Scene: A dimly lit pub in Britain 🇬🇧. Mr. Wise to… is seated next to Mr. ViroLiegist, who is nervously supping a pint of warm beer 🍻. Mr. Wise to…, grinning mischievously 😏, leans over.
Mr. Wise to… [Leaning in] “Ello, mate. You, er, work in ‘virology,’ do you? 🧪👨🔬”
Mr. ViroLiegist [In a haughty, upper-class accent] “Yes, that’s right.” 😐
Mr. Wise to… [Nods eagerly, twiddling his thumbs 👍]
“Ahhhh, virology, eh? Very important field, eh? 😉 [Winks] Isolate any ‘viruses’ recently? 🤔 [Leans in closer] You know… isolate isolate, wink wink, nudge nudge?” 😏👈
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, we don’t really… isolate in the strictest sense.” 😬
Mr. Wise to… [Nods knowingly 🤨] “Oh, don’t you now, eh? Don’t really isolate, wink wink, say no more! 😎
So, uh, you get your little culture dish 🧫, and—what—throw in some monkey kidney cells, eh? 🐒 Give it a little stir, nudge nudge?” 🥄😉
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, yes, we introduce cell cultures—” 🧬
Mr. Wise to… “Introduce, eh? 😏 [Winks dramatically] I’ll bet you do! Eh? 👀 [Leans in close, eyes wide] Cytopathic effects, eh? Lovely bit of destruction 🔥, wink wink, say no more!” 🧨
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, yes, it’s just part of the process…” 😓
Mr. Wise to… [Interrupts, grinning 😁] “Part of the process, eh? Process, eh? Mixing and matching 🧪, bit of this, bit of that – eh? All gets a bit complicated, don’t it? 🤯 [Leans back, crossing his arms smugly 😌] I bet there’s PCR involved, eh? Eh? 📈 Amplifying things that aren’t really, you know – wink wink, say no more!” 🤫
Mr. ViroLiegist: “We use PCR to—” 🧫🧬
Mr. Wise to… [Leans forward, raising his eyebrows repeatedly 👀👀👀]
“Ohhh, I bet you do! PCR – right between the old ’genes’, eh? 🧬 Amplify this, amplify that – nudge nudge, lovely bit of sequences, eh?” 🧵📊
Mr. ViroLiegist [Awkwardly]... “Well, it’s to detect—” 😓
Mr. Wise to… “Detect, eh? 🧐 [Grinning wider 😄] Oh, I bet you detect all sorts of things! Bits of ‘RNA’ floating about in the old soup 🍜, eh? No need for anything pure, eh? Just a bit of random genetic detritus, eh? You sly dog, you!” 🐶💥
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, it’s not quite that simple—” 😐
Mr. Wise to… [Nudges him 😉]
“Not that simple, eh? Say no more! No need to complicate things, right? 🧠 Just throw in some random sequences, patch ’em together 🧩, bit of guesswork, eh? Lovely bit of data stitching – wink wink! 🪡📉
[Leans in] You ever, uh, publish any of that? Eh? Eh? Get a cheeky little grant for your trouble?” 💸📄
Mr. ViroLiegist [Hesitating]
“Well, I mean, we—” 😳
Mr. Wise to… [Nods eagerly 😏]
“Ohhhh, I bet you did, eh? Got your cheeky little funding, eh? 🤑 [Elbows him harder] Lots of papers written 📝, all about nothing in particular – eh? Just a bit of this, a bit of that – wink wink, nudge nudge! 😎
And all without really having seen the little blighter, eh?” 🔬❓👻
Mr. ViroLiegist [Sputtering on his warm pint 🍺]
“Well, we have electron microscope images—” 📷
Mr. Wise to… “Ohhh, electron microscopes, eh? 🧫🔍 [Winks again, jabbing him with his elbow 🫳😏] Big ol’ blurry blobs, eh? Slap a few arrows on there, call it a virus, eh? 🟢🔴➡️ Lovely bit of science, that! [Sits back, smug 😌] Can’t argue with that now, can you? Science at its finest, eh? Say no more!” 🎓😂
Mr. ViroLiegist [Confused 😵]
“I—”
Mr. Wise to… [Leaning back in satisfaction 😎]
“Ohhhh, you’re a sly one, mate. Absolutely love it! Nudge nudge, wink wink!” 😁😉
📽️ [Fade out, as Mr. Wise to… smirks knowingly 😏 and Mr. ViroLiegist squirms uncomfortably 🥴]
Dr. Kary Mullis Nobel Prize for PCR, made it clear that PCR cannot be used to test whole viruses, ONLY viral sequences of nucleic acids that most viruses share, for example; gp120 envelopes is found in SARS2 and HIV, so what exactly are we looking at?
