Thank you. Now if we could just get everyone in the world to read this.
"The companies that make the shots have special microscopes too. They could have looked inside their own bottles. They did not."
They did though. The metal is an attack vector and is not there by accident. If you go almost anywhere outside your home and turn in 360 degrees, with the right kind of eyes you will find the answer as to why.
Metal reacts to electromatic waves which are emitted en-masss from all of those towers surrounding and saturating you with microwaves which appeaed almost literally overnight when the world was locked in their homes afraid of a virus—the very thing these bovine "vaccines" are supposed to protect against.
Long story short those kids are likely now a part of the grid. And, if true, there is surely going to be hell to pay for those that did this to them.
Matthew 18-6: if anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
Metal reacts to electromagnetic waves? Not usually. Wave intensity is important to having any effect. RF radiation from cell towers(or any EM wave source) drops exponentially from the source. Extremely close to the source is only way to receive high intensity. Who stand next to a cell tower 200 ft in the air?
Maybe intense gamma waves IN outer space . . . perhaps some ions of metals react to certain waves but if so, minimal. It would be interesting to hear what you are referring to here.
Yes, metals strongly react to electromagnetic waves, primarily by reflecting them due to their abundance of free electrons.
When an electromagnetic wave strikes a metal, its oscillating electric field causes these free electrons to move and oscillate in sync. This synchronized motion generates a counter-field that effectively cancels the wave's penetration into the metal (a phenomenon known as the skin effect) and re-radiates the energy as a reflected wave.
Reflection: The dominant reaction for most metals below their plasma frequency (which includes visible light, microwaves, and radio waves), making them excellent conductors and shields.
Absorption: A minor portion of the wave's energy is absorbed as the oscillating electrons collide with the metal’s lattice structure, converting electromagnetic energy into heat.
Penetration: Metals do not reflect gamma rays effectively, as their frequency is too high for the electrons to respond quickly enough, allowing the radiation to pass through.
Well, Jacquelyn, I am not a physicist, just an engineer. But, in my world you have not made a case for how metals in general, make for bad actors as tiny particle residents in a human body. If, for example, your explanation was something like this, I would have had cause to pause:
<<
-- any tiny, low intensity burst from a cell tower half a mile away will cause a catalytic effect in any free metal particle in a human body. It can cause the metal to combine with a variety of salts, blood, cell exosomes to cause carcinogenic agents.
-- There are studies showing human babies dying of cancer from cell tower catalytic effects.>>
Of course, nothing you say above can be construed by any imagination to infer such a crazy story.
In order for any effect to occur a CONSTANT and HIGH intensity non-relenting and directed EM source must be applied to have any effect on human physiology from what I know. For example, a directed Xray or microwave directed at a human body for over 2 or 3 seconds would be required to Affect it. How a tiny particle of metal could accelerate, catalyze, exacerbate such radiation is beyond me. Maybe YOU know! How any human could purposefully allow themselves to be set in front of such an imposing weapon of such conception is also beyond me. Sitting in your home 200 yards from a cell tower sending out micro second bursts hitting a human at 100,000 times lower intensity than the 200 yd source ain't the same.
On the other hand you did not address my points regarding EM wave intensity and distance from EM source effects on human physiology. Also, you pasted in random information regarding absorption which outright admits that virtually nothing is absorbed by metals but the info still fails to apply the absorption level to distance from source. Virtually all EM radiation is reflected except high frequency spectra like gamma which is not slowed by metals, or nearly anything.
If metals are so terrible for humans we should sure be looking at alternatives for the millions of metal joints walking around in the population!
pretty-red, 5G is directed energy. It uses beamforming to directly access targets as you describe. The towers are linked directly with Havana Syndrome.
-- does not look like directed energy to me; low intensity analog signals to and from a cell tower.
-- signal is changed to digital and sent long distance over land lines to another cell tower to be directed to person you are speaking with.
-- I see NO indication at all that high power or intensity is being sent out to people's phones or people's bodies. Nothing.
-- The person on the receiving end is known only to be in the circle of influence of a certain cell tower so, rationally thinking, there is no way the tower can expect to find them at a particular spot in time. So, it must be transmitting a spherical wave in all directions from the cell tower to get a signal to a target.
