Another EXCELLENT article! My own perspective is that literally anything which "triggers" an immune response is considered a good thing by vaccine makers. Injecting feces would likely pass their approval as an effective "adjuvant" due to what it does to the immune system. They've never once bothered to ask whether it's a good thing to inject things that freak the immune system out, over and over again. In their book, if something causes an immune reaction, it must be a good thing. Conversely, a toxicologist's first clue that something is BAD for the body, is when it causes a massive immune reaction;-)
Poo might be less harmful than this witches brew. It is hard to explain to the worshipers, that aluminium is not less dangerous in injections, and that mercury is still used in jabs, and that causing a false alarm to your body 10 or more times a year can damage your body. They just LOVE to be injected - and inject their kids just as voluntarily.
All of these manipulations are so disturbing. Aluminum hydroxide as an adjunct is simply added to create more medical issues.
My 2 month old Son reached down and pulled the syringe out of his leg before the product was injected. That was a wakeup call for me.
I wish I had been more educated. He had no combo shots & very few after that.
I was also in the US Army. The number of shots we were given is hard to imagine. When I left I had migraines & SLE. I am fairly free of both after 50 years.
The fact that almost all kids cry and are afraid of syringes should speak for itself. Strange nough animals don't seem to mind, at least my dog does not.
Well done, Unbekoming. This article wins over even the skeptics that are still shills for pharma. There is no defense from this essay, frankly. You win, hands down and I love it. Thank you. By the way, I mentioned some facts about this essay to my wife. She makes excellent quality handmade soap, using edible oils saponified with SODIUM HYDROXIDE. (Very caustic)). She understood immediately what would happen if lye, (sodium hydroxide) was injected into the arm of a baby. It would destroy tissue. Aluminum hydroxide would do the same job, maybe even worse tissue damage. It seems quite barbaric to treat babies this way, and the end results, i.e. autism, should be reconsidered by those who choose ignorance and authority simultaneously. The industry is a giant fraud; and harming babies and children is just NOT acceptable.
Is anyone else sickened by the things these "scientists" have done to animals? Is it any wonder that these things make us sick? Sick things were done to create these products. Shame on the world that allows this cruelty.
Injecting toxic matter into bloodstreams should be classified as a crime! Those who do this are totally ignorant and should not call themselves doctors. Fifty years ago, I read how the immune system works. It was known that anything other than natural food entering into the bloodstream would trigger off the lymphatic system...causing the lymph glands (or nodes) to produce billions of white blood cells (corpuscles) to attack and clean out the offending item, such as, foreign proteins, dead cells, microscopic food allergens, etc. Injecting toxic matter, which does not belong in the human body will damage or wipe out the Immune System permitting the poisonous matter in a vaccine to circulate in the bloodstream throughout the body and into the brain.. damaging the organs, glands and cells. This is information I came across many years ago. In my opinion, Vaccines are the biggest scam ever perpetrated on mankind. Injecting toxic substances into human bloodstreams and claiming they will produce immunity..
It seems to me that sadly in some ways the human "immune system" ie your natural body, is so honed and strong to defeat bigpharmas attempts to cure lol, us of "disease".
Were it not so ie kids actually died in great numbers soon after their mandated jabs then maybe the bastards would never have been successful.
Unfortunately the masses are unable to join the dots and never realise that the preponderance of "autoimmune disease" in later life is actually caused by the things they were eagerly jabbed with.
Tick tock...
Adjuvants - aka immunologists dirty little secret.
I’m glad you included the definition of adjuvant. I first learned this word when I was 18 in boot camp. In that context, an adjuvant was a recruit from the previous graduating class, who served as an assistant company commander(drill sergeant). In the context of immunology the word adjuvant is counter to that definition. It’s a catalyst, not a helper.
Dam you’re an absolute legend. Keepm coming. I got vax injured at a young age, which caused other issues. I didn’t get the covid jabz or other vax as an adult.. and yet I still have signals coming out of my body, just like pretty much every one else in our western society. The truth is stranger than fiction, and keeps getting stranger. Stay blessed yall
"When you look at the reliance on the Flarend et al. study, you are looking at a classic example of "science" being weaponized to support a pre-ordained conclusion rather than to investigate a reality.