Oh FFS! Kary Mullis was a FRAUD, both as a mainstream "scientist" AND when he was PRETENDING to be a so-called "dissident"! All honest and scientifically literate people in today's novirus community are VERY AWARE of these facts by now! Anyone else who says anything different is a LIAR or an idiot or BOTH! I was THERE in the old "AIDS" dissident movement! I MET MULLIS...a few times, in fact. I even co-produced a very famous SEMINAR where Mullis was our key note speaker way back in 1997! I KNOW what the F I am talking about!
In addition to all the questionable background detailed in reference #1 above, Mullis's last biotech company which he "founded" had received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense DARPA program to the tune of at least *$2MILLION*!! SOME DISSIDENT! LOL!
Furthermore, David Crowe was a LIAR and a scumbag when he was in charge of our dear old, now-deceased "AIDS" dissident movement. Crowe contributed greatly to the FAILURE of our old "AIDS" dissident movement! Anyone who fails to point out THAT fact should ALSO BE IGNORED! See: https://tig.org.za/RA.htm
A person who got the Nobel Prize for PCR is a “fraud”? Wow! Good luck with that one! If your looking for a fraud, how about Dr. Robert Gallo?By the way, you still haven’t told us what a virus is?
LOL! A person who got the Nobel Prize is NOT a fraud?? WOW! Good luck with THAT one (especially in truther circles!) LOL! By the way, I see that you still haven't taken the time to read all the documents I linked above! Why don't you do THAT first before you spout off more NONSENSE? Also, Gallo and Mullis were freakin' virus-pushing "DANCE PARTNERS"! Fauci and Mullis were even MORE frequent virus-pushing "dance partners"! Wake UP, take the time to learn the REAL HISTORY of these people or just STFU already!!
Of course, *I* do not believe that! My point is that *KARY MULLIS BELIEVED IT!* He said so every chance he GOT! Just because Mullis also garbled some incoherent comment that "PCR"..."doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the *THING YOU ENDED UP WITH* really was gonna hurt you or anything like that" (emphasis added) does NOT invalidate in any way the fact that Mullis always asserted the following about "his" invention:
The "PCR" CAN CERTAINLY DETECT VIRUSES, and it can even do so "down to one molecule" which were also MULLIS' own words that I heard him say IN PERSON! Just because some idiotic present-day dissidents have reading and comprehension difficulties does not change the fact that MULLIS WAS ESTABLISHMENT!!
Thanks very much for your reply, I appreciate it. 1 thing I have come to realize since the Covid circus started, thanks partly to Jon Rappoport, is that viruses do not exist.
So, any of those criticizing the PCR test as a diagnostic test (yes, true, it cannot be sure as such), or criticizing the CDC, or Pfizer et al, but who insist on the existence of viruses are ALL controlled opposition.
I went back thru my notes on Kary Mullis: I attached great importance to what he had said and his curiously untimely death. But I had not re-read those notes in detail for a long time, and now it jumped out at me: yes, he does support the existence of viruses!! Quite a shocker to me.
Conclusion: at the end of the day, KM is part of that controlled opposition.