-- if living near a cell tower(400 yds from me) it appears that millions of spherical analog waves are being sent my way every day; all low intensity.
Directed energy is ONE thing, beamforming utilized in low power cell tower comms is another:
from an AI response to my question in Brave comparing the two:
"Beamforming technology in cell towers focuses signals to improve communication efficiency, typically using low power levels. In contrast, directed energy weapons (DEWs) can produce power outputs exceeding 100 megawatts, which is vastly higher than the energy used in beamforming for telecommunications."
I am a big fan of yours my friend, but please consider, after all the venom lies the governent told and continues to tell about their muderous pandemic and killshot agenda, that they and their industry numbers and disclosures are the absolute last things one should ever believe. They are owned lock stock and barrel by their buyers, bribers,, and blackmailers and covid and 5g go hand in hand. And just like the vaccine, the 5g grid has alernate purposes and undisclosed technologies at work.
In europe there was a scandal called cellgate where the cell companies were increasing the output of the tower signals. There are many videos floating around of the same happening here by in vast increases. But that is beside the point. Just as Sasha discovered with covid DARPA’s fingerprints are all over 5G.
The crap they do list in vaccines is mostly toxic. Apart from believing the insanity that any vaccine can save you from some silly virus, why would anyone fill their body with this toxic crap? If your vaccine fails and you get sick and die, does the doctor pay? No...he reaps gobs of bonuses for bullying you into poisoning yourself while he turns away and pretends he is helping you to be healthier. The joke is on you until you wake the heck up.
Unintentional my arse! As noted, these multi-billion dollar companies have all of the equipment and know-how necessary to find the contamination. They do not want to find it. This is the same as they want the contaminants in the product and therefore, are purposefully injuring and destroying the people's health.
People need to be held accountable! These are at best inexcusable in any manufacturing industry at worst they are a premeditated attempt to harm or murder the individuals receiving these poisons! Get burnt by a Rotten McRonnies coffee… here is a million dollars! Have your life destroyed by Big Pharma oh no we are protected! From an outright attempt to destroy lives? Thats pure straight up 🐂💩!
This needs to be spread far and wide. But I am sure it will be suppressed and blocked everywhere. Just like all the other warnings to stop vaccinating. To my surprise a vaxx' for cats seems to be safer than the 43 that are injected in babies and children. But I still won't take my cats to the vet. Bad enough that I have to take my in-door dog now and then.
In the 1960s-70s, I learned that learned was correct (in oz). Since then, so many people say learnt that I have to stop being triggered by people's spelling mistakes. (Similar words - it was earned not earnt etc). After thinking I was going to prove my point through Gxxgle, I was put in my place - showing different Western countries had different " correct" spellings. Can't argue with the all-knowing Gxxgle
which is now expanded to untold depths wit AI. It is still learned, earned etc in my book.
Just because people slide right in does not make something correct or right or even ok. It even 'sounds' incorrect. Its residence is all wrong. And, again, I am not being a prick. Its just, I have just had enough of the deliberate act of human degrading. Haven't we all ? Stand tall. Taller than "them."
It's been used in English since the 1400s. Nothing degraded about it. English language has many exceptions that don't follow rules. It's the standard British spelling , but learned is also used. I don't know why you are getting your knickers in a twist about it. Your comments and references to pedos/ them are totally disproportionate to being corrected on your original mistake.
There are so many unknowns in these shots. The biggest being is they are injectables and we really don’t know the details of how the human body clears or does not clear foreign material. The biggest unknown being aluminum. Yet, they will cite ‘peer’ reviewed research saying that vaccines are not dangerous and that vaccines even produce a positive effect on mortality beyond their intended prevention of a specific disease. we see how unhealthy our population has become. Specifically, we see how the most vaccinated around us are the unhealthiest. Apparently we are not to trust our lying eyes.
I assume these companies are still in business. Why should they still be in business? Administer penalties big enough to put them out business. The do not deserve, nor have a right to continue existing.
you probably read that pfizer just got a billion contract to make more poison. the govt pays them to continue. I wonder if Pfizer ever made anything decent. I remember reading that the childhood crap the doc prescribed, terramcin, was one of the worst antibiotics/meds ever produced. I probably took 30 or more of these - what did mom know, that this was not 'a bottle for the cough' but poison.
