23 Comments
User's avatar
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

So nurses, doctors, medical students ARE told all the nasty side effects! Why then is it that doctors like Malhotra did not know this, now are infuriated - but only after his father died from the shot? They do know. Are they so power-and-money hungry that they knowingly and willingly poison people including their parents and children? Or, like a friend, do they think this will happen to everyone but themselves? 'Oh this does not happen to me' until it does.

Tonetta's avatar

Malhotra works in the UK, while this Pink Book is issued by and refers to the CDC, i.e. the U.S. I don’t know what the equivalent literature in the UK is that is available to the health field.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Aha. May be the UK does NOT teach it after all. I think though, that a doc needs to read the inserts of meds, especially new, untested meds, and when he finds a blank sheet, he should take a closer look at what is in these jabs. If I could read the phfizer pages with side effects, he certainly should have, and ALL doctors should have.

Tonetta's avatar

I fully agree with you Ingrid! But the majority of doctors don’t seem to read up at all. If the national health institute says ‘safe and effective’, that is what they repeat. One local GP here in town still maintained recently that the jab stayed in the muscle and was gone in no time. Luckily she is not my doctor, or I would switch. i believe doctors are toeing the line, for fear of losing their license. Only the morally brave and strong speak out,

Horsea T.'s avatar

Aside from their capacity for memorizing countless factoids, learning techniques and passing exams, MDs really are not the brightest bunch. These are not people with inquiring minds, not by a long shot. Once they get their license to practice, any curiosity about anything is gone - if they ever had any curiosity in the first place.

Hilde Herman's avatar

Exactly what I thought!

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Bottom line: The PINK BOOK is just a marketing tool for the vaccine manufacturers. Just like the PINK Ribbon non-profit is a tool for the GE MRI and the Oncologist. Accentuate the positive and ignore the negative. Bottom line rules.

Retired Medical-Tech Writer's avatar

For anyone wanting to explore more:

Pick Ribbon Society is a group of women who believe in the mammo radiation diagnostic technology b/c it was used to diagnose their breast cancers. Website: https://pinkribbonsociety.org/mammograms-and-ultrasounds-program/

GE MRI machines are made by General Electric Healthcare systems. Website: https://www.medicalImagingSource.com/ge-mri-scanner-models

Next time I get an MRI for anything, I'll ask the technician what brand and technology their machine is. Most will not know. I stopped getting mammograms in 2008; I only had two previously. The test was sold to me by med. personnel (read nurses/NPs) in HMOs. I didn't trust the technology; it was radiation, a known carcinogen if you're exposed to it too often, like every year.

Be aware that most websites profiling medical products/machines don't have search algorithms at all. That's by design b/c they are primarily selling a product/test to serve the agenda and profit goals of "oncology professionals", as Mr. Braun RPh implies.

E M's avatar

This book is infuriating. Docs are told to share positive stories about vaccination in order to encourage it... but to ignore the negative stories a parent might have. Thank you for telling us about this. I can only read a little at a time...I thought I Didn't the medical community as much as I possibly could.... apparently I haven't hit my limit. 😡

annapolis73's avatar

“Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thought-crime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?”

― George Orwell

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

A brilliant mind, foreseeing what would happen 50+ years later. How books are banned, burned, just like in the middle ages, so people would not know. Thankfully this never worked, truth might be forgotten but will be re-discovered, like flushing toilets known to Romans and then forgotten. Like herbs being used for thousands of years, are now being found again and used. And some always hide some books somewhere and keep the real science alive.Thanks to people like Unbekoming it will live on.

Very Private Investigator's avatar

Some of these people know the agenda and are used to bring it out... Not sure anymore about Orwell but I did hear a lot of dirt on Aldous Huxley. That guy was *not* on our side, AFAIK.

Ivan Illich too seemed a genuinely brilliant mind that I still trust and also predicted things well.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Hard to tell with the rich and famous!

annapolis73's avatar

Our duty to never allow propagnada to suppress truth. The American people can handle it.

Barbara Charis's avatar

The IMPOSSIBLE CLAIMS of IMMUNITY coming from the Vaccine Industry..and the stupidity of our government, which did not do research that would verify these claims has caused massive harm to humanity. Years ago, I read how the immune system works. Our Creator designed the human body with an Immune System composed of lymph glands (or nodes) located in a number of places within the body in order to keep the bloodstream free of impurities. Matter, such as, foreign proteins, dead cells, microscopic food allergens, etc would cause the propagation of white corpuscles by the billions from the lymph glands to clean out any matter which does not belong. .Any type of matter in the bloodstream, other than nutrients from the right natural food, would trigger off the Immune System to GET RID OF IT. It would NOT CREATE IMMUNITY! However, very toxic substances would damage the Immune System...and the bloodstream would carry these toxic substances throughout the body causing trouble in the organs and into the brain, where they would harms the glands in the brain...lower intelligence and cause brain damage. Intelligent people are aware that better nutrition and sanitation caused a major decline in childhood illness, before the Vaccine Industry took credit for it.

The Color Of Air's avatar

IGNORE the CDC which is nothing but a sinking ship of fools.

Shelley's avatar

This talks about shedding of a virus from a baby given a vaccine. But this Substack follows the terrain model which says there are no viruses. So you aren’t shedding a virus. Are you shedding something else? Just trying to understand the conflicting information.

Horsea T.'s avatar

Yes, that is what I'd like to know, too!

Fager 132's avatar

It would be interesting to know how many CDC employees who have read the book also vaccinate their kids. If they vaccinate they're either stupid or sociopaths, and if they don't they're hypocrites.

Geoffrey Newton's avatar

It’s called “kool-aid”!

David Kukkee's avatar

Well done, Unbekoming. More light on the CDC and FDA= saved lives.