Well, when I get to Heaven, I will sign up for every science class they offer. I started reading your article and realized, "I need to go to the part where he explains it to a six--year old."
But at least I can both feel & smell the delicious scent when a storm is coming.
One of the most reassuring articles, bringing clarity to the conversation, the scheming of the meglomaniacs, and the feeling of being more lifelike with every storm. Positively recharged. No wonder, they want to block the sun, at every level.
"...If lightning is one step in a circuit reaching from the Sun to the ground, solar activity should modulate lightning rates in exactly this way."
HAARP seems to be based on this understanding, and claims I've previously dismissed that HAARP could instigate earthquakes and other lithic phenomena attain a rational basis I now must credit. Thanks to your elucidation of this body of evidence, I have gained a new understanding of our universe, and I appreciate it very much.
As I read this piece, I thought that it was exactly like medical orthodoxy, religious orthodoxy, name your orthodoxy. Ask the right question, and the whole edifice collapses. The universe is a gigantic mystery, and each of us is a microcosm of that mystery. Beautiful!
After a long career in electronics manufacturing supplying the medical and military industries, I can confirm that satellites, space stations and spacecraft do not exist. There is no curvature of the Earth, https://earthcurvature.com/ Military hardware does not take curvature into account because there is no curvature.
You the author are an intelligent person, there is no doubt. However, with this article you have fallen under the same delusional spell as many in the medical industry. Complicated explanations wrapped around multiple theories just to accommodate the childish science-fantasy of spinning balls in a vacuum. For God's sake, please grow up and look at the evidence all around you.
"The mainstream cannot allow lightning to be a space-electrical phenomenon. If it did, the electric universe model would follow"
I am not at all convinced that the electric universe model (EUM) would follow from the electric circuit discussed in the article. The article does mention current and voltage but doesnt discuss the total energy available this way. A lightning is brief. To eliminate the gravity associated physics and substitute the electric universe idea requires such energy considerations. Black hole phenomena are now difficult to dispute and seem to agree with mainstream physics. The refraction of light due to gravity also seem to agree with its theory. If electric currents flowing from stars are to replace gravity there is a problem with electric particles travelling much below light speed.v/c<1% And the flow may be irregular. Thus one would expect noticeable fluctuations in gravity. Dark matter theories may be wrong or right in the mainstream so that isnt decisive.
The electric circuit between the earth and the sun is interesting in itself. But the quantitative data I have seen before led me to see it as a minor effect energy-wise while the enormous influx of solar energy captures for example the quantitative aspects of our weather. Therefore when somebody makes claims that the concerned electric circuit explains some phenomenon which demands lots of energy I always look for how they handle that aspect quantitatively. The enthusiasts for the electric universe theory usually dont do that.
.
I certainly wouldnt mind if the so called general theory of relativity (GRT) was wrong but so far its stands up better to experimental scrutiny than was originally expected. It is based on 19th century mathematics called invariant theory expressing that independent of what coordinate system is chosen the result must be the same. That idea reduces the possibilities for what can be invariant. So it has a generality to depart from.
.
A simpler version of invariance is called equiaffine invariance. An example for two dimensions is, what is invariant for all affine transformations in 2D when the transformation may have any 4 coefficients provided that the determinant is unity. Unit determinant means the area enclosed by anything is preserved by the transformation while the shapes involved may change very much
.
The invariant that results is a certain mathematical expression in terms of the two coordinates x and y in the 2D plane
When that expression is set equal to a constant it happens to evaluate to all the astrophysical orbit types of Newtonian Mechanics of the solar system. Those are when the invariant is a constant different from zero ellipses and hyperbolas while if the invariant is zero the result is a parabolic curve. Those are all the trajectories resulting from Newtonian physics for a central force such as from the sun. Note that invariant theory of pure mathematics led to that without any physics assumptions.
.
I provided that example just to show how seemingly powerful invariant theory is.
Newton didnt have that theory available at the time.
.