I think I read in 2019 they had like 23 law cases running against them. Moderna never made anything before the scamdemic. Both companies are relying on govt to stay in business. The govt IMO should not give any money at all to businesses.
That terramycin was in the early 1960s. Did they ever make anything worth while?
The fines for fraud and compo payments are easily covered by profits. They nearly went out of business due to large claims against them but they got help in 1986 with the no liability to them act, and making governments pay limited compensation.
This is Criminal. How can these companies be trusted. They have special liability exemptions that allow this kind of thing to happen. It appears that anyone who brings this bad news to light is shunned sued, fired, and/or threatened . Vaccines are a religion no one can criticize or they are excommunicated and de-platformed. Their studies are labeled Misinformation.
If I were an artist person, the picture I would paint would be a dark, creepy, trashed out lab with ghoulish faced people, randomly throwing into a cauldron bits and pieces of junk to cast spells of sickness and disease. Giggling and screeching about how wonderful this will be. How happy their master is going to be. How stupid humans are with it all. Because they haven't chose to discern what makes sense and what doesn't. Of course my mind is very diluted and a little on the warped side. (good thing i am not artistic)
It would seem even a non intelligent person would question why there are lethal substance in a shot which will go into your blood stream. Sort of reminds me of junkies who could care less what they shoot up but it's all about the security of thinking it will be great.
This article's description of metal particles found in vaccines sounds similar to what was reported by Dr. Poornima Wagh (PhD) during the COVID scam. She was a member of a team of investigators who analyzed the contents of over 2,000 COVID shots from various makers and found metal particles in them. There are numerous ad hominem comments falsely claiming that she's a charlatan. Search for "Dr. Poornima Wagh's Team Odysee" or "Dr. Poornima Wagh’s team test ingredients 2305 vials of Covid-19 injection – The shocking facts!" which should bring up a video of her speaking for about 1.22 hours.
Thank you. Now if we could just get everyone in the world to read this.
"The companies that make the shots have special microscopes too. They could have looked inside their own bottles. They did not."
They did though. The metal is an attack vector and is not there by accident. If you go almost anywhere outside your home and turn in 360 degrees, with the right kind of eyes you will find the answer as to why.
Metal reacts to electromatic waves which are emitted en-masss from all of those towers surrounding and saturating you with microwaves which appeaed almost literally overnight when the world was locked in their homes afraid of a virus—the very thing these bovine "vaccines" are supposed to protect against.
Long story short those kids are likely now a part of the grid. And, if true, there is surely going to be hell to pay for those that did this to them.
Matthew 18-6: if anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
Hmmm, not so sure about that Tri.
Metal reacts to electromagnetic waves? Not usually. Wave intensity is important to having any effect. RF radiation from cell towers(or any EM wave source) drops exponentially from the source. Extremely close to the source is only way to receive high intensity. Who stand next to a cell tower 200 ft in the air?
Maybe intense gamma waves IN outer space . . . perhaps some ions of metals react to certain waves but if so, minimal. It would be interesting to hear what you are referring to here.
There is way more going on with the 5g network than cell. Here is a primer:
https://substack.com/@tritorch/note/c-87295573
They are a surveyllance grid at their most mild. Thise metals are there for a reason
Yes, metals strongly react to electromagnetic waves, primarily by reflecting them due to their abundance of free electrons.
When an electromagnetic wave strikes a metal, its oscillating electric field causes these free electrons to move and oscillate in sync. This synchronized motion generates a counter-field that effectively cancels the wave's penetration into the metal (a phenomenon known as the skin effect) and re-radiates the energy as a reflected wave.
Reflection: The dominant reaction for most metals below their plasma frequency (which includes visible light, microwaves, and radio waves), making them excellent conductors and shields.
Absorption: A minor portion of the wave's energy is absorbed as the oscillating electrons collide with the metal’s lattice structure, converting electromagnetic energy into heat.
Penetration: Metals do not reflect gamma rays effectively, as their frequency is too high for the electrons to respond quickly enough, allowing the radiation to pass through.
