British accumulation of wealth.
.
Freemasonry has over a million members in the anglosaxon culture so there are many who are prone to be biased about this and who tend to maintain the silence when it isnt favourable for their empire.
.
So instead of telling the truth about the overwhelming anglosaxon dominance over freemasonry during a decisive era in world history what usually transpires is how the jews controlled everything including freemasonry.
.
And it is of use for the anglosaxons to use quotes from jewish individuals such as Benjamin D'Israeli. He suggested the jews were very successfully joining Freemasonry. But he didnt know the full story, he was just being opportunistic and was rewarded accordingly with his career.
.
The catholics did expose the Freemasons but that isnt often brought up in the debate since the view of the anglosaxons permeates everything. The truth according to an Irish Catholic Priest, George F. Dillon, who wrote a text titled 'War of Anti-Christ with the Church and Christian Civilization' where he exposed Grand Orient Freemasonry etc. But importantly he mentioned that Lord Palmerston became the Grand Patriarch, the highest authority in Freemasonry in 1837 after his predecessor was assassinated by Palmerston's associate Mazzini.
.
Dillon doesnt mention that this was all held a secret by a small number of insiders who actually supported the secrecy around Palmerston by writing false letters to the dead predecessor, a roman nobleman. Those letters continued to be written as late as 1848. In 1846 one letter in italian sounds like it is a protest against not have been paid for the letter. There was a group of such masonic writers of letters all with code names. It seems this was about hiding from all except a small number of insiders that Britain was in complete control of freemasonry and was simultaneously keeping it secret.
.
It was after that year 1837 that Palmerston first became enthusiastic about immigration by jews to Palestine so 1838 is when modern zionism and the Israel project took shape. It also coincides with the rise of Queen Victoria. That means Lord Palmerston was the real power for the initial decades of the Victorian era until Lord Palmerston died in 1865.
.
This was just a brief view. It is my intention for everybody to realise that the very dominating role of anglosaxons in the debate also means there are many who may feel cautious against exposing such things. Also I need to explain that the term anglosaxon is meant to be understood in a cultural sense, thus not restricted to any etnicity.
.
It means that if your understanding of world events and history is dependent on anglosaxons or those who rely on them there is a risk that the info you rely on is skewed to favour a false narrative.
I dont know if you are being ironic but it was a long comment already.
.
Why turn it into an even longer historical overview?
But since you seem to want more, I could add that the anglosaxons also were behind all radicalisms. Like nazism zionism and radical islam. And virtually all wars and revolutions in the modern era. The two anglophile groupings like Cecil Rhodes gang and the earlier Skull and Bones eventually both aimed for World Government and both supported both fascism and communism.
.
And Britain had the Venetian Oligarchic system transplanted to England between 1530 to 1714 some say. There you may have a flavour of the Black Nobility.
In what ever way that matters to you.
.
The essential thing to me is that pattern where the oligarchic system always supports the occult with the intension of battling the emergence of sound nation states run in the interest of the people. The oligarchy fears an independently thinking educated population and they therefore support any irrational belief that diverts people from real learning.
.
It is amasing how much of that actually constitutes real history! While court Historians make it seem as if it's all a plethora of independent issues.
It was a honest and simple question, not an antagonistic, nor inviting acrimony.
Do you see some European events, such as Napoleon’s campaigns, the two world wars, etc, as fully orchestrated by the string-pullers or a sort of infighting amongst oligarchical rivals?
So Perlof figured out what Carroll Quigley had already written about twenty years prior in his seminal tome "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time'".
An excellent article here by Paragov about getting the land returned to the people. We need to try to get a movement going to take the land back off the wrongful rulers. The land belongs to the people!
I adore James Perloff. He's in my book on the Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi: Victim of His Times in the chapters that I devote to Bashar al-Assad on pages 287-296 where he is interviewed.
You can order your own copy if you log onto https://arlenejohnson.livejournal.com wehre there are comments by some of the people who have read my 2018 hardbound book followed by ordering information. My advice is to use xe.com. Write me at a@truedemocracy.net for my bank information, and to give me your physical address. Ships worlwide by yours truly. My book is top secret history.
We need to stop them in their tracks. There is a pathway. Believe me. Everything they do is based on deception and fraud. In order to succeed, they need most to believe in the deception, in order to be defrauded. But there exists ways to overcome the Fraud. This is where they will break down. Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet will help to do that job. To stop The Great Taking, to stop the wars and Land Grabs, to stop the Genocide, to get people Free Land, to overcome the robots taking their jobs and making them hungry, to stop them from being coerced into taking the vaccines to Genocide or transform them because the AI and robots have arrived... Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet can do it all!
I am familiar with this work. I think Perloff represents a common view among the well-informed. But all those I have encountered in texts dont seem to know about freemasonry to the necessary extent.
In the 19th century freemasonry was under Britains control. Britain also made zionism happen and Christian Zionism had its lobby in the US already in 1891, 31 years before AIPAC.. Modern zionism did not come about due to any initial jewish request. Presumably because the jews correctly anticipated that they would have to pay the bill for all expences. So even if jews had a potential motivation, that was not the reason why modern zionism together with the Israel project came to be pushed forward.
.
The unstated motive from Britains side was, in my view, that the British did not want a reformed world economy to encourage world trade in the interest of the many nations. The British wanted trade in such a way that they were the main beneficiary themselves. So Free Trade meant only to remove tariffs when it was to Britains advantage.
.
They had no restraint against using tariffs themselves even when they demanded from others to remove their tariffs and fomented wars to enforce it. The worlds most powerful Freemason Lord Palmerston was deeply involved all over the world. If he had just been a cabinet member like he was for many years, he would have been much less powerful.
.