And the invariance theory used for GRT is more fundamental so it wouldnt come as a big surprise if that too would bring something interesting. Schwarzschild used that invariant theory and added the assumption that it must asymptotically (ie far away) agree with Newtonian physics. He didnt use Einsteins right hand part of the equation. Einstein likened his righthand side of the equation with a simple shed while he likened the lefthand side with a temple.
.
That 'Temple' came from pure math. Schwarzschild obtained the mathematics that seems to agree with black holes (collapsed stars) more than anybody anticipated (or appreciated) at the time.
(In other applications of the full equation I Think the current wisdom is that it agrees with experiments)
So many areas now to look into with a reopened eye.
And what astonishes me most is that you managed to bring all that together with no mention of the latest exotic physics in the form of scalar waves, in which I'm a firm believer. So I know that even with the electric universe's potential for compensation of gravity there is still an even bigger hole filler just waiting to be placed on the Everyday Items shelf at the Science supermaket.
Just wow!!! 🤩. So, may I respectfully request an article of the impact of regular sunbathing? This is so brilliant. I love how you bring up facts I never thought to ask or question - in spite of the evidence! About 35+ years ago, before becoming Christian, I read the book by Paul Davies, Superforce, on the scientific evidence for a force beyond ourselves. The other impactful words I remember is that electrons move in the direction the scientists expect… what a DESIGN the world we live in is!!!
This post reminds me of Pierre Kory's latest book; The Blueprint of Life which derived from his recent deep dive mineral study & theory behind the rock mineral extract he is associated with.
Lighning post sealed my subscription just today.
Your back and forth style would work really well with this topic.
Now all we have to do is rediscover how to collect that electricity from the atmosphere through the aether to replace a good portion of our power requirements.
Well, when I get to Heaven, I will sign up for every science class they offer. I started reading your article and realized, "I need to go to the part where he explains it to a six--year old."
But at least I can both feel & smell the delicious scent when a storm is coming.
Yep, I had to go straight to the 6 year old part :)
So did I.
Agreed
One of the most reassuring articles, bringing clarity to the conversation, the scheming of the meglomaniacs, and the feeling of being more lifelike with every storm. Positively recharged. No wonder, they want to block the sun, at every level.
🙏⚡️⚡️
I wonder how the thousands of satellites spinning around the earth are affecting this planets connections.
"...If lightning is one step in a circuit reaching from the Sun to the ground, solar activity should modulate lightning rates in exactly this way."
HAARP seems to be based on this understanding, and claims I've previously dismissed that HAARP could instigate earthquakes and other lithic phenomena attain a rational basis I now must credit. Thanks to your elucidation of this body of evidence, I have gained a new understanding of our universe, and I appreciate it very much.
Thanks!
As I read this piece, I thought that it was exactly like medical orthodoxy, religious orthodoxy, name your orthodoxy. Ask the right question, and the whole edifice collapses. The universe is a gigantic mystery, and each of us is a microcosm of that mystery. Beautiful!
After a long career in electronics manufacturing supplying the medical and military industries, I can confirm that satellites, space stations and spacecraft do not exist. There is no curvature of the Earth, https://earthcurvature.com/ Military hardware does not take curvature into account because there is no curvature.
You the author are an intelligent person, there is no doubt. However, with this article you have fallen under the same delusional spell as many in the medical industry. Complicated explanations wrapped around multiple theories just to accommodate the childish science-fantasy of spinning balls in a vacuum. For God's sake, please grow up and look at the evidence all around you.
BTW, apologies for 'please grow up'. I have the utmost respect for you and your efforts to shine light in this world.
Take 'space' and 'galaxy' and all the rest of mainstream cosmology out of it, and it's an interesting theory.
Fascinating
"The mainstream cannot allow lightning to be a space-electrical phenomenon. If it did, the electric universe model would follow"
I am not at all convinced that the electric universe model (EUM) would follow from the electric circuit discussed in the article. The article does mention current and voltage but doesnt discuss the total energy available this way. A lightning is brief. To eliminate the gravity associated physics and substitute the electric universe idea requires such energy considerations. Black hole phenomena are now difficult to dispute and seem to agree with mainstream physics. The refraction of light due to gravity also seem to agree with its theory. If electric currents flowing from stars are to replace gravity there is a problem with electric particles travelling much below light speed.v/c<1% And the flow may be irregular. Thus one would expect noticeable fluctuations in gravity. Dark matter theories may be wrong or right in the mainstream so that isnt decisive.