Well, Jacquelyn, I am not a physicist, just an engineer. But, in my world you have not made a case for how metals in general, make for bad actors as tiny particle residents in a human body. If, for example, your explanation was something like this, I would have had cause to pause:
<<
-- any tiny, low intensity burst from a cell tower half a mile away will cause a catalytic effect in any free metal particle in a human body. It can cause the metal to combine with a variety of salts, blood, cell exosomes to cause carcinogenic agents.
-- There are studies showing human babies dying of cancer from cell tower catalytic effects.>>
Of course, nothing you say above can be construed by any imagination to infer such a crazy story.
In order for any effect to occur a CONSTANT and HIGH intensity non-relenting and directed EM source must be applied to have any effect on human physiology from what I know. For example, a directed Xray or microwave directed at a human body for over 2 or 3 seconds would be required to Affect it. How a tiny particle of metal could accelerate, catalyze, exacerbate such radiation is beyond me. Maybe YOU know! How any human could purposefully allow themselves to be set in front of such an imposing weapon of such conception is also beyond me. Sitting in your home 200 yards from a cell tower sending out micro second bursts hitting a human at 100,000 times lower intensity than the 200 yd source ain't the same.
On the other hand you did not address my points regarding EM wave intensity and distance from EM source effects on human physiology. Also, you pasted in random information regarding absorption which outright admits that virtually nothing is absorbed by metals but the info still fails to apply the absorption level to distance from source. Virtually all EM radiation is reflected except high frequency spectra like gamma which is not slowed by metals, or nearly anything.
If metals are so terrible for humans we should sure be looking at alternatives for the millions of metal joints walking around in the population!
We have to be objective here folks.
pretty-red, 5G is directed energy. It uses beamforming to directly access targets as you describe. The towers are linked directly with Havana Syndrome.
Here are some resources for you:
Senator Blumenthal Discovers That There Are Zero 5G Safety Studies: https://old.bitchute.com/video/bInqnO23DaKl
Dr. Tom Cowan: 5G Radio Frequency and the COVID-19 Connection: https://old.bitchute.com/video/LY6dTOr8PW7s [11mins]
5G Towers Appear to Be Weaponized: https://old.bitchute.com/video/y4ecuAj2w6Jc
The regulators are completely captured. Alas my reference library is gone, or i could send you an avalanch of information this.
https://dgtlinfra.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/How-Tower-Structures-Function-Mobile-Phone-Call-Sequence.jpg
Notes:
-- does not look like directed energy to me; low intensity analog signals to and from a cell tower.
-- signal is changed to digital and sent long distance over land lines to another cell tower to be directed to person you are speaking with.
-- I see NO indication at all that high power or intensity is being sent out to people's phones or people's bodies. Nothing.
-- The person on the receiving end is known only to be in the circle of influence of a certain cell tower so, rationally thinking, there is no way the tower can expect to find them at a particular spot in time. So, it must be transmitting a spherical wave in all directions from the cell tower to get a signal to a target.
-- if living near a cell tower(400 yds from me) it appears that millions of spherical analog waves are being sent my way every day; all low intensity.
one more thing:
Directed energy is ONE thing, beamforming utilized in low power cell tower comms is another:
from an AI response to my question in Brave comparing the two:
"Beamforming technology in cell towers focuses signals to improve communication efficiency, typically using low power levels. In contrast, directed energy weapons (DEWs) can produce power outputs exceeding 100 megawatts, which is vastly higher than the energy used in beamforming for telecommunications."
I am a big fan of yours my friend, but please consider, after all the venom lies the governent told and continues to tell about their muderous pandemic and killshot agenda, that they and their industry numbers and disclosures are the absolute last things one should ever believe. They are owned lock stock and barrel by their buyers, bribers,, and blackmailers and covid and 5g go hand in hand. And just like the vaccine, the 5g grid has alernate purposes and undisclosed technologies at work.
5G Radio Tower High Risk Warnings Right Next to School: https://old.bitchute.com/video/1fFoQ0fjL2BW
In europe there was a scandal called cellgate where the cell companies were increasing the output of the tower signals. There are many videos floating around of the same happening here by in vast increases. But that is beside the point. Just as Sasha discovered with covid DARPA’s fingerprints are all over 5G.