The flaws you noted—the tiny sample size of two rabbits, the truncated 28-day timeline, and the convenient omission of the injection site, lymph nodes, and bone tissue—are not accidental oversights. They are structural necessities to maintain the "safe and effective" narrative."
“If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why are multivalent vaccines allowed? A multivalent vaccine is a vaccine that contains more than 1 vaccine, up to 6, given via a single shot. And why is more than one vaccine, be it monovalent or multivalent, allowed to be given at a time? With such careless and reckless practices the norm, how can it ever be determined which vaccine might be problematic for a recipient if more than one is administered at once? Answer: It can’t be, and that is why it is allowed. Such practices are an excellent way to muddy the waters and keep inconvenient and horrendous truths that the vaccine profiteers don’t want you to know from being exposed. Additionally, the average parent’s warning bells sound more and more loudly with each subsequent painful jab to their precious child. Thus, the idea was hatched to cram as many vaccines into one syringe as possible to make the barbaric practice of vaccination less repugnant for the parent, and to make unpleasant and tragic results more difficult to pinpoint back to a particular vaccine.
If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why are batch lots of vaccines allowed to be separated when shipped, unlike any other drug? If lots are separated, how can it be quickly determined when there is a problematic “hot lot” so that an immediate warning and recall can be issued? A “hot lot” refers to a lot that is causing more adverse events and deaths than usual. Answer: With lots separated, hot lots can’t be quickly identified and recalled, and that is done on purpose. In the late 1970s, vaccine maker Wyeth appears to have developed a plan to evade hot-lot accusations. Why? Because in 1979, 11 babies died within 8 days of a DPT shot. Nine of them had been vaccinated with the same lot of pertussis vaccine, Wyeth #64201. Five died within 24 hours, 4 from the same lot. The following is from a Wyeth Internal Correspondence dated 8-27-79: “After the reporting of SIDS cases in TN, we discussed the merits of limiting distribution of a large number of vials from a single lot to a single state, county, or city health department and obtained agreement from senior management staff to proceed with such a plan.” I have a friend and colleague who for years worked in the pharmacy at a hospital. She confirmed that the only drug that is shipped in separated lots is vaccines. That is unconscionable, not to mention highly dangerous.
If vaccines are safe and effective, why the special status for them? Not only are they the only drug for which the makers and those who administer them shielded from liability, not only are they the only drug shipped in separated lots, but they are the only drug for which it is not required that the package insert be given. Why would that be, unless the vaccine profiteers don’t want people seeing the horrific truths contained within those vaccine package inserts? Today, all that is required to be given is a CDC-produced, very brief Vaccine Information Sheet, known as a VIS. VISs are not at all an accurate reflection of the many and real, known and unknown, risks of the drugs about to be administered.
If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why aren’t there billboards everywhere, and posters in every doctor’s office, hospital, and pharmacy, with information about VAERS and the VICP? Surely our government regulatory agencies, so concerned about our health, would want us to know how and where to alert them about problems with vaccines, right? Why does the majority of doctors not know about VAERS or the VICP? Why are they not required to report any and all adverse events, including death, after administering vaccinations? Why are they not required to inform parents and all vaccine recipients about VAERS and the VICP? Why are they loathe to properly inform about, recognize, acknowledge, admit, report, and treat vaccine-induced injuries and deaths? Why after someone is vaccine injured or vaccine killed is there absolutely no follow up from any government agency to determine what happened so that it can be prevented in the future? Answer: The complete and utter lack of monitoring vaccines post-licensure and post-marketing is purposeful. It is intentional. Our government regulatory agencies, in tight cahoots with pharmaceutical companies and their paid lobbyists, and with the willing compliance of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and their associated trade industry groups, choose to turn a blind eye to vaccine-induced injuries and deaths. They choose to keep well hidden the vaccine adverse events reporting system and the vaccine injury and death compensation program. These various entities, groups, and individuals are complicit in refusing to seek out, become informed about, acknowledge, admit, or allow anything that will undermine the public’s trust in vaccines and jeopardize the vaccine profits from which they all profit handsomely, to the tune of billions of dollars per year.”
Unbekoming, the subtitle for this essay was spot on, exposing that the very substance used to manufacture and induce disease in lab rats is injected to babies, children, and teens every single day, the world over. That says it all for those with ears to hear.