The electric circuit between the earth and the sun is interesting in itself. But the quantitative data I have seen before led me to see it as a minor effect energy-wise while the enormous influx of solar energy captures for example the quantitative aspects of our weather. Therefore when somebody makes claims that the concerned electric circuit explains some phenomenon which demands lots of energy I always look for how they handle that aspect quantitatively. The enthusiasts for the electric universe theory usually dont do that.
.
I certainly wouldnt mind if the so called general theory of relativity (GRT) was wrong but so far its stands up better to experimental scrutiny than was originally expected. It is based on 19th century mathematics called invariant theory expressing that independent of what coordinate system is chosen the result must be the same. That idea reduces the possibilities for what can be invariant. So it has a generality to depart from.
.
A simpler version of invariance is called equiaffine invariance. An example for two dimensions is, what is invariant for all affine transformations in 2D when the transformation may have any 4 coefficients provided that the determinant is unity. Unit determinant means the area enclosed by anything is preserved by the transformation while the shapes involved may change very much
.
The invariant that results is a certain mathematical expression in terms of the two coordinates x and y in the 2D plane
When that expression is set equal to a constant it happens to evaluate to all the astrophysical orbit types of Newtonian Mechanics of the solar system. Those are when the invariant is a constant different from zero ellipses and hyperbolas while if the invariant is zero the result is a parabolic curve. Those are all the trajectories resulting from Newtonian physics for a central force such as from the sun. Note that invariant theory of pure mathematics led to that without any physics assumptions.
.
I provided that example just to show how seemingly powerful invariant theory is.
Newton didnt have that theory available at the time.
.
And the invariance theory used for GRT is more fundamental so it wouldnt come as a big surprise if that too would bring something interesting. Schwarzschild used that invariant theory and added the assumption that it must asymptotically (ie far away) agree with Newtonian physics. He didnt use Einsteins right hand part of the equation. Einstein likened his righthand side of the equation with a simple shed while he likened the lefthand side with a temple.
.
That 'Temple' came from pure math. Schwarzschild obtained the mathematics that seems to agree with black holes (collapsed stars) more than anybody anticipated (or appreciated) at the time.
(In other applications of the full equation I Think the current wisdom is that it agrees with experiments)
Wow!
So many areas now to look into with a reopened eye.
And what astonishes me most is that you managed to bring all that together with no mention of the latest exotic physics in the form of scalar waves, in which I'm a firm believer. So I know that even with the electric universe's potential for compensation of gravity there is still an even bigger hole filler just waiting to be placed on the Everyday Items shelf at the Science supermaket.
Thanks Unbekoming
Do you have or is there an electrical schematic of the new science on Lightning? I would like to see a copy.
Very interesting! In all this body of evidence is there discussions on how to harness lightening or this electrical circuit ?
Very well put. Very truthful in it's merits and facts and the science of the possible bright future ahead.
Just wow!!! 🤩. So, may I respectfully request an article of the impact of regular sunbathing? This is so brilliant. I love how you bring up facts I never thought to ask or question - in spite of the evidence! About 35+ years ago, before becoming Christian, I read the book by Paul Davies, Superforce, on the scientific evidence for a force beyond ourselves. The other impactful words I remember is that electrons move in the direction the scientists expect… what a DESIGN the world we live in is!!!
This post reminds me of Pierre Kory's latest book; The Blueprint of Life which derived from his recent deep dive mineral study & theory behind the rock mineral extract he is associated with.
Lighning post sealed my subscription just today.
Your back and forth style would work really well with this topic.
https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/chapter-iii-the-rockwater-circuit?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=obh4j
Now all we have to do is rediscover how to collect that electricity from the atmosphere through the aether to replace a good portion of our power requirements.