Well, when I get to Heaven, I will sign up for every science class they offer. I started reading your article and realized, "I need to go to the part where he explains it to a six--year old."
But at least I can both feel & smell the delicious scent when a storm is coming.
"...If lightning is one step in a circuit reaching from the Sun to the ground, solar activity should modulate lightning rates in exactly this way."
HAARP seems to be based on this understanding, and claims I've previously dismissed that HAARP could instigate earthquakes and other lithic phenomena attain a rational basis I now must credit. Thanks to your elucidation of this body of evidence, I have gained a new understanding of our universe, and I appreciate it very much.
The first thing to realise before addressing or analysing any of the proposals is that the Earth is not a planet; it is a stationary realm, and it is aviated, navigated and measured as flat. Subsequently, most of the so-called science is incorrect.
One of the most reassuring articles, bringing clarity to the conversation, the scheming of the meglomaniacs, and the feeling of being more lifelike with every storm. Positively recharged. No wonder, they want to block the sun, at every level.
So many areas now to look into with a reopened eye.
And what astonishes me most is that you managed to bring all that together with no mention of the latest exotic physics in the form of scalar waves, in which I'm a firm believer. So I know that even with the electric universe's potential for compensation of gravity there is still an even bigger hole filler just waiting to be placed on the Everyday Items shelf at the Science supermaket.
As I read this piece, I thought that it was exactly like medical orthodoxy, religious orthodoxy, name your orthodoxy. Ask the right question, and the whole edifice collapses. The universe is a gigantic mystery, and each of us is a microcosm of that mystery. Beautiful!
"The mainstream cannot allow lightning to be a space-electrical phenomenon. If it did, the electric universe model would follow"
I am not at all convinced that the electric universe model (EUM) would follow from the electric circuit discussed in the article. The article does mention current and voltage but doesnt discuss the total energy available this way. A lightning is brief. To eliminate the gravity associated physics and substitute the electric universe idea requires such energy considerations. Black hole phenomena are now difficult to dispute and seem to agree with mainstream physics. The refraction of light due to gravity also seem to agree with its theory. If electric currents flowing from stars are to replace gravity there is a problem with electric particles travelling much below light speed.v/c<1% And the flow may be irregular. Thus one would expect noticeable fluctuations in gravity. Dark matter theories may be wrong or right in the mainstream so that isnt decisive.
Well, when I get to Heaven, I will sign up for every science class they offer. I started reading your article and realized, "I need to go to the part where he explains it to a six--year old."
But at least I can both feel & smell the delicious scent when a storm is coming.
Yep, I had to go straight to the 6 year old part :)
Agreed
I wonder how the thousands of satellites spinning around the earth are affecting this planets connections.
They are not spinning; they are floating via helium balloons.
"...If lightning is one step in a circuit reaching from the Sun to the ground, solar activity should modulate lightning rates in exactly this way."
HAARP seems to be based on this understanding, and claims I've previously dismissed that HAARP could instigate earthquakes and other lithic phenomena attain a rational basis I now must credit. Thanks to your elucidation of this body of evidence, I have gained a new understanding of our universe, and I appreciate it very much.
Thanks!
The first thing to realise before addressing or analysing any of the proposals is that the Earth is not a planet; it is a stationary realm, and it is aviated, navigated and measured as flat. Subsequently, most of the so-called science is incorrect.
Never seen my hair blowing behind me, on this spinning globe! Really, really, stupid ideas.
Fascinating stuff
One of the most reassuring articles, bringing clarity to the conversation, the scheming of the meglomaniacs, and the feeling of being more lifelike with every storm. Positively recharged. No wonder, they want to block the sun, at every level.
🙏⚡️⚡️
Wow!
So many areas now to look into with a reopened eye.
And what astonishes me most is that you managed to bring all that together with no mention of the latest exotic physics in the form of scalar waves, in which I'm a firm believer. So I know that even with the electric universe's potential for compensation of gravity there is still an even bigger hole filler just waiting to be placed on the Everyday Items shelf at the Science supermaket.
Thanks Unbekoming
Fascinating
As I read this piece, I thought that it was exactly like medical orthodoxy, religious orthodoxy, name your orthodoxy. Ask the right question, and the whole edifice collapses. The universe is a gigantic mystery, and each of us is a microcosm of that mystery. Beautiful!
Very interesting! In all this body of evidence is there discussions on how to harness lightening or this electrical circuit ?
Do you have or is there an electrical schematic of the new science on Lightning? I would like to see a copy.
NICE!
Learned about this some years ago through https://www.jmccanneyscience.com/
He put all of this together, very interesting.
"The mainstream cannot allow lightning to be a space-electrical phenomenon. If it did, the electric universe model would follow"
I am not at all convinced that the electric universe model (EUM) would follow from the electric circuit discussed in the article. The article does mention current and voltage but doesnt discuss the total energy available this way. A lightning is brief. To eliminate the gravity associated physics and substitute the electric universe idea requires such energy considerations. Black hole phenomena are now difficult to dispute and seem to agree with mainstream physics. The refraction of light due to gravity also seem to agree with its theory. If electric currents flowing from stars are to replace gravity there is a problem with electric particles travelling much below light speed.v/c<1% And the flow may be irregular. Thus one would expect noticeable fluctuations in gravity. Dark matter theories may be wrong or right in the mainstream so that isnt decisive.
I am remembering the Lightning Research Project at Camp Blanding FL fnd by DARPA. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169809505000682