Some pertinent excerpts from my 2016 presentation at WAPF’s Wise Traditions Conference:
“Many vaccines contain mercury in the form of thimerosal. Thimerosal was patented in 1928, and has been used ever since, despite it being tested on humans only once, in 1929…a test in which all 22 subjects died within 2 days of receiving the thimerosal. Mercury is a known toxin and neurotoxin, with no safe amount for a human. It can kill when applied externally. With vaccines, it is injected internally. Claims that mercury has been removed from vaccines given to children are false.
Many vaccines contain ingredients that have never been clinically approved by the FDA. Defying common sense and violating basic safety and ethics standards, the FDA approves vaccines that contain never-proven-safe and known-to-be-dangerous ingredients. For example, there are two forms of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines, aluminum hydroxyphosphate salt and aluminum oxyhydroxide salt. Neither has been clinically approved by the FDA, both are known toxins and neurotoxins, yet both are in vaccines approved by the FDA. These are but two examples, there are more.
Aluminum, used in the majority of today’s vaccines, is an undisputed toxin and neurotoxin. Its toxicity has been known for some 90 years. The two aluminum adjuvants mentioned above are used in vaccines for the express purpose of inducing toxicity. Permitting the use of aluminum in vaccines is akin to permitting lead paint in government approved toys and teething rings. Aluminum, like mercury, is also a known teratogen, an agent or factor that causes malformation of an embryo. Permitting its use in vaccines for pregnant women is akin to permitting that which causes spontaneous abortion and/or deformity of the fetus…thalidomide comes to mind. Yesterday, Dr. Stephanie Seneff discussed the possible role of TDaP and DTP vaccines, both of which contain aluminum, and both of which were recently recommended to be given to pregnant women in Brazil, as possible causes for the rise in cases of microcephaly there. Microcephaly is abnormal smallness of the head, a congenital condition, associated with incomplete brain development.
Aluminum adjuvants (not clinically approved and used to induce toxicity), monovalent and/or multivalent vaccines (improperly approved and containing unapproved ingredients, including those used to induce toxicity, and containing ingredients known to be toxic and neurotoxic), or a combination thereof are used as the controls in vaccine safety trials. A control is supposed to be a placebo, an inert substance which doesn’t cause harm or therapeutic effect. Neither an aluminum adjuvant nor a vaccine, nor a combination thereof, qualifies as a placebo, therefore, no valid safety claims can be made for any vaccine.
Vaccine making pharmaceutical companies are permitted by the FDA to do their own safety testing, with no oversight and no verification from a financially independent entity. As mentioned in the point above, they do not use placebos for controls. Nevertheless, when they say that the trial vaccine proved to be no more dangerous or deadly than the aluminum adjuvant, or other vaccine, or combination thereof, against which it was tested, they declare it safe. Is that how you want medical procedures for your children being declared safe? The FDA and CDC accept this current method of testing. They also accept that vaccines are not tested for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility.”
AND:
“Would you allow something that could cause life-altering and life-threatening asthma and allergies to be injected into your child? Of course not. You know that both asthma and allergies severely restrict a child’s life in many ways and that both can result in death. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject food proteins (which the blood is incapable of breaking down into amino acids, resulting in inflammation), antibiotics such as neomycin, polymyxin B, gentamicin, and streptomycin, and toxic chemicals at the same time as adjuvants (e.g. aluminum), which are designed to artificially overstimulate the immune system, resulting in the chronic and sometimes fatal conditions of asthma and allergies. Additionally, new studies regarding what is called “molecular mimicry” continue to emerge, demonstrating that when protein fragments in vaccine antigens match protein fragments of proteins in the body, it sets the stage for allergies and other autoimmune problems. Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of children in our country with asthma, life-threatening peanut allergies, numerous types of food allergies and food intolerances, and numerous types of environmental allergies. Coincidence?”
Another EXCELLENT article! My own perspective is that literally anything which "triggers" an immune response is considered a good thing by vaccine makers. Injecting feces would likely pass their approval as an effective "adjuvant" due to what it does to the immune system. They've never once bothered to ask whether it's a good thing to inject things that freak the immune system out, over and over again. In their book, if something causes an immune reaction, it must be a good thing. Conversely, a toxicologist's first clue that something is BAD for the body, is when it causes a massive immune reaction;-)
Poo might be less harmful than this witches brew. It is hard to explain to the worshipers, that aluminium is not less dangerous in injections, and that mercury is still used in jabs, and that causing a false alarm to your body 10 or more times a year can damage your body. They just LOVE to be injected - and inject their kids just as voluntarily.