That was not difficult for me. I was already on your side, but what IS difficult is to separate the corn from the chaff, and not just for this issue.
Nowadays, for any (geo)political issue there is so much so-called controlled opposition that it is easy to get fooled by what seems to be a genuine person.
Exactly. We don't actually know. The most likely answer, mathematically, is cell debris. We have no scientific reason to think it's anything besides cell debris.
Mullis tended to use Peter Deusberg's language, since they were close friends and colleagues, and Deusberg insisted on calling what he saw "viruses" but he also insisted they were "harmless viruses" that were "never active" so they were not viruses in the sense that folks tend to think of them (vectors of disease). We do a deep deep dive on all this in the AIDS episode which we are re-releasing for free soon.
Dr. David Ho has patented “viral load” and his R&D funded by the theory of HIV/AIDS. Why does his viral load test need an amplifier if there is plenty of viruses in an infected person. Is he catching his own bait and calling it fish? A person so heavily invested the AIDS paradigm should not be confirming it! Something his viral-load manufacturing insert actually states; “this test cannot be used to confirm HIV status.”
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx (snip) Put Simply: PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis, stated there was a "lack of a chemical mechanism that is necessary to determine the "cause" of death" from AIDS patients. He describes how the scientific law of "cause and effect", Newton's 3rd Law of Motion, must be maintained, an opposite chemical reaction. The cause and effect "chemical reaction" in your body that actually caused the chain reaction that leads to a death, CANNOT be a dead mRNA material like a Virus. There is no chemical reaction (the same reaction provided by his PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction test) going on at all with a Virus all by itself; it needs a replicator mechanism (mRNA vaccine) and a host cell to duplicate. The Mysterious Death of Fauci's Notable Critic, Kary Mullis.
Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case:
With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
Nobody, including virologists can actually tell you what a virus is, or whether it’s alive or dead matter? So how have we based a whole category of science on something we can’t define, yet alone be dispositive?
Pradhan et al, found HIV sequences in SARS2 in 2019, and HERV’s also give false positives.Dr. Nancy Banks, in her book on AIDS list over 70 conditions that give false positives for HIV, so what exactly are we talking about when we say some is seropositive?
antibody tests usually. and there are more than 70 reasons why someone could come up positive, including stuff like if they've been pregnant in the last 2 years etc...
In a statement released Thursday on vaccination rates, the CDC said, “The decision to vaccinate is a personal one. Parents should consult their health care providers on options for their families.” The 2024-2025 school year was the third record-breaking year in a row for the exemption rate, according to The Associated Press.
What disturbs me is the inability by experts and virologists to define what a virus is? Is it alive or dead material? If they don’t know then how have we created an entire science on it?
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
Question to ponder: Do those highly ethical compassionate folk in charge of bio 2-4 labs that among other things create non natural concoctions that mimick what a virus is and release them to environment,some of them then causing a excuse for vaccine creation (ie cause problem needing solution etc,) appreciate the cover no virus exists activists give them? Of course they do ..funny how that big factor not even mentioned here...How easy is it to put some bacteria, fungal, venom, parasite etc together and label it a virus? Easy enough where they were doing it in 1800 when virus term was created and natural version type parameters created..though never met well artificial replications of function level worked fine...Not even going there to percentage of issue factor reveals high number of no virus types are shills pro lab and rest convinced by them there on the right side of equation instead of fooled there over a century quite well, only slightly new twists to old lie..see its potential as true fitting bill? Good now apply some humility and ramp it up to main issue factor actually not sub..and tell everyone and change this deception to revealed!!!
🍺NUDGE-NUDGE-WINK-WINK😉😉
Scene: A dimly lit pub in Britain 🇬🇧. Mr. Wise to… is seated next to Mr. ViroLiegist, who is nervously supping a pint of warm beer 🍻. Mr. Wise to…, grinning mischievously 😏, leans over.