Lighting up like a Christmas tree….
This is from a few years ago... vaccines are a fraud and always have been.
Ingredients:
In the current National Vaccine Schedule, in the first 6 years of life your child receives the following Vaccine Ingredients:
• 17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (Insecticide)
• 5,700 mcg aluminum (a known neurotoxin)
• Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (aborted calf's blood)
• 801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
• 23,250 mcg gelatin (ground up animal carcasses)
• 500 mcg human albumin (human blood)
• 760 mcg of monosodium L-glutamate (causes obesity & diabetes)
• Unknown amounts of MRC-5 cells (aborted human babies)
• Over 10 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
• Over 0.075 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
• Over 560 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
• 116 mcg potassium chloride (used in lethal injection to shut down the heart and stop breathing)
• 188 mcg potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent)
• 260 mcg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda)
• 70 mcg sodium borate (Borax, used for cockroach control-infertility in male primates)
• 54,100 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
• Unknown amounts of sodium citrate (food additive)
• Unknown amounts of sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive)
• 2,800 mcg sodium phosphate (toxic to any organism)
• Unknown amounts of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
• 32,000 mcg sorbitol (Not to be injected)
• 0.6 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
• Over 40,000 mcg sucrose (cane sugar)
• 35,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
• 5,000 mcg urea (metabolic waste from human urine)
• Other chemical residuals
(From the book, "What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don't Want You To Know About Vaccines" - By Dr Todd M. Elsner)
BRAVO. Thank you.
The crap they do list in vaccines is mostly toxic. Apart from believing the insanity that any vaccine can save you from some silly virus, why would anyone fill their body with this toxic crap? If your vaccine fails and you get sick and die, does the doctor pay? No...he reaps gobs of bonuses for bullying you into poisoning yourself while he turns away and pretends he is helping you to be healthier. The joke is on you until you wake the heck up.
Unintentional my arse! As noted, these multi-billion dollar companies have all of the equipment and know-how necessary to find the contamination. They do not want to find it. This is the same as they want the contaminants in the product and therefore, are purposefully injuring and destroying the people's health.
Excellent as always!
People need to be held accountable! These are at best inexcusable in any manufacturing industry at worst they are a premeditated attempt to harm or murder the individuals receiving these poisons! Get burnt by a Rotten McRonnies coffee… here is a million dollars! Have your life destroyed by Big Pharma oh no we are protected! From an outright attempt to destroy lives? Thats pure straight up 🐂💩!
> They did not assert intent they could not prove from a microscope image.
Actually they did assert intent. They asserted that it was unintended:
> In the conclusion of their paper, Gatti and Montanari propose that the contamination is unintentional.
They actually went off the "scientific" rails to do so, which is interesting.
Sounds like the (false) narrative of "mistakes were made."
This needs to be spread far and wide. But I am sure it will be suppressed and blocked everywhere. Just like all the other warnings to stop vaccinating. To my surprise a vaxx' for cats seems to be safer than the 43 that are injected in babies and children. But I still won't take my cats to the vet. Bad enough that I have to take my in-door dog now and then.
I've learnt so much after only being subbed about a week Thanks.
Learned.
Nope, learnt is the main UK verb , but either is acceptable.
🤦💂♂️Brits taught us proper English ! That is not proper English. (it may be "acceptable" as pedophilia is...). 🙃
Whatever floats your boat luv.
Weird take.
You can see where UK is today ...and US is soon following. Degradation starts with baby steps, is the point. (Not weird, at all).
It's proper English, British English. So, yeah...your take is weird.
FYI - Brits and Aussies say ‘learnt’ for past tense of ‘learn’
In the 1960s-70s, I learned that learned was correct (in oz). Since then, so many people say learnt that I have to stop being triggered by people's spelling mistakes. (Similar words - it was earned not earnt etc). After thinking I was going to prove my point through Gxxgle, I was put in my place - showing different Western countries had different " correct" spellings. Can't argue with the all-knowing Gxxgle
which is now expanded to untold depths wit AI. It is still learned, earned etc in my book.