True about the poo;-)
I believe many do not vaccinate their own kids like mr billybates
All of these manipulations are so disturbing. Aluminum hydroxide as an adjunct is simply added to create more medical issues.
My 2 month old Son reached down and pulled the syringe out of his leg before the product was injected. That was a wakeup call for me.
I wish I had been more educated. He had no combo shots & very few after that.
I was also in the US Army. The number of shots we were given is hard to imagine. When I left I had migraines & SLE. I am fairly free of both after 50 years.
The fact that almost all kids cry and are afraid of syringes should speak for itself. Strange nough animals don't seem to mind, at least my dog does not.
Our animals are too trusting
just like most humans!
Been there done that. I need to tighten up.
on the question of the "regulatory dose", please also see: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40876523/
Well done, Unbekoming. This article wins over even the skeptics that are still shills for pharma. There is no defense from this essay, frankly. You win, hands down and I love it. Thank you. By the way, I mentioned some facts about this essay to my wife. She makes excellent quality handmade soap, using edible oils saponified with SODIUM HYDROXIDE. (Very caustic)). She understood immediately what would happen if lye, (sodium hydroxide) was injected into the arm of a baby. It would destroy tissue. Aluminum hydroxide would do the same job, maybe even worse tissue damage. It seems quite barbaric to treat babies this way, and the end results, i.e. autism, should be reconsidered by those who choose ignorance and authority simultaneously. The industry is a giant fraud; and harming babies and children is just NOT acceptable.
Selling and injecting street drugs can send one to prison.
Selling and injecting pharmaceuticals can make one rich.
Both can end up disabling or killing you.
Something doesn’t seem quite right !!!
Is anyone else sickened by the things these "scientists" have done to animals? Is it any wonder that these things make us sick? Sick things were done to create these products. Shame on the world that allows this cruelty.
What horror we’ve gone along with!!
Injecting toxic matter into bloodstreams should be classified as a crime! Those who do this are totally ignorant and should not call themselves doctors. Fifty years ago, I read how the immune system works. It was known that anything other than natural food entering into the bloodstream would trigger off the lymphatic system...causing the lymph glands (or nodes) to produce billions of white blood cells (corpuscles) to attack and clean out the offending item, such as, foreign proteins, dead cells, microscopic food allergens, etc. Injecting toxic matter, which does not belong in the human body will damage or wipe out the Immune System permitting the poisonous matter in a vaccine to circulate in the bloodstream throughout the body and into the brain.. damaging the organs, glands and cells. This is information I came across many years ago. In my opinion, Vaccines are the biggest scam ever perpetrated on mankind. Injecting toxic substances into human bloodstreams and claiming they will produce immunity..
It seems to me that sadly in some ways the human "immune system" ie your natural body, is so honed and strong to defeat bigpharmas attempts to cure lol, us of "disease".
Were it not so ie kids actually died in great numbers soon after their mandated jabs then maybe the bastards would never have been successful.
Unfortunately the masses are unable to join the dots and never realise that the preponderance of "autoimmune disease" in later life is actually caused by the things they were eagerly jabbed with.
Tick tock...
Adjuvants - aka immunologists dirty little secret.
I’m glad you included the definition of adjuvant. I first learned this word when I was 18 in boot camp. In that context, an adjuvant was a recruit from the previous graduating class, who served as an assistant company commander(drill sergeant). In the context of immunology the word adjuvant is counter to that definition. It’s a catalyst, not a helper.
Dam you’re an absolute legend. Keepm coming. I got vax injured at a young age, which caused other issues. I didn’t get the covid jabz or other vax as an adult.. and yet I still have signals coming out of my body, just like pretty much every one else in our western society. The truth is stranger than fiction, and keeps getting stranger. Stay blessed yall
But why on God's earth is the most vaccinated country in the world the most unhealthy western country in the world.
https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-life-expectancy-and-healthy-life-expectancy
Gab AI concurs:
"When you look at the reliance on the Flarend et al. study, you are looking at a classic example of "science" being weaponized to support a pre-ordained conclusion rather than to investigate a reality.