Mr. Wise to… [Leaning in] “Ello, mate. You, er, work in ‘virology,’ do you? 🧪👨🔬”
Mr. ViroLiegist [In a haughty, upper-class accent] “Yes, that’s right.” 😐
Mr. Wise to… [Nods eagerly, twiddling his thumbs 👍]
“Ahhhh, virology, eh? Very important field, eh? 😉 [Winks] Isolate any ‘viruses’ recently? 🤔 [Leans in closer] You know… isolate isolate, wink wink, nudge nudge?” 😏👈
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, we don’t really… isolate in the strictest sense.” 😬
Mr. Wise to… [Nods knowingly 🤨] “Oh, don’t you now, eh? Don’t really isolate, wink wink, say no more! 😎
So, uh, you get your little culture dish 🧫, and—what—throw in some monkey kidney cells, eh? 🐒 Give it a little stir, nudge nudge?” 🥄😉
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, yes, we introduce cell cultures—” 🧬
Mr. Wise to… “Introduce, eh? 😏 [Winks dramatically] I’ll bet you do! Eh? 👀 [Leans in close, eyes wide] Cytopathic effects, eh? Lovely bit of destruction 🔥, wink wink, say no more!” 🧨
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, yes, it’s just part of the process…” 😓
Mr. Wise to… [Interrupts, grinning 😁] “Part of the process, eh? Process, eh? Mixing and matching 🧪, bit of this, bit of that – eh? All gets a bit complicated, don’t it? 🤯 [Leans back, crossing his arms smugly 😌] I bet there’s PCR involved, eh? Eh? 📈 Amplifying things that aren’t really, you know – wink wink, say no more!” 🤫
Mr. ViroLiegist: “We use PCR to—” 🧫🧬
Mr. Wise to… [Leans forward, raising his eyebrows repeatedly 👀👀👀]
“Ohhh, I bet you do! PCR – right between the old ’genes’, eh? 🧬 Amplify this, amplify that – nudge nudge, lovely bit of sequences, eh?” 🧵📊
Mr. ViroLiegist [Awkwardly]... “Well, it’s to detect—” 😓
Mr. Wise to… “Detect, eh? 🧐 [Grinning wider 😄] Oh, I bet you detect all sorts of things! Bits of ‘RNA’ floating about in the old soup 🍜, eh? No need for anything pure, eh? Just a bit of random genetic detritus, eh? You sly dog, you!” 🐶💥
Mr. ViroLiegist: “Well, it’s not quite that simple—” 😐
Mr. Wise to… [Nudges him 😉]
“Not that simple, eh? Say no more! No need to complicate things, right? 🧠 Just throw in some random sequences, patch ’em together 🧩, bit of guesswork, eh? Lovely bit of data stitching – wink wink! 🪡📉
[Leans in] You ever, uh, publish any of that? Eh? Eh? Get a cheeky little grant for your trouble?” 💸📄
Mr. ViroLiegist [Hesitating]
“Well, I mean, we—” 😳
Mr. Wise to… [Nods eagerly 😏]
“Ohhhh, I bet you did, eh? Got your cheeky little funding, eh? 🤑 [Elbows him harder] Lots of papers written 📝, all about nothing in particular – eh? Just a bit of this, a bit of that – wink wink, nudge nudge! 😎
And all without really having seen the little blighter, eh?” 🔬❓👻
Mr. ViroLiegist [Sputtering on his warm pint 🍺]
“Well, we have electron microscope images—” 📷
Mr. Wise to… “Ohhh, electron microscopes, eh? 🧫🔍 [Winks again, jabbing him with his elbow 🫳😏] Big ol’ blurry blobs, eh? Slap a few arrows on there, call it a virus, eh? 🟢🔴➡️ Lovely bit of science, that! [Sits back, smug 😌] Can’t argue with that now, can you? Science at its finest, eh? Say no more!” 🎓😂
Mr. ViroLiegist [Confused 😵]
“I—”
Mr. Wise to… [Leaning back in satisfaction 😎]
“Ohhhh, you’re a sly one, mate. Absolutely love it! Nudge nudge, wink wink!” 😁😉
📽️ [Fade out, as Mr. Wise to… smirks knowingly 😏 and Mr. ViroLiegist squirms uncomfortably 🥴]
that's hilarious.