Therefore the British needed a hold on the financiers who until then had been useful for Britain even though Britain simultaneously underminded their relations with Britains rivals.
This undermining didnt begin in 1858 but it appears that at that time 'The Protocols of the Elders of Sion' may have been supported by British Freemasonry at that time when the Rothschilds and Bismarck had made a deal. 40% of the translated document in 1906 originated from Maurice Joly and his handler was Adolphe Cremieux a french jew in the service of British Freemasonry. Cremieux was the leader of Scottish Rite in France and held a high position in Swizz Scottish Rite as well.
What Britain feared with 'international financiers' wasnt anything they did that was in Britain's favour. It was the way that would encourage Britains rivals and the development of non-British accumulation of wealth.
.
Freemasonry has over a million members in the anglosaxon culture so there are many who are prone to be biased about this and who tend to maintain the silence when it isnt favourable for their empire.
.
So instead of telling the truth about the overwhelming anglosaxon dominance over freemasonry during a decisive era in world history what usually transpires is how the jews controlled everything including freemasonry.
.
And it is of use for the anglosaxons to use quotes from jewish individuals such as Benjamin D'Israeli. He suggested the jews were very successfully joining Freemasonry. But he didnt know the full story, he was just being opportunistic and was rewarded accordingly with his career.
.
The catholics did expose the Freemasons but that isnt often brought up in the debate since the view of the anglosaxons permeates everything. The truth according to an Irish Catholic Priest, George F. Dillon, who wrote a text titled 'War of Anti-Christ with the Church and Christian Civilization' where he exposed Grand Orient Freemasonry etc. But importantly he mentioned that Lord Palmerston became the Grand Patriarch, the highest authority in Freemasonry in 1837 after his predecessor was assassinated by Palmerston's associate Mazzini.
.
Dillon doesnt mention that this was all held a secret by a small number of insiders who actually supported the secrecy around Palmerston by writing false letters to the dead predecessor, a roman nobleman. Those letters continued to be written as late as 1848. In 1846 one letter in italian sounds like it is a protest against not have been paid for the letter. There was a group of such masonic writers of letters all with code names. It seems this was about hiding from all except a small number of insiders that Britain was in complete control of freemasonry and was simultaneously keeping it secret.
.
It was after that year 1837 that Palmerston first became enthusiastic about immigration by jews to Palestine so 1838 is when modern zionism and the Israel project took shape. It also coincides with the rise of Queen Victoria. That means Lord Palmerston was the real power for the initial decades of the Victorian era until Lord Palmerston died in 1865.
.
This was just a brief view. It is my intention for everybody to realise that the very dominating role of anglosaxons in the debate also means there are many who may feel cautious against exposing such things. Also I need to explain that the term anglosaxon is meant to be understood in a cultural sense, thus not restricted to any etnicity.
.
It means that if your understanding of world events and history is dependent on anglosaxons or those who rely on them there is a risk that the info you rely on is skewed to favour a false narrative.
And how does the Black Nobility show up in this historical analysis?
I dont know if you are being ironic but it was a long comment already.
.
Why turn it into an even longer historical overview?
But since you seem to want more, I could add that the anglosaxons also were behind all radicalisms. Like nazism zionism and radical islam. And virtually all wars and revolutions in the modern era. The two anglophile groupings like Cecil Rhodes gang and the earlier Skull and Bones eventually both aimed for World Government and both supported both fascism and communism.
.
And Britain had the Venetian Oligarchic system transplanted to England between 1530 to 1714 some say. There you may have a flavour of the Black Nobility.
In what ever way that matters to you.
.
The essential thing to me is that pattern where the oligarchic system always supports the occult with the intension of battling the emergence of sound nation states run in the interest of the people. The oligarchy fears an independently thinking educated population and they therefore support any irrational belief that diverts people from real learning.
.
It is amasing how much of that actually constitutes real history! While court Historians make it seem as if it's all a plethora of independent issues.
It was a honest and simple question, not an antagonistic, nor inviting acrimony.
Do you see some European events, such as Napoleon’s campaigns, the two world wars, etc, as fully orchestrated by the string-pullers or a sort of infighting amongst oligarchical rivals?
Thanks for your response.
So Perlof figured out what Carroll Quigley had already written about twenty years prior in his seminal tome "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time'".
pdf here:
http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf
www.drjudywood.com
Excellent.
Now how do you contact Subtack, to inform them, their floormat has an error in BOLDING HEADLINE. It is why I can't write?
An excellent article here by Paragov about getting the land returned to the people. We need to try to get a movement going to take the land back off the wrongful rulers. The land belongs to the people!
https://paragovdigest.substack.com/p/paragov-insights-land-part-3-the
I adore James Perloff. He's in my book on the Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi: Victim of His Times in the chapters that I devote to Bashar al-Assad on pages 287-296 where he is interviewed.
You can order your own copy if you log onto https://arlenejohnson.livejournal.com wehre there are comments by some of the people who have read my 2018 hardbound book followed by ordering information. My advice is to use xe.com. Write me at a@truedemocracy.net for my bank information, and to give me your physical address. Ships worlwide by yours truly. My book is top secret history.
We need to stop them in their tracks. There is a pathway. Believe me. Everything they do is based on deception and fraud. In order to succeed, they need most to believe in the deception, in order to be defrauded. But there exists ways to overcome the Fraud. This is where they will break down. Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet will help to do that job. To stop The Great Taking, to stop the wars and Land Grabs, to stop the Genocide, to get people Free Land, to overcome the robots taking their jobs and making them hungry, to stop them from being coerced into taking the vaccines to Genocide or transform them because the AI and robots have arrived... Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet can do it all!
https://theworldidreamof.substack.com/p/the-legal-basis-for-land-to-be-free