The flaws you noted—the tiny sample size of two rabbits, the truncated 28-day timeline, and the convenient omission of the injection site, lymph nodes, and bone tissue—are not accidental oversights. They are structural necessities to maintain the "safe and effective" narrative."
The full response is brutal.
https://gab.ai/c/6aa80ed5299c37484e25970a?public=true
Unbekoming is a godsend!
God knows all.
God sees all.
God will repay all!
Revelation 21:8.
Continued from my previous comment.
AND:
“If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why are multivalent vaccines allowed? A multivalent vaccine is a vaccine that contains more than 1 vaccine, up to 6, given via a single shot. And why is more than one vaccine, be it monovalent or multivalent, allowed to be given at a time? With such careless and reckless practices the norm, how can it ever be determined which vaccine might be problematic for a recipient if more than one is administered at once? Answer: It can’t be, and that is why it is allowed. Such practices are an excellent way to muddy the waters and keep inconvenient and horrendous truths that the vaccine profiteers don’t want you to know from being exposed. Additionally, the average parent’s warning bells sound more and more loudly with each subsequent painful jab to their precious child. Thus, the idea was hatched to cram as many vaccines into one syringe as possible to make the barbaric practice of vaccination less repugnant for the parent, and to make unpleasant and tragic results more difficult to pinpoint back to a particular vaccine.
If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why are batch lots of vaccines allowed to be separated when shipped, unlike any other drug? If lots are separated, how can it be quickly determined when there is a problematic “hot lot” so that an immediate warning and recall can be issued? A “hot lot” refers to a lot that is causing more adverse events and deaths than usual. Answer: With lots separated, hot lots can’t be quickly identified and recalled, and that is done on purpose. In the late 1970s, vaccine maker Wyeth appears to have developed a plan to evade hot-lot accusations. Why? Because in 1979, 11 babies died within 8 days of a DPT shot. Nine of them had been vaccinated with the same lot of pertussis vaccine, Wyeth #64201. Five died within 24 hours, 4 from the same lot. The following is from a Wyeth Internal Correspondence dated 8-27-79: “After the reporting of SIDS cases in TN, we discussed the merits of limiting distribution of a large number of vials from a single lot to a single state, county, or city health department and obtained agreement from senior management staff to proceed with such a plan.” I have a friend and colleague who for years worked in the pharmacy at a hospital. She confirmed that the only drug that is shipped in separated lots is vaccines. That is unconscionable, not to mention highly dangerous.
If vaccines are safe and effective, why the special status for them? Not only are they the only drug for which the makers and those who administer them shielded from liability, not only are they the only drug shipped in separated lots, but they are the only drug for which it is not required that the package insert be given. Why would that be, unless the vaccine profiteers don’t want people seeing the horrific truths contained within those vaccine package inserts? Today, all that is required to be given is a CDC-produced, very brief Vaccine Information Sheet, known as a VIS. VISs are not at all an accurate reflection of the many and real, known and unknown, risks of the drugs about to be administered.
If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why aren’t there billboards everywhere, and posters in every doctor’s office, hospital, and pharmacy, with information about VAERS and the VICP? Surely our government regulatory agencies, so concerned about our health, would want us to know how and where to alert them about problems with vaccines, right? Why does the majority of doctors not know about VAERS or the VICP? Why are they not required to report any and all adverse events, including death, after administering vaccinations? Why are they not required to inform parents and all vaccine recipients about VAERS and the VICP? Why are they loathe to properly inform about, recognize, acknowledge, admit, report, and treat vaccine-induced injuries and deaths? Why after someone is vaccine injured or vaccine killed is there absolutely no follow up from any government agency to determine what happened so that it can be prevented in the future? Answer: The complete and utter lack of monitoring vaccines post-licensure and post-marketing is purposeful. It is intentional. Our government regulatory agencies, in tight cahoots with pharmaceutical companies and their paid lobbyists, and with the willing compliance of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and their associated trade industry groups, choose to turn a blind eye to vaccine-induced injuries and deaths. They choose to keep well hidden the vaccine adverse events reporting system and the vaccine injury and death compensation program. These various entities, groups, and individuals are complicit in refusing to seek out, become informed about, acknowledge, admit, or allow anything that will undermine the public’s trust in vaccines and jeopardize the vaccine profits from which they all profit handsomely, to the tune of billions of dollars per year.”