Massive thanks!! Greatly appreciated!!
Dr. Kary Mullis Nobel Prize for PCR, made it clear that PCR cannot be used to test whole viruses, ONLY viral sequences of nucleic acids that most viruses share, for example; gp120 envelopes is found in SARS2 and HIV, so what exactly are we looking at?
Oh FFS! Kary Mullis was a FRAUD, both as a mainstream "scientist" AND when he was PRETENDING to be a so-called "dissident"! All honest and scientifically literate people in today's novirus community are VERY AWARE of these facts by now! Anyone else who says anything different is a LIAR or an idiot or BOTH! I was THERE in the old "AIDS" dissident movement! I MET MULLIS...a few times, in fact. I even co-produced a very famous SEMINAR where Mullis was our key note speaker way back in 1997! I KNOW what the F I am talking about!
See:
1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fbpYott1Mdw_BuuiE6_rjO_7Xr5Z_PdoxtK3fNZI9Gc
2. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/the-mullis-mirage
3. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/new-kary-mullis-was-not-killed-by
In addition to all the questionable background detailed in reference #1 above, Mullis's last biotech company which he "founded" had received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense DARPA program to the tune of at least *$2MILLION*!! SOME DISSIDENT! LOL!
Furthermore, David Crowe was a LIAR and a scumbag when he was in charge of our dear old, now-deceased "AIDS" dissident movement. Crowe contributed greatly to the FAILURE of our old "AIDS" dissident movement! Anyone who fails to point out THAT fact should ALSO BE IGNORED! See: https://tig.org.za/RA.htm
A person who got the Nobel Prize for PCR is a “fraud”? Wow! Good luck with that one! If your looking for a fraud, how about Dr. Robert Gallo?By the way, you still haven’t told us what a virus is?
LOL! A person who got the Nobel Prize is NOT a fraud?? WOW! Good luck with THAT one (especially in truther circles!) LOL! By the way, I see that you still haven't taken the time to read all the documents I linked above! Why don't you do THAT first before you spout off more NONSENSE? Also, Gallo and Mullis were freakin' virus-pushing "DANCE PARTNERS"! Fauci and Mullis were even MORE frequent virus-pushing "dance partners"! Wake UP, take the time to learn the REAL HISTORY of these people or just STFU already!!
Before you give out homework assignments perhaps you could confirm who appointed you as Minister of truth?
Before you provide even MORE evidence of your learning disabilities, why don't you just STFU and DO YOUR FREAKIN' HOMEWORK! LOL! https://longtimedissident.substack.com/about
Your attack style replies doesn’t lend to confidence in your statements.
Who the F are YOU? Mike Stone?? LOL! F off, you ANONYMOUS TROLL! I'm using my REAL NAME, here, and this is who *I* AM:
https://longtimedissident.substack.com/about
Your "TONE POLICE" style doesn't lend confidence in your reading comprehension skills!
In other words, the PCR "test" can be used to establish the existence of a virus?
If that is not your point, then what IS your point in reply to Geoffrey Newton?
Of course, *I* do not believe that! My point is that *KARY MULLIS BELIEVED IT!* He said so every chance he GOT! Just because Mullis also garbled some incoherent comment that "PCR"..."doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the *THING YOU ENDED UP WITH* really was gonna hurt you or anything like that" (emphasis added) does NOT invalidate in any way the fact that Mullis always asserted the following about "his" invention:
The "PCR" CAN CERTAINLY DETECT VIRUSES, and it can even do so "down to one molecule" which were also MULLIS' own words that I heard him say IN PERSON! Just because some idiotic present-day dissidents have reading and comprehension difficulties does not change the fact that MULLIS WAS ESTABLISHMENT!!