Just because people slide right in does not make something correct or right or even ok. It even 'sounds' incorrect. Its residence is all wrong. And, again, I am not being a prick. Its just, I have just had enough of the deliberate act of human degrading. Haven't we all ? Stand tall. Taller than "them."
It's been used in English since the 1400s. Nothing degraded about it. English language has many exceptions that don't follow rules. It's the standard British spelling , but learned is also used. I don't know why you are getting your knickers in a twist about it. Your comments and references to pedos/ them are totally disproportionate to being corrected on your original mistake.
Rules? Who said anything about rules? Certainly not I.
Gosh durn it! 🙂
Depends which English speaking country one is from. I'm from the US and "learned"/the hard way that learnt is legitimate.
There are so many unknowns in these shots. The biggest being is they are injectables and we really don’t know the details of how the human body clears or does not clear foreign material. The biggest unknown being aluminum. Yet, they will cite ‘peer’ reviewed research saying that vaccines are not dangerous and that vaccines even produce a positive effect on mortality beyond their intended prevention of a specific disease. we see how unhealthy our population has become. Specifically, we see how the most vaccinated around us are the unhealthiest. Apparently we are not to trust our lying eyes.
I assume these companies are still in business. Why should they still be in business? Administer penalties big enough to put them out business. The do not deserve, nor have a right to continue existing.
you probably read that pfizer just got a billion contract to make more poison. the govt pays them to continue. I wonder if Pfizer ever made anything decent. I remember reading that the childhood crap the doc prescribed, terramcin, was one of the worst antibiotics/meds ever produced. I probably took 30 or more of these - what did mom know, that this was not 'a bottle for the cough' but poison.
Fizer has committed more fraud over the last 30 years than any other company on the planet.
I think I read in 2019 they had like 23 law cases running against them. Moderna never made anything before the scamdemic. Both companies are relying on govt to stay in business. The govt IMO should not give any money at all to businesses.
That terramycin was in the early 1960s. Did they ever make anything worth while?
I'm pretty sure I had the terra too. The name has stayed with me.
The fines for fraud and compo payments are easily covered by profits. They nearly went out of business due to large claims against them but they got help in 1986 with the no liability to them act, and making governments pay limited compensation.
This is Criminal. How can these companies be trusted. They have special liability exemptions that allow this kind of thing to happen. It appears that anyone who brings this bad news to light is shunned sued, fired, and/or threatened . Vaccines are a religion no one can criticize or they are excommunicated and de-platformed. Their studies are labeled Misinformation.
Their 2014 research on nanotoxicology is probably worth examining:
https://dn710002.ca.archive.org/0/items/case-studies-in-nanotoxicology-and-particle-toxicology-antonietta-m-gatti-stefan_202304/Case%20Studies%20in%20Nanotoxicology%20and%20Particle%20Toxicology%20%28Antonietta%20M%20Gatti%2C%20Stefano%20Montanari%29%20%28z-lib.org%29.pdf
If I were an artist person, the picture I would paint would be a dark, creepy, trashed out lab with ghoulish faced people, randomly throwing into a cauldron bits and pieces of junk to cast spells of sickness and disease. Giggling and screeching about how wonderful this will be. How happy their master is going to be. How stupid humans are with it all. Because they haven't chose to discern what makes sense and what doesn't. Of course my mind is very diluted and a little on the warped side. (good thing i am not artistic)
It would seem even a non intelligent person would question why there are lethal substance in a shot which will go into your blood stream. Sort of reminds me of junkies who could care less what they shoot up but it's all about the security of thinking it will be great.
I think this world has absolutely gone mad.
Sorry.
Pets are being injected with more and more quackcines, too. All to "protect" them.
This article's description of metal particles found in vaccines sounds similar to what was reported by Dr. Poornima Wagh (PhD) during the COVID scam. She was a member of a team of investigators who analyzed the contents of over 2,000 COVID shots from various makers and found metal particles in them. There are numerous ad hominem comments falsely claiming that she's a charlatan. Search for "Dr. Poornima Wagh's Team Odysee" or "Dr. Poornima Wagh’s team test ingredients 2305 vials of Covid-19 injection – The shocking facts!" which should bring up a video of her speaking for about 1.22 hours.