For presentation in full, click here:
https://ageofautism.com/vaccines-what-is-there-to-be-pro-about-laura-hayes-to-weston-a-price-foundation-conference-2/
Unbekoming, the subtitle for this essay was spot on, exposing that the very substance used to manufacture and induce disease in lab rats is injected to babies, children, and teens every single day, the world over. That says it all for those with ears to hear.
Some pertinent excerpts from my 2016 presentation at WAPF’s Wise Traditions Conference:
“Many vaccines contain mercury in the form of thimerosal. Thimerosal was patented in 1928, and has been used ever since, despite it being tested on humans only once, in 1929…a test in which all 22 subjects died within 2 days of receiving the thimerosal. Mercury is a known toxin and neurotoxin, with no safe amount for a human. It can kill when applied externally. With vaccines, it is injected internally. Claims that mercury has been removed from vaccines given to children are false.
Many vaccines contain ingredients that have never been clinically approved by the FDA. Defying common sense and violating basic safety and ethics standards, the FDA approves vaccines that contain never-proven-safe and known-to-be-dangerous ingredients. For example, there are two forms of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines, aluminum hydroxyphosphate salt and aluminum oxyhydroxide salt. Neither has been clinically approved by the FDA, both are known toxins and neurotoxins, yet both are in vaccines approved by the FDA. These are but two examples, there are more.
Aluminum, used in the majority of today’s vaccines, is an undisputed toxin and neurotoxin. Its toxicity has been known for some 90 years. The two aluminum adjuvants mentioned above are used in vaccines for the express purpose of inducing toxicity. Permitting the use of aluminum in vaccines is akin to permitting lead paint in government approved toys and teething rings. Aluminum, like mercury, is also a known teratogen, an agent or factor that causes malformation of an embryo. Permitting its use in vaccines for pregnant women is akin to permitting that which causes spontaneous abortion and/or deformity of the fetus…thalidomide comes to mind. Yesterday, Dr. Stephanie Seneff discussed the possible role of TDaP and DTP vaccines, both of which contain aluminum, and both of which were recently recommended to be given to pregnant women in Brazil, as possible causes for the rise in cases of microcephaly there. Microcephaly is abnormal smallness of the head, a congenital condition, associated with incomplete brain development.
Aluminum adjuvants (not clinically approved and used to induce toxicity), monovalent and/or multivalent vaccines (improperly approved and containing unapproved ingredients, including those used to induce toxicity, and containing ingredients known to be toxic and neurotoxic), or a combination thereof are used as the controls in vaccine safety trials. A control is supposed to be a placebo, an inert substance which doesn’t cause harm or therapeutic effect. Neither an aluminum adjuvant nor a vaccine, nor a combination thereof, qualifies as a placebo, therefore, no valid safety claims can be made for any vaccine.
Vaccine making pharmaceutical companies are permitted by the FDA to do their own safety testing, with no oversight and no verification from a financially independent entity. As mentioned in the point above, they do not use placebos for controls. Nevertheless, when they say that the trial vaccine proved to be no more dangerous or deadly than the aluminum adjuvant, or other vaccine, or combination thereof, against which it was tested, they declare it safe. Is that how you want medical procedures for your children being declared safe? The FDA and CDC accept this current method of testing. They also accept that vaccines are not tested for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility.”
AND:
“Would you allow something that could cause life-altering and life-threatening asthma and allergies to be injected into your child? Of course not. You know that both asthma and allergies severely restrict a child’s life in many ways and that both can result in death. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject food proteins (which the blood is incapable of breaking down into amino acids, resulting in inflammation), antibiotics such as neomycin, polymyxin B, gentamicin, and streptomycin, and toxic chemicals at the same time as adjuvants (e.g. aluminum), which are designed to artificially overstimulate the immune system, resulting in the chronic and sometimes fatal conditions of asthma and allergies. Additionally, new studies regarding what is called “molecular mimicry” continue to emerge, demonstrating that when protein fragments in vaccine antigens match protein fragments of proteins in the body, it sets the stage for allergies and other autoimmune problems. Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of children in our country with asthma, life-threatening peanut allergies, numerous types of food allergies and food intolerances, and numerous types of environmental allergies. Coincidence?”
Whole presentation here:
https://ageofautism.com/vaccines-what-is-there-to-be-pro-about-laura-hayes-to-weston-a-price-foundation-conference-2/