I have added your substack to my RSS feed reader.
Thanks very much for your reply, I appreciate it. 1 thing I have come to realize since the Covid circus started, thanks partly to Jon Rappoport, is that viruses do not exist.
So, any of those criticizing the PCR test as a diagnostic test (yes, true, it cannot be sure as such), or criticizing the CDC, or Pfizer et al, but who insist on the existence of viruses are ALL controlled opposition.
I went back thru my notes on Kary Mullis: I attached great importance to what he had said and his curiously untimely death. But I had not re-read those notes in detail for a long time, and now it jumped out at me: yes, he does support the existence of viruses!! Quite a shocker to me.
Conclusion: at the end of the day, KM is part of that controlled opposition.
Thanks again for the heads up.
You're quite welcome! It's always refreshing to encounter someone who GETS IT without me having to post a billion replies! LOL!
That was not difficult for me. I was already on your side, but what IS difficult is to separate the corn from the chaff, and not just for this issue.
Nowadays, for any (geo)political issue there is so much so-called controlled opposition that it is easy to get fooled by what seems to be a genuine person.
Have you seen this article and partial controlled opposition list? https://shumway.substack.com/p/controlled-opposition
I can tell you I had quite a shock about some of the names.
Exactly. We don't actually know. The most likely answer, mathematically, is cell debris. We have no scientific reason to think it's anything besides cell debris.
Mullis tended to use Peter Deusberg's language, since they were close friends and colleagues, and Deusberg insisted on calling what he saw "viruses" but he also insisted they were "harmless viruses" that were "never active" so they were not viruses in the sense that folks tend to think of them (vectors of disease). We do a deep deep dive on all this in the AIDS episode which we are re-releasing for free soon.
If someone with the same equipment used by Fan Wu et al. Using the same data points collected from the patients in Wuhan in Jan 2020.
Would they be able to get the same result published by Fan Wu et al.
Unless it's the exact same sequence as published, I believe that there is an issue.
Dr. David Ho has patented “viral load” and his R&D funded by the theory of HIV/AIDS. Why does his viral load test need an amplifier if there is plenty of viruses in an infected person. Is he catching his own bait and calling it fish? A person so heavily invested the AIDS paradigm should not be confirming it! Something his viral-load manufacturing insert actually states; “this test cannot be used to confirm HIV status.”
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx (snip) Put Simply: PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis, stated there was a "lack of a chemical mechanism that is necessary to determine the "cause" of death" from AIDS patients. He describes how the scientific law of "cause and effect", Newton's 3rd Law of Motion, must be maintained, an opposite chemical reaction. The cause and effect "chemical reaction" in your body that actually caused the chain reaction that leads to a death, CANNOT be a dead mRNA material like a Virus. There is no chemical reaction (the same reaction provided by his PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction test) going on at all with a Virus all by itself; it needs a replicator mechanism (mRNA vaccine) and a host cell to duplicate. The Mysterious Death of Fauci's Notable Critic, Kary Mullis.
Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case:
With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
Nobody, including virologists can actually tell you what a virus is, or whether it’s alive or dead matter? So how have we based a whole category of science on something we can’t define, yet alone be dispositive?
Pradhan et al, found HIV sequences in SARS2 in 2019, and HERV’s also give false positives.Dr. Nancy Banks, in her book on AIDS list over 70 conditions that give false positives for HIV, so what exactly are we talking about when we say some is seropositive?
antibody tests usually. and there are more than 70 reasons why someone could come up positive, including stuff like if they've been pregnant in the last 2 years etc...
Virology Debunked w/ Cracker Jack PCR Test - 10 Points On-The-Box https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/virology-debunked-w-cracker-jack-pcr-test---10-points-on-the-box
Good news: Vaccination Rates Hit Record-Breaking Low for Third Year in a Row as Religious Exemptions Reach Record High.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccination-rates-record-low-third-year-religious-exemptions-new-high/
In a statement released Thursday on vaccination rates, the CDC said, “The decision to vaccinate is a personal one. Parents should consult their health care providers on options for their families.” The 2024-2025 school year was the third record-breaking year in a row for the exemption rate, according to The Associated Press.
Michael have enormous mistakes:
PCR do not detect DNA --->
DNA do not exist at all --->
Documented here: https://substack.com/@controlstudies/posts
Amazing! Thank you!
Excellent new series.
habeas corpus?
If you cannot bring the body before the court, you cannot honestly prosecute it.
That goes for viruses, genomes, DNA, RNA etc. etc.
And blinking lights on monitors and Insilco images are not the accused.
What disturbs me is the inability by experts and virologists to define what a virus is? Is it alive or dead material? If they don’t know then how have we created an entire science on it?
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
May 16th 2021 "Not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID," she said. "They may have had mild disease but died, for example, of a heart attack." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-walensky-criticism-updated-guidance-coronavirus-deaths
January 21st 2022 a noble Nobel PCR Inventor, Kary Mullis. https://banned.video/watch?id=61eb268a060c640ca547677c -- Originally published this 10/15/2020 and I've since made an even better video about him HERE https://futurenews.news/watch?id=61ab744efe336b045dbcf549 but I thought this was worth uploading here also. sources Crimes Against Humanity https://www.bitchute.com/video/wNuz54BqUgc/ PCR https://youtu.be/QhyaFStJEvU Kary Mullis https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI https://youtu.be/dL3cAS3YUKM https://youtu.be/3OrdJhueROo https://youtu.be/iWOJKuSKw5c https://youtu.be/4VUswvCLMII SPIN.‘SINS OF OMISSION’ https://archive.vn/SN1ne Interview with Kary Mullis https://archive.vn/2AY62 Fauci’s First Fraud https://www.bitchute.com/video/t7nJJiOidzQH/
January 19th 2022 VIRUS-ISOLATION IS IT REAL? ANDREW KAUFMAN MD RESPONDS TO JEREMY HAMMOND https://www.bitchute.com/video/UnpfmjmXNH0O/
January 15th 2022 Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/fauci-admits-pcr-test-cannot-detect-infection/
January 10th 2022 Fake Science, Invalid Data: There is No Such Thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. There is No Pandemic https://www.globalresearch.ca/fake-science-invalid-data-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-confirmed-covid-19-case-there-is-no-pandemic/5761960
January 8th 2021 The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-rt-pcr-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-using-a-test-to-lock-down-society/5728483
January 6th 2022 The Identity of the Virus: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification". Freedom of Information Requests. The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”? https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
January 2nd 2022 Harm, a Powerful Banned Documentary on Fraudulent PCR Tests Instantly Went Viral Before Being Deleted https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2022/01/harm-a-powerful-banned-documentary-on-fraudulent-pcr-tests-instantly-went-viral-before-being-deleted-3764636.html
Question to ponder: Do those highly ethical compassionate folk in charge of bio 2-4 labs that among other things create non natural concoctions that mimick what a virus is and release them to environment,some of them then causing a excuse for vaccine creation (ie cause problem needing solution etc,) appreciate the cover no virus exists activists give them? Of course they do ..funny how that big factor not even mentioned here...How easy is it to put some bacteria, fungal, venom, parasite etc together and label it a virus? Easy enough where they were doing it in 1800 when virus term was created and natural version type parameters created..though never met well artificial replications of function level worked fine...Not even going there to percentage of issue factor reveals high number of no virus types are shills pro lab and rest convinced by them there on the right side of equation instead of fooled there over a century quite well, only slightly new twists to old lie..see its potential as true fitting bill? Good now apply some humility and ramp it up to main issue factor actually not sub..and tell everyone and change this deception to revealed!!!